ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To reassess the practical value of verbal autopsy data, which, in the absence of more definitive information, have been used to describe the causes of maternal mortality and to identify priorities in programmes intended to save women's lives in developing countries. METHODS: We reanalysed verbal autopsy data from a study of 145 maternal deaths that occurred in Guerrero, Querétaro and San Luis Potosí, Mexico, in 1995, taking into account other causes of death and the WHO classification system. The results were also compared with information given on imperfect death certificates. FINDINGS: The reclassification showed wide variations in the attribution of maternal deaths to single specific medical causes. CONCLUSION: The verbal autopsy methodology has inherent limitations as a means of obtaining histories of medical events. At best it may reconfirm the knowledge that mortality among poor women with little access to medical care is higher than that among wealthier women who have better access to such care.
Subject(s)
Developing Countries/statistics & numerical data , Maternal Mortality , Adult , Autopsy/methods , Cause of Death , Death Certificates , Female , Humans , Mexico/epidemiology , PregnancyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study measured the effect of information about family planning methods and STD risk factors and prevention, together with personal choice on the selection of intrauterine devices (IUDs) by clients with cervical infection. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, controlled trial in which family planning clients were assigned to one of two groups, the standard practice (control) group in which the provider selected the woman's contraceptive and the information and choice (intervention) group. The study enrolled 2107 clients in a family planning clinic in Mexico City. RESULTS: Only 2.1% of the clients had gonorrhoea or chlamydial infections. Significantly fewer women in the intervention group selected the IUD than the proportion for whom the IUD was recommended in the standard care group by clinicians (58.2% v 88.2%, p = 0.0000). The difference was even more pronounced among infected women: 47.8% v 93.2% (intervention v control group, p = 0.0006). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention increased the selection of condoms and reduced the selection of IUDs, especially among women with cervical infections, for whom IUD insertion is contraindicated.
Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Choice Behavior , Family Planning Services/methods , Sex Education/methods , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Chlamydia Infections/prevention & control , Contraception/methods , Contraindications , Female , Gonorrhea/epidemiology , Gonorrhea/prevention & control , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Intrauterine Devices , Mexico/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Regression Analysis , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & controlABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This quasi-experimental study tested a method to safely reduce the rate of cesarean delivery in Ecuador. METHOD: Hospital policy was modified to provide co-management for cesarean candidates at the major maternity hospital in Quito. Cesarean rates before (n=14743) and after (n=12351) the intervention were compared by chi-square and multiple logistic regression with other major maternity hospitals (before, n=12514; after, n=9590). Characteristics of cesarean candidates who had vaginal or cesarean deliveries in the intervention hospital were compared by chi-square (n=1584). RESULT: Cesarean rates declined by 4.5% (P<0.001) in the intervention hospital. A smaller (2.1%, P<0.01) reduction occurred in the other major public hospital in Quito where students of the co-principal investigator attempted to reduce cesarean delivery. Cesarean rates were unchanged in the public maternity hospitals of other major cities. CONCLUSION: Case co-management, a simple, locally appropriate, and inexpensive intervention, safely reduced surgical delivery, hospital stay and cost of care.
Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Vaginal Birth after Cesarean/statistics & numerical data , Chi-Square Distribution , Ecuador/epidemiology , Female , Hospitals, Maternity , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Policy Making , PregnancyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of vitamin A deficiency has traditionally been assessed through xerophthalmia or biochemical surveys. The cost and complexity of implementing these methods limits the ability of nonresearch organizations to identify vitamin A deficiency. This study examined the validity of a simple, inexpensive food frequency method to identify areas with a high prevalence of vitamin A deficiency. METHODS: The validity of the method was tested in 15 communities, 5 each from the Philippines, Guatemala, and Tanzania. Serum retinol concentrations of less than 20 micrograms/dL defined vitamin A deficiency. RESULTS: Weighted measures of vitamin A intake six or fewer times per week and unweighted measures of consumption of animal sources of vitamin A four or fewer times per week correctly classified seven of eight communities as having a high prevalence of vitamin A deficiency (i.e., 15% or more preschool-aged children in the community had the deficiency) (sensitivity = 87.5%) and four of seven communities as having a low prevalence (specificity = 57.1%). CONCLUSIONS: This method correctly classified the vitamin A deficiency status of 73.3% of the communities but demonstrated a high false-positive rate (42.9%).
Subject(s)
Diet Surveys , Vitamin A Deficiency/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Female , Guatemala/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Male , Nutritional Status , Philippines/epidemiology , Reproducibility of Results , Tanzania/epidemiology , Vitamin A/administration & dosage , Vitamin A/bloodABSTRACT
Because resources for care of low-birthweight (LBW) infants in developing countries are scarce, the Kangaroo mother method (KMM) was developed. The infant is kept upright in skin-to-skin contact with the mother's breast. Previous studies reported several benefits with the KMM but interpretation of their findings is limited by small size and design weaknesses. We have done a longitudinal, randomised, controlled trial at the Isidro Ayora Maternity Hospital in Quito, Ecuador. Infants with LBW (< 2000 g) who satisfied out-of-risk criteria of tolerance of food and weight stabilisation were randomly assigned to KMM and control (standard incubator care) groups (n = 128 and 147, respectively). During 6 months of follow-up the KMM group had a significantly lower rate than the control group of serious illness (lower-respiratory-tract disorders, apnoea, aspiration, pneumonia, septicaemia, general infections; 7 [5%] vs 27 [18%], p < 0.002), although differences between the groups in less severe morbidity were not significant. There was no significant difference in growth or in the proportion of women breastfeeding, perhaps because the proportion breastfeeding was high in both groups owing to strong promotion. Mortality was the same in both groups; most deaths occurred during the stabilisation period before randomisation. KMM mothers made more unscheduled clinic visits than control mothers but their infants had fewer re-admissions and so the cost of care was lower with the KMM. Since the eligibility criteria excluded nearly 50% of LBW infants from the study, the KMM is not universally applicable to these infants. The benefits might be greater in populations where breastfeeding is not so common.