Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Neurol ; 270(12): 6057-6063, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37656291

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Primary hypokalemic periodic paralysis (HypoPP) is an inherited channelopathy most commonly caused by mutations in CACNA1S. HypoPP can present with different phenotypes: periodic paralysis (PP), permanent muscle weakness (PW), and mixed weakness (MW) with both periodic and permanent weakness. Little is known about the natural history of HypoPP. METHODS: In this 3-year follow-up study, we used the MRC scale for manual muscle strength testing and whole-body muscle MRI (Mercuri score) to assess disease progression in individuals with HypoPP-causing mutations in CACNA1S. RESULTS: We included 25 men (mean age 43 years, range 18-76 years) and 12 women (mean age 42 years, range 18-76 years). Two participants were asymptomatic, 21 had PP, 12 MW, and two PW. The median number of months between baseline and follow-up was 42 (range 26-52). Muscle strength declined in 11 patients during follow-up. Four of the patients with a decline in muscle strength had no attacks of paralysis during follow-up, and two of these patients had never had attacks of paralysis. Fat replacement of muscles increased in 27 patients during follow-up. Eight of the patients with increased fat replacement had no attacks of paralysis during follow-up, and two of these patients had never had attacks of paralysis. DISCUSSION: The study demonstrates that HypoPP can be a progressive myopathy in both patients with and without attacks of paralysis.


Subject(s)
Hypokalemic Periodic Paralysis , Male , Humans , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Hypokalemic Periodic Paralysis/genetics , Follow-Up Studies , Mutation/genetics , Muscle Weakness , Paralysis
2.
Trop Med Int Health ; 27(11): 999-1008, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36148529

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences in bacterial distribution and resistance patterns of relevant pathogens in skin and tissue infections among migrants compared to nonmigrants. METHODS: The population is based on a cohort of migrants who obtained residence as refugees or family-reunited migrants in Denmark between January 1993 and December 2015. The cohort was linked to positive swabs and tissue cultures collected from hospitals and general practitioners between the years 2000 and 2016 at the Department of Microbiology, University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark. We calculated odds ratios for pathogen distribution and resistance patterns using logistic regression by comparing migrants with nonmigrants. RESULTS: In total, 43,770 pathogens from 37,276 individuals were included, with Staphylococcus aureus being the most common bacterium. Migrants had higher odds of infections with Enterobacterales than nonmigrants (OR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.23-1.63) and lower odds of beta-haemolytic Streptococci (OR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.73-0.86). Family-reunited migrants and refugees had higher odds of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) than nonmigrants (OR 5.01, 95% CI: 3.73-6.73 and OR 3.66, 95% CI: 2.61-5.13). This was more pronounced in female migrants. The odds of ciprofloxacin-resistant Enterobacterales were higher in both family-reunited migrants and refugees than in nonmigrants (OR 2.21, 95% CI: 1.34-3.64 and OR 2.17, 95% CI: 1.34-3.52). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of MRSA and ciprofloxacin-resistant Enterobacterales was higher among family-reunited migrants and refugees than in nonmigrants. Our findings suggest an increased awareness for AMR in migrants.


Subject(s)
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcal Infections , Transients and Migrants , Female , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Ciprofloxacin , Denmark/epidemiology
4.
J Travel Med ; 26(8)2019 Dec 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31651032

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To investigate the distribution of urine isolates and antibiotic resistance patterns in the predominant uropathogen Escherichia coli in migrant and non-migrant individuals. METHODS: We linked a cohort consisting of all migrants obtaining residence as refugees or family-reunited migrants in Denmark between January 1993 and December 2015 to hospital urine samples examined from January 2000 to December 2015 at the Department of Microbiology, University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark. Samples from non-migrant individuals, Danish-born from Danish parents, were included as comparison. Analysis was carried out using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 14 561 first-time urine samples included, with E. coli being the most prevalent bacterial pathogen. Of the identified isolates, 4686/11 737 were E. coli among non-migrants and 1032/2824 among migrants.Sulfamethoxazol-Trimethoprim (SXT) resistance was found in 34.3% (350/1020) of E. coli isolates among migrants and 23.2% (1070/4619) among non-migrant patients [odds ratio (OR) 1.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.47-2.03]. Ciprofloxacin resistance was found in 5.8% (36/618) of isolates among migrants and 2.2% (67/3092) among non-migrants (OR 2.20, 95% CI: 1.37-3.53). Gentamicin (GEN) resistance was seen in 10.8% (61/565) and 4.7% (110/2328) of isolates (OR 2.33, 95% CI:1.63-3.34), Cefuroxime resistance in 8.5% (87/1019) and 3.4% (158/4618) (OR 2.40, 95% CI:1.77-3.24), Ampicillin (AMP) resistance in 51.4% and 40.8% (OR 1.65, 95% CI: 1.42-1.92) and Piperacillin-Tazobactam resistance in 6.9% (30/432) and 4.2% (65/1532) for migrant and non-migrant patients, respectively. When stratifying according to migrant status, family-reunited had higher odds of resistance than refugees for SXT, GEN and AMP. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of antibiotic resistance was significantly higher in E. coli isolates among migrants, both refugees and family-reunited, than non-migrant patients. Differences could not be explained by comorbidity or income. The results emphasize the importance of urine sample testing in both local-born and migrants before antibiotic start-up and point to the benefit of considering migration to secure individual treatment and equal health outcomes.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Emigrants and Immigrants , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Refugees , Transients and Migrants , Adult , Ciprofloxacin/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Denmark , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Escherichia coli Infections/urine , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Residence Characteristics , Urinalysis
5.
J Headache Pain ; 18(1): 46, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28421374

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of migraine with co-existing tension-type headache and neck pain is high in the general population. However, there is very little literature on the characteristics of these combined conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate a) the prevalence of migraine with co-existing tension-type headache and neck pain in a clinic-based sample, b) the level of physical activity, psychological well-being, perceived stress and self-rated health in persons with migraine and co-existing tension-type headache and neck pain compared to healthy controls, c) the perceived ability of persons with migraine and co-existing tension-type headache and neck pain to perform physical activity, and d) which among the three conditions (migraine, tension-type headache or neck pain) is rated as the most burdensome condition. METHODS: The study was conducted at a tertiary referral specialised headache centre where questionnaires on physical activity, psychological well-being, perceived stress and self-rated health were completed by 148 persons with migraine and 100 healthy controls matched by sex and average age. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to assess characteristics of migraine, tension-type headache and neck pain. RESULTS: Out of 148 persons with migraine, 100 (67%) suffered from co-existing tension-type headache and neck pain. Only 11% suffered from migraine only. Persons with migraine and co-existing tension-type headache and neck pain had lower level of physical activity and psychological well-being, higher level of perceived stress and poorer self-rated health compared to healthy controls. They reported reduced ability to perform physical activity owing to migraine (high degree), tension-type headache (moderate degree) and neck pain (low degree). The most burdensome condition was migraine, followed by tension-type headache and neck pain. CONCLUSIONS: Migraine with co-existing tension-type headache and neck pain was highly prevalent in a clinic-based sample. Persons with migraine and co-existing tension-type headache and neck pain may require more individually tailored interventions to increase the level of physical activity, and to improve psychological well-being, perceived stress and self-rated health.


Subject(s)
Exercise/psychology , Migraine Disorders/psychology , Neck Pain/psychology , Personal Satisfaction , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Tension-Type Headache/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Migraine Disorders/complications , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Neck Pain/complications , Neck Pain/physiopathology , Stress, Psychological/complications , Stress, Psychological/physiopathology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tension-Type Headache/complications , Tension-Type Headache/physiopathology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...