Altered Gene Expression Within the Renin-Angiotensin System in Normal Aging and Dementia.

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is dysregulated in Alzheimer's disease (AD). In this study, we have explored the hypothesis that an -age--related imbalance in brain RAS is a trigger for RAS dysregulation in AD. We characterized RAS gene expression in the frontal cortex from (i) a cohort of normal aging (n = 99, age range = 19-96 years) and (ii) a case-control cohort (n = 209) including AD (n = 66), mixed dementia (VaD + AD; n = 50), pure vascular dementia (VaD; n = 42), and age-matched controls (n = 51). The AD, mixed dementia, and age-matched controls were further stratified by Braak tangle stage (BS): BS0-II (n = 48), BSIII-IV (n = 44), and BSV-VI (n = 85). Gene expression was calculated by quantitative PCR (qPCR) for ACE1, AGTR1, AGTR2, ACE2, LNPEP, and MAS1 using the 2-∆∆Cq method, after adjustment for reference genes (RPL13 and UBE2D2) and cell-specific calibrator genes (NEUN, GFAP, PECAM). ACE1 and AGTR1, markers of classical RAS signaling, and AGTR2 gene expression were elevated in normal aging and gene expression in markers of protective downstream regulatory RAS signaling, including ACE2, MAS1, and LNPEP, were unchanged. In AD and mixed dementia, AGTR1 and AGTR2 gene expression were elevated in BSIII-IV and BSV-VI, respectively. MAS1 gene expression was reduced at BSV-VI and was inversely related to parenchymal Aß and tau load. LNPEP gene expression was specifically elevated in VaD. These data provide novel insights into RAS signaling in normal aging and dementia.

Renin Angiotensin System as a Potential Treatment Target for Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major health concern and leading cause of death and disability in young adults in the United Kingdom and worldwide; however, there is a paucity of disease modifying therapies for the treatment of TBI. This review investigates the potential of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) as a treatment pathway for TBI in adults. Relevant electronic databases were searched on December 18, 2019, and updated May 16, 2021. All English language articles with adult human or animal populations investigating RAS drugs as an intervention for TBI or reporting genetic evidence relevant to the RAS and TBI were screened. Eighteen pre-clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 2269) and two clinical cohort studies (n = 771) were included. Meta-analyses of six pre-clinical RCTs (n = 99) indicated that candesartan improved neurological function over the short term (< 7 days: standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-1.03, I2 = 0%) and over the long term (≥ 7 days: SMD 1.06, 95% CI 0.38; 1.73, I2 = 0%) post-TBI. Findings were similar for most secondary outcomes. There was a suggestion of benefit from other RAS-targeting drugs, although evidence was limited because there were few small studies. There was insufficient evidence to enable strong assessment of these drugs on mortality post-TBI. We conclude that angiotensin-receptor blockers, especially candesartan, show positive outcomes post-TBI in pre-clinical studies with moderate quality of evidence (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation [GRADE]). More research into the effect of regulatory-RAS targeting drugs is needed. Clinical trials of candesartan following TBI are recommended, because there is strong and consistent evidence of neuroprotection shown by these pre-clinical studies.

Progress toward standardized diagnosis of vascular cognitive impairment: Guidelines from the Vascular Impairment of Cognition Classification Consensus Study.

INTRODUCTION: Progress in understanding and management of vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) has been hampered by lack of consensus on diagnosis, reflecting the use of multiple different assessment protocols. A large multinational group of clinicians and researchers participated in a two-phase Vascular Impairment of Cognition Classification Consensus Study (VICCCS) to agree on principles (VICCCS-1) and protocols (VICCCS-2) for diagnosis of VCI. We present VICCCS-2. METHODS: We used VICCCS-1 principles and published diagnostic guidelines as points of reference for an online Delphi survey aimed at achieving consensus on clinical diagnosis of VCI. RESULTS: Six survey rounds comprising 65-79 participants agreed guidelines for diagnosis of VICCCS-revised mild and major forms of VCI and endorsed the National Institute of Neurological Disorders-Canadian Stroke Network neuropsychological assessment protocols and recommendations for imaging. DISCUSSION: The VICCCS-2 suggests standardized use of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders-Canadian Stroke Network recommendations on neuropsychological and imaging assessment for diagnosis of VCI so as to promote research collaboration.

The Vascular Impairment of Cognition Classification Consensus Study.

INTRODUCTION: Numerous diagnostic criteria have tried to tackle the variability in clinical manifestations and problematic diagnosis of vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) but none have been universally accepted. These criteria have not been readily comparable, impacting on clinical diagnosis rates and in turn prevalence estimates, research, and treatment. METHODS: The Vascular Impairment of Cognition Classification Consensus Study (VICCCS) involved participants (81% academic researchers) from 27 countries in an online Delphi consensus study. Participants reviewed previously proposed concepts to develop new guidelines. RESULTS: VICCCS had a mean of 122 (98-153) respondents across the study and a 67% threshold to represent consensus. VICCCS redefined VCI including classification of mild and major forms of VCI and subtypes. It proposes new standardized VCI-associated terminology and future research priorities to address gaps in current knowledge. DISCUSSION: VICCCS proposes a consensus-based updated conceptualization of VCI intended to facilitate standardization in research.

Vascular cognitive impairment neuropathology guidelines (VCING): the contribution of cerebrovascular pathology to cognitive impairment.

There are no generally accepted protocols for post-mortem assessment in cases of suspected vascular cognitive impairment. Neuropathologists from seven UK centres have collaborated in the development of a set of vascular cognitive impairment neuropathology guidelines (VCING), representing a validated consensus approach to the post-mortem assessment and scoring of cerebrovascular disease in relation to vascular cognitive impairment. The development had three stages: (i) agreement on a sampling protocol and scoring criteria, through a series of Delphi method surveys; (ii) determination of inter-rater reliability for each type of pathology in each region sampled (Gwet's AC2 coefficient); and (iii) empirical testing and validation of the criteria, by blinded post-mortem assessment of brain tissue from 113 individuals (55 to 100 years) without significant neurodegenerative disease who had had formal cognitive assessments within 12 months of death. Fourteen different vessel and parenchymal pathologies were assessed in 13 brain regions. Almost perfect agreement (AC2 > 0.8) was found when the agreed criteria were used for assessment of leptomeningeal, cortical and capillary cerebral amyloid angiopathy, large infarcts, lacunar infarcts, microhaemorrhage, larger haemorrhage, fibrinoid necrosis, microaneurysms, perivascular space dilation, perivascular haemosiderin leakage, and myelin loss. There was more variability (but still reasonably good agreement) in assessment of the severity of arteriolosclerosis (0.45-0.91) and microinfarcts (0.52-0.84). Regression analyses were undertaken to identify the best predictors of cognitive impairment. Seven pathologies-leptomeningeal cerebral amyloid angiopathy, large infarcts, lacunar infarcts, microinfarcts, arteriolosclerosis, perivascular space dilation and myelin loss-predicted cognitive impairment. Multivariable logistic regression determined the best predictive models of cognitive impairment. The preferred model included moderate/severe occipital leptomeningeal cerebral amyloid angiopathy, moderate/severe arteriolosclerosis in occipital white matter, and at least one large infarct (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 77%). The presence of 0, 1, 2 or 3 of these features resulted in predicted probabilities of vascular cognitive impairment of 16%, 43%, 73% or 95%, respectively. We have developed VCING criteria that are reproducible and clinically predictive. Assuming our model can be validated in an independent dataset, we believe that this will be helpful for neuropathologists in reporting a low, intermediate or high likelihood that cerebrovascular disease contributed to cognitive impairment.10.1093/brain/aww214_video_abstractaww214_video_abstract.