[Performance development of a university operating room after implementation of a central operating room management]. / Leistungsentwicklung eines universitären OP-Bereichs nach Implementierung eines zentralen OP-Managements.

The difficult financial situation in German hospitals requires measures for improvement in process quality. Associated increases in revenues in the high income field "operating room (OR) area" are increasingly the responsibility of OR management but it has not been shown that the introduction of an efficiency-oriented management leads to an increase in process quality and revenues in the operating theatre. Therefore the performance in the operating theatre of the University Medical Center Göttingen was analyzed for working days in the core operating time from 7.45 a.m. to 3.30 p.m. from 2009 to 2014. The achievement of process target times for the morning surgery start time and the turnover times of anesthesia and OR-nurses were calculated as indicators of process quality. The number of operations and cumulative incision-suture time were also analyzed as aggregated performance indicators. In order to assess the development of revenues in the operating theatre, the revenues from diagnosis-related groups (DRG) in all inpatient and occupational accident cases, adjusted for the regional basic case value from 2009, were calculated for each year. The development of revenues was also analyzed after deduction of revenues resulting from altered economic case weighting. It could be shown that the achievement of process target values for the morning surgery start time could be improved by 40 %, the turnover times for anesthesia reduced by 50 % and for the OR-nurses by 36 %. Together with the introduction of central planning for reallocation, an increase in operation numbers of 21 % and cumulative incision-suture times of 12% could be realized. Due to these additional operations the DRG revenues in 2014 could be increased to 132 % compared to 2009 or 127 % if the revenues caused by economic case weighting were excluded. The personnel complement in anesthesia (-1.7 %) and OR-nurses (+2.6 %) as well as anesthetists (+6.7 %) increased less compared to the revenues or were slightly reduced. This improvement in process quality and cumulative incision-suture times as well as the increase in revenues, reflect the positive impact of an efficiency-oriented central OR management. The OR management releases due to measures of process optimization the necessary personnel and time resources and therefore achieves the basic prerequisites for increased revenues of surgical disciplines. The method presented can be used by other hospitals as a guideline to analyze performance development.

[OR minute myth : Guidelines for calculation of DRG revenues per OR minute]. / Mythos OP-Minute : Leitfaden zur Kalkulation von DRG-Erlösen pro Op-Minute.

The economic situation in German Hospitals is tense and needs the implementation of differentiated controlling instruments. Accordingly, parameters of revenue development of different organizational units within a hospital are needed. This is particularly necessary in the revenue and cost-intensive operating theater field. So far there are only barely established productivity data for the control of operating room (OR) revenues during the year available. This article describes a valid method for the calculation of case-related revenues per OR minute conform to the diagnosis-related groups (DRG).For this purpose the relevant datasets from the OR information system and the § 21 productivity report (DRG grouping) of the University Medical Center Göttingen were combined. The revenues defined in the DRG browser of the Institute for Hospital Reimbursement (InEK) were assigned to the corresponding process times--incision-suture time (SNZ), operative preparation time and anesthesiology time--according to the InEK system. All full time stationary DRG cases treated within the OR were included and differentiated according to the surgical department responsible. The cost centers "OR section" and "anesthesia" were isolated to calculate the revenues of the operating theater. SNZ clusters and cost type groups were formed to demonstrate their impact on the revenues per OR minute. A surgical personal simultaneity factor (GZF) was calculated by division of the revenues for surgeons and anesthesiologists. This factor resembles the maximum DRG financed personnel deployment for surgeons in German hospitals.The revenue per OR minute including all cost types and DRG was 16.63 €/min. The revenues ranged from 10.45 to 24.34 €/min depending on the surgical field. The revenues were stable when SNZ clusters were analyzed. The differentiation of cost type groups revealed a revenue reduction especially after exclusion of revenues for implants and infrastructure. The calculated GZF over all surgical departments was 2.2 (range 1.9-3.6). A calculation of this factor at the DRG level can give economically relevant information about the case-related personnel deployment.This analysis shows for the first time the DRG-conform calculation of revenues per OR minute. There is a strong dependency on the considered cost type and the performing surgical field. Repetitive analyses are necessary due to the lack of reference values and are a suitable tool to monitor the revenue development after measures for process optimization. Comparative analyses within different surgical fields on this data base should be avoided. The demonstrated method can be used as a guideline for other hospitals to calculate the DRG revenues within the OR. This enables pursuing cost-effectiveness analysis by comparing these revenues with cost data from the cost unit accounting at a DRG or case level.

[Implementation of a rational standard of hygiene for preparation of operating rooms]. / Implementierung eines rationalen Hygienestandards zur Aufbereitung von Operationssälen.

BACKGROUND: The assurance of high standards of care is a major requirement in German hospitals while cost reduction and efficient use of resources are mandatory. These requirements are particularly evident in the high-risk and cost-intensive operating theatre field with multiple process steps. The cleaning of operating rooms (OR) between surgical procedures is of major relevance for patient safety and requires time and human resources. The hygiene procedure plan for OR cleaning between operations at the university hospital in Göttingen was revised and optimized according to the plan-do-check-act principle due to not clearly defined specifications of responsibilities, use of resources, prolonged process times and increased staff engagement. METHODS: The current status was evaluated in 2012 as part of the first step "plan". The subsequent step "do" included an expert symposium with external consultants, interdisciplinary consensus conferences with an actualization of the former hygiene procedure plan and the implementation process. All staff members involved were integrated into this management change process. The penetration rate of the training and information measures as well as the acceptance and compliance with the new hygiene procedure plan were reviewed within step "check". The rates of positive swabs and air sampling as well as of postoperative wound infections were analyzed for quality control and no evidence for a reduced effectiveness of the new hygiene plan was found. After the successful implementation of these measures the next improvement cycle ("act") was performed in 2014 which led to a simplification of the hygiene plan by reduction of the number of defined cleaning and disinfection programs for preparation of the OR. RESULTS: The reorganization measures described led to a comprehensive commitment of the hygiene procedure plan by distinct specifications for responsibilities, for the course of action and for the use of resources. Furthermore, a simplification of the plan, a rational staff assignment and reduced process times were accomplished. Finally, potential conflicts due to an insufficient evidence-based knowledge of personnel was reduced. CONCLUSION: This present project description can be used by other hospitals as a guideline for similar changes in management processes.

[Perioperative thermal management in Germany varies depending on the hospital size]. / Perioperatives Wärmemanagement in Abhängigkeit von der Krankenhausgröße in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: Improvement of quality of care and patient safety while decreasing costs are major challenges in healthcare systems. This challenge includes the avoidance of perioperative hypothermia to reduce the associated adverse effects, length of stay and treatment costs. Due to the medical and economic relevance the national S3 guidelines for the prevention of perioperative hypothermia were recently published. AIM: This study presents and analyses the reality of utilization of thermal management in German hospitals depending on the size of the hospital, which is based on the number of beds. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on the data of an online survey among all members of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine about perioperative thermal management, a subgroup analysis differentiating between the size of hospitals was performed. The survey included questions about the structural and organizational conditions, the practical implementation of temperature measurement and warming therapy and the developmental status of clinical standard operating procedures (SOP) and educational training. RESULTS: Comparing the structural quality, major differences were found with respect to the availability of core body temperature measurement and the provision of warming devices especially at different peripheral anesthesia workplaces as well as the existence of SOPs and educational training. The availability increased with hospital size. With respect to process quality, the frequency of prewarming increased with hospital size as well as the frequency of intraoperative temperature measurements during different anesthesia procedures. CONCLUSION: Major differences were found in several aspects of perioperative thermal management depending on the hospital size. The main potential for improvement was found in smaller hospitals. Developmental needs primarily exist in the configuration of peripheral anesthesia workplaces, educational training, implementation of SOPs and prewarming of patients.