ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has put the UK's National Health Service under extreme pressure, and acute psychiatric services have had to rapidly adapt to a new way of working. This editorial describes the experience of a London psychiatric intensive care unit (PICU) where all nine in-patients ultimately tested COVID-19 positive.
ABSTRACT
A lack of integration between internal processes and failure to use the full potential of information technology (IT) systems is common in psychiatric hospitals. We aimed to reduce the number of out-of-hours medical errors by ensuring that there is consistent and transparent weekend medical handover by creating an electronic handover system that is easy to use, robust and embedded into the existing trust IT systems. We employed quality improvement (QI) methodology to address this issue. After trialling in a single site followed by six cycles of improvement, the weekend medical handover system is now in use across four boroughs and has been integrated into trust policy. It has received qualitative and quantitative evidence of improvement, with 100% of doctors reporting the system improved patient care and a 64% (from 11 to 4 events/year) reduction in moderate, severe and catastrophic adverse incidents occurring out-of-hours within the older adult service (p=0.29, χ2 1.117). The increasing number of complex patients with comorbid medical illness in psychiatric inpatient services demands robust handover systems similar to that of an acute trust. This QI work offers a template for achieving this across other psychiatric trusts and demonstrates the positive change that can be achieved.
Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care/standards , Electronic Health Records/standards , Hospitals, Psychiatric/organization & administration , Patient Handoff , Quality Improvement , Aged , Communication , Humans , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Patient Handoff/organization & administration , Patient Handoff/standards , Patient Safety , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/standards , Retrospective Studies , United KingdomABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is a high prevalence of delirium in palliative care patients. This review aims to evaluate the effects of the pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions used to manage delirium symptoms in this patient group. RECENT FINDINGS: A recent study has suggested there is no role for antipsychotic medication in the management of delirium in palliative care patients, which is a move away from previous expert opinion. In addition, recent findings suggest there may be a role for the use of antipsychotics in combination with benzodiazepines in the management of agitated delirium. SUMMARY: It is too early to abandon the use of antipsychotic medication entirely in the management of delirium, however there remains inadequate evidence to support the routine use of either pharmacological or nonpharmacological interventions for delirium treatment. Clinicians should determine the delirium subtype and severity, using this to inform the most appropriate pharmacological treatment if required. Further rigorously designed research is needed to seek clarity over whether the alleviation of symptoms is dose dependent, and to determine whether there is a severity threshold over which pharmacological interventions are most effective. Future research is required to evaluate nonpharmacological interventions in this population.
