Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 45
Filter
1.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 11(4): ofae153, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38665169

ABSTRACT

Vancomycin and fidaxomicin taper regimens were the most common treatment strategies employed but nearly half of patients (40/83) referred to our Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) clinic did not require further treatment. The overall 60-day CDI recurrence rate was 16.9% (11/65). CDI management at a dedicated clinic may improve clinical outcomes.

3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 45(1): 57-62, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37462099

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for the detection of C. difficile is a highly sensitive test. Some clinical laboratories have included a 2-step testing algorithm utilizing PCR plus toxin enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) to increase specificity. OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk factors and outcomes of C. difficile PCR-positive/toxin-positive encounters compared to PCR-positive/toxin-negative encounters. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: A Veterans' Affairs hospital. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study of patient encounters with a positive C. difficile test by PCR and either a toxin EIA-positive assay (ie, cases) or toxin EIA-negative assay (ie, controls). Clinically relevant exposures and risk factors were determined to assess CDI recurrence at 30 days. Available encounter stool specimens were cultured for C. difficile and were subjected to restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) strain typing. RESULTS: Among 130 C. difficile PCR-positive patient encounters, 80 (61.5%) were toxin EIA negative and 50 (38.5%) were toxin EIA positive. Encounters that were toxin positive were more frequently treated (96.0%) compared to toxin-negative encounters (71.3%; P < .01). A multivariable logistic regression model revealed that toxin-negative encounters were less likely to suffer a recurrent CDI episode within 30 days (odds ratio [OR], 0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.83). Additionally, a higher C. difficile PCR cycle threshold predicted a lower risk of CDI recurrence at 30 days. (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-0.98). During the study period, the REA group Y strain accounted for most toxin-negative encounters (32.5%; P = .05), whereas REA group BI strain accounted for most toxin-positive encounters (24.3%; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: A testing strategy of PCR plus toxin EIA helped predict recurrent CDI.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Toxins , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections , Humans , Bacterial Toxins/analysis , Clostridioides difficile/genetics , Retrospective Studies , Case-Control Studies , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures , Algorithms , Feces
5.
Anaerobe ; 84: 102788, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37931679

ABSTRACT

Among 23 patients with multiply recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (mrCDI) who received bezlotoxumab at the end of antibiotic treatment a sustained clinical response of 91 % at 30 days and 78 % at 90 days was achieved. Bezlotoxumab administered at the end of antibiotic treatment was effective in patients with mrCDI.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections , Humans , Recurrence , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Clostridium Infections/prevention & control
6.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 2023 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38019088

ABSTRACT

GOALS: To assess fecal microbiota, live-jslm (REBYOTA, abbreviated as RBL, formerly RBX2660) efficacy and safety in participants grouped by recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) risk factors and treatment-related variables. BACKGROUND: RBL is the first microbiota-based live biotherapeutic approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of rCDI in adults after antibiotic treatment for rCDI. STUDY: Treatment success rates across subgroups for PUNCH CD3 (NCT03244644) were estimated using a Bayesian hierarchical model, borrowing data from PUNCH CD2 (NCT02299570). Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the double-blind treatment period within 8 weeks. RESULTS: Treatment differences between RBL and placebo at 8 weeks were similar to the total population for most subgroups. Treatment effect sizes were similar between CDI tests, higher for oral vancomycin courses >14 days versus ≤14 days and higher for antibiotic washout periods of 3 days versus ≤2 days. The largest reductions in the rate of rCDI with RBL versus placebo were observed for participants with a 3-day CDI antibiotic washout period and participants with ≥4 previous CDI episodes. Most RBL-treated participants experienced TEAEs that were mild or moderate in severity and related to preexisting conditions. CONCLUSION: This analysis provides further evidence of RBL efficacy and safety across subgroups, including those at high risk for rCDI.

7.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 12(7)2023 Jul 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37508255

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increases in some healthcare-associated infections. We investigated the impact of the pandemic on the rates and molecular epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) within one VA hospital. We anticipated that the potential widespread use of antibiotics for pneumonia during the pandemic might increase CDI rates given that antibiotics are a major risk for CDI. Hospital data on patients with CDI and recurrent CDI (rCDI) were reviewed both prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (2015 to 2019) and during the pandemic (2020-2021). Restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) strain typing was performed on CD isolates recovered from stool samples collected from October 2019 to March 2022. CDI case numbers declined by 43.2% in 2020 to 2021 compared to the annual mean over the previous 5 years. The stool test positivity rate was also lower during the COVID-19 pandemic (14.3% vs. 17.2%; p = 0.013). Inpatient hospitalization rates declined, and rates of CDI among inpatients were reduced by 34.2% from 2020 to 2021. The mean monthly cases of rCDI also declined significantly after 2020 [3.38 (95% CI: 2.89-3.87) vs. 1.92 (95% CI: 1.27-2.56); p = <0.01]. Prior to the pandemic, REA group Y was the most prevalent CD strain among the major REA groups (27.3%). During the first wave of the pandemic, from 8 March 2020, to 30 June 2020, there was an increase in the relative incidence of REA group BI (26.7% vs. 9.1%); After adjusting for CDI risk factors, a multivariable logistic regression model revealed that the odds of developing an REA group BI CDI increased during the first pandemic wave (OR 6.41, 95% CI: 1.03-39.91) compared to the pre-pandemic period. In conclusion, the incidence of CDI and rCDI decreased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. In contrast, REA BI (Ribotype 027), a virulent, previously epidemic CD strain frequently associated with hospital transmission and outbreaks, reappeared as a prevalent strain during the first wave of the pandemic, but subsequently disappeared, and overall CDI rates declined.

8.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 78(7): 1779-1784, 2023 07 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37279600

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Omadacycline is a novel aminomethylcycline tetracycline antimicrobial that was approved for the treatment of community-associated bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) in 2018. Omadacycline has demonstrated a high degree of in vitro activity towards Clostridioides difficile and previous data have hypothesized that use of omadacycline for CABP or ABSSSI may decrease the risk of C. difficile infections. OBJECTIVES: To compare the in vitro antimicrobial activity of omadacycline versus commonly used antimicrobials for the approved indications of use. METHODS: We compared the antimicrobial activity of eight antimicrobials approved for CABP and ABSSSI against omadacycline by agar dilution on 200 clinically relevant contemporary C. difficile isolates representing local and national prevalent strain types. RESULTS: The in vitro omadacycline geometric mean MIC was 0.07 mg/L. Ceftriaxone resistance was noted in >50% of all isolates tested. The epidemic strain group, identified as restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) group BI, was commonly resistant to azithromycin (92%), moxifloxacin (86%) and clindamycin (78%). REA group DH strains had an elevated trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole geometric mean MIC of 17.30 mg/L compared with the geometric mean MIC of 8.14 mg/L noted in all other isolates. In the REA group BK isolates that had a doxycycline MIC of ≥2 mg/L, the omadacycline MIC was <0.5 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Among 200 contemporary C. difficile isolates, there were no notable elevations in the in vitro omadacycline MIC, indicating a high level of activity towards C. difficile in comparison with commonly used antimicrobials for CABP and ABSSSI.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Clostridioides , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Tetracyclines/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
9.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 23(7): e259-e265, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37062301

ABSTRACT

With the approval and development of narrow-spectrum antibiotics for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), the primary endpoint for treatment success of CDI antibiotic treatment trials has shifted from treatment response at end of therapy to sustained response 30 days after completed therapy. The current definition of a successful response to treatment (three or fewer unformed bowel movements [UBMs] per day for 1-2 days) has not been validated, does not reflect CDI management, and could impair assessments for successful treatment at 30 days. We propose new definitions to optimise trial design to assess sustained response. Primarily, we suggest that the initial response at the end of treatment be defined as (1) three or fewer UBMs per day, (2) a reduction in UBMs of more than 50% per day, (3) a decrease in stool volume of more than 75% for those with ostomy, or (4) attainment of bowel movements of Bristol Stool Form Scale types 1-4, on average, by day 2 after completion of primary CDI therapy (ie, assessed on day 11 and day 12 of a 10-day treatment course) and following an investigator determination that CDI treatment can be ceased.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Feces , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy
10.
Microbiol Spectr ; : e0051723, 2023 Mar 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36975811

ABSTRACT

Colonization with nontoxigenic Clostridioides difficile strain M3 (NTCD-M3) has been demonstrated in susceptible hamsters and humans when administered after vancomycin treatment. NTCD-M3 has also been shown to decrease risk of recurrent C. difficile infection (CDI) in patients following vancomycin treatment for CDI. As there are no data for NTCD-M3 colonization after fidaxomicin treatment, we studied the efficacy of NTCD-M3 colonization and determined fecal antibiotic levels in a well-studied hamster model of CDI. Ten of 10 hamsters became colonized with NTCD-M3 after 5 days of treatment with fidaxomicin when NTCD-M3 was administered daily for 7 days after treatment discontinuation. The findings were nearly identical to 10 vancomycin-treated hamsters also given NTCD-M3. High fecal levels of OP-1118, the major fidaxomicin metabolite, and vancomycin were noted during treatment with the respective agents and modest levels noted 3 days after treatment discontinuation at the time when most of the hamsters became colonized. These findings support the ongoing development of NTCD-M3 for the prevention of recurrent CDI. IMPORTANCE NTCD-M3 is a novel live biotherapeutic, that has been shown in a Phase 2 clinical trial to prevent recurrence of C. difficile infection (CDI) when administered shortly after antibiotic treatment of the initial CDI episode. Fidaxomicin was not, however, in widespread use at the time this study was conducted. A large multi-center Phase 3 clinical trial is now currently in the planning stage, and it is anticipated that many patients eligible for this study will be treated with fidaxomicin. Since efficacy in the hamster model of CDI has predicted success in patients with CDI, we studied the ability of NTCD-M3 to colonize hamsters after treatment with either fidaxomicin or vancomycin.

13.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(5): 755-757, 2021 09 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34492699

ABSTRACT

This clinical practice guideline is a focused update on management of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in adults specifically addressing the use of fidaxomicin and bezlotoxumab for the treatment of CDI. This guideline was developed by a multidisciplinary panel representing the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). This guideline is intended for use by healthcare professionals who care for adults with CDI, including specialists in infectious diseases, gastroenterologists, hospitalists, pharmacists, and any clinicians and healthcare providers caring for these patients. The panel's recommendations for the management CDI are based upon evidence derived from topic-specific systematic literature reviews. Summarized below are the recommendations for the management of CDI in adults. The panel followed a systematic process which included a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of the evidence and strength of recommendation using the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). A detailed description of background, methods, evidence summary and rationale that support each recommendation, and knowledge gaps can be found online in the full text.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections , Communicable Diseases , Adult , Clostridioides , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care , Humans
14.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(5): e1029-e1044, 2021 09 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34164674

ABSTRACT

This clinical practice guideline is a focused update on management of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in adults specifically addressing the use of fidaxomicin and bezlotoxumab for the treatment of CDI. This guideline was developed by a multidisciplinary panel representing the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). This guideline is intended for use by healthcare professionals who care for adults with CDI, including specialists in infectious diseases, gastroenterologists, hospitalists, pharmacists, and any clinicians and healthcare providers caring for these patients. The panel's recommendations for the management CDI are based upon evidence derived from topic-specific systematic literature reviews. Summarized below are the recommendations for the management of CDI in adults. The panel followed a systematic process which included a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of the evidence and strength of recommendation using the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). A detailed description of background, methods, evidence summary and rationale that support each recommendation, and knowledge gaps can be found online in the full text.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections , Communicable Diseases , Adult , Clostridioides , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care , Humans
15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(6): 1107-1109, 2021 09 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33714998

ABSTRACT

We treated 46 patients with multiple recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections (mrCDI) using a tapered-pulsed (T-P) fidaxomicin regimen, the majority of whom failed prior T-P vancomycin treatment. Sustained clinical response rates at 30 and 90 days were 74% (34/46) and 61% (28/46). T-P fidaxomicin shows promise for management of mrCDI.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clostridioides , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Fidaxomicin , Humans , Recurrence
16.
J Aerosol Sci ; 1552021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35979194

ABSTRACT

As encouraged by Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century, researchers increasingly apply high-throughput in vitro approaches to identify and characterize nanoparticle hazards, including conventional aqueous cell culture systems to assess respiratory hazards. Translating nanoparticle dose from conventional toxicity testing systems to relevant human exposures remains a major challenge for assessing occupational risk of nanoparticle exposures. Here, we explored existing computational tools and data available to translate nanoparticle dose metrics from cellular test systems to inhalation exposures of silver nanoparticles in humans. We used the Multiple-Path Particle Dosimetry (MPPD) Model to predict nanoparticle deposition of humans exposed to 20 and 110 nm silver nanoparticles at 0.9 µg/m3 over an 8 h period, the proposed National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) recommended exposure limit (REL). MPPD predicts 8.1 and 3.7 µg of silver deposited in an 8 h period for 20 and 110 nm nanoparticles, respectively, with 20 nm particles displaying nearly 11-fold higher total surface area deposited. Peak deposited nanoparticle concentrations occurred more proximal in the pulmonary tract compared to mass deposition patterns (generation 4 vs. generations 20-21, respectively) due to regional differences in lung lining fluid volumes. Assuming 0.4% nanoparticle dissolution by mass measured in previous studies predicted peak concentrations of silver ions in cells of 1.06 and 0.89 µg/mL for 20 and 110 nm particles, respectively. Both predicted concentrations are below the measured toxic threshold of 1.7 µg/mL of silver ions in cells from in vitro assessments. Assuming 4% dissolution by mass predicted 10-fold higher silver concentrations in tissues, peaking at 10.6 and 8.9 µg/mL, for 20 and 110 nm nanoparticles respectively, exceeding the observed in vitro toxic threshold and highlighting the importance and sensitivity of dissolution rates. Overall, this approach offers a framework for extrapolating nanotoxicity results from in vitro cell culture systems to human exposures. Aligning appropriate dose metrics from in vitro and in vivo hazard characterizations and human pulmonary doses from occupational exposures are critical components for successful nanoparticle risk assessment and worker protection providing guidance for designing future in vitro studies aimed at relevant human exposures.

17.
Future Microbiol ; 15: 967-979, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32715754

ABSTRACT

Fidaxomicin is an oral narrow-spectrum novel 18-membered macrocyclic antibiotic that was initially approved in 2011 by the US FDA for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) in adults. In February 2020, the FDA approved fidaxomicin for the treatment of CDI in children age >6 months. In adults, fidaxomicin is as efficacious as vancomycin in treating CDI and reduces the risk of recurrent CDI. An investigator-blinded, randomized, multicenter, multinational clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of fidaxomicin with vancomycin in children was recently published confirming similar findings as previously reported in adults. Fidaxomicin is the first FDA-approved treatment for CDI in children and offers a promising option for reducing recurrent CDI in this population.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Fidaxomicin/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Clinical Trials as Topic , Clostridioides difficile/drug effects , Clostridioides difficile/physiology , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Fidaxomicin/chemistry , Humans , Treatment Outcome , United States
18.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 41(10): 1148-1153, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32576334

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most clinical microbiology laboratories have replaced toxin immunoassay (EIA) alone with multistep testing (MST) protocols or nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) alone for the detection of C. difficile. OBJECTIVE: Study the effect of changing testing strategies on C. difficile detection and strain diversity. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: A Veterans' Affairs hospital. METHODS: Initially, toxin EIA testing was replaced by an MST approach utilizing a glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin EIA followed by tcdB NAAT for discordant results. After 18 months, MST was replaced by a NAAT-only strategy. Available patient stool specimens were cultured for C. difficile. Restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) strain typing and quantitative in vitro toxin testing were performed on recovered isolates. RESULTS: Before MST (toxin EIA), 79 of 708 specimens (11%) were positive, and after MST (MST-A), 121 of 517 specimens (23%) were positive (P < .0001). Prior to NAAT-only testing (MST-B), 80 of the 490 specimens (16%) were positive by MST, and after NAAT-only testing was implemented, 67 of the 368 specimens (18%) were positive (P = nonsignificant). After replacing toxin EIA testing, REA strain group diversity increased (8, 13, 13, and 10 REA groups in the toxin EIA, MST-A, MST-B, and NAAT-only periods, respectively) and in vitro toxin concentration decreased. The average log10 toxin concentration of the isolates were 2.08, 1.88, 1.20 and 1.55 ng/mL for the same periods, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MST and NAAT had similar detection rates for C. difficile. Compared to toxin testing alone, they detected increased diversity of C. difficile strains, many of which were low toxin producing.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Toxins , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections , Nucleic Acids , Algorithms , Bacterial Proteins , Bacterial Toxins/genetics , Clostridioides , Clostridioides difficile/genetics , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Feces , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Prohibitins , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
19.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 26(2): 247-254, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31961290

ABSTRACT

During a surveillance study of patients in a long-term care facility and the affiliated acute care hospital in the United States, we identified a Clostridioides difficile strain related to the epidemic PCR ribotype (RT) 027 strain associated with hospital outbreaks of severe disease. Fifteen patients were infected with this strain, characterized as restriction endonuclease analysis group DQ and RT591. Like RT027, DQ/RT591 contained genes for toxin B and binary toxin CDT and a tcdC gene of identical sequence. Whole-genome sequencing and multilocus sequence typing showed that DQ/RT591 is a member of the same multilocus sequence typing clade 2 as RT027 but in a separate cluster. DQ/RT591 produced a similar cytopathic effect as RT027 but showed delayed toxin production in vitro. DQ/RT591 was susceptible to moxifloxacin but highly resistant to clindamycin. Continued surveillance is warranted for this clindamycin-resistant strain that is related to the fluoroquinolone-resistant epidemic RT027 strain.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/epidemiology , Long-Term Care , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Clindamycin/pharmacology , Clostridioides difficile/drug effects , Clostridioides difficile/genetics , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/drug therapy , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/microbiology , Feces/microbiology , Female , Humans , Illinois/epidemiology , Male , Ohio/epidemiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Prohibitins , Whole Genome Sequencing
20.
J Clin Med ; 10(1)2020 Dec 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33396595

ABSTRACT

Most pathogenic strains of C. difficile possess two large molecular weight single unit toxins with four similar functional domains. The toxins disrupt the actin cytoskeleton of intestinal epithelial cells leading to loss of tight junctions, which ultimately manifests as diarrhea in the host. While initial studies of purified toxins in animal models pointed to toxin A (TcdA) as the main virulence factor, animal studies using isogenic mutants demonstrated that toxin B (TcdB) alone was sufficient to cause disease. In addition, the natural occurrence of TcdA-/TcdB+ (TcdA-/B+)mutant strains was shown to be responsible for cases of C. difficile infection (CDI) with symptoms identical to CDI caused by fully toxigenic (A+/B+) strains. Identification of these cases was delayed during the period when clinical laboratories were using immunoassays that only detected TcdA (toxA EIA). Our hospital laboratory at the time performed culture as well as toxA EIA on patient stool samples. A total of 1.6% (23/1436) of all clinical isolates recovered over a 2.5-year period were TcdA-/B+ variants, the majority of which belonged to the restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) group CF and toxinotype VIII. Despite reports of serious disease due to TcdA-/B+ CF strains, these infections were typically mild, often not requiring specific treatment. While TcdB alone may be sufficient to cause disease, clinical evidence suggests that both toxins have a role in disease.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...