Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Spec Oper Med ; 21(3): 11-20, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34529799

ABSTRACT

Deployed medical providers at all roles of care must be prepared to recognize and manage acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Under optimal conditions, treatment is initiated with medical therapy and may be followed by prompt coronary angiography and revascularization. Emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not available in most deployed locations, however, and the time for such intervention is often dependent on long-range evacuation. This CPG provides guidance on best management for ACS patients in the deployed and resource-constrained environment.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Coronary Angiography , Humans , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Spec Oper Med ; 21(2): 80-84, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34105127

ABSTRACT

Although skin and soft tissue infections are common in the deployed setting, infectious myositis is relatively uncommon. Bacterial infection of the muscle is the most common infectious etiology and can result in a spectrum of disease, to include abscess formation to necrotizing myositis, toxic shock syndrome, and death. Diagnosis can be elusive, particularly in the early stages. Recognition and proper management are crucial to prevent complications. The authors present a case report of infectious myositis diagnosed and managed in an austere deployed environment, as well as a discussion regarding current recommendations on diagnosis and treatment.


Subject(s)
Fasciitis, Necrotizing , Myositis , Shock, Septic , Soft Tissue Infections , Streptococcal Infections , Humans , Myositis/diagnosis , Myositis/therapy
3.
Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex) ; (PB 8-21-01/02/03): 28-33, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33666909

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) has spread across the globe with a concerningly high infectivity resulting in the World Health Organization deeming it a pandemic. It has resulted in thousands of deaths and placed enormous strain on communities, healthcare systems and healthcare workers as they battle shortages of ventilators, supplies, and difficulties in protecting patients and hospital staff alike. Challenges in managing the disease have led to new treatment and management strategies as healthcare teams struggle to adapt. We present the first case of COVID-19 managed in the austere deployed environment of Operation Inherent Resolve in which the patient was treated with dexamethasone, remdesivir, COVID-19 convalescent plasma, positive pressure ventilation, and proning. We discuss some of the inherent and unique challenges of caring for a patient in this resource constrained environment with a brief review of the literature on the treatment and management.


Subject(s)
Adenosine Monophosphate/analogs & derivatives , Alanine/analogs & derivatives , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19/therapy , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Military Personnel , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Adenosine Monophosphate/therapeutic use , Alanine/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Immunization, Passive , Male , Respiratory Insufficiency/diagnosis , Respiratory Insufficiency/virology , Young Adult , COVID-19 Serotherapy
4.
Cancer Cytopathol ; 121(8): 449-58, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23677908

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of pancreatic tumors is often complicated because of sampling and interpretive challenges. The current study was performed to determine the rates, types, and causes of diagnostic discrepancies. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed cytology cases from 2004 to 2010 using matched surgical resection cases as the gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 733 cases were divided into 3 categories: 1) positive or suspicious (290 cases); 2) negative or atypical (403 cases); and 3) unsatisfactory (40 cases). Of these cases, 101 fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cases had matched surgical resections including 58 positive diagnoses, 39 negative diagnoses, and 4 unsatisfactory diagnoses. All 19 discrepant cases represented false-negative diagnoses without any false-positive cases noted, which included 2 cases with interpretive errors (10%) and 17 cases with sampling errors (90%). All matched cytology cases were divided into 5 subgroups based on the type of lesion or type of error and were analyzed for sensitivity and specificity. The sampling error rate in cystic lesions (8 of 24; 33%) was significantly higher than that in solid lesions (9 of 73; 12%). The false-negative rate in the interpretive error group (3%) was significantly lower than that in the sampling error group (23%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study confirm that pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA diagnosis has a very low false-positive rate but a relatively high false-negative rate using matched surgical resections as the gold standard. The major cause of a false-negative cytology diagnosis is sampling error and the rate of sampling error in cystic lesions is significantly higher than that in solid lesions.


Subject(s)
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , False Negative Reactions , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...