ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation testing is standard-of-care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Outcomes of second-/third-line compared to first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown conflicting results. We investigated utilization of molecular diagnostics and the outcomes of treatment with first-/second-line TKIs in patients with advanced NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was carried out of 2,206 patients with stage IIIb/IV NSCLC treated between 2008 and 2014 in four hospitals in the Netherlands. RESULTS: The rate of performing molecular diagnostics increased from 20.8% to 74.4% in the study period. The median overall survival of EGFR mutation-positive patients treated with TKIs was superior compared to EGFR mutation-negative patients treated with chemotherapy (720 vs. 274 days, p<0.0001). No difference in overall survival was found between EGFR mutation-positive patients treated only with TKIs compared to those treated with chemotherapy prior to TKIs, or upon progression under TKIs. CONCLUSION: The rate of EGFR testing has improved, increasing the number of patients eligible for targeted therapy. Chemotherapy, prior or subsequent to TKIs, for the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive patients, did not result in significantly better overall survival compared to that achieved with TKIs alone.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adult , Afatinib , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Disease-Free Survival , Erlotinib Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Female , Gefitinib , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Male , Middle Aged , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Netherlands , Quinazolines/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Severity of airflow obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is based on forced expiratory volume in one second expressed as percentage predicted (FEV1%predicted) derived from reference equations for spirometry results. AIMS: To establish how switching to new spirometric reference equations would affect severity staging of airflow obstruction in the Dutch primary care COPD patient population. METHODS: Spirometry tests of 3,370 adults aged >40 years with obstruction (postbronchodilator FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) <0.70) were analysed. The presence and severity of obstruction were defined using Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria. Postbronchodilator FEV1%predicted was calculated using three reference equations: corrected European Community of Steel and Coal (ECSC) (currently recommended in Dutch primary care), Swanney et al., and Global Lung Initiative (GLI). Discordances between severity classifications based on these equations were analysed. RESULTS: We studied 1,297 (38.5%) females and 2,073 males. Application of contemporary reference equations (i.e. Swanney and GLI) changed the GOLD severity stages obtained with the ECSC equations, mostly into milder stages. Severity of airflow obstruction was staged differently in 14.0% and 6.3%, respectively, when the Swanney et al. and GLI reference equations were applied. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the (corrected) ECSC equations, switching to more contemporary reference equations would result in lower FEV1 predicted values and affect interpretation of spirometry by reclassifying 6-14% of primary care COPD patients into different (mostly milder) severity stages. If and how this will affect GPs' treatment choices in individual patients with COPD requires further investigation.
