Acetabular revision with impaction bone grafting and a cemented polyethylene acetabular component: comparison of the Kaplan-Meier analysis to the competing risk analysis in 62 revisions with 25 to 30 years follow-up.

We present the results of 62 consecutive acetabular revisions using impaction bone grafting and a cemented polyethylene acetabular component in 58 patients (13 men and 45 women) after a mean follow-up of 27 years (25 to 30). All patients were prospectively followed. The mean age at revision was 59.2 years (23 to 82). We performed Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis and also a Competing Risk (CR) analysis because with long-term follow-up, the presence of a competing event (i.e. death) prevents the occurrence of the endpoint of re-revision. A total of 48 patients (52 hips) had died or had been re-revised at final review in March 2011. None of the deaths were related to the surgery. The mean Harris hip score of the ten surviving hips in ten patients was 76 points (45 to 99). The KM survivorship at 25 years for the endpoint 're-revision for any reason' was 58.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 38 to 73) and for 're-revision for aseptic loosening' 72.1% (95% CI 51 to 85). With the CR analysis we calculated the KM analysis overestimates the failure rate with respectively 74% and 93% for these endpoints. The current study shows that acetabular impaction bone grafting revisions provide good clinical results at over 25 years.

Acetabular revision with impacted morsellised cancellous bone grafting and a cemented acetabular component: a 20- to 25-year follow-up.

We present an update of the clinical and radiological results of 62 consecutive acetabular revisions using impacted morsellised cancellous bone grafts and a cemented acetabular component in 58 patients, at a mean follow-up of 22.2 years (20 to 25). The Kaplan-Meier survivorship for the acetabular component with revision for any reason as the endpoint was 75% at 20 years (95% confidence interval (CI) 62 to 88) when 16 hips were at risk. Excluding two revisions for septic loosening at three and six years, the survivorship at 20 years was 79% (95% CI 67 to 93). With further exclusions of one revision of a well-fixed acetabular component after 12 years during a femoral revision and two after 17 years for wear of the acetabular component, the survivorship for aseptic loosening was 87% at 20 years (95% CI 76 to 97). At the final review 14 of the 16 surviving hips had radiographs available. There was one additional case of radiological loosening and four acetabular reconstructions showed progressive radiolucent lines in one or two zones. Acetabular revision using impacted large morsellised bone chips (0.5 cm to 1 cm in diameter) and a cemented acetabular component remains a reliable technique for reconstruction, even when assessed at more than 20 years after surgery.

[Favourable long-term results from cemented total hip arthroplasty combined with acetabular bone impaction grafting in patients under the age of 50]. / Goede langetermijnresultaten van een gecementeerde totaleheupprothese in combinatie met een acetabulumreconstructie met geïmpacteerde botsnippers bij patiënten jonger dan 50 jaar.

OBJECTIVE: Determination of long-term results of hip replacements in patients who, at the time of operation, were under the age of 50. Procedures whereby an existing acetabulum defect was filled with bone chips that were impacted into a strong layer, after which a cemented total hip prosthesis was implanted. DESIGN: Descriptive. METHOD: Prospectively collected data from patients who were under the age of 50, and had undergone a hip replacement operation at our hospital between 1 July 1979 and 31 December 1987 were analysed. Data were collected up to 31 December 2002. The main outcome was time to revision. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 25 patients, 17 women and 8 men with 29 prosthetic hips. The average age at operation was 37.6 years (range: 20-49). Follow-up time was 15-23 years (median: 18.7 years). 1 patient (1 hip) was lost to follow-up. 3 patients (4 hips) died within 15 years after the operation; none of them had undergone revision. 4 revisions had been performed: I septic loosening (14 years p.o.) and 3 aseptic loosenings (6, 15, 20 years p.o.). The cumulative survival with the end-point 'revision for any reason' was 96% (95% CI: 88-100) at to years and 88% (95% CI: 74-100) at 20 years; after exclusion of the septic loosening the survival at 20 years was 92% (95% CI: 80-100). CONCLUSION: Hip replacement including a reconstruction technique for an acetabulum defect in patients under the age of 50 was regarded as successful if after 10 years, at least 90% of the prostheses were still in situ.

Acetabular revision with impacted morsellised cancellous bone grafting and a cemented cup. A 15- to 20-year follow-up.

This study presents the clinical and radiological results of 62 consecutive acetabular revisions in 58 patients, at a mean of 16.5 years follow-up (15 to 20). The Kaplan-Meier survivorship for the cup with end-point revisions for any reason, was 79% at 15 years (95% confidence interval (CI); 67 to 91). Excluding two revisions for septic loosening at three and six years, and one revision of a well-fixed cup after 12 years in the course of a femoral revision, the survivorship was 84% at 15 years (95% CI; 73 to 95). At review there were no additional cases of loosening, although seven acetabular reconstructions showed radiolucent lines in one or two zones. Acetabular revision using impacted large morsellised bone chips (0.7 cm to 1.0 cm) and a cemented cup, is a reliable technique of reconstruction, when assessed at more than 15 years.

An audit of microbiology laboratory utilization: the diagnosis of infection in orthopedic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the quality of ordering, collection and transport of specimens for microbiological analysis by a department of orthopedic surgery. METHODS: The analysis consisted of a prospective formal evaluation performed by two consultant microbiologists. RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen consecutive requests were audited. These requests belonged to 55 clinical episodes, 39 of which were of (presumed) infection and 16 of surveillance. The main sites sampled were: joint 28 (51%), and extra-articular bone or tissue 6 (11%). Of 98 surgical specimens, 20 (20%) yielded a relevant microorganism. The requests were classified as definitely appropriate in 67% and 85% of episodes, by the two consultants respectively. No request was considered unjustified. Collection, handling and transport were categorized as definitely appropriate in 56% and 73% of requests. Analysis of compliance with an existing protocol for prosthetic joint revision revealed similar errors. CONCLUSION: Audits of this type can give invaluable information about the area of uncertainty between the clinician and the laboratory and can identify appropriate measures for corrective action.