Rising hospital admissions for alcohol-related cirrhosis and the impact of sex and comorbidity - a data linkage study.

OBJECTIVES: International studies have shown shifting demographic data and rising hospitalizations for alcohol-related cirrhosis (ARC), with a paucity of data from Australia. We examined hospitalizations, mortality and demographic data for people admitted with ARC over the last decade in Queensland, Australia. STUDY DESIGN: Data linkage study. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of adults hospitalized with ARC during 2008-2019 was performed using state-wide admissions data. International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, codes identified admissions with the principal diagnosis of ARC based on validated algorithms. Comorbidity was assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index. RESULTS: A total of 7152 individuals had 24,342 hospital admissions with ARC (16,388 were for ARC). There was a predominance of males (72.6%) and age ≥50 years (80.4%) at index admission. Females were admitted at a significantly younger age than men (59% of women and 43% of men were aged <60 years, P < 0.001). Comorbidities were common, with 45.1% of people having at least one comorbidity. More than half (54.6%) of the patients died over the study period (median follow-up time was 5.1 years; interquartile range 2.4-8.6). Women had significantly lower mortality, with 47.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 45.0-50.2) probability of 5-year survival, compared with 40.1% (95% CI 38.5-41.6) in men. In multivariable analysis, this was attributable to significantly lower age and comorbidity burden in women. Significantly lower survival was seen in people with higher comorbidity burden. Overall, the number of admissions for ARC increased 2.2-fold from 869 admissions in 2008 to 1932 in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital admissions for ARC have risen substantially in the last decade. Females were admitted at a younger age, with fewer comorbidities and had lower mortality compared with males. The association between greater comorbidity burden and higher mortality has important clinical implications, as comorbidity-directed interventions may reduce mortality.

Awareness and opinions of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by hospital specialists.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Subjects with metabolic risk factors for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are commonly seen by hospital specialists other than gastroenterologists/hepatologists. The aim of this study was to assess the awareness of NAFLD and opinions regarding management among non-hepatologists at two major tertiary hospitals in Brisbane. METHODS: A face-to-face questionnaire assessing current beliefs and practices regarding NAFLD was administered to specialists and specialists-in-training across six specialties (internal medicine, cardiology/cardiac surgery, endocrinology, thoracic medicine, rheumatology and nephrology). RESULTS: One hundred clinicians were surveyed with 99% returning completed questionnaires (>89% questions answered). The majority of respondents (75%) believe the prevalence of NAFLD in the general population to be ≤ 10%, although two-thirds feel that its incidence will rise markedly. The vast majority (>90%) appreciate that traditional cardiovascular risk factors (obesity, hypertriglyceridaemia and diabetes) are risk factors for NAFLD and acknowledge that these are common in non-hepatology patients. Despite this, most believe that NAFLD is uncommon in their own patients (89% indicated a prevalence ≤ 30%). The vast majority (93%) agree that non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is associated with increased overall mortality, but 60% also believe that simple steatosis confers increased liver-related mortality. Most (74%) agree that a diagnosis of NASH cannot be made using liver enzymes, but 67% support 6-monthly liver function tests as the most effective way to monitor progression of NAFLD. Most respondents (71%) make no referrals to hepatology for suspected NAFLD. CONCLUSIONS: Non-hepatologists appreciate the seriousness of NAFLD but appear to underestimate its prevalence, especially among their own patients despite known risk factors. Attitudes regarding simple steatosis versus NASH and appropriate monitoring of suspected NAFLD suggest that more can be done to improve the understanding of this disease among non-hepatologists. This has implications for targeting 'at-risk' populations and appropriate referral of patients to hepatology clinics.