Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Heart Lung ; 29(4): 287-93, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10900066

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We determined instances of aspiration in adults with tracheostomies and investigated the effect of the Passy-Muir tracheostomy speaking valve on occurrences of aspiration. METHODS: Adults with tracheostomies scheduled for videofluoroscopic swallowing examinations who met inclusion criteria were enrolled. According to study protocol, 6 presentations of thin liquids were recorded, 3 with and 3 without the Passy-Muir tracheostomy speaking valve. If a cuffed tube was present, the cuff was deflated fully for all presentations. RESULTS: Seven of 15 subjects aspirated material on 1 or more presentations of thin liquid. Five subjects aspirated material only with the Passy-Muir tracheostomy speaking valve off, whereas 2 subjects aspirated material with and without the valve. No subject aspirated material while the valve was on exclusively. Aspiration was significantly less frequent with the Passy-Muir tracheostomy speaking valve on than with it off. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically unapparent aspiration occurs commonly in patients with tracheostomies. An expiratory occlusive valve can reduce, though not eliminate, occurrences of aspiration. CLINICAL IMPLICATION: The benefit of the Passy-Muir tracheostomy speaking valve should be evaluated in selected patients who aspirate liquid.


Subject(s)
Tracheostomy/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Inhalation/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Tracheostomy/instrumentation , Videotape Recording
3.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 78(5): 644-9, 1996 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8642019

ABSTRACT

We performed a prospective study of sixty-two patients who were managed with a closed core needle biopsy in an outpatient clinic for a soft-tissue mass or a bone tumor with soft-tissue extension between August 1, 1992, and June 1, 1994. Eight (13 percent) of the closed core needle biopsies yielded no neoplastic tissue. Two needle biopsies (3 percent), which were of myxomatous masses, did not allow distinction between a benign and a malignant neoplasm; both masses were extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcomas. Additionally, the histological grade of four resected specimens (6 percent) differed from that determined with the closed needle biopsy. The diagnostic accuracy of the closed needle biopsies was 84 percent (fifty-two of sixty-two). All ten diagnostic errors involved soft-tissue tumors. A retrospective study of a similar cohort of patients who had open biopsy in an outpatient operating room by the same surgeon in a contemporary period in the same institution and with analysis by the same pathologist, revealed a diagnostic accuracy of 96 percent (forty-eight of fifty). The hospital charges for the closed core needle biopsy were $1106, compared with $7234 for the open biopsy. We concluded that core needle biopsy can be performed in an outpatient clinic with use of local anesthesia and that it is substantially less expensive and more convenient than open biopsy. This technique has an acceptable but definitely lower rate of accuracy compared with open biopsy, especially for soft-tissue tumors, and it should be used only in a small subset of patients (those who have a large soft-tissue mass or a bone tumor with palpable soft-tissue extension). However, given the small size of the tissue sample, the clinician must recognize possible disadvantages, including a non-diagnostic biopsy, an indeterminate biopsy, or a potential error in the histological grade. These problems are much more likely to occur after core needle biopsy of soft-tissue masses. Because of the potential for errors in diagnosis when core needle biopsy is used, the musculoskeletal oncologist must rely on his or her clinical acumen. When a diagnosis is in reasonable doubt, there is no radiographic confirmation, the biopsy shows no tumor cells, or there is a combination of these findings, operative decisions should be made as if no biopsy had been performed. The management of patients who, after core needle biopsy, have a diagnosis of a bone or soft-tissue tumor, is best carried out by an experienced musculoskeletal oncologist working in close collaboration with an experienced musculoskeletal pathologist.


Subject(s)
Biopsy, Needle , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/pathology , Ambulatory Care/economics , Biopsy/economics , Biopsy, Needle/economics , Biopsy, Needle/methods , Humans , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/economics , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL