Implementing a Formalized Risk-Based Approach to Determine Candidacy for Multidisciplinary CKD Care: A Descriptive Cohort Study.

Background: The kidney failure risk equation (KFRE) can be used to predict progression to end-stage kidney disease in a clinical setting. Objective: Evaluate implementation of a formalized risk-based approach in nephrologists' outpatient clinics and multidisciplinary chronic kidney disease (CKD) clinics to determine candidacy for multidisciplinary care, and the impact of CKD care selection on clinical outcomes. Design: Population-based descriptive cohort study. Setting: Alberta Kidney Care South. Patients: Adults attending or considered for a multidisciplinary CKD clinic between April 1, 2017, and March 31, 2019. Measurements: Exposure-The course of CKD care assigned by the nephrologist: management at multidisciplinary CKD clinic; management by a nephrologist or primary care physician. Primary Outcome-CKD progression, defined as commencement of kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Secondary Outcomes-Death, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations. Methods: We linked operational data from the clinics (available until March 31, 2019) with administrative health and laboratory data (available until March 31, 2020). Comparisons among patient groups, courses of care, and clinical settings with negative binomial regression count models and calculated unadjusted and fully adjusted incidence rate ratios. For the all-cause death outcome, we used Cox survival models to calculate unadjusted and fully adjusted hazard ratios. Results: Of the 1748 patients for whom a KFRE was completed, 1347 (77%) remained in or were admitted to a multidisciplinary CKD clinic, 310 (18%) were managed by a nephrologist only, and 91 (5%) were referred back for management by their primary care physician. There was a much higher kidney failure risk among patients who remained at or were admitted to a multidisciplinary CKD clinic (median 2-year risk of 34.7% compared with 3.6% and 0.8% who remained with a nephrologist or primary care physician, respectively). None of the people managed by their primary care physician alone commenced KRT, while only 2 (0.6%) managed by a nephrologist without multidisciplinary CKD care commenced KRT. The rates of emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and death were lower in those assigned to management outside the multidisciplinary CKD clinics when compared with those managed in the multidisciplinary care setting. Limitations: The follow-up period may not have been long enough to determine outcomes, and potentially limited generalizability given variability of care in multidisciplinary clinics. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that a portion of patients can be directed to less resource-intensive care without a higher risk of adverse events. Trial registration: Not applicable.

Contexte: L'équation KFRE (Kidney Failure Risk Equation) peut être utilisée en environnement clinique pour prédire le risque d'évolution vers l'insuffisance rénale terminale (IRT). Objectif: Évaluer la mise en œuvre d'une approche structurée fondée sur le risque dans les cliniques multidisciplinaires d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC) et les cliniques ambulatoires des néphrologues afin de déterminer l'aptitude des patients à recevoir des soins multidisciplinaires et de mesurer l'incidence des soins d'IRC reçus sur les résultats cliniques. Conception: Étude de cohorte populationnelle descriptive. Cadre: Alberta Kidney Care South. Sujets: Adultes fréquentant ou envisageant de fréquenter une clinique multidisciplinaire d'IRC entre le 1er avril 2017 et le 31 mars 2019. Mesures: Exposition­le parcours de soins d'IRC attribué par le néphrologue ­ prise en charge en clinique multidisciplinaire d'IRC; prise en charge par un néphrologue ou un médecin de premier recours. Principaux résultats­progression de l'IRC, définie comme l'amorce d'une thérapie de remplacement rénal (TRR). Résultats secondaires­décès, visites aux urgences et hospitalisations. Méthodologie: Nous avons couplé les données opérationnelles des cliniques (disponibles jusqu'au 31 mars 2019) aux données administratives de santé et aux données de laboratoire (disponibles jusqu'au 31 mars 2020). Des modèles de régression binomiale négative et des rapports des taux d'incidence non corrigés et entièrement corrigés ont servi aux comparaisons entre les groupes de patients, les parcours de soins et les environnements cliniques. Les risques relatifs non corrigés et entièrement corrigés de décès toutes causes confondues ont été calculés à l'aide de modèles de survie de Cox. Résultats: Des 1 748 patients avec une KFRE calculée, 1 347 (77 %) sont restés ou ont été admis dans une clinique multidisciplinaire d'IRC, 310 (18 %) ont été pris en charge par un néphrologue seulement et 91 (5 %) ont été orientés pour une prise en charge par leur médecin de premier recours. Le risque d'insuffisance rénale terminale était beaucoup plus élevé chez les patients restés ou admis dans une clinique multidisciplinaire d'IRC (risque médian à 2 ans : 34,7 %) que chez ceux pris en charge par un néphrologue (3,6 %) et par un médecin de premier recours (0,8 %). Aucun patient pris en charge par un médecin de premier recours n'avait amorcé une TRR; 2 personnes (0,6 %) prises en charge par un néphrologue sans soins multidisciplinaires d'IRC avaient amorcé une TRR. Les taux de visites aux urgences, d'hospitalisations et de décès étaient plus faibles chez les patients pris en charge à l'extérieur des cliniques multidisciplinaires d'IRC comparativement à ceux pris en charge dans ces cliniques. Limites: La période de suivi n'était peut-être pas été assez longue pour déterminer les résultats. La variabilité des soins dans les cliniques multidisciplinaires pourrait également limiter la généralisation des résultats. Conclusion: Nos résultats suggèrent qu'une partie des patients pourrait être dirigée vers des soins nécessitant moins de ressources sans hausser le risque d'événements indésirables.

An eHealth self-management intervention for adults with chronic kidney disease, My Kidneys My Health: a mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: There is limited research of electronic tools for self-management for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We sought to evaluate participant engagement, perceived self-efficacy and website usage in a preliminary evaluation of My Kidneys My Health, a patient-facing eHealth tool in Canada. METHODS: We conducted an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study of adults with CKD who were not on kidney replacement therapy and who had access to My Kidneys My Health for 8 weeks. Outcomes included acceptance (measured by the Technology Acceptance Model), self-efficacy (measured by the Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scale [CDSES]) and website usage patterns (captured using Google Analytics). We analyzed participant interviews using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-nine participants with CKD completed baseline questionnaires, of whom 22 completed end-of-study questionnaires; data saturation was achieved with 15 telephone interviews. Acceptance was high, with more than 70% of participants agreeing or strongly agreeing that the website was easy to use and useful. Of the 22 who completed end-of-study questionnaires, 18 (82%) indicated they would recommend its use to others and 16 (73%) stated they would use the website in the future. Average scores for website satisfaction and look and feel were 7.7 (standard deviation [SD] 2.0) and 8.2 (SD 2.0) out of 10, respectively. The CDSES indicated that participants gained an increase in CKD information. Interviewed participants reported that the website offered valuable information and interactive tools for patients with early or newly diagnosed CKD, or for those experiencing changes in health status. Popular website pages and interactive features included Food and Diet, What is CKD, My Question List and the Depression Screener. INTERPRETATION: Participants indicated that the My Kidneys My Health website provided accessible content and tools that may improve self-efficacy and support in CKD self-management. Further evaluation of the website's effectiveness in supporting self-management among a larger, more heterogenous population is warranted.

Use of Google Analytics to Explore Dissemination Activities for an Online CKD Clinical Pathway: A Retrospective Study.

Background: Data on dissemination strategies that generate awareness of clinical pathways for kidney care are limited. Objective: This study reports the application of Google Analytics to describe the reach and use of the Chronic Kidney Disease Pathway (CKD-P) using a multi-faceted dissemination strategy. Design: The design of this study is a retrospective descriptive study. Setting: This study was conducted in Alberta, Canada. Patients: Individuals who accessed the CKD-P Web site between November 5, 2014, and May 31, 2019. Measurements: Dissemination activities included print, electronic, in-person meetings, and a laboratory prompt. We used Google Analytics over a 5-year period to evaluate the following CKD-P Web site user metrics: number of sessions, pageviews, visit duration, user path, and bounce rate (when an individual visits a single page of the Web site and leaves the Web site without interacting with additional pages). Methods: We plotted dissemination activities alongside Web site metrics using control charts and described the data using means and percentages. We performed chi-square test for trends to evaluate year-over-year usage. Results: There were 83 294 users, 90 805 sessions, and 231 684 pageviews. The overall bounce rate was 45.7%. Each user had an average of 1.5 sessions and a session duration of 2 minutes and 8 seconds. There was a significant positive trend for total annual users (P = .008), new users (P = .009), number of sessions (P = .006), and pageviews per day (P = .016). Limitations: We were unable to confirm if users were primary care providers and if word-of-mouth dissemination among providers/researchers drove people to use the CKD-P. Conclusions: Google Analytics was a useful and accessible tool for evaluating CKD-P reach and use trends. It was challenging to identify how individual dissemination activities contributed to CKD-P reach; however, repeated dissemination appeared to play a role in increasing CKD-P use. Trial registration: Not applicable-observational study design.

Contexte: Il existe peu de données sur les stratégies de diffusion pour sensibiliser les différents intervenants aux plans d'intervention en santé rénale. Objectif: Cette étude rend compte de l'utilization de Google Analytics pour décrire la portée et l'utilization d'un plan d'intervention en ligne pour l'insuffisance rénale chronique (CKD-P ­ Chronic Kidney Disease Pathway) à l'aide d'une stratégie de diffusion à plusieurs facettes. Conception de l'étude: Étude descriptive rétrospective. Cadre: Alberta, Canada. Sujets: Les individus ayant accédé au site Web CKD-P entre le 5 novembre 2014 et le 31 mai 2019. Mesures: Les activités de diffusion comprenaient des documents imprimés, des documents électroniques, des réunions en personne et un lien internet vers le site web de CKD-P lors de la transmission d'un résultat anormal de laboratoire. Nous avons utilisé Google Analytics pendant cinq ans pour évaluer les mesures suivantes pour les utilisateurs du site Web CKD-P: nombre de sessions, vues de page, durée des visites, chemin d'accès utilisateur et taux de rebond (lorsqu'une personne visite une seule page du site Web et le quitte sans interagir avec d'autres pages). Méthodologie: Les activités de diffusion et les paramètres du site Web sont présentés à l'aide de tableaux de contrôle, et les données à l'aide de moyennes et de pourcentages. Un test de Chi-Deux a servi à déterminer les tendances et évaluer l'utilization d'une année sur l'autre. Résultats: Nous avons répertorié 83 294 utilisateurs, 90 805 sessions et 231 684 pages consultées. Le taux de rebond global était de 45,7 %. En moyenne, chaque utilisateur comptait 1,5 session dont la durée moyenne était de 2 minutes 8 secondes. On a observé une tendance positive significative pour le nombre total annuel d'utilisateurs (P = 0,008), les nouveaux utilisateurs (P = 0,009), le nombre de sessions (P = 0,006) et les vues de pages par jour (P = 0,016). Limites: Il n'a pas été possible de confirmer si les utilisateurs étaient des fournisseurs de soins primaires et si la diffusion de bouche-à-oreille entre les fournisseurs/chercheurs avait amené les gens à utiliser CKD-P. Conclusion: Google Analytics s'est avéré un outil utile et accessible pour évaluer les tendances de portée et d'utilization de CKD-P. Il est difficile d'établir comment les activités de diffusion individuelles contribuent à la portée de CKD-P; la diffusion répétée semble néanmoins jouer un rôle dans l'augmentation de l'utilization de CKD-P. Enregistrement de l'essai: Sans objet ­ étude observationnelle.

Development and Preliminary Psychometric Testing of an Adult Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management (CKD-SM) Questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Self-management focused interventions to slow chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression are increasingly common. However, valid self-report instruments to evaluate the effectiveness of self-management interventions in CKD are limited. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop and conduct preliminary psychometric testing of a patient-informed questionnaire to assess aspects of CKD self-management for patients with CKD categories G2-G5 (not on kidney replacement therapy [KRT]). DESIGN: Self-administered electronic questionnaires (multiphase). SETTING: Online. SAMPLE: Canadian adults with CKD categories G2-G5 (not on KRT). METHODS: The CKD-SM questionnaire was developed and tested in 4 phases. First, we used a content coverage matrix to identify potential questionnaire items based on existing self-efficacy questionnaires, self-management theories, and patient-identified priorities. Second, the draft questionnaire was reviewed by a multidisciplinary expert panel using percent acceptance to finalize the questionnaire. Third, we tested an electronic version of the questionnaire with patients with CKD, evaluating preliminary psychometric properties including internal consistency, face validity, and content validity. Finally, we tested the questionnaire within a CKD self-management intervention study and collected data on internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and pre-post responsiveness. RESULTS: We identified 22 potential questionnaire items for the first round of expert panel review. Thirteen items were retained in the first round. Eleven additional items were tested in the second review round and all were retained. Of the 24 items retained following expert review of the questionnaire, 21 had greater than 85% acceptance (content validity index [CVI], 0.75-1.00) and 3 items had 75% acceptance (CVI, 0.5). Thirty patients with CKD from across Canada participated in the pilot testing, and 29 patients participated in the CKD self-management intervention study. In the pilot test, several participants requested inclusion of a question that explicitly addressed mental health; consequently, an additional item relating to mental health was included prior to the intervention study (final questionnaire total was 25 items). Internal consistency (Cronbach α) was high for both the pilot (0.921) and intervention study (0.912). Preintervention test-retest reliability, measured with intraclass correlation coefficient, was acceptable (0.732, 95% confidence interval, 0.686-0.771, P < .001), and paired pre/postintervention comparison, measured with Wilcoxon sign-rank, demonstrated significant increases in self-management (P < .05) despite stable preintervention test-retest responses. Participants were satisfied with the content, wording, and design. LIMITATIONS: The sample sizes were small for each component of the analysis, and the sampling was consecutive/convenience-based. CONCLUSIONS: We used self-management theories, patient-identified self-management needs, expert review, and conducted preliminary psychometric testing to finalize a CKD self-management questionnaire for patients with G2-G5 CKD (not on KRT). The finalized questionnaire assesses aspects of self-management for individuals with CKD and may be particularly helpful as a tool to evaluate self-management interventions among patients with CKD.

CONTEXTE: Les interventions focalisées sur la prise en charge par le patient qui visent à ralentir la progression de l'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC) sont de plus en plus courantes. Il existe cependant peu d'outils d'autodéclaration validés pour évaluer l'efficacité de ces interventions en contexte d'IRC. OBJECTIFS: Nous souhaitions élaborer un questionnaire destiné aux patients pour évaluer les aspects de la prise en charge de la néphropathie chronique par les patients atteints d'IRC de stade G2-G5 (ne suivant aucune thérapie de remplacement rénal [TRR]), puis réaliser des tests psychométriques préliminaires. CONCEPTION: Questionnaires électroniques autoadministrés (multiphases). CADRE: En ligne. ÉCHANTILLON: Des Canadiens adultes atteints d'IRC de grade G2-G5 (ne suivant aucune TRR). MÉTHODOLOGIE: Le questionnaire CKD-SM a été développé et testé en quatre phases : 1) une matrice de couverture de contenu a été utilisée pour déterminer les possibles éléments du questionnaire à partir des questionnaires d'auto-efficacité existants, des théories de prise en charge par le patient et des priorités identifiées par le patient; 2) le questionnaire préliminaire a été examiné par un groupe d'experts multidisciplinaire et finalisé avec le pourcentage d'acceptation; 3) une version électronique du questionnaire a été testée auprès de patients atteints d'IRC, pour en évaluer les propriétés psychométriques préliminaires, notamment la cohérence interne et la validité de la forme et du contenu, et enfin; 4) le questionnaire a été testé dans le cadre d'une étude portant sur les interventions par le patient en IRC et recueillant des données sur la cohérence interne, la fiabilité test-retest et la réactivité avant et après le test. RÉSULTATS: Nous avons défini 22 questions potentielles lors du premier tour de révision par le groupe d'experts. Treize questions ont été retenues au premier tour; onze questions supplémentaires ont été testées lors de la deuxième révision, et toutes ont été adoptées. Parmi les 24 questions retenues après révision du questionnaire par les experts, 21 présentaient une acceptation supérieure à 85 % (ratio de validité du contenu [RVC] : 0,75-1,00), contre 75 % pour les trois autres (RVC 0,5). Trente patients atteints d'IRC de partout au Canada ont participé à l'essai pilote tandis que 29 ont participé à l'étude d'intervention initiées par le patient en IRC. Pendant l'essai pilote, plusieurs participants ont demandé l'inclusion d'une question traitant explicitement de santé mentale; une question supplémentaire relative à la santé mentale a donc été incluse avant l'étude d'intervention (le questionnaire final comportait 25 questions). La cohérence interne (alpha de Cronbach) était élevée tant pour le pilote (0,921) que pour l'étude d'intervention (0,912). La fiabilité du test-retest préintervention, mesurée avec le coefficient de corrélation intra-classe, s'est avérée acceptable (0,732; IC : 0,686-0,771; p=<0,001) et la comparaison préintervention/post-intervention en paire, mesurée avec le test de rang de Wilcoxon, a montré une augmentation significative des interventions initiées par le patient (p<0,05) malgré des réponses stables au test-retest préintervention. Les participants se sont dits satisfaits du contenu, du libellé et de la conception de l'étude. LIMITES: Les échantillons pour chaque composante de l'analyse étaient faibles et l'échantillonnage était consécutif/basé sur la commodité. CONCLUSION: Nous avons utilisé des théories de prise en charge par le patient, les besoins identifiés par les patients, une revue par des experts et effectué des tests psychométriques préliminaires pour finaliser un questionnaire de prise en charge initiée par le patient de l'IRC (CKD-SM) pour les patients atteints d'IRC de stade G2-G5 (sans TRR). Le questionnaire finalisé évalue les aspects de l'autogestion chez les personnes atteintes d'IRC et peut être particulièrement utile comme outil d'évaluation de ces interventions chez ces patients.

Enhancing primary care capacity in chronic kidney disease management: a quality improvement educational initiative.

BACKGROUND: Gaps in identification, medical management and appropriate referral for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are evident. OBJECTIVE: We designed and implemented an interactive educational intervention (accredited workshop) to improve primary care providers' awareness of tools to support guideline-concordant CKD management. DESIGN: We used the Kern method to design the educational intervention and targeted the accredited workshops to primary care team members (physicians, nurses and allied health) in Alberta, Canada. We conducted anonymous pre-workshop and post-workshop surveys to identify practice-specific barriers to care, identify potential solutions, and evaluate provider confidence pre-intervention and post-intervention. We used non-parametric statistics to analyse Likert-type survey data and descriptive content analysis to categorise responses to open-ended survey questions. RESULTS: We delivered 12 workshops to 114 providers from September 2017 through March 2019. Significant improvements (p<0.001) in confidence to appropriately identify, manage and refer patients with CKD were observed. Participants identified several patient-level, provider-level, and system-level barriers and potential solutions to care for patients with CKD; the majority of these barriers were addressed in the interactive workshop. CONCLUSIONS: The Kern model was an effective methodology to design and implement an educational intervention to improve providers' confidence in managing patients with CKD in primary care. Future research is needed to determine if these perceived knowledge and confidence improvements affect patient outcomes and whether improvements are sustained long term.

Online clinical pathway for chronic kidney disease management in primary care: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical pathways aim to improve patient care. We sought to determine whether an online chronic kidney disease (CKD) clinical pathway was associated with improvements in CKD management. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective pre/post population-based cohort study using linked health data from Alberta, Canada. We included adults 18 years or older with mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73m2. The primary outcome was measurement of an outpatient urine albumin creatinine ratio (ACR) in a 28-day period, among people without a test in the prior year. Secondary outcomes included use of guideline-recommended drug therapies (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and statins). RESULTS: The study period spanned October 2010 to March 2017. There were 84 independent 28-day periods (53 pre, 31 post pathway implementation) including 345,058 adults. The population was predominantly female (56%) with median age 77 years; most had category 3A CKD (67%) and hypertension (82%). In adjusted segmented regression models, the increase in the rate of change of ACR testing was greatest in Calgary zone (adjusted OR 1.19 per year, 95% CI 1.16-1.21), where dissemination of the pathway was strongest; this increase was more pronounced in those without diabetes (adjusted OR 1.25 per year, 95% CI 1.21-1.29). Small improvements in guideline-concordant medication use were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: Following implementation of an online CKD clinical pathway, improvements in ACR testing were evident in regions where the pathway was most actively used, particularly among individuals without diabetes.

A Web-Based Self-Management Support Prototype for Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease (My Kidneys My Health): Co-Design and Usability Testing.

BACKGROUND: Supporting patients to self-manage their chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been identified as a research priority by patients with CKD and those who care for them. Self-management has been shown to slow CKD progression and improve the quality of life of individuals living with the disease. Previous work has identified a need for a person-centered, theory-informed, web-based tool for CKD self-management that can be individualized to a patient's unique situation, priorities, and preferences. We addressed this gap using an integrated knowledge translation method and patient engagement principles. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to conduct systematic co-design and usability testing of a web-based self-management prototype for adults with CKD (nondialysis and nontransplant) and their caregivers to enhance self-management support. METHODS: A multistep, iterative system development cycle was used to co-design and test the My Kidneys My Health prototype. The 3-step process included creating website features and content using 2 sequential focus groups with patients with CKD and caregivers, heuristic testing using the 10 heuristic principles by Nielsen, and usability testing through in-person 60-minute interviews with patients with CKD and their caregivers. Patients with CKD, caregivers, clinicians, researchers, software developers, graphic designers, and policy makers were involved in all steps of this study. RESULTS: In step 1, 18 participants (14 patients and 4 caregivers) attended one of the 2 sequential focus groups. The participants provided specific suggestions for simplifying navigation as well as suggestions to incorporate video, text, audio, interactive components, and visuals to convey information. A total of 5 reviewers completed the heuristic analysis (step 2), identifying items mainly related to navigation and functionality. Furthermore, 5 participants completed usability testing (step 3) and provided feedback on video production, navigation, features and functionality, and branding. Participants reported visiting the website repeatedly for the following features: personalized food tool, my health care provider question list, symptom guidance based on CKD severity, and medication advice. Usability was high, with a mean system usability score of 90 out of 100. CONCLUSIONS: The My Kidneys My Health prototype is a systematically developed, multifaceted, web-based CKD self-management support tool guided by the theory and preferences of patients with CKD and their caregivers. The website is user friendly and provides features that improve user experience by tailoring the content and resources to their needs. A feasibility study will provide insights into the acceptability of and engagement with the prototype and identify preliminary patient-reported outcomes (eg, self-efficacy) as well as potential factors related to implementation. This work is relevant given the shift to virtual care during the current pandemic times and provides patients with support when in-person care is restricted.

Preferences for a self-management e-health tool for patients with chronic kidney disease: results of a patient-oriented consensus workshop.

BACKGROUND: Electronic health (e-health) tools may support patients' self-management of chronic kidney disease. We aimed to identify preferences of patients with chronic kidney disease, caregivers and health care providers regarding content and features for an e-health tool to support chronic kidney disease self-management. METHODS: A patient-oriented research approach was taken, with 6 patient partners (5 patients and 1 caregiver) involved in study design, data collection and review of results. Patients, caregivers and clinicians from across Canada participated in a 1-day consensus workshop in June 2018. Using personas (fictional characters) and a cumulative voting technique, they identified preferences for content for 8 predetermined topics (understanding chronic kidney disease, diet, finances, medication, symptoms, travel, mental and physical health, work/school) and features for an e-health tool. RESULTS: There were 24 participants, including 11 patients and 6 caregivers, from across Canada. The following content suggestions were ranked the highest: basic information about kidneys, chronic kidney disease and disease progression; reliable information on diet requirements for chronic kidney disease and comorbidities, renal-friendly foods; affordability of medication, equipment, food, financial resources and planning; common medications, adverse effects, indications, cost and coverage; symptom types and management; travel limitations, insurance, access to health care, travel checklists; screening and supports to address mental health, cultural sensitivity, adjusting to new normal; and support to help integrate at work/school, restrictions. Preferred features included visuals, the ability to enter and track health information and interact with health care providers, "on-the-go" access, links to resources and access to personal health information. INTERPRETATION: A consensus workshop developed around personas was successful for identifying detailed subject matter for 8 predetermined topic areas, as well as preferred features to consider in the codevelopment of a chronic kidney disease self-management e-health tool. The use of personas could be applied to other applications in patient-oriented research exploring patient preferences and needs in order to improve care and relevant outcomes.

Content and Quality of Websites for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: An Environmental Scan.

BACKGROUND: Although numerous websites for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are available, little is known about their content and quality. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of CKD websites, and the degree to which they align with information needs identified by patients with CKD. METHODS: We identified websites by entering "chronic kidney disease" in 3 search engines: Google.com (with regional variants for Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States), Bing.com, and Yahoo.com. We included the first 50 unique English-language sites from each search. We evaluated website content using a 30-point scale comprising 8 priority content domains identified by patients with CKD (understanding CKD, diet, symptoms, medications, mental/physical health, finances, travel, and work/school). We used standardized tools to evaluate usability, reliability, and readability (DISCERN, HONcode, LIDA, Reading Ease, and Reading Grade Level). Two reviewers independently conducted the search, screen, and evaluation. RESULTS: Of the 2093 websites identified, 115 were included. Overall, sites covered a mean (SD) of 29% (17.8) of the CKD content areas. The proportion of sites covering content related to understanding CKD, symptoms, and diet was highest (97%, 80%, and 72%, respectively). The proportion of sites covering travel, finances, and work/school content was lowest (22%, 12%, and 12%, respectively). The mean (SD) scores for DISCERN, LIDA and HONcode were 68% (14.6), 71% (14.4), and 75% (17.2), respectively, considered above average for usability and reliability. The mean (SD) Reading Grade Level was 10.6 (2.8) and Reading Ease was 49.8 (14.4), suggesting poor readability. CONCLUSIONS: Although many CKD web sites were of reasonable quality, their readability was poor. Furthermore, most sites covered less than 30% of the content patients identified as important for CKD self-management. These results will inform content gaps in internet-accessible information on CKD self-management that should be addressed by future eHealth web-based tools.

CONTEXTE: Bien qu'il existe de nombreux sites Web s'adressant aux patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC), on en sait peu sur leur qualité et sur la pertinence de leur contenu. OBJECTIFS: Évaluer la qualité de sites Web traitant de l'IRC et vérifier s'ils sont en phase avec les besoins d'information formulés par les patients. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons répertorié des sites Web en entrant chronic kidney disease (insuffisance rénale chronique) dans trois moteurs de recherche, soit Google.com (et ses variantes régionales australienne, canadienne, britannique et étatsunienne), Bing.com et Yahoo.com. Ont été inclus les 50 premiers sites en anglais s'affichant sur chacun. Le contenu a été évalué avec une échelle en 30 points englobant huit domaines d'intérêt cités par les patients atteints d'IRC, soit Understanding CKD (comprendre l'IRC), Diet (régime alimentaire), Symptoms (symptômes), Medications (médicaments), Mental/Physical Health (santé physique/mentale), Finances (finances), Travel (voyage) et Work/School (travail/études). Des outils normalisés (DISCERN, HONcode, LIDA, Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level) ont été employés pour évaluer la convivialité, la fiabilité et la lisibilité des contenus. Deux examinateurs ont procédé à la recherche, au triage et à l'évaluation des sites de façon indépendante. RÉSULTATS: Des 2 093 sites répertoriés, 115 ont été inclus. Dans l'ensemble, ceux-ci couvraient les domaines d'intérêt à 29 % (17,8) en moyenne. La compréhension de l'IRC (97 %), les symptômes (80 %) et le régime alimentaire (72 %) se sont révélés les sujets abordés par une plus grande proportion des sites évalués. Les voyages (22 %), la situation financière (12 %) et le travail/les études (12 %) constituaient quant à eux les sujets les moins couverts. Les scores moyens pour DISCERN (68 % [14,6]), LIDA (71 % [14,4]) et HONcode (75 % [17,2]) se sont avérés au-dessus de la moyenne pour la convivialité et la fiabilité. Le score moyen au Reading Grade Level était de 10,6 (2,8) et celui du Reading Ease était de 49,8 (14,4), suggérant une faible lisibilité. CONCLUSION: Bien que la qualité de plusieurs sites Web traitant de l'IRC se soit révélée satisfaisante, leur lisibilité était faible. De plus, la plupart couvraient moins de 30 % du contenu jugé important par les patients dans l'autogestion de la maladie. Ces résultats mettront en lumière les lacunes de l'information accessible sur internet quant à l'autogestion de l'IRC; lacunes qui devraient être comblées par les futurs outils de santé en ligne.

Patient and provider experience and perspectives of a risk-based approach to multidisciplinary chronic kidney disease care: a mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: The Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE) predicts risk of progression to kidney failure and is used to guide clinical decisions for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: The KFRE was implemented to guide access to multidisciplinary care for CKD patients in Alberta, Canada, based on their 2-year risk of kidney failure. We used a mixed methods approach to investigate patients' and providers' perspectives and experiences 1 year following KFRE implementation. We conducted post-implementation interviews with multidisciplinary clinic providers and with low-risk patients who transitioned from multidisciplinary to general nephrology care. We also administered pre- and post-implementation patient care experience surveys, targeting both low-risk patients discharged to general nephrology and high-risk patients who remained in the multidisciplinary clinic, and provider job satisfaction surveys. RESULTS: Twenty-seven interviews were conducted (9 patients, 1 family member, 17 providers). Five categories were identified among patients and providers: targeted care; access to resources outside the multidisciplinary clinics; self-efficacy; patient reassurance and reduced stress; and transition process for low-risk patients Two additional categories were identified among providers only: anticipated concerns and job satisfaction. Patients and providers reported that the risk-based approach allowed the clinic to target care to those most likely to experience kidney failure and most likely to benefit from multidisciplinary care. While some participants indicated the risk-based model enhanced the sustainability of the clinics, others expressed concern that care for low-risk patients discharged from multidisciplinary care, or those now considered ineligible, may be inadequate. Overall, 413 patients completed the care experience survey and 73 providers completed the workplace satisfaction survey. The majority of patients were satisfied with their care in both periods with no overall differences. When considering the responses "Always" and "Often" together versus not, there were statistically significant improvements in domains of access to care, caring staff, and safety of care. There were no differences in healthcare providers' job satisfaction following KFRE implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and healthcare providers reported that the risk-based approach improved the focus of the multidisciplinary CKD clinics by targeting patients at highest risk, with survey results suggesting no difference in patient care experience or healthcare provider job satisfaction.

Perceived Benefits and Challenges of a Risk-Based Approach to Multidisciplinary Chronic Kidney Disease Care: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.

BACKGROUND: The kidney failure risk equation (KFRE) provides an estimate of risk of progression to kidney failure, and may guide clinical care. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe patient, family, and health care provider's perspectives of the perceived benefits and challenges of using a risk-based approach to guide care delivery for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), and refine implementation based on their input. METHODS: We used qualitative methodology to explore perceived benefits and challenges of implementing a risk-based approach (using the KFRE) to determine eligibility for multidisciplinary CKD care in Southern Alberta. We obtained perspectives from patients and families through focus groups, as well as input from health care providers through interviews and open-ended responses from an online survey. Twelve patients/family members participated in 2 focus groups, 16 health care providers participated in an interview, and 40 health care providers responded to the survey. RESULTS: Overall, participants felt that a KFRE-based approach had the potential to improve efficiency of the clinics by targeting care to patients at highest risk of kidney failure; however, they also expressed concerns about the impact of loss of services for lower risk individuals. Participants also articulated concerns about a perceived lack of capacity for adequate CKD patient care in the community. Our implementation strategy was modified as a result of participants' feedback. CONCLUSIONS: We identified benefits and challenges to implementation of a risk-based approach to guide care of patients with advanced CKD. Based on these results, our implementation strategy has been modified by removing the category of referral back to primary care alone, and instead having that decision made jointly by nephrologists and patients among low-risk patients.

CONTEXTE: La Kidney Failure Risk equation (KFRE), l'équation qui mesure le risque d'évolution vers la défaillance rénale, est susceptible d'orienter les soins prodigués en néphrologie. OBJECTIFS DE L'ÉTUDE: Nous souhaitions savoir comment les patients, leurs proches et leurs fournisseurs de soins percevaient le recours à une approche de prédiction du risque pour répartir les patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC) dans le système de soins. Plus précisément, nous nous sommes intéressés aux avantages et aux défis perçus face à une telle approche, et les commentaires recueillis se destinaient à en raffiner la mise en œuvre. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons utilisé une méthodologie qualitative pour étudier les avantages et les défis perçus de la KFRE comme outil d'évaluation de l'admissibilité de patients sud-albertains atteints d'IRC à la prise en charge par une équipe multidisciplinaire. Les perceptions des patients et de leurs proches ont été recueillies lors de groupes de discussion; les fournisseurs de soins ont quant à eux donné leur avis au moyen d'entrevues et d'un sondage en ligne à questions ouvertes. Au total, douze patients et membres de leurs familles ont participé aux groupes de discussion, 16 fournisseurs des soins ont été interviewés et 40 ont répondu au sondage en ligne. RÉSULTATS: Dans l'ensemble, les participants étaient d'avis que la KFRE avait le potentiel d'améliorer l'efficience des cliniques en néphrologie en canalisant les soins vers les patients à risque élevé de défaillance rénale. Les participants se sont toutefois dits préoccupés par les éventuelles conséquences d'une perte de services pour les patients à moindre risque. Ils appréhendaient également une capacité insuffisante du milieu communautaire à prendre en charge les patients atteints d'IRC. Nous avons modifié notre stratégie de mise en œuvre suivant les commentaires recueillis. CONCLUSION: Cette étude nous a permis de recenser les avantages et les défis perçus face à l'application d'une approche fondée sur la KFRE pour prodiguer des soins aux patients atteints d'IRC à un stade avancé. À la lumière des résultats, la stratégie de mise en œuvre a été modifiée. Nous avons notamment supprimé la catégorie de renvoi automatique aux seuls soins primaires pour faire en sorte que, dans le cas de patients à faible risque, le mode de prise en charge soit conjointement déterminé par le néphrologue et le patient.

Implementation and Evaluation of a Risk-Based Approach to Guide Chronic Kidney Disease Care: Protocol for a Multiphase Mixed-Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Risk prediction tools are used in a variety of clinical settings to guide patient care, although their use in chronic kidney disease (CKD) care is limited. OBJECTIVES: To assess the association of a risk-based model of CKD care on patient care, satisfaction, outcomes, and cost. DESIGN: Mixed-methods with a pre-post design. SETTING: We will use mixed-methods and a pre-post design to evaluate use of the Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE) to guide CKD care. The KFRE will be applied to patients currently followed in nephrology multidisciplinary CKD clinics in Alberta, as well as to new patients being considered for multidisciplinary care. PATIENTS: Patients with a 2-year risk of kidney failure ≥10% or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤15 mL/min/1.73 m2 will be recommended care by a multidisciplinary team coordinated by a nurse clinician and nephrologist, with access to other multidisciplinary resources including dietitians, pharmacists, and social workers as required. MEASUREMENTS/METHODS: Focus groups and interviews will be conducted to qualitatively describe patient and provider perspectives of potential barriers and facilitators to implementation of the risk-based approach to CKD care. Patient and provider surveys will also be used to quantify patient and provider satisfaction before and after the intervention. Finally, administrative data will be used to evaluate the association between the risk-based approach to care and outcomes including health care resource use, frequency of testing, modality choice, and death. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a risk-based model of care has the potential to increase use of optimal treatments such as the use of home dialysis and preemptive kidney transplantation, while reducing costs and poor outcomes related to processes of care such as unnecessary laboratory testing; however, there is also potential for unintended consequences. Our mixed-methods approach will integrate perceptions and needs from key stakeholders (including patients with CKD, their families, and their providers) to guide implementation and ensure appropriate modifications.

CONTEXTE: Les outils de prévision des risques sont employés dans différents contextes cliniques pour orienter les soins prodigués aux patients. Néanmoins, leur usage dans le contexte de l'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC) demeure limité. OBJECTIF: Évaluer, dans le contexte de l'IRC, l'influence qu'un modèle de soins intégrant la prévision des risques pourrait avoir sur les soins prodigués aux patients, sur leur satisfaction, sur l'évolution de la maladie et sur les coûts de santé. TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Méthode mixte avec évaluation avant et après l'intervention. CADRE DE L'ÉTUDE: À l'aide d'une méthode mixte et d'une évaluation avant et après l'intervention, nous mesurerons l'emploi de l'équation prédictive du risque d'évolution vers l'insuffisance rénale, la Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE), comme guide de soins en IRC. La KFRE sera appliquée aux patients suivis actuellement dans les cliniques multidisciplinaires de néphrologie en Alberta, de même qu'à tous les nouveaux patients qui seront aiguillés vers les soins multidisciplinaires. PATIENTS: Deux groupes de patients seront aiguillés vers une équipe de soins multidisciplinaire coordonnée par une infirmière clinicienne et un néphrologue, soit les patients présentant un risque égal ou supérieur à 10 % de progresser vers l'insuffisance rénale d'ici deux ans, et ceux dont le débit de filtration glomérulaire estimé (DFGe) est de 15 ml/min/1,73 m2 ou moins. Ces patients auront également accès aux autres ressources de la clinique si nécessaire, notamment des nutritionnistes, des pharmaciens et des travailleurs sociaux. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Des groupes de discussion seront formés et des entretiens individuels seront menés pour sonder le point de vue des patients et des fournisseurs de soins sur les possibles obstacles et facilitateurs à l'adoption d'une approche de soins axée sur la prévision du risque. Ces sondages serviront également à évaluer la satisfaction des participants avant et après l'intervention. Les données administratives seront employées pour évaluer l'association entre une approche de soins axée sur la prévision du risque et les issues en lien avec l'intervention, notamment l'utilisation des ressources en santé, la fréquence des tests, le choix de modalité et le décès. CONCLUSION: L'emploi d'un modèle de soins intégrant la prévision du risque a le potentiel d'accroître le recours aux traitements optimaux tels que la dialyse à domicile et la greffe rénale préventive. Il permettra également de réduire les coûts de santé et les issues défavorables comme les tests de laboratoires inutiles. Par contre, ce modèle comporte aussi un risque de conséquences imprévues. Notre approche par méthodes mixtes intègrera les avis et les besoins des personnes impliquées (les patients atteints d'IRC, leurs familles et le personnel soignant) afin d'orienter la mise en œuvre et pour s'assurer d'apporter les modifications appropriées.