Validation of self-reported cardiovascular problems in childhood cancer survivors by contacting general practitioners: feasibility and results.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies often rely on self-reported health problems and validation greatly improves study quality. In a study of late effects after childhood cancer, we validated self-reported cardiovascular problems by contacting general practitioners (GPs). This paper describes: (a) the feasibility of this approach; and (b) the agreement between survivor-reports and reports from their GP. METHODS: The Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (SCCSS) contacts all childhood cancer survivors registered in the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry since 1976 who survived at least 5 years from cancer diagnosis. We validated answers of all survivors who reported a cardiovascular problem in the questionnaire. Reported cardiovascular problems were hypertension, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, stroke, thrombosis, and valvular problems. In the questionnaire, we further asked survivors to provide a valid address of their GP and a consent for contact. We sent case-report forms to survivors' GPs and requested information on cardiovascular diagnoses of their patients. To determine agreement between information reported by survivors and GPs, we calculated Cohen's kappa (κ) coefficients for each category of cardiovascular problems. RESULTS: We used questionnaires from 2172 respondents of the SCCSS. Of 290 survivors (13% of 2172) who reported cardiovascular problems, 166 gave consent to contact their GP and provided a valid address. Of those, 135 GPs (81%) replied, and 128 returned the completed case-report form. Survivor-reports were confirmed by 54/128 GPs (42%). Of the 54 GPs, 36 (28% of 128) confirmed the problems as reported by the survivors; 11 (9% of 128) confirmed the reported problem(s) and gave additional information on more cardiovascular outcomes; and seven GPs (5% of 128) confirmed some, but not all cardiovascular problems. Agreement between GPs and survivors was good for stroke (κ = 0.79), moderate for hypertension (κ = 0.51), arrhythmias (κ = 0.41), valvular problems (κ = 0.41) and thrombosis (κ = 0.56), and poor for coronary heart disease (κ = 0.15) and heart failure (κ = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Despite excellent GP compliance, it was found unfeasible to validate self-reported cardiovascular problems via GPs because they do not serve as gatekeepers in the Swiss health care system. It is thus necessary to develop other validation methods to improve the quality of patient-reported outcomes.

Chronic health conditions after childhood Langerhans cell histiocytosis: Results from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

PURPOSE: Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare disease characterized by dysregulated proliferation of myeloid marrow progenitors and subsequent organ infiltration. While LCH is associated with a favorable prognosis, some survivors may develop chronic health conditions (CHC) because of the disease. In this study, we aimed to assess the spectrum and prevalence of CHC among LCH survivors compared with siblings and identify factors associated with the development of CHC. METHODS: The Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study sent questionnaires to all ≥ 5-year LCH survivors registered in the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry and diagnosed between 1976 and 2015. Siblings also received similar questionnaires. We compared CHC prevalence between LCH survivors and siblings and used logistic regression to identify determinants of CHC. RESULTS: A total of 123 LCH survivors participated in the study, with a response rate of 69%. Median time since diagnosis was 13 years (interquartile range 9-20). Among LCH survivors, 59% had at least one CHC. Cardiovascular (13% vs. 6%), endocrine (15% vs. 2%), musculoskeletal (22% vs. 13%), and digestive (15% vs. 8%) CHC were more common among LCH survivors compared to siblings (all p < 0.05). Factors most strongly associated with the occurrence of CHC were multisystem LCH, multifocal bone involvement, and involvement of the pituitary gland. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of long-term LCH survivors suffered from one or more CHC and were affected considerably more than siblings. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: LCH survivors in follow-up care should be screened especially for cardiovascular, endocrine, musculoskeletal, and digestive conditions.

Prevalence and factors associated with cancer-related fatigue in Swiss adult survivors of childhood cancer.

PURPOSE: Reported prevalence of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) among childhood cancer survivors (CCS) varies widely, and evidence on factors associated with CRF among CCS is limited. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of CRF and its associated factors among adult CCS in Switzerland. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, we invited adult CCS who survived at least 5 years since last cancer diagnosis, and were diagnosed when age 0-20 years and treated at Inselspital Bern between 1976 and 2015 to complete two fatigue-measuring instruments: the Checklist Individual Strength subjective fatigue subscale (CIS8R; increased fatigue 27-34, severe fatigue ≥ 35) and the numerical rating scale (NRS; moderate fatigue 4-6, severe fatigue 7-10). We collected information about previous cancer treatment and medical history, and calculated ß coefficients for the association between CIS8R/NRS fatigue scores and potential determinants using multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: We included 158 CCS (participation rate: 30%) with a median age at study of 33 years (interquartile range 26-38). Based on CIS8R, 19% (N = 30) of CCS reported increased fatigue, yet none reported severe fatigue. CRF was associated with female sex, central nervous system (CNS) tumors, sleep disturbance, and endocrine disorders. Lower CRF levels were observed among CCS age 30-39 years compared to those younger. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of adult CCS reported increased levels of CRF. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: CCS who are female and < 30 years old, have a history of CNS tumor, report sleep disturbance, or have an endocrine disorder should be screened for CRF.

Body image in adolescent survivors of childhood cancer: The role of chronic health conditions.

BACKGROUND: Cancer and its treatment may impair the body image of childhood cancer survivors during adolescence. We compared the body image between adolescent cancer survivors and their siblings, and determined whether survivors' body image is associated with socio-demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics and chronic health conditions. PROCEDURE: As part of the nationwide Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, we sent questionnaires to adolescents (aged 16-19 years), who survived >5 years after having been diagnosed with childhood cancer between 1989 and 2010. Siblings received the same questionnaire. We assessed the level of agreement with three body image statements referring to body satisfaction and preferences for changes. Chronic health conditions were classified into cardiovascular, pulmonary, endocrine, musculoskeletal, renal/digestive, neurological and hearing or vision impairment. We used ordered logistic regression models to identify determinants of a more negative body image. RESULTS: Our study included 504 survivors (48% female) with a median age at study of 17.7 years (interquartile range: 16.8-18.6) and 136 siblings. Survivors and siblings reported overall comparable levels of agreement with body image statements (all p > .05). Female survivors (all odds ratio [ORs] ≥1.7), survivors treated with haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT; all ORs ≥2.2), and survivors with ≥2 chronic health conditions (all ORs ≥1.4) reported a more negative body image. This was particularly pronounced for survivors suffering from musculoskeletal or endocrine conditions. CONCLUSION: Female survivors, survivors treated with HSCT or with chronic health conditions are at risk of body image concerns during adolescence. Increased awareness among clinicians and targeted psychosocial support could mitigate such concerns.

Severity of hearing loss after platinum chemotherapy in childhood cancer survivors.

BACKGROUND: Hearing loss is a potential side effect from childhood cancer treatment. We described the severity of hearing loss assessed by audiometry in a representative national cohort of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) and identified clinical risk factors. PROCEDURE: We included all CCS from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry who were diagnosed ≤18 age and treated with platinum-based chemotherapy between 1990 and 2014. We extracted audiograms, treatment-related information, and demographic data from medical records. Two reviewers independently assessed the severity of hearing loss at latest follow-up using the Münster Ototoxicity Scale. We used ordered logistic regression to identify clinical risk factors for severity of hearing loss. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 270 CCS. Median time from cancer diagnosis to last audiogram was 5 years (interquartile range 2.5-8.1 years). We found 53 (20%) CCS with mild, 78 (29%) with moderate, and 75 (28%) with severe hearing loss. Higher severity grades were associated with (a) younger age at cancer diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 5.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.5-12.0 for <5 years); (b) treatment in earlier years (OR 4.8, 95% CI: 2.1-11.0 for 1990-1995); (c) higher cumulative cisplatin doses (OR 13.5, 95% CI: 4.7-38.8 for >450 mg/m2 ); (d) concomitant cranial radiation therapy (CRT) (OR 4.4, 95% CI: 2.5-7.8); and (e) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) (OR 2.7, 95% CI: 1.0-7.2). CONCLUSION: Three of four CCS treated with platinum-based chemotherapy experienced some degree of hearing loss. We recommend closely monitoring patient's hearing function if treated at a young age with high cumulative cisplatin doses, and concomitant CRT as part of long-term care.

Social, emotional, and behavioral functioning in young childhood cancer survivors with chronic health conditions.

BACKGROUND: The cancer diagnosis and its intensive treatment may affect the long-term psycho-social adjustment of childhood cancer survivors. We aimed to describe social, emotional, and behavioral functioning and their determinants in young childhood cancer survivors. PROCEDURE: The nationwide Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study sends questionnaires to parents of survivors aged 5-15 years, who have survived at least 5 years after diagnosis. We assessed social, emotional, and behavioral functioning using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). The SDQ includes four difficulties scales (emotional, conduct, hyperactivity, peer problems), a total difficulties indicator, and one strength scale (prosocial). We compared the proportion of survivors with borderline and abnormal scores to reference values and used multivariable logistic regression to identify determinants. RESULTS: Our study included 756 families (response rate of 72%). Thirteen percent of survivors had abnormal scores for the total difficulties indicator compared to 10% in the general population. The proportion of survivors with abnormal scores was highest for the emotional scale (15% vs. 8% in the general population), followed by the peer problems scale (14% vs. 7%), hyperactivity (8% vs. 10%), and conduct scale (6% vs. 7%). Few survivors (4% vs. 7%) had abnormal scores on the prosocial scale. Children with chronic health conditions had a higher risk of borderline and abnormal scores on all difficulties scales (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Most childhood cancer survivors do well in social, emotional, and behavioral life domains, but children with chronic health conditions experience difficulties. Therefore, healthcare professionals should offer specific psycho-social support to these survivors.

Quantitative retrospective natural history modeling for orphan drug development.

The natural history of most rare diseases is incompletely understood and usually relies on studies with low level of evidence. Consistent with the goals for future research of rare disease research set by the International Rare Diseases Research Consortium in 2017, the purpose of this paper is to review the recently developed method of quantitative retrospective natural history modeling (QUARNAM) and to illustrate its usefulness through didactically selected analyses examples in an overall population of 849 patients worldwide with seven (ultra-) rare neurogenetic disorders. A quantitative understanding of the natural history of the disease is fundamental for the development of specific interventions and counseling afflicted families. QUARNAM has a similar relationship to a published case study as a meta-analysis has to an individual published study. QUARNAM relies on sophisticated statistical analyses of published case reports focusing on four research questions: How long does it take to make the diagnosis? How long do patients live? Which factors predict disease severity (eg, genotypes, signs/symptoms, biomarkers)? Where can patients be recruited for studies? Useful statistical techniques include Kaplan-Meier estimates, cluster analysis, regression techniques, binary decisions trees, word clouds, and geographic mapping. In comparison to other natural history study methods (prospective studies or retrospective studies such as chart reviews), QUARNAM can provide fast information on hard clinical endpoints (ie, survival, diagnostic delay) with a lower effort. The choice of method for a particular drug development program may be driven by the research question and may encompass combinatory approaches.

Quantitative natural history characterization in a cohort of 142 published cases of patients with galactosialidosis-A cross-sectional study.

Galactosialidosis (GS; OMIM #256540) is a rare multisystemic inborn glycoprotein storage disease caused by biallelic mutations in the cathepsin A gene resulting in combined deficiency of the lysosomal enzymes ß-galactosidase and α-neuraminidase. The precise understanding of the natural course of the disease is limited. Development of enzyme replacement therapy is at the preclinical stage. The purpose of this research project was to quantitatively characterize the natural history of the condition. Quantitative analysis of all published cases in the literature with sufficient data (N = 142 patients) was carried out. Main outcome variables were survival, diagnostic delay, description of symptoms, biomarker-phenotype associations, and radiological findings. STROBE criteria were respected. Median survival age of the cohort was 48 years. Median age of onset was 4.25 years with interquartile range (IQR) 1 to 16 years. Median age at diagnosis was 19 (IQR: 8.92-29) years, with median diagnostic delay of 8 (IQR: 4-12) years. Patients with residual ß-galactosidase activity of more than 8.6% (leukocytes) survived significantly longer than patients with lower enzyme activities.