Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Health Phys ; 94(3): 255-63, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18301099

ABSTRACT

Results of dose-response analyses for different clinical symptoms of acute radiation syndrome (ARS) are reported here. The analyses were performed on dosimetric and clinical data from a group of ARS patients (59 cases) exposed to gamma and neutron or gamma radiation alone due to nuclear accidents at Mayak Production Association (Mayak PA). Findings suggested the possibility of prediction of injury severity within the first hours or days after acute exposure based on clinical symptoms and signs such as the onset of vomiting, neutrophil count abnormalities in the peripheral blood within the first 2-3 hours after acute exposure, and lymphocyte count abnormalities in the peripheral blood within the first 24-48 h after acute exposure.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Radiation Injuries/classification , Radiation Injuries/epidemiology , Risk Assessment/methods , Severity of Illness Index , Algorithms , Humans , Prevalence , Proportional Hazards Models , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , Russia/epidemiology , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Health Phys ; 93(3): 207-19, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17693771

ABSTRACT

The Doses-2005 model is a combination of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) models modified using data from the Mayak Production Association cohort. Surrogate doses from inhaled plutonium can be assigned to approximately 29% of the Mayak workers using their urine bioassay measurements and other history records. The purpose of this study was to quantify and qualify the uncertainties in the estimates for radiation doses calculated with the Doses-2005 model by using Monte Carlo methods and perturbation theory. The average uncertainty in the yearly dose estimates for most organs was approximately 100% regardless of the transportability classification. The relative source of the uncertainties comes from three main sources: 45% from the urine bioassay measurements, 29% from the Doses-2005 model parameters, and 26% from the reference masses for the organs. The most significant reduction in the overall dose uncertainties would result from improved methods in bioassay measurement with additional improvements generated through further model refinement. Additional uncertainties were determined for dose estimates resulting from changes in the transportability classification and the smoking toggle. A comparison was performed to determine the effect of using the model with data from either urine bioassay or autopsy data; no direct correlation could be established. Analysis of the model using autopsy data and incorporation of results from other research efforts that have utilized plutonium ICRP models could improve the Doses-2005 model and reduce the overall uncertainty in the dose estimates.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Radioactive , Models, Theoretical , Occupational Exposure , Plutonium , Uncertainty , Autopsy , Biological Assay , Cohort Studies , Humans , Monte Carlo Method , Plutonium/urine , Radiation Dosage , Radiometry , Russia , Smoking
3.
Health Phys ; 84(3): 317-21, 2003 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12645766

ABSTRACT

As part of an ongoing dose reconstruction project, equivalent organ dose rates from photons and neutrons were estimated using the energy spectra measured in the central hall above the graphite reactor core located in the Russian Mayak Production Association facility. Reconstruction of the work environment was necessary due to the lack of personal dosimeter data for neutrons in the time period prior to 1987. A typical worker scenario for the central hall was developed for the Monte Carlo Neutron Photon-4B (MCNP) code. The resultant equivalent dose rates for neutrons and photons were compared with the equivalent dose rates derived from calculations using the conversion coefficients in the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publications 51 and 74 in order to validate the model scenario for this Russian facility. The MCNP results were in good agreement with the results of the ICRP publications indicating the modeling scenario was consistent with actual work conditions given the spectra provided. The MCNP code will allow for additional orientations to accurately reflect source locations.


Subject(s)
Models, Biological , Nuclear Reactors , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Occupational Exposure/standards , Organ Specificity/radiation effects , Radiometry/methods , Radiometry/standards , Calibration , Computer Simulation , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , International Cooperation , Models, Statistical , Monte Carlo Method , Neutrons , Photons , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection/standards , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Russia , Sensitivity and Specificity
4.
Health Phys ; 82(4): 445-54, 2002 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11906133

ABSTRACT

One of the objectives of the Joint Coordinating Committee for Radiation Effects Research Project 2.4 is to document the methodology used to determine the radiation doses in workers from the Mayak Production Association who were exposed to plutonium. The doses have been employed in numerous dose response studies measuring both stochastic and deterministic effects. This article documents both the historical (pre-1999) and current ("Doses 1999") methods used by the FIB-1 scientists to determine the doses. Both methods are based on a three-chamber lung model developed by the FIB-1 scientists. This method was developed in partial isolation from the West and has unique characteristics from the more familiar ICRP biokinetic models. Some of these characteristics are the use of empirically based transportability classifications and the parameter modification for chelation-therapy-enhanced excretion data. An example dose calculation is provided and compared to the dose that would be obtained if the ICRP models were used. The comparison demonstrates that the models are not interchangeable and produce different results.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure , Plutonium/pharmacokinetics , Power Plants , Humans , Models, Biological , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Tissue Distribution , Urine/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...