Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Med Glas (Zenica) ; 18(2): 370-377, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34331436

ABSTRACT

Aim To analyse the resolution of chest X-ray findings in relation to laboratory parameters in patients infected with acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in a two- month followup. Analysis of chest X-ray findings in the first few months after the disease is the main goal of our work. Methods Out of the total of 343 patients chest X-ray findings were followed in 269 patients. Patients were divided into groups according to the severity of findings. D-dimer, inflammatory markers, blood cell count, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were analysed. Chest X-ray was analysed during the hospitalization on the day of admission, on the third, the seventh and the fourteenth day (scoring method was used). After discharge chest X-ray was performed in a two-week follow-up, then after one and two months, and after three months if necessary. Results Incomplete chest X-ray resolution was identified in 24 (39.34%) patients with severe, 27 (22.31 %) patients with moderate and in three (3.91%) patients with mild findings. Statistical significance was established in overall score by comparison between all groups (p<0.001), and in the moderate compared to the mild group (p=0.0051). The difference of NLR in the severe compared to the moderate group was observed (p=0.0021) and in the severe group compared to the mild group (p=0.00013). Conclusion Chest X-ray findings persisted mostly in the severe group followed by the moderate and mild ones. Long-term followup is necessary for the appropriate treatment and prevention of fibrosis, and reduction of symptoms.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Radiography, Thoracic , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Retrospective Studies , X-Rays
2.
Med Glas (Zenica) ; 10(2): 413-5, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23892871

ABSTRACT

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy introduced in the late eighties has now become the gold standard and has taken the place of conventional cholecystectomy. Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy is an iatrogenic, but rare catastrophe associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The incidence of bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is 0.1-0.42%. We have presented a patient who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy which got complicated with bile duct injury grade four. The complication was recognized three weeks later. A remediation of complications was performed in a reference center with full involvement of the primary surgeon.


Subject(s)
Bile Ducts , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Cholecystectomy , Humans , Incidence , Malpractice
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL