ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Advanced age is a factor associated with altered fracture healing. Delays in healing may increase the incidence of complications in the elderly, who are less able to tolerate long periods of immobilization and activity restrictions. This study sought to determine whether fracture repair could be enhanced in elderly animals by: (1) inhibiting macrophage activation, (2) blocking the M-CSF receptor c-fms, and (3) inhibiting monocyte trafficking using CC chemokine receptor-2 (CCR2) knockout mice. METHODS: Closed unstable tibial shaft fractures were produced in mice aged 4, 12, and 78 weeks. Mice were then fed a diet containing PLX3397 or a control diet from days 1-10 after injury. Fractures were similarly made in CCR2 mice aged 78 weeks. The fracture callus was collected during fracture healing and was assessed for its size and the presence of macrophages, both of which were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: PLX3397 treatment resulted in a decrease in the number of macrophages in the fracture callus at day 5. Calluses in juvenile mice trended toward being smaller compared with those in elderly mice (P = 0.08). There was also a trend toward larger callus size and increased bone formation in PLX3397-treated elderly animals when compared with those of the control animals (P = 0.12). Similar increases in bone formation (P = 0.013) and decreases in cartilage within the callus (P = 0.03) were seen at day 10 in CCR2 mice. CONCLUSIONS: The inhibition of macrophages in elderly mice may lead to an acceleration of fracture healing. Altering macrophage activation after fracture may represent a therapeutic strategy for preventing delayed healing and nonunion in the elderly.
Subject(s)
Fracture Healing/drug effects , Macrophages/drug effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Receptor, Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/antagonists & inhibitors , Tibial Fractures/physiopathology , Age Factors , Animals , Fracture Healing/physiology , Macrophages/physiology , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Knockout , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Receptors, CCR2/genetics , Receptors, CCR2/metabolism , Tibial Fractures/drug therapyABSTRACT
Wearable technology has become an important trend in consumer electronics in the past year. The miniaturization and mass production of myriad sensors have made possible the integration of sensors and output devices in wearable platforms. Despite the consumer focus of the wearable revolution some surgical applications are being developed. These fall into augmentative, assistive, and assessment functions and primarily layer onto current surgical workflows. Some challenges to the adoption of wearable technologies are discussed and a conceptual framework for understanding the potential of wearable technology to revolutionize surgical practice are presented.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to identify standard procedures for the validation of arthroscopic simulators and determine whether simulators improve the surgical skills of users. METHODS: Arthroscopic simulator validation studies and randomized trials assessing the effectiveness of arthroscopic simulators in education were identified from online databases, as well as, grey literature and reference lists. Only validation studies and randomized trials were included for review. Study heterogeneity was calculated and where appropriate, study results were combined employing a random effects model. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirteen studies were reviewed. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria assessing the construct validity of simulators. A pooled analysis of internal validation studies determined that simulators could discriminate between novice and experts, but not between novice and intermediate trainees on time of completion of a simulated task. Only one study assessed the utility of a knee simulator in training arthroscopic skills directly and demonstrated that the skill level of simulator-trained residents was greater than non-simulator-trained residents. CONCLUSIONS: Excessive heterogeneity exists in the literature to determine the internal and transfer validity of arthroscopic simulators currently available. Evidence suggests that simulators can discriminate between novice and expert users, but discrimination between novice and intermediate trainees in surgical education should be paramount. International standards for the assessment of arthroscopic simulator validity should be developed to increase the use and effectiveness of simulators in orthopedic surgery.
