Osteopathic manipulative treatment for the allopathic resident elective: does it change practice after graduation?

CONTEXT: Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) for the allopathic resident is an elective at the University of Minnesota North Memorial Residency that engages the resident in the basic tenants of osteopathic medicine, with exposure to the vast application of OMT with a curricular focus on low back pain management. Implementing an elective curriculum is a feasible way to improve attitudes in OMT for MDs in a Family Medicine residency, and residents can learn OMT in an elective rotation. OBJECTIVES: This article aims to determine if MDs who complete an OMT for the allopathic physician elective rotation have higher comfort caring for patients with back pain compared to those who do not complete the elective. Further, this article is designed to evaluate if these MDs continue to incorporate OMT into the care they provide once they graduate from their residency programs. METHODS: Graduates from the University of Minnesota North Memorial Family Medicine Residency (2013 to 2019) were sent an email invitation in August 2020 to complete a Qualtrics survey regarding their comfort with caring for patients with back pain, referral patterns for these patients, and the ongoing use of OMT in their practices. Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) graduates who responded to the survey were removed from the analysis. RESULTS: Among emailed graduates, 61.8% (42/68) completed the survey, with representation from each class ranging from 1 to 7 years postresidency. The five DO graduates who responded were removed from the analysis. Among the remaining 37 respondents, 27 had completed the OMT for the allopathic rotation ("elective participants") during their residency training and 10 had not ("control"). Half (50.0%) of the control group provide OMT care compared to 66.7% of the elective participants, with a comfort score of 22.6 (standard deviation [SD] 32.7) in the control group vs. 34.0 (SD 21.0) in elective participants (on a 0-100 scale; 100 being completely comfortable; p=0.091). Among the control group, 40.0% regularly refer to a DO provider compared to 66.7% of those who completed the elective (p=0.257). The mean comfort score for performing a physical examination on patients presenting with back pain was 78.7 (SD 13.1) and 80.9 (SD 19.3) in the control and elective participants groups, respectively (p=0.198). CONCLUSIONS: Allopathic Family Medicine residents who completed an elective rotation in OMT have a slight increase in frequency of referring to DOs. They also have a meaningful increase in comfort performing OMT. With the limited number of DOs being a common barrier to OMT care, more widely implemented training in OMT for allopathic Family Medicine residents may be a reasonable intervention to improve the care of patients with back pain.

Change that Matters: A Health Behavior Change and Behavioral Health Curriculum for Primary Care.

Although primary care is an ideal setting in which to address behavioral influences on health, clinicians spend little time discussing preventive care, including lifestyle counseling. There is a dearth of comprehensive training and evidence-based resources to educate clinicians in how to effectively engage with patients about these topics. This study describes and evaluates the acceptability of Change that Matters: Promoting Healthy Behaviors, a ten-module curriculum to train clinicians in brief, evidence-based interventions. Each module includes three parts: interactive patient handouts, didactic training, and electronic health record templates to guide the discussion and after visit summary. A two-part, mixed-methods pilot study was used to evaluate the acceptability of the curriculum in a family medicine residency clinic. In Study 1, external family medicine faculty experts (N = 11) provided written feedback on the patient handouts. In Study 2, 20 residents and 20 patients completed qualitative interviews regarding their experience with curricular materials. Content analysis was used to extract qualitative themes. Experts rated the patient handouts as highly understandable and actionable. Resident themes indicated that the curriculum provided concrete tools to address health behavior change, helped structure patient discussions, and increased confidence. Patients felt empowered to make behavior changes. This new curriculum addresses a gap in existing resources, and is available for free download online which can facilitate dissemination ( https://changethatmatters.umn.edu/ ). Research has found the curriculum to be acceptable to experts, residents, and patients. Future studies need to explore its impact on the behavior of both clinicians and patients.

Values-Based Behavioral Activation for Chronic Pain in Primary Care: A Pilot Study.

Chronic pain is prevalent and can be complex to manage in primary care. Encouraging patients with chronic pain to engage in valued activities has been associated with reduced disability and distress. This single-arm, mixed methods pilot study examined whether adding a values-based behavioral activation intervention to a chronic pain protocol is feasible and acceptable in an urban, underserved family medicine residency clinic. Patients (N = 30) living with chronic pain completed a values assessment and co-created a plan with a psychologist to engage in values-based activities. Patients completed self-report measures of psychological health and functioning pre- and post-intervention and a qualitative interview at the follow-up visit. The intervention was considered feasible and acceptable. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction and enjoyment of the intervention and significantly less pain interference at follow-up compared to baseline. Values-based behavioral activation for chronic pain may be implemented as part of behavioral health practice in primary care.

Erratum: A better approach to the diagnosis of PE.

The author list for the June 2019 PURL ("A better approach to the diagnosis of PE." J Fam Pract. 2019;68:286,287,295) should have read: Andrew H. Slattengren, DO; Shailendra Prasad, MBBS, MPH; David C. Bury, DO; Michael M. Dickman, DO; Nick Bennett, DO; Ashley Smith, MD; Robert Oh, MD, MPH, FAAFP; Robert Marshall, MD, MPH, MISHM, FAAFP.

PURL: A better approach to the diagnosis of PE.

A simple diagnostic algorithm is all that's needed to safely and effectively reduce our reliance on CT pulmonary angiography to diagnose PE.

Personal Manuscript Acceptance Rates: Metrics for Self-assessment in Scholarship.

INTRODUCTION: There is no established baseline for how frequently clinical researchers personally encounter manuscript rejection, making it difficult for faculty to put their own evolving experience in context. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of obtaining personal acceptance per submission (APS) and acceptance per manuscript (APM) rates for individual faculty members. METHODS: We performed a cross-section survey pilot study of clinical faculty members of two departments (family medicine and pediatrics), in one academic health center in the academic year 2017-2018. The survey asked participants to report the number of attempted submissions required per journal article they have had accepted in the prior 2 years as well as any submissions that did not lead to publication. RESULTS: Sixty-eight of 136 eligible faculty (50%) completed the questionnaire. Academic clinicians in the sample eventually published 80% of the manuscripts submitted, with 39% of papers rejected per submission attempt. Associate professors had the highest APS (0.71) and APM (0.88). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot, we demonstrated the feasibility of retrospectively collecting data that could identify baseline manuscript acceptance rates and were able to generate department averages and rank specific averages for manuscript acceptance and rejection. We confirmed that rejection is common among academic clinicians. The APS and APM can be used by academic clinicians to track their own progress from day one of their publishing careers as a method of self-assessment, rather than having to wait for citations to accumulate.

Best uses of osteopathic manipulation.

With the growing number of DOs and the high utilization of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT), it is important for all physicians to understand the role OMT can play in the treatment of conditions ranging from low back pain to irritable bowel syndrome so that patients may be offered, or referred for, the treatment when appropriate.

PURLs: Kidney stones? It's time to rethink those meds.

Despite being recommended for ureteral stone expulsion, tamsulosin or nifedipine are no more effective than placebo.