Improved survival of patients with melanoma brain metastases in the era of targeted BRAF and immune checkpoint therapies.

BACKGROUND: The development of brain metastases is common for systemic treatment failure in patients with melanoma and has been associated with a poor prognosis. Recent advances with BRAF and immune checkpoint therapies have led to improved patient survival. Herein, the authors evaluated the risk of de novo brain metastases and survival among patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) since the introduction of more effective therapies. METHODS: Patients with unresectable AJCC stage III/IV melanoma who received first-line systemic therapy at Moffitt Cancer Center between 2000 and 2012 were identified. Data were collected regarding patient characteristics, stage of disease, systemic therapies, MBM status/management, and overall survival (OS). The risk of de novo MBM was calculated using a generalized estimating equation model and survival comparisons were performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional analyses. RESULTS: A total of 610 patients were included, 243 of whom were diagnosed with MBM (40%). Patients with MBM were younger, with a lower frequency of regional metastasis. No significant differences were noted with regard to sex, BRAF status, or therapeutic class. The risk of de novo MBM was found to be similar among patients treated with chemotherapy, biochemotherapy, BRAF-targeted therapy, ipilimumab, and anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 regimens. The median OS of patients with MBM was significantly shorter when determined from the time of first regional/distant metastasis but not when determined from the time of first systemic therapy. The median OS from the time of MBM diagnosis was 7.5 months, 8.5 months, and 22.7 months, respectively, for patients diagnosed from 2000 to 2008, 2009 to 2010, and 2011 to the time of last follow-up (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Brain metastases remain a common source of systemic treatment failure. The OS for patients with MBM has improved significantly. Further research into MBM prevention is needed. Cancer 2018;124:297-305. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Challenging the knowledge base and skillset for providing surgical consent by orthopedic and plastic surgeons in the Netherlands: an identified area of improvement in patient safety.

BACKGROUND: Successfully completing a surgical informed consent process is an important element of the preoperative consult. A previous study of Dutch general surgeons demonstrated that the implementation of SIC did not meet acceptable standards. However, the quality of the SIC process in the orthopedic surgical or plastic surgical arena is unknown. METHODS: Following ethical approval, an online survey investigating specifics of surgical informed consent was performed among members of the Dutch Scientific Association of Orthopedic Surgeons and the Dutch Society for Plastic Surgery. RESULTS: A total of 335 responses from a majority of departments of orthopedic (86 %) and plastic surgery (78 %) were eligible for analysis. Scores on knowledge were poor as only 50 % recognized the three basic elements of surgical informed consent (competence, exchange of information and consent). The orthopedic group used more tools in the surgical informed consent process, such as instruction movies and websites or specialized nursing staff, compared to plastic surgery (orthopedic: 31-50 % vs. plastic: 6-30 %, p = 0.05- < 0.001). In contrast, surgical informed consent forms were used more frequently by the plastic surgical group (orthopedic 21 % vs. plastic:42 % p < 0.001). Control of the efficacy of the surgical informed consent process was low, 36 % in both groups. One in every seven orthopedic or plastic surgeons was faced with an official surgical informed consent-related complaint in the previous five years. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to general surgeons, Dutch orthopedic and plastic surgeons demonstrate poor knowledge and skills regarding surgical informed consent. Increased awareness, better training and use of modern tools including standard forms and online software programs will improve the SIC process and will optimize patient care.

Developments in Intralesional Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Locoregional advanced melanoma poses a complex clinical challenge that requires a multidisciplinary, patient-centered approach. Numerous agents have been studied for their suitability as intralesional therapy in the past decades, but few have successfully completed phase 3 clinical trial testing. METHODS: The relevant medical literature was searched for articles regarding use of intralesional therapies in metastatic melanoma. Therapies with data from phase 2 or higher studies were selected for review. This review also summarizes the mechanisms of action, adverse-event profiles, and clinical data for these agents. RESULTS: Intralesional therapies demonstrate promising effects in select patients with advanced melanoma. The optimal approach should be individually tailored and consist of a combination of intralesional therapies, regional perfusions, systemic immunotherapies, targeted therapies, and surgery, if necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Due to its relatively good local response rates and tolerable adverse-event profile, intralesional therapy may be a treatment option for select patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic melanoma.

BRAF inhibition for advanced locoregional BRAF V600E mutant melanoma: a potential neoadjuvant strategy.

Selective BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) yield objective responses in 50% of patients with metastatic BRAF V600E mutant melanoma. Adding an MEK inhibitor increases this response rate to 70%. Limited data are available on the outcomes of unresectable stage III patients, and it remains unclear whether BRAF-targeted therapy can be utilized as a neoadjuvant strategy. Data on patients with advanced locoregional BRAF V600E mutant melanoma treated with BRAF-targeted therapy at Moffitt Cancer Center were analyzed to determine response rates, subsequent resection rates after tumor downsizing, pathologic responses, and patient survival. Fifteen patients with locoregional disease treated with BRAF-targeted therapy, either BRAFi alone (vemurafenib; 11 patients) or a combination of BRAFi and an MEK inhibitor (dabrafenib plus trametinib or placebo; four patients), were identified. The median age was 50 years; the median follow-up was 25.4 months. The median BRAF-targeted therapy treatment duration was 6.0 months (range 1.2-29.4 months). Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors-based evaluation demonstrated objective response in 11 patients (73.3%). Six patients underwent resection of the remaining disease after therapy. Pathological analysis showed complete pathologic response (n=2), partial pathologic response (n=2), or no pathologic response (n=2). Four of six patients undergoing surgery have been alive for more than 2 years, including three patients currently free from active disease. No complications attributable to BRAF-targeted therapy were observed in the perioperative period. Dose reduction or discontinuation because of toxicities occurred in 10/15 patients. Neoadjuvant BRAF-targeted therapy may be effective in advanced locoregional BRAF V600E mutant melanoma patients in increasing resectability, yielding pathological responses, and achieving prolonged survival.

Side effects of analgesia may significantly reduce quality of life in symptomatic multiple myeloma: a cross-sectional prevalence study.

BACKGROUND: Pain is a common symptom in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Many patients are dependent on analgesics and in particular opioids, but there is limited information on the impact of these drugs and their side effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHOD: In a cross-sectional study, semi-structured interviews were performed in 21 patients attending the hospital with symptomatic MM on pain medications. HRQoL was measured using items 29 and 30 of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30. RESULTS: Patients were able to recall a median of two (range 0-4) analgesics. They spontaneously identified a median of two (range 1-5) side effects attributable to their analgesic medications. Patients' assessment of HRQoL based on the EORTC QLQ-C30 questions 29/30 was mean 48.3 (95 % CI; 38.7-57.9) out of 100. Patients' assessment of their HRQoL in the hypothetical situation, in which they would not experience any side effects from analgesics, was significantly higher: 62.6 (53.5-71.7) (t test, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study provides, for the first time, evidence that side effects of analgesics are common in symptomatic MM and may result in a statistically and clinically significant reduction of self-reported HRQoL.

LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery to the brain with concurrent vemurafenib for melanoma metastases.

While selective BRAF inhibitors have demonstrated improved outcomes in patients with metastatic BRAF V600E mutant melanoma, management of brain metastases prior to and during therapy presents challenges. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective treatment for melanoma brain metastases, but there is limited safety and efficacy data on the use of SRS during BRAF therapy. An analysis was performed of patients with metastatic melanoma and brain metastases treated with SRS while on vemurafenib. MRI scans were reviewed post-SRS to evaluate local control (LC) as well as distant control. We identified 80 metastatic melanoma brain lesions treated in 24 patients. The median planning target volume was 0.28 cm(3) (range 0.05-4.19 cm(3)), and lesions were treated to a median dose of 24 Gy (range 15-24 Gy). The median follow up was 5.1 months (range 2-25.2 months). Eight (10 %) lesions showed progression at a median of 6.1 months (range 2-20.1 months) following SRS. Kaplan-Meier LC estimates at 6 and 12 months were 92 and 75 %, respectively. Fourteen (58 %) patients were noted to have distant brain failure at a median of 3.4 months (range 1.9-16.1 months) following treatment with SRS. Median overall (OS) from the date of SRS was 7.2 months (range 1.5-26.8 months) with a median of 11.9 months (range 1.5-28.5 months) since the date of brain metastases diagnosis. There was no evidence of increased toxicity with the combination of SRS and vemurafenib. SRS to brain metastases appears to be both safe and effective for patients treated concurrently with BRAF inhibitors.

Ligand-independent EPHA2 signaling drives the adoption of a targeted therapy-mediated metastatic melanoma phenotype.

UNLABELLED: Many patients with BRAF inhibitor resistance can develop disease at new sites, suggesting that drug-induced selection pressure drives metastasis. Here, we used mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomic screening to uncover ligand-independent EPHA2 signaling as an adaptation to BRAF inhibitor therapy that led to the adoption of a metastatic phenotype. The EPHA2-mediated invasion was AKT-dependent and readily reversible upon removal of the drug as well as through PI3K and AKT inhibition. In xenograft models, BRAF inhibition led to the development of EPHA2-positive metastases. A retrospective analysis of patients with melanoma on BRAF inhibitor therapy showed that 68% of those failing therapy develop metastases at new disease sites, compared with 35% of patients on dacarbazine. Further IHC staining of melanoma specimens taken from patients on BRAF inhibitor therapy as well as metastatic samples taken from patients failing therapy showed increased EPHA2 staining. We suggest that inhibition of ligand-independent EPHA2 signaling may limit metastases associated with BRAF inhibitor therapy. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides evidence that BRAF inhibition promotes the adoption of a reversible, therapy-driven metastatic phenotype in melanoma. The cotargeting of ligand-independent EPHA2 signaling and BRAF may be one strategy to prevent the development of therapy-mediated disease at new sites.

Intralesional therapy for metastatic melanoma.

INTRODUCTION: Intralesional therapy for metastatic melanoma has some advantages over systemic therapy. Local drug administration allows for delivery of an increased concentration of the agent and reduced systemic exposure, thereby increasing local efficacy and limiting toxicity. Moreover, since in vivo tumor nodules contain the tumor antigens, this tumor tissue may serve as an autologous vaccine to induce systemic immunity. This so-called 'bystander effect', where uninjected distant lesions exhibit a response, has been reported in select intralesional therapy trials. AREAS COVERED: This review will give an overview of the working mechanisms, clinical evidence and side effects for available intralesional and topical therapies and summarize the most recent developments in this field. EXPERT OPINION: The ideal treatment approach for locoregionally advanced melanoma should be multidisciplinary and tailored to the patient, taking into consideration patient-related, tumor-related factors (such as location, tumor burden, mutation status) and previous treatments received. It will likely not be a single therapy, but rather a combination of injectable treatments, regional perfusions and systemic therapies.

Regional therapy in metastatic melanoma: an update on minimally invasive intraarterial isolated limb infusion and percutaneous hepatic perfusion.

INTRODUCTION: The management of locoregioanlly metastatic melanoma of the limb and metastatic melanoma to the liver poses a clinical challenge with limited therapeutic options. An effective therapeutic modality includes regional intraarterial perfusion-based therapy. Percutaneous vascular isolation as in isolated limb infusion (ILI) and percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) provide the additional advantage of minimally invasive techniques to further limit morbidity. AREAS COVERED: This review includes the technical aspects of ILI, PHP, the chemotherapeutic agents used and clinical responses. Also reviewed are pharmacokinetics and novel methods to enhance delivery of chemotherapeutics for both ILI and PHP and the efforts to improve therapeutic response and limit toxicity. EXPERT OPINION: Metastatic melanoma, particularly unresectable disease in the liver and in-transit disease in the limb, poses a clinical challenge with few effective treatments available. Although systemic therapy with immunotherapy or targeted therapy is an option, these modalities are associated with some systemic toxicity. Modalities that target treatment regionally, particularly minimally invasive techniques such as ILI and PHP, provide promising options to focus therapy on treating the affected limb or liver. The effectiveness of these minimally invasive methods has been supported by retrospective studies as well as prospective trials.

[Preoperative medical record-keeping can be improved: new informed consent form assists both physicians and patients]. / Preoperatieve dossiervoering kan beter: nieuw informed-consentformulier helpt arts én patiënt.

Adequate record-keeping is an important part of the surgical informed consent (IC) process. Standardization can enhance the quality of this process but is incomplete and qualitatively insufficiently implemented in current surgical practice. The introduction of well-designed tools would improve daily practice. We inventoried preoperative reporting at all 91 Dutch departments of General Surgery. Thirty-nine of the 73 departments that provided information on their IC process used a standard form. Twenty-nine of these forms were sent for analysis using a checklist based on legislation, recent case law and specialist literature. The mean number of items per form was 37, but not a single form was complete. Based on these results in combination with relevant legislation, guidelines and expert opinions, an adequate, user-friendly and straightforward preoperative IC form was designed. This IC form can serve as a checklist and report for the physician and as an information leaflet for the patient.

Long-term effects of BRAF inhibitors in melanoma treatment: friend or foe?

The clinical development of selective BRAF inhibitors for metastatic BRAF V600 mutant melanoma patients has been a major breakthrough in targeted therapeutics. Objective response rates of approximately 50% have been observed in the Phase III studies of the BRAF inhibitors vemurafenib and dabrafenib. The side effects can be relatively common, including proliferative skin toxicities. The latter range from hyperkeratosis and keratoacanthomas (KAs) to squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) and new primary melanomas. In addition, case reports on the emergence of gastric/colonic polyps and RAS mutant malignancies have been described during BRAF inhibitor therapy. These events have been attributed to paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway in BRAF wild-type cells exposed to selective BRAF inhibitors in addition to increased RAS activity. Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition appears to improve clinical outcomes and reduce cutaneous proliferation events as fewer KAs and SCCs have been observed with combination therapy. Next-generation pan-RAF inhibitors ('paradox breakers') and ERK inhibitors may further enhance clinical activity in metastatic BRAF-mutant melanoma patients and mitigate this paradoxical oncogenesis. Further investigation into the potential long-term effects of selective BRAF inhibitors is warranted as expanded use of these agents is expected in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma and other malignancies.

Body mass index as a prognostic marker for biochemical recurrence in Dutch men treated with radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether body mass index (BMI) is a prognostic factor for biochemical recurrence (BCR) in Dutch men after radical prostatectomy (RP), as although epidemiological studies of obesity in relation to prostate cancer have provided conflicting results, recent studies from the USA suggest that a higher BMI is a risk factor for progression of prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of the 1417 patients with prostate cancer who had RP at two University hospitals, 1302 were included in the present study. BMI (kg/m(2)) classes were defined as normal (<25), overweight (25-30) and obese (> or =30). The median follow-up was 59 months and clinical data were obtained retrospectively from charts. BCR was defined as two consecutive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of >0.1 ng/mL. RESULTS: In all, 600 patients were classified as having normal weight (43.9%), 665 as overweight (48.6%) and 103 as obese (7.5%). Overall, 297 patients developed BCR after RP; the 10-year risk (95% confidence interval) of BCR was 31.9 (26.6-37.2)%, 30.5 (25.8-35.2)% and 23.9 (14.9-32.9)% for patients in the three categories, respectively (P = 0.836). Multivariable proportional hazard regression analyses of BMI and established prognostic factors for BCR did not change these results. CONCLUSION: BMI appeared to have no prognostic value for BCR in Dutch patients with clinically localized prostate cancer and treated with RP.