Videoconferences and Treatment of Depression: Satisfaction Score Correlated with Number of Sessions Attended but Not with Age.

Aim: To investigate whether there is a correlation between age and satisfaction with the use of videoconferences (VCs) and whether the number of video sessions had an impact on satisfaction. Methods: This study was a subanalysis of the joint European project, MasterMind, and participants were recruited from15 pilot studies in 11 different countries. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire 8 (CSQ 8) was used as assessment tool, and scores were summed to give total scores. Results: Participants were included if they had filled out the CSQ 8 questionnaire and demographic data were available. This resulted in a total of 199 participants. We found that the total score was not significantly correlated with age (Spearman's rho = -0.0415, p = 0.563) and gender (Wilcoxon W = 5,066, p = 0.409). There was a significant positive correlation between number of sessions attended (Spearman's rho = 0.5777, p < 0.001) and total score after adjusting for age, gender, region, symptoms score, and education level in a multiple linear regression model (coefficient = 0.170, SE = 0.059, p = 0.004). Excluded responders were significantly younger than included responders, had lower symptoms score, attended fewer sessions, had a higher education, and were more likely to be employed.Conclusions: VC satisfaction scores in patients with unipolar depression do not depend on age but increase with experience in all age groups.

Disagreement in Satisfaction Between Patients and Providers in the Use of Videoconferences by Depressed Adults.

Aim: To evaluate whether there was a difference in satisfaction scores between providers and patients in the use of videoconferences (VCs) by depressed adults. Method: This study was a subanalysis of the joint European project, MasterMind, and participants were recruited from 15 pilot studies in 11 different countries. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ)-3 was used as assessment tool, and scores were summed to give total scores. The questionnaire consists of three items evaluating general satisfaction, fulfillment of needs in treatment, and usability. Results: A total of 362 respondents, 201 patients and 161 providers, completed the questionnaire. Providers had a mean total CSQ-3 score of 9.17 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 8.90-9.45), whereas patients had a mean of 9.70 (95% CI = 9.44-9.98). Mean scores for item 1 (the extent to which VCs had met the needs of the participants): patients 3.19, providers 2.93 (p = 0.00048); for item 2 (general satisfaction): patients 3.22, providers 3.08 (p = 0.083); and item 3 (whether participants wanted to use VCs again): patients 3.28 providers 3.16 (p = 0.045).Conclusion: The results showed that total satisfaction scores were higher in patients than in providers. The differences between patients and providers were significant for items 1 and 3 (p < 0.05), but we did not find a significant difference regarding item 2.