Assessing vaginal pressure profiles before and after prolapse surgery using an intravaginal pressure sensor (femfit®).

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The impact of surgery on pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function remains uncertain. There is a pressure differential along the length of the vagina, influenced by surrounding active and passive tissue structures, giving rise to a pressure profile. The aim of this study is to determine if an intravaginal pressure sensor, femfit®, can measure differences in pressure profiles before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: This pilot study includes 22 women undergoing POP surgery. Intravaginal pressure profiles were measured with femfit® pre- and post-surgery and differences tested using paired Student's t-tests. Patients completed validated questionnaires for vaginal, bowel, and urinary incontinence symptoms pre- and post-POP surgery and a femfit® usability questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixteen sets of vaginal pressure data were analysed. The highest pressure generated was identified as the peak PFM pressure, whilst all sensor measurements provided a pressure profile. Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was measured by the most distal sensor, 8. On average, the difference between peak PFM pressure and IAP was significantly greater post-surgery (p < 0.01). Urinary and vaginal symptom questionnaire scores were significantly improved after POP surgery. Femfit® usability questionnaires demonstrated high levels of patient acceptability. CONCLUSIONS: Women generate higher peak PFM pressures compared to IAP post-POP surgery, with pressure profiles that are comparable to women without POP. This metric might be useful to assess the outcome of POP surgery and encourage women to maintain this profile via PFM training, potentially reducing POP recurrence risk.

Assessing exercises recommended for women at risk of pelvic floor disorders using multivariate statistical techniques.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: There is a widely held, but untested, belief that certain exercises and activities generate intraabdominal pressure (IAP) that may compromise the function of the pelvic floor muscles. Women with, or at risk of, pelvic floor disorders are advised therefore to refrain from these exercises and activities in order to theoretically protect their pelvic floor. The aim of this study was to compare IAPs generated during exercises of different types that are recommended to women as pelvic floor "safe" with those generated during the corresponding conventional exercises that women are typically cautioned against. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional cohort study. All participants were guided by a trained exercise practitioner through a series of ten exercise pairs, one version recommended to women as pelvic floor "safe" and one conventional version which women are cautioned against. IAP components were extracted from the pressure traces from a wireless intravaginal pressure sensor and used in multivariate linear regression modelling, canonical discriminant analysis, and linear mixed modelling. RESULTS: A total of 53 participants were recruited. After adjusting for age, body mass index and parity, there was an exercise type-version effect (p < 0.01). After taking into account all pressure components of the IAP trace, there was a significant difference in IAP between the recommended and discouraged versions of the same exercise for five of the ten exercise types. Coughing and the Valsalva manoeuvre generated IAPs that were distinct from those generated by the exercises. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in IAPs were found between the recommended and discouraged versions of the same exercise for all exercise types. In particular, the IAPs generated during the two versions of ball rotations, lunges, core, push-ups and squats did not differ significantly. Performing the recommended pelvic floor "safe" version instead of the discouraged conventional version of these exercises may not necessarily protect the pelvic floor and vice versa.

Characterizing levator-ani muscle stiffness pre- and post-childbirth in European and Polynesian women in New Zealand: a pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: The influence of levator-ani muscles on second-stage labor is poorly understood. The ability of these muscles to stretch without damage may affect birth outcomes, but little is known about material properties, effects of pregnancy and/or ethnicity on levator-ani stiffness. There are strong associations between muscle damage and subsequent pelvic floor disorders. This study aimed to quantify levator-ani muscle stiffness during the third trimester of pregnancy and postpartum in European and Polynesian women. Associations between stiffness, obstetric variables, and the risk of intrapartum levator-ani injury (avulsion) were investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective observational pilot study. A total of 167 (106 European and 61 Polynesian) nulliparous women were recruited antenatally; 129 returned postnatally. Participants were assessed between 36 and 38 weeks' gestation and three to five months postpartum. Assessments included pelvic floor ultrasound, elastometry testing, and validated questionnaires on pelvic floor function. Logistic regression, Student t-, Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests were used as appropriate. RESULTS: There are significant differences between antenatal and postnatal muscle stiffness measurements (p < 0.01). Stiffness was significantly higher in the European cohort (p = 0.03). There were more avulsion injuries in European (20%) than in Polynesian (9%) women. There were no significant differences in antenatal stiffness between women with and without avulsion, but change in stiffness (antenatal to postnatal) was significantly less in the avulsion group. There were no associations between stiffness, and other obstetric variables, epidural anesthesia seemed protective (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of levator-ani muscle stiffness is feasible. Muscle stiffness is significantly different before and after birth.

Vaginal mesh for prolapse: a long-term prospective study of 218 mesh kits from a single centre.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim was to assess the long-term surgical outcomes and complications in patients undergoing mesh-augmented vaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: This is a report of a prospective long-term follow-up experience from the Urogynaecological Service, Counties Manukau District Health Board (CMDHB), Auckland, New Zealand. The subjects were 158 symptomatic women undergoing mesh-augmented prolapse repair (218 kits, Feb 2005 to July 2013) using the Apogee and/or Perigee kits (with IntePro mesh until November 2009, and IntePro Lite mesh thereafter). A dedicated electronic database was used. RESULTS: The median follow-up times were 138 and 105 weeks for the Apogee and Perigee kits, respectively; 56.6% and 48.8% of these kits, respectively, were inserted for recurrent prolapse. Cure rates for prolapse using mesh kits in patients with a history of native tissue POP repair in the same compartment were 90.91% for the anterior compartment (60 of 66) and 95.74% for the posterior compartment (45 of 47). The cumulative mesh extrusion/exposure rate was 15.8% of patients (11.5% of mesh kits) and was significantly higher with the Apogee kit than with the Perigee kit (P = 0.03). The rate of extrusion/exposure was significantly lower with IntePro Lite than with IntePro (P = 0.04 for Perigee and P = 0.0001 for Apogee). There was a significantly higher rate of extrusion/exposure with the Perigee kit in women with previous anterior compartment native tissue repair than with the Apogee kit in women with previous posterior compartment native tissue repair (21.2% versus 6.4%; P = 0.03). Only 8% of extrusions/exposures needed revision of the mesh. A set of significant predictors of mesh extrusion/exposure was identified. Overall success rates were 81.4% (110/135) for the Perigee kit and 74.7% (62/83) for the Apogee kit. CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the longest prospective mesh follow-up studies to date from a single centre and highlights the need for continuing surveillance despite high overall success rates.

Clinical evaluation of a high-fidelity wireless intravaginal pressure sensor.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: A wireless intravaginal pressure sensor (IVPS) has been developed to quantify abdominal pressure (P(abd)) changes during exercise and activities of daily living to guide post-operative advice given to women. In this pilot study, we aimed to compare IVPS performance, comfort, retention, and acceptability to a standard fluid-filled intrarectal pressure catheter currently used to measure P(abd) during routine urodynamics. METHODS: A Life-Tech 3-mm urodynamic intrarectal catheter and IVPS were inserted concurrently in volunteers attending a urodynamics clinic. The IVPS was positioned above the levator plate and the intrarectal catheter positioned in routine fashion well above the anal sphincter. Routine urodynamics was undertaken, with women asked to perform star jumps if coughing or Valsalva did not invoke leakage. Subjects rated device comfort using a visual analogue scale (0-10). Repeated measures Bland-Altman analysis determined level of agreement (LOA) between the two devices for peak pressures for each activity. RESULTS: Twenty-seven women were recruited, 67% of the participants preferred the IVPS, 18% the intrarectal catheter, while 15% had no preference. Mean comfort score was 0.9 ± 1.7 and 2.1 ± 2.6 (p = 0.049) for the IVPS and intrarectal catheter respectively. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated minimal bias for cough and Valsalva, however LOA were wide. Differences were more prominent during star jumps where rapid dynamic pressure changes occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The IVPS had a higher comfort score and was well retained. The LOA between the two systems was moderate, but the high sampling rate and lower susceptibility to motion artefacts of the IVPS may provide more accurate information that will be important clinically.

Unipedicle TRAM flap procedures are associated with symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction in women: a case control study.

HYPOTHESIS: Chronic conditions that cause raised intra-abdominal pressure, such as obesity, chronic cough and constipation are risk factors for pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). We hypothesise that unipedicle transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (UTRAM flap) for reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer increases the risk of PFD. AIM: The aim of this study is to assess if there is increased risk of pelvic floor dysfunction associated with UTRAM flap reconstruction compared to controls. METHOD: 39 patients who had UTRAM flaps for breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer between year 1997 to 2004 were recruited as cases. They were matched by age with 36 controls, who have had breast cancer but not U TRAM flap reconstruction as part of their treatment. Validated questionnaires (Pelvic floor distress inventory PFDI-20) were completed by study participants, and demographic data were also collected. Mixed effect analysis of variance was used to assess for statistical difference in the mean PFDI-20 scores, adjusted by age, parity, BMI and history of gynaecological surgery. RESULTS: The case group has significantly higher mean PFDI-20 score than the control group, 13 (3-29) vs 5.5 (1-11), MH odds ratio 1.8 (1.1-2.8), p value=0.02. CONCLUSION: Women who have undergone U TRAM flap reconstruction appeared to have more symptoms of PFD, compared to women who did not have the procedure. It is likely that the reduction in volume of abdomen, following surgery leads to an increase in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) which predisposes these women to PFD. Future work to assess changes in IAP is proposed.

Hormonal manipulation in women with chronic, cyclic irritable bladder symptoms and pelvic pain.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic, painful bladder symptoms are diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for urologists and gynecologists. The aims of this study were to evaluate women with menstrual cycle-related changes in their interstitial cystitis symptoms, to treat them with hormonal manipulation, and to follow them long term. STUDY DESIGN: The cases of women who were referred to a tertiary care center with interstitial cystitis and menstrual cycle exacerbation of symptoms were evaluated in a retrospective study. Fifteen women had undergone laparoscopy that was followed immediately by cystoscopy and bladder hydrodistension. Patients were then treated with leuprolide acetate or oral contraceptive pills. RESULTS: Patient age ranged from 23 to 48 years. The duration of symptoms ranged from 1 to 26 years. Ten patients (67%) had findings of both interstitial cystitis and peritoneal endometriosis. Five of 15 patients (33%) had interstitial cystitis, but no endometriosis was found. Symptoms improved for 8 of 9 women who were treated with leuprolide acetate and for 5 of 6 women who were treated with oral contraceptive pills. Patients were followed up for an average of 55 months. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic laparoscopy should be considered together with hydrodistension of the bladder for women with pelvic pain and irritative bladder symptoms that are exacerbated premenstrually. Endometriosis is often present in patients with these complex symptoms. This is the first report of hormonal treatment for chronic, cyclic irritative bladder symptoms; improvement appears to occur even when endometriosis is not identified by laparoscopy.