Randomized Phase 3 Trial of the Hypoxia Modifier Nimorazole Added to Radiation Therapy With Benefit Assessed in Hypoxic Head and Neck Cancers Determined Using a Gene Signature (NIMRAD).

PURPOSE: Tumor hypoxia is an adverse prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We assessed whether patients with hypoxic HNSCC benefited from the addition of nimorazole to definitive intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: NIMRAD was a phase 3, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-anonymized trial of patients with HNSCC unsuitable for concurrent platinum chemotherapy or cetuximab with definitive IMRT (NCT01950689). Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive IMRT (65 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks) plus nimorazole (1.2 g/m2 daily, before IMRT) or placebo. The primary endpoint was freedom from locoregional progression (FFLRP) in patients with hypoxic tumors, defined as greater than or equal to the median tumor hypoxia score of the first 50 patients analyzed (≥0.079), using a validated 26-gene signature. The planned sample size was 340 patients, allowing for signature generation in 85% and an assumed hazard ratio (HR) of 0.50 for nimorazole effectiveness in the hypoxic group and requiring 66 locoregional failures to have 80% power in a 2-tail log-rank test at the 5% significance level. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-eight patients were randomized by 19 centers in the United Kingdom from May 2014 to May 2019, with a median follow-up of 3.1 years (95% CI, 2.9-3.4). Hypoxia scores were available for 286 (85%). The median patient age was 73 years (range, 44-88; IQR, 70-76). There were 36 (25.9%) locoregional failures in the hypoxic group, in which nimorazole + IMRT did not improve FFLRP (adjusted HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.36-1.44; P = .35) or overall survival (adjusted HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.53-1.72; P = .88) compared with placebo + IMRT. Similarly, nimorazole + IMRT did not improve FFLRP or overall survival in the whole population. In total (N = 338), 73% of patients allocated nimorazole adhered to the drug for ≥50% of IMRT fractions. Nimorazole + IMRT caused more acute nausea compared with placebo + IMRT (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 G1+2: 56.6% vs 42.4%, G3: 10.1% vs 5.3%, respectively; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of the hypoxia modifier nimorazole to IMRT for locally advanced HNSCC in older and less fit patients did not improve locoregional control or survival.

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy in patients with oligometastatic cancers: a prospective, registry-based, single-arm, observational, evaluation study.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is increasingly being used to treat oligometastatic cancers, but high-level evidence to provide a basis for policy making is scarce. Additional evidence from a real-world setting is required. We present the results of a national study of patients with extracranial oligometastases undergoing SABR, representing the largest dataset, to our knowledge, on outcomes in this population so far. METHODS: In 2015, National Health Service (NHS) England launched a Commissioning through Evaluation scheme that funded a prospective, registry-based, single-arm, observational, evaluation study of patients with solid cancer and extracranial oligometastases treated with SABR. Prescribed doses ranged from 24-60 Gy administered in three to eight fractions. The study was done at 17 NHS radiotherapy centres in England. Patients were eligible for the scheme if aged 18 years or older with confirmed primary carcinoma (excluding haematological malignancies), one to three extracranial metastatic lesions, a disease-free interval from primary tumour development to metastases of longer than 6 months (with the exception of synchronous colorectal liver metastases), a WHO performance status of 2 or lower, and a life expectancy of at least 6 months. The primary outcome was overall survival at 1 year and 2 years from the start of SABR treatment. The study is now completed. FINDINGS: Between June 15, 2015, and Jan 30, 2019, 1422 patients were recruited from 17 hospitals in England. The median age of the patients was 69 years (IQR 62-76), and the most common primary tumour was prostate cancer (406 [28·6%] patients). Median follow-up was 13 months (IQR 6-23). Overall survival was 92·3% (95% CI 90·5-93·9) at 1 year and 79·2% (76·0-82·1) at 2 years. The most common grade 3 adverse event was fatigue (28 [2·0%] of 1422 patients) and the most common serious (grade 4) event was increased liver enzymes (nine [0·6%]). Notreatment-related deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: In patients with extracranial oligometastatic cancer, use of SABR was associated with high overall survival and low toxicity. 'The study findings complement existing evidence from a randomised, phase 2 trial, and represent high-level, real-world evidence supporting the use of SABR in this patient cohort, with a phase 3 randomised, controlled trial to confirm these findings underway. Based on the selection criteria in this study, SABR was commissioned by NHS England in March, 2020, as a treatment option for patients with oligometastatic disease. FUNDING: NHS England Commissioning through Evaluation scheme.

Inter-fraction robustness of intensity-modulated proton therapy in the post-operative treatment of oropharyngeal and oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate dosimetric consequences of inter-fraction setup variation and anatomical changes in patients receiving multifield optimised (MFO) intensity modulated proton therapy for post-operative oropharyngeal (OPC) and oral cavity (OCC) cancers. METHODS: Six patients receiving MFO for post-operative OPC and OCC were evaluated. Plans were robustly optimised to clinical target volumes (CTVs) using 3 mm setup and 3.5% range uncertainty. Weekly online cone beam CT (CBCT) were performed. Planning CT was deformed to the CBCT to create virtual CTs (vCTs) on which the planned dose was recalculated. vCT plan robustness was evaluated using a setup uncertainty of 1.5 mm and range uncertainty of 3.5%. Target coverage, D95%, and hotspots, D0.03cc, were evaluated for each uncertainty along with the vCT-calculated nominal plan. Mean dose to organs at risk (OARs) for the vCT-calculated nominal plan and relative % change in weight from baseline were evaluated. RESULTS: Robustly optimised plans in post-operative OPC and OCC patients are robust against inter-fraction setup variations and range uncertainty. D0.03cc in the vCT-calculated nominal plans were clinically acceptable across all plans. Across all patients D95% in the vCT-calculated nominal treatment plan was at least 100% of the prescribed dose. No patients lost ≥10% weight from baseline. Mean dose to the OARs and max dose to the spinal cord remained within tolerance. CONCLUSION: MFO plans in post-operative OPC and OCC patients are robust to inter-fraction uncertainties in setup and range when evaluated over multiple CT scans without compromising OAR mean dose. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This is the first paper to evaluate inter-fraction MFO plan robustness in post-operative head and neck treatment.

Use of a novel atlas for muscles of mastication to reduce inter observer variability in head and neck radiotherapy contouring.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): Trismus is caused by injury to the masticatory muscles resulting from cancer or its treatment. Contouring these muscles to reduce dose and radiation related trismus can be problematic due to interobserver variability. This study aimed to evaluate the reduction in interobserver variability achievable with a new contouring atlas. MATERIALS/METHODS: The atlas included: medial and lateral pterygoids (MP, LP), masseter (M) and temporalis (T) muscles, and the temporo-mandibular joint (TMJ). Seven clinicians delineated five paired structures on CT scans from 5 patients without the atlas. After ≥5 weeks, contouring was repeated using the atlas. Using contours generated by the clinicians on the same 5 CT scans as reference, dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean distance-to-agreement (DTA) and centre of mass (COM) difference were compared with and without the atlas. Comparison was also performed split by training grade. Mean and standard deviation (SD) values were measured. RESULTS: The atlas reduced interobserver variability for all structures. Mean DTA significantly improved for MP (p = 0.01), M (p < 0.01), T (p < 0.01) and TMJ (p < 0.01). Mean DTA improved using the atlas for the trainees across all muscles, with the largest reduction in variability observed for the T (4.3 ±â€¯7.1 v 1.2 ±â€¯0.4 mm, p = 0.06) and TMJ (2.1 ±â€¯0.7 v 0.8 ±â€¯0.3 mm, p < 0.01). Distance between the COM and interobserver variability reduced in all directions for MP and T. CONCLUSION: A new atlas for contouring masticatory muscles during radiotherapy planning for head and neck cancer reduces interobserver variability and could be used as an educational tool.

Image-based Data Mining to Probe Dosimetric Correlates of Radiation-induced Trismus.

PURPOSE: To identify imaged regions in which dose is associated with radiation-induced trismus after head and neck cancer radiation therapy (HNRT) using a novel image-based data mining (IBDM) framework. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A cohort of 86 HNRT patients were analyzed for region identification. Trismus was characterized as a continuous variable by the maximum incisor-to-incisor opening distance (MID) at 6 months after radiation therapy. Patient anatomies and dose distributions were spatially normalized to a common frame of reference using deformable image registration. IBDM was used to identify clusters of voxels associated with MID (P ≤ .05 based on permutation testing). The result was externally tested on a cohort of 35 patients with head and neck cancer. Internally, we also performed a dose-volume histogram-based analysis by comparing the magnitude of the correlation between MID and the mean dose for the IBDM-identified cluster in comparison with 5 delineated masticatory structures. RESULTS: A single cluster was identified with the IBDM approach (P < .01), partially overlapping with the ipsilateral masseter. The dose-volume histogram-based analysis confirmed that the IBDM cluster had the strongest association with MID, followed by the ipsilateral masseter and the ipsilateral medial pterygoid (Spearman's rank correlation coefficients: Rs = -0.36, -0.35, -0.32; P = .001, .001, .002, respectively). External validation confirmed an association between mean dose to the IBDM cluster and MID (Rs = -0.45; P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: IBDM bypasses the common assumption that dose patterns within structures are unimportant. Our novel IBDM approach for continuous outcome variables successfully identified a cluster of voxels that are highly associated with trismus, overlapping partially with the ipsilateral masseter. Tests on an external validation cohort showed an even stronger correlation with trismus. These results support use of the region in HNRT treatment planning to potentially reduce trismus.

Long term patient reported swallowing function following chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Limited data are available to inform on long term swallowing outcomes following concurrent chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma. The aims of this study are to determine long term patient-reported swallowing outcomes across two large UK centres in routine clinical practice and identify associated factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients treated for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and irradiation of the bilateral neck, between 2011 and 2013 were identified. Those requiring therapeutic enteral feeding prior to treatment, or having subsequent disease relapse, were excluded from the study. Patients were sent postal invitations to complete the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), at least two years following completion of treatment. RESULTS: Completed MDADI were received from 201/242 eligible patients (83%) at a median of 3.4 years (range 2-5) post treatment. Median composite MDADI score was 68.4. 64 (32%) had composite MDADI <60 classed as 'poor' function, 76 (38%) scores ≥60-<80 classed as adequate function, and 61 (31%) had scores ≥80 classed as optimal function. Patients with normal and abnormal pre-treatment diet had median composite MDADI scores of 70.5 versus 47.4 respectively. Patients who did not require enteral feeding during treatment and those who did had median composite MDADI scores of 76.3 versus 65.3 respectively. On multivariate analysis poorer performance status, abnormal pre-treatment diet, and use of enteral feeding during radiotherapy were all significantly associated with lower composite, global and subscale MDADI scores. CONCLUSIONS: Patient reported swallowing dysfunction remains common in the long term post-chemoradiotherapy. Impaired pre-treatment diet and use of enteral feeding during treatment are key factors associated with poorer swallowing outcomes.

Protocol for the trismus trial-therabite versus wooden spatula in the amelioration of trismus in patients with head and neck cancer: randomised pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients can develop trismus from their head and neck cancer or as a result of treatment. Trismus affects the jaw muscles and makes mouth opening difficult. To potentially combat trismus, patients could undertake proactive jaw stretching exercises prior to, during and after radiotherapy, although currently these are not the standard of care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a randomised, open-label, controlled, two-centre feasibility study, to assess the objective and subjective effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of therabite use compared with wooden spatula in ameliorating trismus in patients treated for stage 3 and 4 oral and oropharyngeal cancer, managed either by primary surgery followed by (chemo)radiotherapy or primary (chemo)radiotherapy. The principal objective assessment is measurement of maximum jaw opening. Assessments in all cases will be performed preradiotherapy and again at 3 and 6 months postintervention.Secondary aims of the study will be (1) to assess whether therabite or the wooden spatula intervention improves patients' quality of life, (2) reduce the level of post-treatment clinical management/healthcare use and (3) a nested qualitative study will explore the experience of the patient taking part in the intervention; data will be transcribed verbatim and analysis will be based on content analysis methods using the interview questions as the framework for examination. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: North West Greater Manchester granted ethical approval (REC Reference 11/NW/0744). Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki have been adhered to. The results will be presented internationally and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. Head and neck cancer charities and information websites will also be approached. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01733797.

Prospective evaluation of relationships between radiotherapy dose to masticatory apparatus and trismus.

AIMS: This feasibility study aimed to identify relationships between radiation doses to the masticatory apparatus as a combined block or as individual subunits with changes in trismus following radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients from a single center were recruited prospectively as part of a randomized trial comparing proactive exercises in the management of trismus. Patients with stage III/IV oral cavity or oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers received intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent systemic therapy. All patients had trismus prior to radiotherapy. Maximal inter-incisor distance (MID) was measured pre- and 6 months from the start of radiotherapy. Bilateral muscles of mastication: medial and lateral pterygoids (MP and LP), masseters (M), temporalis (T), temporomandibular joint (TMJ) were contoured on CT images. The block comprised all muscles excluding the TMJ below the orbital floor. Mean dose, equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and V35-V60 Gy were compared with change in MID. RESULTS: In six patients, the MID deteriorated at 6 months from the start of radiotherapy compared with 14 whose MID improved. No significant association was observed between age, gender, smoking, alcohol status, exercise compliance, cisplatin, tumor site, stage, V35-V60 Gy or EUD with change in MID. A clinical outlier was excluded. Without the outlier (n = 19), a significant association was seen between mean dose and change in MID at 6 months for the ipsilateral block (p = .01), LP (p = .04) and M (p < .01). All patients where trismus deteriorated at 6 months received mean doses >40 Gy to the block. CONCLUSION: Higher mean radiation doses to the ipsilateral block, LP and M were significantly associated with deterioration in trismus. Limiting dose to these structures to ≤40 Gy for tumors not invading the masticatory muscles may improve treatment-related sequelae. The ipsilateral block, LP and M should be studied further as possible alternative avoidance structures in radiotherapy treatment planning.

Indications for Salivary Gland Radiotherapy.

There is an established role for post-operative radiotherapy in the treatment of benign and malignant salivary gland tumours. For benign disease, the addition of radiotherapy improves local tumour control in cases with incomplete excision, involved surgical margins or multi-focal disease recurrence. After capsule rupture or spillage alone, surveillance should usually be advised. For malignant disease, post-operative radiotherapy is recommended for an advanced tumour stage, high-grade tumour, perineural or lympho-vascular invasion, close or positive resection margins, extra-parotid extension or lymph node involvement. The main benefit is increased loco-regional tumour control, although this may translate into a modest improvement in survival. The possible late side effects of parotid bed irradiation include skin changes, chronic otitis externa, sensorineural hearing loss, osteoradionecrosis and secondary malignancy. Severe complications are rare, but patients should be counselled carefully about the risks. Primary radiotherapy is unlikely to be curative and is reserved to cases in which resection would cause unacceptable functional or cosmetic morbidity or would likely result in subtotal resection (R2) or to patients with distant metastases to gain local tumour control. There are provisional data on the use of charged particle radiotherapy in this setting. Some patients may benefit from synchronous chemotherapy with radiotherapy, but this group is not defined, and data from comparative prospective studies are required before routine clinical use of this treatment.

Prognostic value of hypoxia-associated markers in advanced larynx and hypopharynx squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the prognostic value of hypoxia-associated markers carbonic anhydrase-9 (CA-9) and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) in advanced larynx and hypopharynx squamous cell carcinoma (SCCa) treated by organ preservation strategies. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Pretreatment CA-9 and HIF-1α expression, clinicopathologic data, and tumor volume were analyzed in a series of 114 patients with T3-4 SCCa larynx or hypopharynx treated by (chemo)radiation. RESULTS: Adverse prognostic factors for locoregional control were T4 classification (P = 0.008), and for disease-specific survival were CA-9 positivity (P = 0.039), T4 classification (P = 0.001), larger tumor volume (P = 0.004), N1-3 classification (P = 0.002), and pretreatment hemoglobin < 13.0 g/dl (P = 0.014). With increasing CA-9 expression, there was a trend to increasing tumor recurrence (P trend = 0.009) and decreasing survival (P trend = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, independent variables were T4 classification (hazard ratio [HR] 13.54, P = 0.01) for locoregional failure, and CA-9 positivity (HR = 8.02, P = 0.042) and higher tumor volume (HR = 3.33, P = 0.007) for disease-specific mortality. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to look specifically at T3 and T4 SCCa larynx and hypopharynx for a relationship between hypoxia-associated marker expression and clinical outcome. Pretreatment immunohistochemical CA-9 expression is an adverse prognostic factor for disease-specific survival, indicating that CA-9 expression may confer a more aggressive tumor phenotype.

Adaptive and innovative Radiation Treatment FOR improving Cancer treatment outcomE (ARTFORCE); a randomized controlled phase II trial for individualized treatment of head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Failure of locoregional control is the main cause of recurrence in advanced head and neck cancer. This multi-center trial aims to improve outcome in two ways. Firstly, by redistribution of the radiation dose to the metabolically most FDG-PET avid part of the tumour. Hereby, a biologically more effective dose distribution might be achieved while simultaneously sparing normal tissues. Secondly, by improving patient selection. Both cisplatin and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) antibodies like Cetuximab in combination with Radiotherapy (RT) are effective in enhancing tumour response. However, it is unknown which patients will benefit from either agent in combination with irradiation. We will analyze the predictive value of biological markers and (89)Zr-Cetuximab uptake for treatment outcome of chemoradiation with Cetuximab or cisplatin to improve patient selection. METHODS: ARTFORCE is a randomized phase II trial for 268 patients with a factorial 2 by 2 design: cisplatin versus Cetuximab and standard RT versus redistributed RT. Cisplatin is dosed weekly 40 mg/m(2) for 6 weeks. Cetuximab is dosed 250 mg/m(2) weekly (loading dose 400 mg/m(2)) for 6 weeks. The standard RT regimen consists of elective RT up to 54.25 Gy with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to 70 Gy in 35 fractions in 6 weeks. Redistributed adaptive RT consists of elective RT up to 54.25 Gy with a SIB between 64-80 Gy in 35 fractions in 6 weeks with redistributed dose to the gross tumour volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV), and adaptation of treatment for anatomical changes in the third week of treatment.Patients with locally advanced, biopsy confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, oral cavity or hypopharynx are eligible.Primary endpoints are: locoregional recurrence free survival at 2 years, correlation of the median (89)Zr-cetuximab uptake and biological markers with treatment specific outcome, and toxicity. Secondary endpoints are quality of life, swallowing function preservation, progression free and overall survival. DISCUSSION: The objective of the ARTFORCE Head and Neck trial is to determine the predictive value of biological markers and (89)Zr-Cetuximab uptake, as it is unknown how to select patients for the appropriate concurrent agent. Also we will determine if adaptive RT and dose redistribution improve locoregional control without increasing toxicity.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01504815.

Osteoradionecrosis in head-and-neck cancer has a distinct genotype-dependent cause.

PURPOSE: We performed a case-control study to establish whether the development of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) was related to a variant allele substituting T for C at -509 of the transforming growth factor-ß1 gene (TGF-ß1). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 140 patients, 39 with and 101 without ORN, who underwent radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer with a minimum of 2 years follow-up, were studied. None of the patients had clinical evidence of recurrence at this time. DNA extracted from blood was genotyped for the -509 C-T variant allele of the TGF-ß1 gene. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient, cancer treatment, or tumor characteristics between the two groups. Of the 39 patients who developed ORN, 9 were homozygous for the common CC allele, 19 were heterozygous, and 11 were homozygous for the rare TT genotype. Of the 101 patients without ORN, the distribution was 56 (CC), 33 (CT), and 12 (TT). The difference in distribution was significant, giving an increased risk of ORN of 5.7 (95% CI, 1.7-19.2) for homozygote TT patients (p = 0.001) and 3.6 (95% CI, 1.3-10.0) for heterozygotes (p = 0.004) when compared with patients with the CC genotype. Postradiotherapy dentoalveolar surgery preceding the development of ORN was associated with the CC genotype (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the postulate that the development of ORN is related to the presence of the T variant allele at -509 within the TGF-ß1 gene.

Monitoring dosimetric impact of weight loss with kilovoltage (kV) cone beam CT (CBCT) during parotid-sparing IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Parotid-sparing head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can reduce long-term xerostomia. However, patients frequently experience weight loss and tumor shrinkage during treatment. We evaluate the use of kilovoltage (kV) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for dose monitoring and examine if the dosimetric impact of such changes on the parotid and critical neural structures warrants replanning during treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer were treated with contralateral parotid-sparing IMRT concurrently with platinum-based chemotherapy. Mean doses of 65 Gy and 54 Gy were delivered to clinical target volume (CTV)1 and CTV2, respectively, in 30 daily fractions. CBCT was prospectively acquired weekly. Each CBCT was coregistered with the planned isocenter. The spinal cord, brainstem, parotids, larynx, and oral cavity were outlined on each CBCT. Dose distributions were recalculated on the CBCT after correcting the gray scale to provide accurate Hounsfield calibration, using the original IMRT plan configuration. RESULTS: Planned contralateral parotid mean doses were not significantly different to those delivered during treatment (p > 0.1). Ipsilateral and contralateral parotids showed a mean reduction in volume of 29.7% and 28.4%, respectively. There was no significant difference between planned and delivered maximum dose to the brainstem (p = 0.6) or spinal cord (p = 0.2), mean dose to larynx (p = 0.5) and oral cavity (p = 0.8). End-of-treatment mean weight loss was 7.5 kg (8.8% of baseline weight). Despite a ≥10% weight loss in 5 patients, there was no significant dosimetric change affecting the contralateral parotid and neural structures. CONCLUSIONS: Although patient weight loss and parotid volume shrinkage was observed, overall, there was no significant excess dose to the organs at risk. No replanning was felt necessary for this patient cohort, but a larger patient sample will be investigated to further confirm these results. Nevertheless, kilovoltage CBCT is a valuable tool for patient setup verification and monitoring of dosimetric variation during radiotherapy.

Development and validation of a nomogram for prediction of survival and local control in laryngeal carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy alone: a cohort study based on 994 patients.

INTRODUCTION: To advise laryngeal carcinoma patients on the most appropriate form of treatment, a tool to predict survival and local control is needed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a population-based cohort study on 994 laryngeal carcinoma patients, treated with RT from 1977 until 2008. Two nomograms were developed and validated. Performance of the models is expressed as the Area Under the Curve (AUC). RESULTS: Unfavorable prognostic factors for overall survival were low hemoglobin level, male sex, high T-status, nodal involvement, older age, lower EQD(2T) (total radiation dose corrected for fraction dose and overall treatment time), and non-glottic tumor. All factors except tumor location were prognostic for local control. The AUCs were 0.73 for overall survival and 0.67 for local control. External validation of the survival model yielded AUCs of 0.68, 0.74, 0.76 and 0.71 for the Leuven (n=109), the VU Amsterdam (n=178), the Manchester (n=403) and the NKI cohort (n=205), respectively, while the validation procedure for the local control model resulted in AUCs of 0.70, 0.71, 0.72 and 0.62. The resulting nomograms were made available on the website www.predictcancer.org. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with a laryngeal carcinoma treated with RT alone, we have developed visual, easy-to-use nomograms for the prediction of overall survival and primary local control. These models have been successfully validated in four external centers.

Perfusion estimated with rapid dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging correlates inversely with vascular endothelial growth factor expression and pimonidazole staining in head-and-neck cancer: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: To analyze, in a pilot study, rapidly acquired dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI data with a general two-compartment exchange tracer kinetic model and correlate parameters obtained with measurements of hypoxia and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eight patients were scanned before surgery. The DCE-MRI data were acquired with 1.5-s temporal resolution and analyzed using the two-compartment exchange tracer kinetic model to obtain estimates of parameters including perfusion and permeability surface area. Twelve to 16 h before surgery, patients received an intravenous injection of pimonidazole. Samples taken during surgery were used to determine the level of pimonidazole staining using immunohistochemistry and VEGF expression using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Correlations between the biological and imaging data were examined. RESULTS: Of the seven tumors fully analyzed, those that were poorly perfused tended to have high levels of pimonidazole staining (r = -0.79, p = 0.03) and VEGF expression (r = -0.82, p = 0.02). Tumors with low permeability surface area also tended to have high levels of hypoxia (r = -0.75, p = 0.05). Hypoxic tumors also expressed higher levels of VEGF (r = 0.82, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of perfusion obtained with rapid DCE-MRI data in patients with head-and-neck cancer correlate inversely with pimonidazole staining and VEGF expression.

Mucosal melanoma of the head and neck: radiotherapy or surgery?

INTRODUCTION: Head and neck mucosal melanoma (MuM) is rare, comprising < 1% of all melanomas in Western Europe. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of case records of patients treated between 1965 and 2001 was carried out. (Survival outcomes were obtained from the case notes and cancer registry.) The median age of the 68 patients was 63 years (range 29-86 years). Thirty-nine percent were male, and 61% were female. (The minimum follow-up time was 15 months.) The two most common primary sites were the sinonasal complex (65%) and oral cavity (19%). Twenty-one percent of patients presented with metastases (nodal or distant). Fifty-five patients were treated with curative intent: 30 patients with primary radiotherapy and 25 patients with surgery +/- postoperative radiotherapy. RESULTS: The overall survival was 22% at 5 years, and the cancer-specific survival was 32% at 5 years. CONCLUSION: MuM has a poor overall prognosis. Poor prognostic indicators are site at presentation and presentation with metastasis. This series is unique in that a significant proportion of patients were given primary radiotherapy as definitive treatment. Surgery may have advantages, particularly for oral cavity MuM. In contrast to previous reports, definitive radiotherapy is worthy of consideration as curative treatment.

Comparison of patient-reported late treatment toxicity (LENT-SOMA) with quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35) assessment after head and neck radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: The patient's role in toxicity reporting is increasingly acknowledged but requires the adaptation and validation of toxicity reporting instruments for patient use as most toxicity scales are designed for physician use. Recording of radiotherapy related late toxicity is important and needs to be improved. A patient-scored symptom questionnaire of late treatment effects using LENT-SOMA was compared with a recognised quality of life tool (EORTC QLQ-C30/H&N35). MATERIALS/METHODS: LENT-SOMA and EORTC QLQ-C30 patient questionnaires were prospectively completed by 220 head and neck cancer patients over 3 years and 72 completed EORTC QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires at 2 years post-radiotherapy. RESULTS: Endpoints common to both questionnaires (pain, swallowing, dental pain, dry mouth, opening mouth, analgesics) were matched. Spearman rank correlation coefficients with ρ>0.6 (P<0.001) were obtained for all "matched" scales except for analgesics scale, ρ=0.267 (P<0.05). There was good agreement between LENT-SOMA and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 except for analgesic endpoints. Global quality of life scores correlated negatively with average LENT-SOMA scores (P<0.001). Significant differences in average LENT-SOMA scores between treatment modalities were found. The LENT-SOMA questionnaire has demonstrated a high Cronbach's α value (0.786) indicating good reliability. CONCLUSIONS: LENT-SOMA patient questionnaire results agreed well with those from the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 questionnaire for toxicity items where they could be compared explicitly, particularly for subjective endpoints. Patient-reported late toxicity had a negative impact on quality of life. The LENT-SOMA patient questionnaire is both reliable and sensitive to differences between patients treated with different modalities. A patient-based questionnaire is an important contributor to capturing late radiotherapy effects.