Who Could Be Blamed in the Case of Discrepant Histology and Serology Results for Helicobacter pylori Detection?

BACKGROUND: Discrepancies between histology and serology results for Helicobacter pylori detection could be caused by a variety of factors, including a biopsy sampling error, expertise of the pathologist, natural loss of infection due to advanced atrophy, or a false-positive serology in the case of a previous infection, since antibodies may be present in blood following recovery from the infection. AIMS: To identify true H. pylori-positive individuals in discrepant cases by serology and histology using real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as a gold standard. METHODS: Study subjects with discrepant histology and serology results were selected from the GISTAR pilot study data base in Latvia. Subjects having received previous H. pylori eradication therapy or reporting use of proton pump inhibitors, antibacterial medications, or bismuth containing drugs one month prior to upper endoscopy were excluded. We compared the discrepant cases to the corresponding results of RT-PCR performed on gastric biopsies. RESULTS: In total, 97 individuals with discrepant results were identified: 81 subjects were serology-positive/histology-negative, while 16 were serology-negative/histology-positive. Among the serology-positive/histology-negative cases, 64/81 (79.0%) were false-positives by serology and, for the majority, inflammation was absent in all biopsies, while, in the serology-negative/histology-positive group, only 6.2% were proven false-positives by histology. CONCLUSIONS: Among this high H. pylori prevalent, middle-aged population, the majority of discrepant cases between serology and histology were due to false positive-serology, rather than false-negative histology. This confirms the available evidence that the choice of treatment should not be based solely on the serological results, but also after excluding previous, self-reported eradication therapy.

Achievement of treatment targets predicts progression of vascular complications in type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: To study the association between achievement of guideline-defined treatment targets on HbA1c, low-density lipoproteins (LDL-C), and blood pressure with the progression of diabetic complications in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: The study included 355 patients at baseline and 114 patients with follow-up data after 3-5 years. Outcome variables were the progression of diabetic kidney disease, retinopathy, or cardiovascular disease (CVD). We used logistic regression and other machine learning algorithms (MLA) to model the association of achievement of treatment targets and probability of progression of complications. RESULTS: Achievement of the target blood pressure was associated with 96% lower odds of a new CVD event (0.04 (95% CI 0.00, 0.53), p = 0.016), and 72% lower odds of progression of any complication (0.28 (95% CI 0.09, 0.89), p = 0.027. Achievement of HbA1c target was associated with lower odds of composite complication progression by 82% (0.18 (95% CI 0.04, 0.88), p = 0.034.) None of the patients who achieved HbA1c target progressed in CVD. MLA demonstrated good accuracy for the prediction of progression of CVD (AUC 0.824), and lower accuracy for other complications. CONCLUSION: The achievement of blood pressure and HbA1c treatment targets is associated with lower odds of vascular complication of T1D in a real life study.

Association between symptoms of depression, diabetes complications and vascular risk factors in four European cohorts of individuals with type 1 diabetes - InterDiane Consortium.

AIMS: To investigate the association between depressive symptomatology and health markers in type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Four countries from the InterDiane Consortium had adopted the Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy Study protocol, including the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Associations between depression symptomatology, diabetes complications (diabetic nephropathy, proliferative retinopathy, major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE]) and vascular risk factors (metabolic syndrome, body mass index, glycaemic control) were investigated. RESULTS: In a sample of 1046 participants (Croatia n = 99; Finland n = 314; Latvia n = 315; Lithuania n = 318), 13.4% displayed symptoms of depression (BDI score ≥ 16) with no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of depression among the cohorts. The highest rates of diabetic nephropathy (37.1%) and proliferative retinopathy (36.3%) were observed in Lithuania. The rates of MACE and metabolic syndrome were highest in Finland. In joint analyses, individuals exhibiting depression symptomatology had higher HbA1c (79 vs. 72 mmol/mol, p < 0.001) and higher triglyceride concentration (1.67 vs. 1.28 mmol/l, p < 0.001), than those without. In the multivariable model, BDI score was positively associated with the presence of diabetic nephropathy, proliferative retinopathy, MACE, and metabolic syndrome and its triglyceride component. Moreover, BDI score was positively associated with the number of metabolic syndrome components, triglyceride concentration, and HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS: Comorbid depression should be considered a relevant factor explaining metabolic problems and vascular outcomes. Causality cannot be inferred from this cross-sectional study.

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.

The progress this year in Helicobacter pylori diagnosis concerned essentially endoscopy and molecular techniques. New endoscopy techniques such as blue laser imaging and magnifying narrow band imaging allow the visualization of mucosal aspects representing H. pylori infection, intestinal metaplasia, and even ambiguous early gastric cancer. Several real-time PCRs have also been used either to quantify H. pylori or to detect mutations associated with clarithromycin resistance in gastric biopsies or applied on gastric juice, stool specimens, or the oral cavity. The presence of H. pylori in free-living amebae purified from wastewater and drinking water was also determined by PCR and sequencing, as well as culture from a few wastewater samples. Among the noninvasive methods, the urea breath test was used in different conditions, including with a new test meal, which is claimed to avoid the proton-pump inhibitor washout period before testing. Several articles concerning antibody detection and stool antigen test were also published.

Accuracy of two plasma antibody tests and faecal antigen test for non-invasive detection of H. pylori in middle-aged Caucasian general population sample.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy of two plasma Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) antibody test-systems and a stool antigen test (SAT) system in a general population sample in Latvia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood and faecal samples were analysed in healthy individuals (40-64 years), referred for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy according to pilot study protocol within a population-based study investigating gastric cancer prevention strategies (GISTAR pilot study). Antibodies to H. pylori were assessed in plasma by latex-agglutination test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). H. pylori antigen in faecal samples was detected by a monoclonal enzyme immunoassay-based SAT. Histological assessment of H. pylori based on a modified Giemsa staining method was used as the gold standard. Individuals having received H. pylori eradication within one year prior to enrolment were excluded. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and overall accuracy were calculated. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were designed to estimate the optimal diagnostic cut-off value of tests. RESULTS: The analysis included 779 participants for latex-agglutination test, 1002 for ELISA and 672 individual samples for SAT. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and overall accuracy were as follows: latex-agglutination test (86;81;87;80;84%), ELISA (97;72;83;94;86%) and SAT (87;81;87;81;85%), respectively. The optimal diagnostic cut-off value for ELISA test was ≥50.26 g/L. CONCLUSIONS: Although the performance of the three tests was comparable to each other, the three test systems showed suboptimal accuracy, with important implications for public health programs based on 'test-and-treat' strategy.