Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 57
Filter
3.
Complement Ther Clin Pract ; 17(1): 54-7, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21168116

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Qigong is a Chinese health promoting exercise with a rhythmic pattern of slow movements and breathing affecting the autonomous nervous system. OBJECTIVES: To examine the implementation of Qigong for half an hour daily in a computerised office, and to study effects on health state, general health, neck-shoulder and lumbar spine symptoms and stress after six weeks training DESIGN: A crossover intervention study with 37 employees randomised in two groups. A questionnaire was completed one week before starting study and every second week during the training period. After 6 weeks the first group stopped and the second group started the training. RESULTS: There was a small significant improvement of neck pain and disability following therapy. CONCLUSION: Qigong training may reduce neck disability in office workers. A longer training period might be needed in further Qigong studies in healthy, normal populations.


Subject(s)
Breathing Exercises , Computers , Neck Pain/therapy , Neck , Shoulder , Stress, Physiological , Stress, Psychological/therapy , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Eur J Neurol ; 15(2): 156-61, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18093153

ABSTRACT

Members of families with mutations in the tau gene are known to be heterogeneous in their clinical presentation, ranging from frontotemporal dementia to a clinical picture more resembling corticobasal degeneration or progressive supranuclear palsy. In this report, we describe a new phenotype for the tau S305S mutation, previously described as progressive supranuclear palsy. Clinically, the three affected family members showed alterations in personality and behaviour as well as cognitive decline and late levodopa-resistant parkinsonian symptoms, consistent with the diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17. One autopsied case displayed degeneration of the frontal and temporal lobes together with extensive tau pathology in both neurones and glial cells. Sarkosyl-soluble and -insoluble tau extracted from frontal cortex revealed a ratio shift with decreased levels of tau with three microtubule-binding repeats and increased levels of tau with four microtubule-binding repeats (4R tau). These findings provide further evidence for the clinical and pathological variation both within and between families with mutations in the tau gene. In addition, they support previous studies which demonstrate that the S305S mutation influences the splicing of tau exon 10 and results in an overproduction of 4R tau.


Subject(s)
Dementia/genetics , Mutation , Parkinsonian Disorders/genetics , tau Proteins/genetics , Adult , Amino Acid Substitution , Behavior , Brain/pathology , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Cysteine , Dementia/metabolism , Dementia/pathology , Dementia/psychology , Humans , Male , Parkinsonian Disorders/metabolism , Parkinsonian Disorders/psychology , Pedigree , Personality , Phenotype , Protein Isoforms/metabolism , Threonine , tau Proteins/metabolism
5.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 46(3): 218-222, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18063452

ABSTRACT

A randomised, single-blind, within-patient, crossover study was done in 45 patients (29 women and 16 men, mean age 49 years, range 37-71) who had bilateral "identical" gingivectomies. On one occasion a standard volume of local anaesthetic containing 2% lidocaine and 1/80,000 adrenaline was infiltrated into the mucosal tissue before operation. On the other, double the standard volume with 1% lidocaine and 1/160,000 adrenaline was infiltrated. The intensity of postoperative pain was recorded by the patients on a 100 mm visual analogue scale every hour for an 11-hour observation period. The time courses and the sum of pain intensity after injection of the double and standard volumes did not differ significantly. Doubling the volume of local anaesthetic while maintaining the total lidocaine and adrenaline concentration that was infiltrated does not influence the intensity of acute pain after gingivectomy.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Dental/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects , Gingivectomy/methods , Lidocaine/adverse effects , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Adult , Aged , Anesthesia, Dental/methods , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Epidemiologic Methods , Epinephrine/administration & dosage , Epinephrine/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Vasoconstrictor Agents/administration & dosage , Vasoconstrictor Agents/adverse effects
6.
Complement Ther Clin Pract ; 13(2): 78-84, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17400142

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Chinese research indicates that the Qigong method reduces psychosomatic and physical symptoms through an effect on the sympathetic nervous system. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to investigate the effects of Qigong on stress among computer operators. DESIGN: Ten women were included in a Qigong group and an equal number in a control group. Heart rate, blood pressure, and finger temperature were measured at the beginning and at the end of the working day during 5 weeks. twenty four-hours urine samples were collected in the first and last weeks to measure catecholamine excretion in urine. Participants kept a daily record of psychological measures of strain and weekly measures of stress levels. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Qigong reduced noradrenaline excretion in urine (p<0.05), and influenced the heart rate and temperature, indicating reduced activity of the sympathetic nervous system. Moreover, Qigong reduced low-back symptoms (p<0.05). In conclusion, Qigong exercise may reduce stress at computerised work.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/prevention & control , Breathing Exercises , Burnout, Professional/prevention & control , Health Behavior , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Blood Pressure , Body Temperature , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Catecholamines/urine , Female , Heart Rate , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
J Med Genet ; 43(12): 931-5, 2006 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16825432

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Family history is one of the most consistent risk factors for dementia. Therefore, analysis of families with a distinct inheritance pattern of disease can be a powerful approach for the identification of previously unknown disease genes. OBJECTIVE: To map susceptibility regions for Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: A complete genome scan with 369 microsatellite markers was carried out in 12 extended families collected in Sweden. Age at disease onset ranged from 53 to 78 years, but in 10 of the families there was at least one member with age at onset of < or =65 years. Mutations in known early-onset Alzheimer's disease susceptibility genes have been excluded. All people were genotyped for APOE, but no clear linkage with the epsilon4 allele was observed. RESULTS: Although no common disease locus could be found in all families, in two families an extended haplotype was identified on chromosome 8q shared by all affected members. In one of the families, a non-parametric multimarker logarithm of the odds (LOD) score of 4.2 (p = 0.004) was obtained and analysis based on a dominant model showed a parametric LOD score of 2.4 for this region. All six affected members of this family shared a haplotype of 10 markers spanning about 40 cM. Three affected members in another family also shared a haplotype in the same region. CONCLUSION: On the basis of our data, we propose the existence of a dominantly acting Alzheimer's disease susceptibility locus on chromosome 8.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Aged , Apolipoproteins E/genetics , DNA Mutational Analysis , Family Health , Female , Genetic Linkage/genetics , Genome, Human/genetics , Genotype , Haplotypes/genetics , Humans , Lod Score , Male , Microsatellite Repeats , Middle Aged , Pedigree , Polymorphism, Single-Stranded Conformational , Sweden
8.
Br J Anaesth ; 94(5): 642-8, 2005 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15790675

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this randomized double-blind study was to compare the efficacy and safety of propacetamol 2 g (an i.v. acetaminophen 1 g formulation) administered as a 2-min bolus injection (n=50) or a 15-min infusion (n=50) with oral acetaminophen 1 g (n=50) or placebo (n=25) for analgesia after third molar surgery in patients with moderate to severe pain after impacted third molar removal. METHODS: All patients were evaluated for efficacy during the initial 6 h period after treatment administration (T(0)) and for safety during the entire week after T(0). RESULTS: The onset of analgesia after propacetamol was shorter (3 min for bolus administration, 5 min for 15-min infusion) than after oral acetaminophen (11 min). Active treatments were significantly better for all parameters (pain relief, pain intensity, patient's global evaluation, duration of analgesia) than placebo (P<0.05). Adverse events were more frequent after propacetamol, especially pain at the injection site. Propacetamol bolus resulted in a much higher incidence of local adverse events than the infusion (propacetamol bolus 90% vs propacetamol infusion 52%) with no clinically significant benefits in terms of analgesic efficacy. CONCLUSION: I.V. propacetamol, administered as a 15-min infusion, is a fast-acting analgesic agent. It is more effective in terms of onset of analgesia than a similar dose of oral acetaminophen.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/analogs & derivatives , Acetaminophen/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage , Molar, Third/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Tooth Extraction , Acetaminophen/adverse effects , Administration, Oral , Adult , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement/methods , Tooth, Impacted/surgery
9.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 43(8): 849-58, 2003 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12953342

ABSTRACT

A controlled, randomized, double-blind crossover study, in which the patients acted as their own controls, was carried out to test the efficacy of naproxen 500 mg x 2 versus acetaminophen 1000 mg x 4 for 3 days on the postoperative course following third molar surgery. Acetaminophen reduced the mean swelling on the 3rd postoperative day by 22.4% (p = 0.023) compared to that after naproxen. On the 6th postoperative day, there was 20.9% less mean swelling with naproxen (p = 0.44), although the total swelling measurements were much less than those measured on the 3rd postoperative day. Summed pain intensity (SUMPI3.5-11) on the day of surgery revealed no statistically significant difference between the acetaminophen or naproxen regimen with the exception of 0.5 hours (p = 0.002) and 1 hour (p = 0.009) after first medication when acetaminophen gave less pain than naproxen. Since the drug regimens were different, summed PI for the first acetaminophen dose interval (SUMPI3.5-6) and the first naproxen dose interval (SUMPI3.5-9) was calculated. There was a tendency toward a statistically significant difference in favor of acetaminophen for SUMPI3.5-6 (p = 0.055) but no statistically significant difference (p = 0.41) between the treatments with respect to SUMPI3.5-9. Naproxen was statistically superior (p < or = 0.002) to acetaminophen at 08:00, 12:00, and 16:00 hours on the 1st postoperative day and at 08:00 hours on the 2nd postoperative day, when the pain intensity level was lower than that on the day of surgery. A 3-day acetaminophen regimen reduces acute postoperative swelling better than naproxen on the 3rd postoperative day after third molar surgery but not on the 6th postoperative day when the total swelling is less.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Edema/drug therapy , Molar, Third/surgery , Naproxen/therapeutic use , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Postoperative Complications/drug therapy , Tooth Extraction , Acetaminophen/administration & dosage , Acetaminophen/adverse effects , Adult , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Confidence Intervals , Cross-Over Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Naproxen/administration & dosage , Naproxen/adverse effects
10.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 55(4): 405-12, 2003 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12680890

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To evaluate the effect of a 3-day regimen of ibuprofen 600 mg x 4 on acute postoperative swelling and pain and other inflammatory events after third molar surgery compared with a traditional regimen of paracetamol 1000 mg x 4. METHODS: A controlled, randomized, double-blind, cross-over study where 36 patients (26 females, 10 males) with mean age 23 (range 19-27) years acted as their own controls. All patients were subjected to surgical removal of bilateral third molars. After one operation the patients received tablets of ibuprofen 600 mg x 4 for 3 days. After the other operation they received an identical regimen of paracetamol 1000 mg tablets. Swelling was objectively measured (mm) with a standardized face bow and the patients scored their pain intensity (PI) on a 100-mm visual analogue scale. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between paracetamol and ibuprofen treatment with respect to effect on acute postoperative swelling. Swelling after paracetamol on the third postoperative day was 1.8% less than that after ibuprofen. Mean (95% CI) difference between treatments was -0.3 (-4.7, 4.1) mm. On the sixth postoperative day swelling after ibuprofen was 2.3% less than that after paracetamol. Mean (95% CI) between treatments was 0.2 (-2.4, 2.8) mm. There was no statistically significant difference in pain intensity between the paracetamol and the ibuprofen regimen on the day of surgery. The mean (95% CI) difference between the treatments for summed pain intensity on the day of surgery (SUMPI 3.5-11) was 3.31 (-47.7, 54.3) mm. Two patients developed fibrinolysis of the blood clot (dry socket) after receiving ibuprofen while none did this after paracetamol treatment. There was no noticeable difference between treatments with respect to appearance of haematomas/ecchymoses or adverse effects which all were classified as mild to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: A 3-day regimen of ibuprofen 600 mg x 4 daily does not offer any clinical advantages compared with a traditional paracetamol regimen 1000 mg x 4 daily with respect to alleviation of acute postoperative swelling and pain after third molar surgery.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Molar, Third , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Edema/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Male , Time Factors , Tooth Extraction
11.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 43(3): 305-14, 2003 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12638400

ABSTRACT

A randomized, double-blind, within-patient, crossover study was carried out after bilateral "identical" surgical procedures using local anesthesia only. A 3-day tablet regime of racemic ketoprofen 75 mg or acetaminophen 1000 mg qid (x 4) was given starting 3 hours after surgery. Ketoprofen reduced objectively measured swelling 27.8% (p < 0.04) better than acetaminophen 3 days after surgery and 70.8% (p < 0.02) better than acetaminophen 6 days after surgery. The pain intensity (PI) was lower after ketoprofen than after acetaminophen from 2 to 6 hours after the first drug intake (all p-values < or = 0.03). Sum PI during the first (SUMPI3.5-6, p = 0.003) and second dose intervals (SUMPI6.5-9, p = 0.007) was lower for ketoprofen than for acetaminophen but not different for the third dose interval (SUMPI9.5-11, p = 0.53). Ketoprofen was a more effective analgesic than acetaminophen on the day of surgery (SUMPI3.5-11, p = 0.005). There was no difference (p > 0.05) between the treatments with respect to mouth opening, drug preference, global evaluation, or adverse reports. Adverse reports included stomach pain and diarrhea in both treatment groups. Ketoprofen 75 mg x 4 for 3 days reduces subjectively assessed pain and objectively measured swelling (i.e., anti-inflammatory effect) following third-molar surgery.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Ketoprofen/therapeutic use , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Acetaminophen/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/adverse effects , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Ketoprofen/adverse effects , Male , Molar, Third/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Time Factors , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects
12.
Br J Psychiatry ; 179: 514-8, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11731354

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although serotonin reuptake inhibitors are effective in panic disorder, questions concerning whether doses associated with antidepressant efficacy are also effective for panic disorder remain. AIMS: To assess the efficacy of the usual antidepressant dose of fluoxetine in treating full panic attacks. METHOD: Patients with panic disorder were randomised to placebo or to fluoxetine initiated at 10 mg daily for 1 week and then increased to 20 mg daily. The trial lasted 12 weeks, but after 6 weeks patients who had failed to achieve a satisfactory response were eligible for dose escalation to a maximum of 60 mg of fluoxetine daily. RESULTS: Fluoxetine was associated with a statistically significantly greater proportion of panic-free patients compared with placebo after 6 weeks and at end-point. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoxetine at a dose of 20 mg daily is safe and efficacious in reducing symptoms of panic disorder. Patients who fail to obtain a satisfactory response at 20 mg daily may benefit from further dose increases.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/administration & dosage , Fluoxetine/administration & dosage , Panic Disorder/drug therapy , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Adult , Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Fluoxetine/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Single-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome
13.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 51(4): 335-41, 2001 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11318769

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The combination of lignocaine and adrenaline may cause more postoperative pain than other types of local anaesthetic agents with comparable clinical efficacy. This study investigates the dose-response effect of adrenaline added to lignocaine on postoperative pain, when used as local anaesthetic for oral soft tissue surgery. METHODS: A controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study included 195 patients (108 females/87 males) with mean age 49 years (range 26-75 years). The patients were allocated to one of three treatment groups receiving lignocaine 2% (n = 66), lignocaine 2% with adrenaline 1 : 160 000 (n = 63) or lignocaine 2% with adrenaline 1 : 80 000 (n = 66). RESULTS: Lignocaine 2% with adrenaline 1 : 80 000 gave significantly more pain intensity than lignocaine 2% or lignocaine 2% with adrenaline 1 : 160 000. The postoperative pain intensity courses after lignocaine 2% and lignocaine 2% with adrenaline 1 : 160 000 showed a similar pattern except for the time period just after completion of surgery when lignocaine 2% with adrenaline 1 : 80 000 caused less pain. CONCLUSIONS: High adrenaline concentrations (1 : 80 000) combined with lignocaine local anaesthetic solution offers no advantage with respect to pain alleviation during the immediate postoperative pain period. High exogenous adrenaline concentrations may play a significant role in enhancing acute postoperative intensity.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic Agonists/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Epinephrine/administration & dosage , Gingivectomy , Lidocaine/therapeutic use , Pain, Postoperative , Adrenergic Agonists/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Epinephrine/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy
14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11291357

ABSTRACT

A model using volumetry to evaluate the effect of drugs on acute postoperative swelling after operations for primary Dupuytren's contracture (DC) and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) was established and validated. The temperature of the saline and time of measurement during the day influenced the volumetric readings. The error of measurement after volumetry of unoperated and operated hands after operations for DC was 0.7% and 0.6%, respectively. Naproxen (500 mg twice a day), paracetamol (1000 mg four times a day), or placebo were given postoperatively for three days to 35 patients after DC and 42 patients after CTS in a randomised, placebo-controlled study. Hand volume was measured preoperatively and 72 hours after surgery. There was a difference in swelling (p = 0.009) indicating different degree of development of swelling 72 hours postoperatively between the DC and CTS placebo groups, which invalidated pooling of the data. After operations for DC naproxen was slightly but not significantly superior to paracetamol and placebo, with paracetamol numerically superior to placebo. The power of the study, caused by the limited number of patients included, does not permit this difference to reach significance. Operations for CTS caused so little swelling that comparisons were invalidated. Naproxen treatment, irrespective of type of operation, did not require rescue analgesics, while two patients after CTS treated with paracetamol did. Two and six placebo-treated patients required rescue drugs after operations for DC and CTS, respectively. We conclude that naproxen might have a clinical relevant effect on swelling when used on minor surgery in the hand, unlike paracetamol. Naproxen might be a useful analgesic during the immediate postoperative phase.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/surgery , Dupuytren Contracture/surgery , Edema/prevention & control , Hand/surgery , Naproxen/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Inflammation/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged
15.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 38(3): 230-4, 2000 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10864732

ABSTRACT

A randomized, single-blind, within-patient, crossover study was done in 44 patients (27 women and 17 men mean age 47 years, range 29-63) who had bilateral 'identical' gingivectomies. On one occasion a standard volume of local anaesthetic containing lignocaine 2% and adrenaline (1/80 000) was infiltrated into the mucosal tissue before operation. On the other occasion double the standard volume was infiltrated. The intensity of pain postoperatively was recorded by the patients on 100 mm visual analogue scale every hour for an 11-hour observation period. The intensity of pain when double volume had been given was significantly higher than that after the standard volume from 2 to 8 hours postoperatively (P < 0.04), the median (range) being 52.0 mm (0.0-434.0) compared with 30.5 mm (0.0-359.0) after the standard volume (P < 0.005). Doubling the volume of local anaesthetic containing adrenaline that was infiltrated increased the intensity of acute pain after gingivectomy.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Dental/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects , Epinephrine/adverse effects , Gingivectomy/adverse effects , Lidocaine/adverse effects , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Adult , Anesthesia, Local/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Cross-Over Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Epinephrine/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Single-Blind Method , Statistics, Nonparametric
16.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 40(4): 370-8, 2000 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10761164

ABSTRACT

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the time to onset of analgesia and the analgesic efficacy of two formulations of acetaminophen 1000 mg--an effervescent solution and tablet--in 242 patients with moderate or severe pain following dental surgery. Onset of analgesia was determined using a two-stopwatch procedure. Analgesia was assessed over a 4-hour period. Treatments were compared using standard indexes of pain intensity and pain relief and summary measures. Both acetaminophen formulations were significantly more effective than their corresponding placebo for all efficacy assessments. The median time to onset of analgesia was significantly shorter with effervescent acetaminophen (20 minutes) compared to tablet acetaminophen (45 minutes). During the first 45 minutes after administration, effervescent acetaminophen was significantly more effective at each scheduled assessment time than tablet acetaminophen. The median time to meaningful pain relief was significantly shorter with effervescent acetaminophen (45 minutes) compared to tablet acetaminophen (60 minutes). At 4 hours after administration, the pain relief was significantly better with tablet acetaminophen than with effervescent acetaminophen. No other significant differences were observed between the active treatments. In conclusion, effervescent acetaminophen produces a significantly faster onset of analgesia than tablet acetaminophen.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Analgesia , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Tooth Extraction/adverse effects , Acetaminophen/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Dry Socket/chemically induced , Female , Headache/chemically induced , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/chemically induced , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Patient Satisfaction , Solutions , Tablets , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
17.
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol ; 21(7): 505-10, 1999 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10544396

ABSTRACT

It is known that some local anesthetics may cause pain when the initial local anesthetic effect disappears. The aim of this trial was to compare the postoperative pain intensities after infiltration of plain lidocaine 1% and 2% used in gingivectomies. The trial was done as a controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study involving 117 patients with mean age 48 years (range 29-71 years) allocated to two treatment groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the mean postoperative pain courses of lidocaine 1% and 2% after gingivectomies during an 11-h observation period. A numerical difference was seen from 7 to 11 h in favor of lidocaine 1%. There were more patients experiencing no pain, but more patients reporting higher pain scores in the lidocaine 2% group than in the lidocaine 1% group. These differences were not statistically significant. It can be concluded that there is apparently no difference between lidocaine 1% and 2% with respect to postoperative pain experience when using gingivectomy as a pain model.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia/methods , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Gingivectomy/adverse effects , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Adult , Aged , Anesthesia/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Lidocaine/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement/drug effects , Pain, Postoperative/chemically induced
18.
Anesth Prog ; 46(2): 71-6, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10853568

ABSTRACT

A controlled, randomized, double-blind, within-patient, crossover study was made with 50 patients (28 women and 22 men) of mean age 47 years (range, 32-69 years) who were subjected to identical bilateral gingivectomies. On one occasion, lidocaine 2% was infiltrated as the local anesthetic. On the other occasion, lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:80,000 was given. Postoperative pain intensity was recorded by the patients on a 100-mm visual analogue scale every hour during an 11-hour observation period. The mean pain intensity was numerically higher after lidocaine 2% at 0 hours and 1 hour postoperatively. Then the mean pain intensity after lidocaine 2% was lower than that after lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:80,000 throughout the remaining observation period. The difference in pain intensity was statistically significant (P < .05) at 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7 hours after surgery. Mean sum (SEM) pain intensity over the 11-hour observation period was lower (P = .03) after lidocaine 2%, 66.5 (13.4) mm than after lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:80,000, 92.6 (15.4) mm. The study shows that high epinephrine concentration (1:80,000) increases the postoperative pain after dental soft tissue surgery with mild pain.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Dental/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects , Epinephrine/adverse effects , Gingivectomy/methods , Lidocaine/adverse effects , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Vasoconstrictor Agents/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Anesthesia, Dental/methods , Anesthesia, Local/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement
19.
J Orofac Orthop ; 59(6): 331-9, 1998.
Article in English, German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9857602

ABSTRACT

Two nickel-titanium arch-wire types commonly used for initial tooth alignment were compared with regard to the pain/discomfort patients experience during the initial phase of tooth movement. The two arch wires used were a superelastic nickel-titanium alloy, 0.014 inch Sentalloy, Light (GAC International Inc. Central Islip, NY, USA) and a 0.014 inch Nitinol (Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA), a conventional nickel-titanium aligning archwire. One hundred and twenty-eight consecutive patients attending an orthodontic university clinic and 2 private practices for routine placement of a fixed appliance were randomly assigned one of these 2 initial arch wires. Assessments of pain/discomfort were made daily by means of a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) over the first 7-day period after bonding. On the first day, recordings were made every hour for the first 11 hours. The results showed that the level of discomfort increased continuously every hour after the insertion of either a Sentalloy or a Nitinol as first arch wires, with a peak in the first night, remaining high on the second day and decreasing thereafter to baseline level after 7 days. During the first 10 hours it was apparent that the pain/discomfort experienced after placement of a Sentalloy was less than that found with the Nitinol archwire, although a significant difference could be found at 4 hours only. No significant gender-specific differences were found in either archwire group. A significant difference between the upper and lower dental arches was observed during the first 11 hours after placement of either a Sentalloy or a Nitinol arch wire, with the lower arch having the higher pain experience.


Subject(s)
Dental Alloys , Nickel , Orthodontic Wires/adverse effects , Pain/etiology , Titanium , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Orthodontic Wires/statistics & numerical data , Pain/diagnosis , Pain Measurement/statistics & numerical data , Sex Characteristics , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time Factors , Tooth Movement Techniques/methods , Tooth Movement Techniques/statistics & numerical data
20.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 38(5): 447-54, 1998 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9602959

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this single-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blind study was to evaluate the analgesic dose-response relationship of 50-mg, 100-mg, 200-mg, and 400-mg doses of ibuprofen after third molar surgery. Patients were instructed to take a single dose of either placebo or 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, or 400 mg of ibuprofen when the postoperative pain was moderate to severe. Acetaminophen 500 mg was used as a rescue medication. Pain intensity, pain relief, and any possible adverse events were recorded on self-administered questionnaires hourly for 6 hours after intake of study medication. If rescue medication was taken, the time of intake was registered. A total of 304 patients entered the study, and 258 complied with the protocol. A positive analgesic dose-response relationship of 50-mg, 100-mg, 200-mg, and 400-mg doses of ibuprofen was observed when evaluated by pain intensity difference, sum of pain intensity difference, pain relief, total pain relief, and survival distribution of patients not taking rescue medication. Although significant pain relief was seen after a dose of 50 mg ibuprofen, ibuprofen 400 mg provided maximum pain relief and the longest duration of analgesic effect. Mild transient adverse events were reported by 6.8% of the patients. However, there was no significant difference in frequency between the placebo and 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, and 400 mg ibuprofen dose groups.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Ibuprofen/administration & dosage , Molar, Third/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Adult , Analgesia , Analysis of Variance , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Pain Measurement/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...