Evaluation of the quality of 'do not use' medication abbreviation audits: a key enabler to successful implementation of audit and feedback.

Background Hospital pharmacy audit and feedback of 'do not use' medication abbreviations improves patient safety. For audit and feedback systems to be effective, the data captured must be of high quality such that end-users trust the information to guide practice change. The quality of data captured during monthly standardized pharmacy 'do not use' abbreviation audits is currently unknown. Objective We aimed to assess pharmacy 'do not use' abbreviation audit data quality. Method Primary audit data quality was assessed by examining a random sample of handwritten medication prescriptions for the presence and type of 'do not use' abbreviations. This data was compared with the pharmacy monthly audit data to determine data capture agreement and consistency over time. Results There were 1132 prescriptions from July, October, and December 2019 included. Data capture agreement between the pharmacy audit and the secondary assessment using Cohen's Kappa ranged from 0.53 to 0.63. The primary audit under-reported 'do not use' abbreviation rates, however this did not vary over time (χ2 = 1.215, p = 0.545). Conclusion Pharmacy staff audits under-reported 'do not use' abbreviation rates, however this was consistent over time. The quality of pharmacy audits should be assessed and disseminated to end-users prior to implementing feedback.

Barriers to and Enablers of Implementation of High-Value Interventions by Renal Pharmacists: A Qualitative Study Informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that patients with chronic kidney disease who are followed by a renal clinical pharmacist have improved clinical outcomes. In 2016, a consensus list of quality indicator drug therapy problems (QI-DTPs) was developed by renal clinical pharmacists to help prioritize which renal patients should receive interventions. Before QI-DTP interventions can be implemented in clinical practice, barriers to and enablers of their use need to be identified, to allow development of strategies to overcome the barriers and apply the enablers. OBJECTIVE: To identify modifiable barriers to and enablers of implementation of renal QI-DTP interventions by renal clinical pharmacists. METHODS: In this exploratory qualitative descriptive study, one-on-one, semistructured, audio-recorded telephone interviews were conducted with renal clinical pharmacists to identify the barriers to and enablers of implementation of renal QI-DTP interventions. The interviews consisted of questions developed according to the Theoretical Domains Framework. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 13 renal pharmacists from across Canada. The main barriers to implementation of renal QI-DTP interventions that participants identified were knowledge gaps, prioritization, and nephrologist acceptance. The main enablers identified were training, colleague support, and better patient care. CONCLUSION: Three barriers to and three enablers of implementation of renal QI-DTP interventions were identified. These barriers and enablers can be used to help with pharmacist education and to optimize the care that pharmacists provide to renal patients.

CONTEXTE: Des études précédentes démontrent une amélioration des résultats cliniques de patients souffrant d'une maladie rénale chronique, qui sont suivis par un pharmacien clinicien en néphrologie. En 2016, des pharmaciens cliniciens en néphrologie ont mis au point une liste consensuelle des indicateurs de qualité des problèmes de pharmacothérapie (QI-DTP) pour les aider à prioriser les patients souffrant d'une insuffisance rénale, qui doivent subir une intervention. Avant de mettre en place ces QI-DTP en pratique clinique, on doit déterminer les éléments qui entravent et facilitent leur utilisation pour pouvoir élaborer des stratégies visant à surmonter les obstacles et à appliquer les éléments facilitateurs. OBJECTIF: Déterminer les éléments modifiables qui entravent et facilitent la mise en place des QI-DTP par les pharmaciens cliniciens en néphrologie lors d'interventions rénales. MÉTHODES: Dans cette étude exploratoire, descriptive et qualitative, des entretiens téléphoniques individuels, semi-structurés et enregistrés ont été menés auprès de pharmaciens cliniciens en néphrologie pour déterminer les éléments qui entravent et facilitent la mise en place de QI-DTP lors d'interventions rénales. Les entretiens consistaient en des questions préparées selon le Theoretical Domains Framework. RÉSULTATS: Les entretiens ont été menés auprès de 13 pharmaciens en néphrologie de partout au Canada. Les principaux éléments entravant la mise en place de QI-DTP lors d'interventions rénales déterminées par les participants étaient: le manque de connaissances, la priorisation et l'acception des néphrologues. Les principaux éléments facilitant la tâche étaient: la formation, le soutien des collègues et de meilleurs soins offerts aux patients. CONCLUSION: Trois éléments entravant et trois éléments facilitant la mise en place de QI-DTP lors d'interventions rénales ont été déterminés. Ils peuvent être utilisés pour contribuer à la formation du pharmacien et pour optimiser les soins offerts aux patients qui souffrent d'insuffisance rénale.

Contribution of Pharmacy Practice Residents to Resolution of Drug Therapy Problems for Patients: RES-DTP Study.

BACKGROUND: Canadian pharmacy practice residency programs promote development of key competencies for direct patient care resulting in resolution of drug therapy problems (DTPs), which is 1 of 8 national clinical pharmacy key performance indicators. There are no Canadian data on the contribution of residents to resolution of DTPs, including DTPs for priority diseases covered in disease-state education modules (PD-DTPs) or quality indicator DTPs (QI-DPTs), as assessed through application of evidence-based interventions proven to reduce morbidity, mortality, or health resource utilization. OBJECTIVE: To describe the contribution of pharmacy practice residents to direct patient care using 3 process-of-care measures: resident-resolved DTPs, PD-DTPs, and QI-DTPs. METHODS: This prospective, observational single-group study was conducted across 5 rotation sites within the authors' health authority from September 2, 2013, to June 13, 2014. The primary outcome was number of DTPs resolved. The secondary outcomes were number of PD-DTPs resolved; number of QI-DTPs resolved; numbers of DTPs, PD-DTPs, and QI-DTPs resolved over time; and residents' satisfaction with electronic tracking of resolved DTPs (in terms of training, usability, efficiency, and time requirements). RESULTS: Four residents completed a total of twenty-one 4-week rotations and resolved a total of 1201 DTPs. Of these, 620 (52%) were PD-DTPs and 479 (40%) were QI-DTPs. Overall, the number of interventions increased for rotations 1-3, decreased for rotations 4 and 5, and increased again for rotation 6. The median score for all questions in all domains of the satisfaction survey was 4 out of 5 ("agree"). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacy practice residents were resolving DTPs, PD-DTPs, and QI-DTPs for patients and were contributing significantly to direct patient care. On the basis of literature evidence, the number and type of interventions observed in this study would be expected to improve clinical and health economic outcomes for patients.

CONTEXTE: Les programmes de résidence canadiens en pratique pharmaceutique encouragent le développement de compétences clés relatives aux soins directs offerts aux patients. Ces compétences entraîneront la résolution des problèmes de pharmacothérapie (DTP), l'un des huit indicateurs clés nationaux de rendement relatifs à la pharmacie clinique. Il n'existe pas de données canadiennes portant sur la contribution des résidents à la résolution des problèmes de pharmacothérapie, notamment ceux relatifs aux maladies prioritaires (PD-DTP) couverts dans les modules d'éducation sur les problèmes de santé, ou les indicateurs de qualité des DTP (QI-DPT), évalués au moyen d'interventions fondées sur des données scientifiques dont il a été prouvé qu'elles réduisaient la morbidité, la mortalité ou l'utilisation des ressources sanitaires. Dans une étude, les intervenants avaient des opinions divergentes concernant la contribution des résidents à la résolution des DTP, des PD-DTP et des QI-DTP. OBJECTIF: Décrire la contribution des résidents dans le cadre de la pratique pharmaceutique des soins directs offerts aux patients à l'aide de trois mesures spécifiques du processus des soins : DTP, PD-DTP et QI-DTP résolus par les résidents. MÉTHODES: Cette étude prospective par observation portant sur un seul groupe a été menée dans cinq sites de rotation compris dans la sphère d'autorité sanitaire des auteurs, du 2 septembre 2013 au 13 juin 2014. Le résultat principal était le nombre de DTP résolus. Les résultats secondaires étaient les suivants : nombre de PD-DTP résolus; nombre de QI-DTP résolus; nombre de DTP, de PD-DTP et de QI-DTP résolus avec le temps; et la satisfaction des résidents à l'égard du suivi électronique de leurs DTP résolus (en termes de formation, de facilité d'utilisation, d'efficacité et d'exigences en matière de temps). RÉSULTATS: Quatre résidents ont effectué un total de 21 rotations de quatre semaines et ont résolu 1201 DTP. De ceux-ci, 620 (52 %) étaient des PD-DTP et 479 (40 %), des QI-DTP. Les interventions générales ont augmenté de la 1re à la 3e rotation; elles ont diminué à la 4e et à la 5e rotation; elles ont à nouveau augmenté à la 6e rotation. Le score moyen de toutes les questions posées dans l'enquête de satisfaction, tous domaines confondus, était de 4 sur 5 (ou « d'accord ¼). CONCLUSIONS: Les résidents en pratique pharmaceutique résolvaient les DTP, les PD-DTP et les QI-DTP des patients et contribuaient de manière significative aux soins directs aux patients. Sur base de la documentation, on pourrait s'attendre à ce que le nombre et le type d'interventions observées dans cette étude améliorent les résultats cliniques et sanitaires des patients.

A Nondestructive Indirect Approach to Long-Term Wood Moisture Monitoring Based on Electrical Methods.

Wood has a long tradition of use as a building material due its properties and availability. However, it is very sensitive to moisture. Wood components of building structures basically require a certain level of moisture protection, and thus moisture monitoring to ensure the serviceability of such components during their whole lifespan while integrated within buildings is relevant to this area. The aim of this study is to investigate two moisture monitoring techniques promoting moisture safety in wood-based buildings (i.e., new structures, as well as renovated and protected buildings). The study is focused on the comparison of two electrical methods that can be employed for the nondestructive moisture monitoring of wood components integrated in the structures of buildings. The main principle of the two presented methods of the moisture measurement by electric resistance is based on a simple resistor-capacitor (RC) circuit system improved with ICM7555 chip and integrator circuit using TLC71 amplifier. The RC-circuit is easier to implement thanks to the digital signals of the used chip, whilst the newly presented integration method allows faster measurement at lower moisture contents. A comparative experimental campaign utilizing spruce wood samples is conducted in this relation. Based on the results obtained, both methods can be successfully applied to wood components in buildings for moisture contents above 8%.

Development of intervention-related quality indicators for renal clinical pharmacists using a modified Delphi approach.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a list of renal Quality Indicator Drug therapy problems (QI-DTPs) that serve to advance renal pharmacy practice to improve patient care. METHODS: Eighteen (18) renal, clinical pharmacists participated in an internet-based three-round modified Delphi survey. Each of the three rounds took approximately 2 weeks to complete. Panellists rated 30-candidate renal QI-DTPs using seven selection criteria and one overall consensus criterion on a nine-point Likert scale. Consensus was reached if 75% or more of panellists assigned a score of 7-9 on the consensus criterion during the third Delphi round. KEY FINDINGS: All panellists completed three rounds of Delphi survey. Seventeen-candidate renal QI-DTPs met the consensus definition. CONCLUSIONS: A Delphi panel of renal clinical pharmacists successfully identified 17 consensus renal QI-DTPs. Assessment and implementation of these QI-DTPs will serve to advance renal pharmacy practice and improve patient care.

Improving the Clinical Pharmacist Handover Process in the Intensive Care Unit with a Pharmacotherapy-Specific Tool: The I-HAPPY Study.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists in the intensive care unit (ICU) provide pharmaceutical care to critically ill patients. Identification and resolution of drug therapy problems improves outcomes for these patients. To maintain continuity of care, pharmacotherapy plans should be transferred to a receiving pharmacist upon discharge of patients from the ICU. No previous studies have addressed the development or evaluation of a systematic, standardized clinical handover tool and process for pharmacists. OBJECTIVES: To assess pharmacists' satisfaction with and utilization of a pharmacotherapy-specific handover tool and process. METHODS: Plan-do-study-act methodology was employed to develop a clinical handover tool and process, which were implemented in a Canadian health authority. For evaluation of the tool and process, a multicentre, online survey questionnaire was distributed to 14 clinical pharmacists in the ICU and ward settings at 5 hospitals between February 15 and April 22, 2016. RESULTS: Thirteen of the pharmacists completed the survey. All 13 pharmacists (100%) were satisfied with usability; 12 (92%) were satisfied with training, organization, and accuracy of the process; and 11 (85%) were satisfied with completeness and efficiency. Most pharmacists conducted 1 or 2 handovers per week, with each having a duration of 3-5 min. Seven (54%) of the respondents reported that they communicated handovers mostly or exclusively by telephone, and 6 (46%) reported using mostly or exclusively face-to-face communication. However, 6 (46%) reported a preference for face-to-face communication, and 3 (23%) reported a preference for the telephone; the remaining 4 (31%) had no preference for mode of communication. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents were highly satisfied with the handover tool and process. ICU pharmacists appeared more satisfied with the training, organization, and completeness of handover, whereas ward pharmacists appeared more satisfied with the accuracy and efficiency of handover. Workload requirements were minimal, and face-to-face interaction, although slightly less well utilized than the telephone, was the preferred method of communication.

CONTEXTE: Les pharmaciens exerçant dans les unités de soins intensifs (USI) prodiguent des soins pharmaceutiques aux patients gravement malades. Or, déceler et résoudre les problèmes pharmacothérapeutiques améliore les résultats cliniques pour ces patients. Afin de maintenir la continuité des soins, les plans pharmacothérapeutiques doivent être communiqués au moment du congé des patients de l'USI à un autre pharmacien qui prendra ensuite le relais. Aucune étude n'avait auparavant étudié la mise au point ou l'évaluation d'un outil et d'un processus normalisés de transfert des soins à être utilisés systématiquement par les pharmaciens. OBJECTIFS: Évaluer le taux de satisfaction des pharmaciens à l'égard d'un outil et d'un processus destinés au transfert des soins pharmacothérapeutiques et en analyser leur utilisation. MÉTHODES: La méthodologie planifier-exécuter-étudier-agir a été employée pour mettre au point un outil et un processus de transfert clinique introduits dans une régie de santé canadienne. Afin d'évaluer l'outil et le processus, un sondage en ligne a été présenté à 14 pharmaciens cliniciens travaillant soit dans les USI soit dans d'autres services intrahospitaliers de 5 hôpitaux, entre le 15 février et le 22 avril 2016. RÉSULTATS: Treize pharmaciens ont rempli le sondage. Les 13 (100 %) étaient satisfaits de la facilité d'emploi; 12 (92 %) étaient satisfaits de la formation, de l'organisation et de l'exactitude du processus; et 11 (85 %) étaient satisfaits du degré d'exhaustivité et de l'efficacité. La plupart des pharmaciens réalisaient 1 ou 2 transferts par semaine, chacun d'une durée de 3 à 5 minutes. Sept (54 %) répondants ont indiqué qu'ils communiquaient les transferts surtout ou seulement par téléphone et 6 (46 %) ont dit le faire surtout ou uniquement en personne. Or, 6 (46 %) ont indiqué une préférence pour la communication en personne et 3 (23 %) ont dit préférer la voie téléphonique. Les 4 (31 %) autres étaient indifférents au mode de communication utilisé. CONCLUSIONS: Les répondants étaient grandement satisfaits de l'outil et du processus de transfert. Les pharmaciens exerçant dans les USI semblaient plus satisfaits de la formation, de l'organisation et du degré d'exhaustivité du transfert alors que les pharmaciens travaillant dans d'autres services intra-hospitaliers semblaient plus satisfaits de l'exactitude et de l'efficacité du transfert. La charge de travail était minimalement accrue et la communication en personne, bien qu'utilisée moins fréquemment que celle par téléphone, était le mode préféré.

Positive and Negative Impacts of a Continuing Professional Development Intervention on Pharmacist Practice: A Balanced Measure Evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: Evaluations of behavior change interventions aimed at improving professional practice are increasingly focused on impacts at the practice and patient outcome levels. Many of these evaluations assume that if the intended changes occur, the result represents an improvement. However, given the systemic nature of clinical practice, a change in one area can produce changes in other areas as well, some of which may adversely affect the patient. Balancing measures are used to determine whether unintended consequences of an intervention have been introduced into other areas of the system. The aims of this study were to evaluate the impact of behavior change intervention-based continuing professional development (CPD) on pharmacist interventions (resolution of drug therapy problems-DTPs) and resolution of quality indicator DTPs and knowledge change for urinary tract infections (UTI) and pneumonia. As a balancing measure, we aimed to determine whether delivery of behavior change interventions targeting pneumonia and UTI practice results in a negative impact on other important pharmacist interventions, specifically the resolution of heart failure DTPs. METHODS: A quasiexperimental study was conducted at a Canadian health authority that evaluated the impacts of an 8-week multifaceted behavior change intervention delivered to 58 ward-based pharmacists. The primary outcome was change in proportion of UTI and pneumonia DTPs resolved from the 6-month preintervention to 6-month postintervention phase. Secondary outcomes were changes in proportion of UTI and pneumonia quality indicator DTPs resolved, knowledge quiz scores, and proportion of quality indicator DTPs resolved for heart failure as a balancing measure. RESULTS: A total of 58 pharmacists were targets of the intervention. The proportion of resolved UTI and pneumonia DTPs increased from 17.8 to 27.2% (relative risk increase 52.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 42.8-63.6%; P < 0.05). The proportion of resolved UTI and pneumonia quality indicator DTPs increased from 12.2% to 18.2% (relative risk increase 49.9%, 95% CI 34.5-67.0%; P < 0.05). Resolved heart failure DTPs decreased from 14.3 to 8.5% (RRR 40.4%, 95% CI 33.9-46.2%; P < 0.05). Thirty-six pharmacists completed the pre- and post-quiz. Scores increased from 11.3/20 ± 3.2/20 to 14.8/20 ± 2.9/20 (P < 0.05). DISCUSSION: CPD using a multifaceted behavior change intervention improved pharmacist behavior and knowledge for UTI and pneumonia. However, these improvements may be offset by reduced interventions for other disease states, such as heart failure. Strategies to mitigate the unintended effects on other professional behaviors should be implemented when delivering CPD focused on changing one aspect of professional behavior.

A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Hypertonic Sodium Solutions and Mannitol for Traumatic Brain Injury: Implications for Emergency Department Management.

OBJECTIVE: To comparatively evaluate hypertonic sodium (HTS) and mannitol in patients following acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) on the outcomes of all-cause mortality, neurological disability, intracranial pressure (ICP) change from baseline, ICP treatment failure, and serious adverse events. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP (World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) were searched (inception to November 2015) using hypertonic saline solutions, sodium chloride, mannitol, osmotic diuretic, traumatic brain injury, brain injuries, and head injury. Searches were limited to humans. Clinical practice guidelines and bibliographies were reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Prospective, randomized trials comparing HTS and mannitol in adults (≥16 years) with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤8) and elevated ICP were included. ICP elevation, ICP reduction, and treatment failure were defined using study definitions. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 326 articles screened, 7 trials enrolling a total of 191 patients met inclusion criteria. Studies were underpowered to detect a significant difference in mortality or neurological outcomes. Due to significant heterogeneity and differences in reporting ICP change from baseline, this outcome was not meta-analyzed. No difference between HTS and mannitol was observed for mean ICP reduction; however, risk of ICP treatment failure favored HTS (risk ratio [RR] = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.18-0.81). Serious adverse events were not reported. CONCLUSIONS: Based on limited data, clinically important differences in mortality, neurological outcomes, and ICP reduction were not observed between HTS or mannitol in the management of severe TBI. HTS appears to lead to fewer ICP treatment failures.

Development of clinical pharmacy key performance indicators for hospital pharmacists using a modified Delphi approach.

BACKGROUND: Key performance indicators (KPIs) are quantifiable measures of quality. There are no published, systematically derived clinical pharmacy KPIs (cpKPIs). OBJECTIVE: A group of hospital pharmacists aimed to develop national cpKPIs to advance clinical pharmacy practice and improve patient care. METHODS: A cpKPI working group established a cpKPI definition, 8 evidence-derived cpKPI critical activity areas, 26 candidate cpKPIs, and 11 cpKPI ideal attributes in addition to 1 overall consensus criterion. Twenty-six clinical pharmacists and hospital pharmacy leaders participated in an internet-based 3-round modified Delphi survey. Panelists rated 26 candidate cpKPIs using 11 cpKPI ideal attributes and 1 overall consensus criterion on a 9-point Likert scale. A meeting was facilitated between rounds 2 and 3 to debate the merits and wording of candidate cpKPIs. Consensus was reached if 75% or more of panelists assigned a score of 7 to 9 on the consensus criterion during the third Delphi round. RESULTS: All panelists completed the 3 Delphi rounds, and 25/26 (96%) attended the meeting. Eight candidate cpKPIs met the consensus definition: (1) performing admission medication reconciliation (including best-possible medication history), (2) participating in interprofessional patient care rounds, (3) completing pharmaceutical care plans, (4) resolving drug therapy problems, (5) providing in-person disease and medication education to patients, (6) providing discharge patient medication education, (7) performing discharge medication reconciliation, and (8) providing bundled, proactive direct patient care activities. CONCLUSIONS: A Delphi panel of hospital pharmacists was successful in determining 8 consensus cpKPIs. Measurement and assessment of these cpKPIs will serve to advance clinical pharmacy practice and improve patient care.

Presence and accuracy of drug dosage recommendations for continuous renal replacement therapy in tertiary drug information references.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians commonly rely on tertiary drug information references to guide drug dosages for patients who are receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). It is unknown whether the dosage recommendations in these frequently used references reflect the most current evidence. OBJECTIVE: To determine the presence and accuracy of drug dosage recommendations for patients undergoing CRRT in 4 drug information references. METHODS: Medications commonly prescribed during CRRT were identified from an institutional medication inventory database, and evidence-based dosage recommendations for this setting were developed from the primary and secondary literature. The American Hospital Formulary System-Drug Information (AHFS-DI), Micromedex 2.0 (specifically the DRUGDEX and Martindale databases), and the 5th edition of Drug Prescribing in Renal Failure (DPRF5) were assessed for the presence of drug dosage recommendations in the CRRT setting. The dosage recommendations in these tertiary references were compared with the recommendations derived from the primary and secondary literature to determine concordance. RESULTS: Evidence-based drug dosage recommendations were developed for 33 medications administered in patients undergoing CRRT. The AHFS-DI provided no dosage recommendations specific to CRRT, whereas the DPRF5 provided recommendations for 27 (82%) of the medications and the Micromedex 2.0 application for 20 (61%) (13 [39%] in the DRUGDEX database and 16 [48%] in the Martindale database, with 9 medications covered by both). The dosage recommendations were in concordance with evidence-based recommendations for 12 (92%) of the 13 medications in the DRUGDEX database, 26 (96%) of the 27 in the DPRF5, and all 16 (100%) of those in the Martindale database. CONCLUSIONS: One prominent tertiary drug information resource provided no drug dosage recommendations for patients undergoing CRRT. However, 2 of the databases in an Internet-based medical information application and the latest edition of a renal specialty drug information resource provided recommendations for a majority of the medications investigated. Most dosage recommendations were similar to those derived from the primary and secondary literature. The most recent edition of the DPRF is the preferred source of information when prescribing dosage regimens for patients receiving CRRT.

Evaluation of the research grant program of the Foundation of the Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists, 1995-2008.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacist-led research has grown substantially over the past 10 to 15 years. The Research Grant Program of the Research and Education Foundation of the Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists (CSHP Foundation), initiated in 1992, is the only funding opportunity available specifically to members of the Society. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the status of research projects funded by the Research Grant Program of the CSHP Foundation, to examine the outcomes of these projects, and to determine the opinions of grant recipients regarding this competition. METHODS: An e-mail survey was sent to each of the 34 hospital pharmacist researchers who received funding from the Research Grant Program of the CSHP Foundation during the period 1995 to 2008. Survey questions sought to evaluate scholarly outcomes (i.e., publications and presentations) from funded projects. The opinions of grant recipients about the value of the program were also solicited. RESULTS: One of the potential respondents had returned the grant money and was ineligible for the survey. Of the 33 potential respondents, 30 (91%) responded to the survey. Overall, 24 of the projects had been completed at the time of the survey, and 19 of these had been published, resulting in a total of 26 manuscripts. Abstracts had been presented for 21 of the projects. In total, 49 abstracts had been presented at national (22), international (13), provincial (7) and local (7) conferences. The median award was $5000 (interquartile range $5000 to $7500). Eleven of the projects had received additional funding, primarily from the recipient's hospital or health authority or from university sources. The survey respondents indicated that the grant from the CSHP Foundation had been critical to completion of their projects and had been of assistance in securing additional funding, when such funding was necessary. Respondents felt that dedicated research funding for hospital pharmacists in Canada should continue. CONCLUSIONS: The Research Grant Program of the CSHP Foundation has been important to hospital pharmacists, enabling a variety of research projects to be initiated and completed. The high rate of project completion and the large number of publications and presentations resulting from this work speak to both the quality of the work and the dedication of the research teams. The CSHP Foundation should continue to fund this competition and should explore a more robust model, with larger awards and more funded projects each year.

A critical appraisal of the quality of critical care pharmacotherapy clinical practice guidelines and their strength of recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical practice guideline (CPG) quality assessment is important before applying their recommendations. Determining whether recommendation strength is consistent with supporting quality of evidence is also essential. We aimed to determine quality of critical care pharmacotherapy CPGs and to assess whether high quality evidence supports strong pharmacotherapy recommendations. METHODS: MEDLINE (1966-February 2008), EMBASE (1980-February 2008), National Guideline Clearinghouse (February 2008) and personal files were searched to identify CPGs. Four appraisers evaluated each guideline using the appraisal of guidelines, research and evaluation (AGREE) instrument. AGREE assesses 23 items in six domains that include scope/purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity, applicability and editorial independence. Standardized domain scores (0-100%) were determined to decide whether to recommend a guideline for use. One appraiser extracted strong pharmacotherapy recommendations and supporting evidence quality. RESULTS: Twenty-four CPGs were included. Standardized domain scores were clarity [69% (95% confidence interval (CI) 62-76%)], scope/purpose [62% (95% CI 55-68%)], rigor of development [51% (95% CI 42-60%)], editorial independence [39% (95% CI 26-52%)], stakeholder involvement [32% (95% CI 26-37%)] and applicability [19% (95% CI 12-26%)]. The proportion of guidelines that could be strongly recommended, recommended with alterations and not recommended was 25, 37.5 and 37.5%, respectively. High quality evidence supported 36% of strong pharmacotherapy recommendations. CONCLUSION: Variation in AGREE domain scores explain why one-third of critical care pharmacotherapy CPGs cannot be recommended. Only one-third of strong pharmacotherapy recommendations were supported by high quality evidence. We recommend appraisal of guideline quality and the caliber of supporting evidence prior to applying recommendations.

Prophylactic intravenous magnesium sulphate in addition to oral {beta}-blockade does not prevent atrial arrhythmias after coronary artery or valvular heart surgery: a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Atrial arrhythmias (AA) are an important cause of morbidity after cardiac surgery. Efforts at prevention of postoperative AA have been suboptimal. Perioperative beta-blocker administration is the standard of care at many centers. Although prophylactic administration of magnesium sulfate (MgSO(4)) has been recommended, review of all previously published trials of MgSO(4) reveals conflicting results. This study was designed to address methodological shortcomings from previous studies and is the largest randomized, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous (IV) MgSO(4) for the prevention of AA after coronary artery bypass grafting or cardiac valvular surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 927 nonemergent cardiac surgery patients were stratified into 2 groups: isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (n=694), or valve surgery with or without coronary artery bypass grafting (n=233), and randomized to receive either 5g IV MgSO(4) or placebo on removal of the cross-clamp, followed by daily 4-hour infusions, from postoperative day 1 until postoperative day 4. All patients were treated according to an established oral beta-blocker protocol. Postoperative serum Mg levels were checked and standard of care was to administer IV MgSO(4) for low serum levels. The primary end point was AA lasting > or =30 minutes or requiring treatment for hemodynamic compromise. There were no differences in the incidence of AA between patients who received IV MgSO(4) or placebo (26.4% versus 24.3%, respectively). The results were similar when broken down according to stratified groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated with a protocol for postoperative oral beta-blocker after nonemergent cardiac surgery, the addition of prophylactic IV MgSO(4) did not reduce the incidence of AA.

Identifying missed opportunities to curtail antimicrobial therapy for presumed ventilator-associated pneumonia using the clinical pulmonary infection score.

BACKGROUND: Early discontinuation of antimicrobial therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia can reduce the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, the occurrence of adverse drug events, and the cost of therapy. Evidence suggests that discontinuation of therapy by day 3 may be appropriate for patients with a clinical pulmonary infection score of 6 or less at baseline and on day 3. OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of patients eligible for antimicrobial discontinuation on day 3 and day 7 of therapy and to determine the proportion of eligible patients for whom antimicrobials were discontinued within these timeframes. METHODS: A 6-month observational study was conducted from October 3, 2005, to March 31, 2006, in a 27-bed medical-surgical tertiary care intensive care unit. Clinical pharmacists attended daily rounds and prospectively identified patients for inclusion in the study. A study pharmacist retrospectively calculated clinical pulmonary infection scores. Other data were obtained from the quality-improvement database and patient health records for the intensive care unit. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were treated for ventilator-associated pneumonia during the study period, of whom 49 were included in the analysis. At day 3, 17 (35%) of the 49 patients were eligible for early discontinuation of antimicrobial therapy, but therapy was discontinued for only 2 (12%) of these 17 patients. At day 7, 10 (32%) of 31 patients were eligible for antimicrobial discontinuation, but therapy was discontinued for only 1 (10%) of these 10 patients. CONCLUSIONS: A significant opportunity exists at the authors' institution to develop and implement an antimicrobial discontinuation policy that uses the clinical pulmonary infection score to guide antimicrobial use for patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Update on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care guidelines.

PURPOSE: The key changes included in the 2005 cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiac care (ECC) guidelines are reviewed. Advances since publication of the current guidelines are also discussed. SUMMARY: The 2005 CPR and ECC guidelines include several key changes from the previous version published in 2000. The new guidelines place an increased emphasis on chest compressions and recommend a compression:ventilation (C:V) ratio of 30:2. Current knowledge on defibrillation has also been incorporated by recommending that Emergency Medical Service (EMS) rescuers give two minutes of CPR before defibrillation when the response interval is greater than four to five minutes and EMS responders did not witness the arrest. Another major change is the recommendation for a single shock to be administered followed immediately by CPR with no check of the cardiac rhythm until two minutes of CPR has been performed postdefibrillation. The 2005 guidelines recommend that an automated external defibrillator should be implemented in public locations where there is a relatively high likelihood of witnessed cardiac arrest. In addition, the most recent guidelines highlight the shift from primary-rhythm-based therapies and resuscitation to a focus on neurologic outcomes. CONCLUSION: Several evidence-based changes were included in the 2005 CPR and ECC guidelines, including a C:V ratio of 30:2 and mitigation of hands-off time, early defibrillation, administration of a single shock versus a three-shock sequence, use of public-access defibrillators, and a shift from primary-rhythm-based therapies to a focus on neurologic outcomes.

Dalteparin versus enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acute spinal cord injury and major orthopedic trauma patients: 'DETECT' trial.

BACKGROUND: To compare the impact of switching from enoxaparin 30 mg subcutaneously (SC) twice daily to dalteparin 5,000 units SC once daily for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in critically-ill major orthopedic trauma and/or acute spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. METHODS: DETECT was a retrospective, cohort study at a tertiary care referral teaching center-phase 1 from December 1, 2002 to November 30, 2003 (enoxaparin); and phase 2 from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004 (dalteparin). Major orthopedic trauma patients with pelvic, femoral shaft, or complex lower extremity fractures, and/or acute SCI patients admitted to the intensive care unit and who received a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for VTE prophylaxis were included. RESULTS: DETECT reviewed 135 patients (63 enoxaparin, 72 dalteparin), with similar baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, injuries, severity of illness, and risk factors for VTE. Clinically symptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) rates were 1.6% with enoxaparin and 9.7% with dalteparin (p=0.103, absolute risk increase [ARI] of 8.1% [-0.6% to 15.6%]), with no differences in major bleeding (6.4% versus 6.9%) or minor bleeding (64% versus 69%), or mortality (4.8% versus 6.9%). Switching from enoxaparin to dalteparin was associated with $12,485 (CAD) in LMWH acquisition cost savings. CONCLUSIONS: DETECT raises the hypothesis that dalteparin 5,000 units SC daily may not be clinically noninferior to enoxaparin 30 mg SC twice daily for VTE prophylaxis in this high-risk population. Until an adequately-powered, prospective noninferiority trial is performed, enoxaparin is supported by level 1 evidence and should be the prophylactic agent of choice.

Corticosteroid treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the evidence for adjunctive corticosteroids for severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (1966-February 2007) and EMBASE (1980-February 2007) were searched to identify English- and French-language publications that evaluated the use of corticosteroids for CAP in adults. Major search terms included community-acquired pneumonia, intensive care unit, steroids, glucocorticoids, and adrenal cortex hormones. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Clinical studies that evaluated the use of corticosteroids for CAP in adults were included. Clinical and surrogate markers of pneumonia were evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Severe CAP is associated with an increase in pulmonary and circulatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha that may be associated with higher mortality. Corticosteroids suppress inflammatory reactions and prevent migration of inflammatory cells from the circulation to tissues by suppressing the synthesis of chemokines and cytokines. One observational comparative study and 2 randomized, controlled studies examined the effects of corticosteroid therapy at various doses on endpoints of pulmonary and systemic inflammation and clinical outcomes. One small observational pilot study revealed that methylprednisolone blunted some of the pulmonary and systemic markers of inflammation. One small, randomized, placebo-controlled study revealed that hydrocortisone had no significant effects on markers of pulmonary and systemic inflammation or clinical outcomes. Another small, randomized, placebo-controlled preliminary study with methodological limitations revealed improvements in oxygenation, organ dysfunction score, and markers of inflammation favoring hydrocortisone over placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Given the lack of proven benefit on clinically meaningful endpoints and adverse events, corticosteroids cannot be recommended for adjunctive treatment of severe CAP.