Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil ; 101(10): 913-919, 2022 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36104843

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We examined the long-term effects of low-intensity electrical stimulation on (micro)vasculature and sitting pressure of a home-based, wearable electrical stimulation device in a pilot feasibility study. DESIGN: In a cohort observation before-after trial, nine middle-aged male (n = 8) and female (n = 1) individuals (48 ± 15 yrs) with American Spinal Injury Association A-C classified chronic (1-24 yrs) spinal cord injury underwent 12 wks of self-administered daily, low-intensity gluteal and hamstring electrical stimulation (50 Hz, 6 hrs [30-min electrical stimulation, 15-min rest]). Common femoral artery diameter and blood blow were determined with ultrasound, skin vascular function during local heating was assessed using Laser-Doppler flowmetry, thigh volume was estimated using leg circumferences and skinfolds, and interface sitting pressure was measured using pressure mapping. RESULTS: Resting common femoral artery diameter increased (0.73 ± 0.20 to 0.79 ± 0.22 cm, P < 0.001) and baseline common femoral artery blood flow increased (0.28 ± 0.12 to 0.40 ± 0.15 l/min, P < 0.002). Gluteal cutaneous vascular conductance showed a time*temperature interaction (P = 0.01) with higher conductance at 42°C after 12 wks. Ischial peak pressure decreased (P = 0.003) by 32 ± 23 mm Hg and pressure gradient decreased (23 ± 7 to 16 ± 6 mm Hg, P = 0.007). Thigh volume increased (+19%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Twelve-week daily home-based gluteal and hamstring electrical stimulation is feasible and effective to improve (micro)vasculature and sitting pressure, and electrical stimulation may have clinical implications for ameliorating pressure ulcers and (micro)vascular complications in spinal cord injury.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy , Spinal Cord Injuries , Buttocks , Electric Stimulation , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sitting Position
2.
Psychooncology ; 30(5): 635-648, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33533166

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Patients with breast cancer face cognitive impairment that affects their quality of life; partially attributable to treatment. Our aim was to detail the prevalence and change of cognitive impairment during the course of treatment. We also investigated the effect of therapy (chemotherapy [CT]) vs. radiotherapy and/or endocrine therapy vs. healthy controls). METHODS: This article reviews longitudinal cohort studies published to date in Medline and Embase that (i) assess cognition before and after therapy, (ii) report prevalence cognitive impairment or change, and (iii) use standardized and valid neuropsychological tests. We used the original authors' criteria for cognitive impairment. RESULTS: The title and abstract of 891 articles were screened, resulting in the identification of 90 potentially relevant articles while applying the eligibility criteria. After full-text examination, 17 studies were included. Prevalence of cognitive impairment range from 25% before therapy, through 24% after therapy to 21% at maximal 1-year follow-up (FU). Compared to their pretreatment cognitive functioning, 24% of patients decline after treatment and 24% at 1-year FU. Some studies also reported cognitive improvement showing that 15% and 31% of patients improve, respectively. In general, patients undergoing CT have a higher chance of cognitive impairment and decline than no-CT patients and healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that one out of four breast cancer patients shows cognitive impairment prior to treatment administration CT and a significant number of patients decline during the course of disease, suggesting that cognitive impairment is not exclusively related to CT and/or no-CT therapies. This study shows that assessment of cognitive functioning, ideally over time, is crucial and may help the implementation of personalized rehabilitation pathways.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Cognitive Dysfunction , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Prevalence , Quality of Life
3.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil ; 97(10): 721-726, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29672351

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Functional electrical stimulation (FES) may help to reduce the risk of developing macrovascular and microvascular complications in people with spinal cord injury. Low-intensity FES has significant clinical potential because this can be applied continuously throughout the day. This study examines the acute effects of low-intensity FES using wearable clothing garment on vascular blood flow and oxygen consumption in people with spinal cord injury. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional observation study. METHODS: Eight participants with a motor complete spinal cord injury received four 3-min unilateral FES to the gluteal and hamstring muscles. Skin and deep femoral artery blood flow and oxygen consumption were measured at baseline and during each bout of stimulation. RESULTS: Femoral artery blood flow increased by 18.1% with the application of FES (P = 0.02). Moreover, femoral artery blood flow increased further during each subsequent block of FES (P = 0.004). Skin perfusion did not change during an individual block of stimulation (P = 0.66). Skin perfusion progressively increased with each subsequent bout (P < 0.001). There was no change in femoral or skin perfusion across time in the nonstimulated leg (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Low-intensity FES acutely increased blood flow during stimulation, with a progressive increase across subsequent FES bouts. These observations suggest that continuous, low-intensity FES may represent a practical and effective strategy to improve perfusion and reduce the risk of vascular complications.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy , Femoral Artery/physiopathology , Microcirculation/physiology , Regional Blood Flow/physiology , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Oxygen Consumption , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy
5.
J Rehabil Med ; 46(6): 493-503, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24819297

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the enabling factors and barriers experienced in the Wheelchair Expert Evaluation Laboratory - implementation (WHEEL-i) project, in which scientific knowledge, tools and associated systematic analyses of hand-rim wheelchair propulsion technique, user's wheelchair propulsion capacity, wheelchair-user interface, and wheelchair mechanics were implemented in 2 rehabilitation centres. DESIGN: Implementation project. PATIENTS: Spinal cord injury. METHODS: In this implementation project standardized tests were performed: wheelchair skills tests, 2 questionnaires, and a steady-state exercise test on a treadmill in which propulsion technique (forces and torques) and physical strain (oxygen uptake, heart rate and mechanical efficiency) were measured. RESULTS: Good interpretation of the test outcomes was the most important barrier. In order to discuss individual wheelchair performance results with patients and clinicians, reference data were developed, smallest detectable differences were calculated and software was developed to simultaneously show video recordings and force and torque signals. CONCLUSION: Based on pilot results, the greatest barrier to systematic monitoring of the individual wheelchair fitting and learning process in rehabilitation with, among others, instrumented measurement wheels, was interpretation of outcomes. For proper interpretation of individual outcomes, the availability of reference data, smallest detectable differences and visualization of outcomes is of utmost importance.


Subject(s)
Arm/physiology , Motor Skills/physiology , Spinal Cord Injuries/rehabilitation , Wheelchairs , Biomechanical Phenomena , Equipment Design , Exercise Test , Heart Rate , Humans , Learning , Locomotion , Netherlands , Practice, Psychological , Rehabilitation Centers , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 53(9): 1646-53, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24729397

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore symptoms and symptom development during the earliest phases of RA in patients with seropositive arthralgia and patients newly diagnosed with RA. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with 15 seropositive patients (anti-CCP positive, and often with arthralgia) and 11 newly presenting RA patients [classified according to the 2010 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria]. Feedback procedures shared the experiences of seropositive arthralgia patients with early RA patients and vice versa. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Symptoms common to both groups included joint pain, psychological distress, muscle cramps, abnormal skin sensations, stiffness, loss of motor control, weakness, fatigue and sleeping difficulties. Also, patterns of symptom evolution and the order of symptom development were described. Seropositive arthralgia patients described pain as annoying, while RA patients described how the severity of pain intensified before diagnosis, to the point where symptoms were psychologically distressing. Patients with seropositive arthralgia described reddening of the skin and burning sensations that they felt were indicative of the onset of swelling. Intense pain appeared to precede the onset of swelling for those with RA, which was often palindromic and travelled between joints until it later became persistent. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the breadth of symptoms that constitute the earliest phases of RA. Further research is needed to develop measures of symptom patterns and clusters to allow the predictive utility of symptoms to be assessed and to allow the integration of aspects of the patient's history into evidence-based investigative and management algorithms for use in primary and secondary care.


Subject(s)
Arthralgia/diagnosis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Attitude to Health , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthralgia/complications , Arthralgia/psychology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/psychology , Biomarkers/blood , Disease Progression , Early Diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/etiology , Pain/psychology , Peptides, Cyclic/blood , Qualitative Research , Severity of Illness Index , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology
7.
J Clin Nurs ; 21(19-20): 2823-31, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21777313

ABSTRACT

AIM: To explore the treatment experiences in patients of Moroccan and Turkish origin and their rehabilitation therapists regarding an adapted outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programme. BACKGROUND: Non-native patients who participated in a cardiac rehabilitation programme at a Dutch rehabilitation centre had more difficulties to achieve the treatment aims than native Dutch patients. Therefore, an adapted programme for non-native patients, lacking proficiency in Dutch, has been instigated. The programme contains six adapted treatment modules and additional strategies: adapted education regarding (1) the heart and the vascular system and (2) the use of healthy food, with use the of (audio) visual educational materials, (3) adapted physical exercise module with explicit involvement of the patients' relatives, (4) standard use of professional interpreters, (5) increase in the number and length of consultations and (6) individual treatment instead of a group programme. DESIGN: Qualitative study. METHOD: Semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were conducted with eight patients of Moroccan and Turkish origin and five native Dutch rehabilitation therapists. By comparison, three native Dutch patients were interviewed regarding the regular programme. RESULTS: The results indicate that the patients' disease symptoms reduced and that patients adopted lifestyle changes. Therapists experienced that the number and length of the consultations, the structural use of interpreters and (audio) visual educational materials contributed to the achievement of the treatment aims. CONCLUSION: An adapted cardiac rehabilitation programme with separate modules and additional strategies for non-native patients appears to lead to satisfied patients who adopted lifestyle changes. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The findings of this study are important as the study highlights the practical actions that may be taken by physicians and healthworkers to adjust rehabilitation treatment to the needs of patients of non-native origin.


Subject(s)
Heart Diseases/rehabilitation , Heart Diseases/ethnology , Humans , Morocco/ethnology , Netherlands , Turkey/ethnology
8.
Disabil Rehabil ; 33(15-16): 1324-9, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21047289

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: (i) To determine whether adaptations for non-native patients have been implemented in pain rehabilitation programmes; (ii) to determine whether characteristics of the rehabilitation institute are related to having adaptations for non-native patients in place. SUBJECTS: Rehabilitation institutes and rehabilitation departments of general hospitals in The Netherlands who offer a pain rehabilitation programme. METHOD: A questionnaire was handed over in person or by e-mail to the rehabilitation physicians of the participating institutes. Twenty-seven (90%) questionnaires were returned. The questionnaire concerned programme adaptations and institute characteristics. The data were analysed by χ(2) tests or Fischer's exact tests and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Twelve institutes (44.4%) reported having adaptations in place for non-native patients in their pain rehabilitation programme. The most common adaptations were as follows: increased number of consultations (25.9% of the institutes); longer consultations (25.9%) and education for employees regarding cultural competency (11.1%). Institutes which treated a high percentage (≥11%) of non-native patients had implemented significantly more frequently adaptations to their rehabilitation programme (p = 0.04). The number of adaptations was neither associated with the proportion of non-native citizens in the local population nor with the number of the institutes' employees. CONCLUSION: Less than half of the institutes had implemented one or more programme adaptations for non-native patients. Institutes which had made adaptations to their rehabilitation programme treated more non-native patients.


Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants , Pain/ethnology , Pain/rehabilitation , Rehabilitation Centers/organization & administration , Adaptation, Psychological , Chronic Disease , Cultural Characteristics , Female , Health Plan Implementation , Humans , Logistic Models , Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Low Back Pain/ethnology , Low Back Pain/rehabilitation , Male , Minority Health , Multivariate Analysis , Netherlands , Pain/diagnosis , Physician-Patient Relations , Program Evaluation , Quality of Health Care , Risk Assessment , Socioeconomic Factors , Treatment Outcome
9.
J Rehabil Med ; 42(6): 566-73, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20549162

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore which factors led to drop-out in patients of Turkish and Moroccan origin with chronic non-specific low back pain who participated in a rehabilitation programme. SUBJECTS: Patients of Turkish or Moroccan origin with chronic non-specific low back pain (n = 23) from 2 rehabilitation centres and 4 rehabilitation departments of general hospitals in the Netherlands. METHODS: In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients of Turkish and Moroccan origin (n = 23), rehabilitation physicians (n = 8) and rehabilitation therapists (n = 2). Interviews were transcribed or summarized and subsequently coded and analysed according to themes. RESULTS: Most patients dropped out due to expectations of a specific medical diagnosis and pain relief as the main aims of rehabilitation treatment. Other reasons for drop-out detected in the interviews were: lack of acknowledgement of the patient's complaints, lack of trust in the rehabilitation physician, contradicting views to those of the physician from the patients' country of origin with regard to the cause and treatment of pain, and communication problems. CONCLUSION: The major reason for drop-out was patients having different expectations, from those of their health providers, of the aim of treatment, as a result of a different view of the origin and treatment of low back pain.


Subject(s)
Low Back Pain/rehabilitation , Patient Dropouts , Adult , Aged , Attitude to Health , Chronic Disease , Communication Barriers , Educational Status , Humans , Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Low Back Pain/psychology , Middle Aged , Minority Groups , Morocco/ethnology , Netherlands/ethnology , Patient Dropouts/psychology , Physician-Patient Relations , Surveys and Questionnaires , Turkey/ethnology
10.
Int J Rehabil Res ; 32(3): 232-7, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19381098

ABSTRACT

Dropout from a rehabilitation programme often occurs in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain of non-native origin. However, the exact dropout rate is not known. The objective of this study was to determine the difference in dropout rate between native and non-native patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain participating in a rehabilitation programme in The Netherlands. A retrospective study (n = 529) of patient files was performed in two rehabilitation centres and two rehabilitation departments of general hospitals in The Netherlands. Patient files were checked for diagnosis, status of origin, sex, age and outcome, that is, reason for finishing treatment. The difference in dropout rate between patients of Dutch and non-Dutch origin was tested by chi tests and logistic regression-analysis, controlling for age, sex, type of rehabilitation institute and phase of the rehabilitation programme. Dropout occurred among one fifth (18.7%) of the total patient population. Dropout among patients of non-Dutch origin was twice as high as among native Dutch patients (P < 0.001). In regression analyses dropout was related to status of non-Dutch origin, treatment in a rehabilitation centre and the diagnostic phase of a rehabilitation programme. In conclusion, patients of non-Dutch origin drop out considerably more frequently than native Dutch patients. Dropout is higher in the diagnostic phase than in the treatment phase and in rehabilitation centres than in hospitals. Future research should clarify the reasons for the high dropout rate in patients of non-native origin.


Subject(s)
Low Back Pain/rehabilitation , Patient Compliance , Patient Dropouts/psychology , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Logistic Models , Low Back Pain/epidemiology , Low Back Pain/ethnology , Male , Middle Aged , Minority Health , Netherlands/epidemiology , Patient Dropouts/statistics & numerical data , Rehabilitation Centers/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...