ABSTRACT
Demand for laboratory testing is increasing disproportionately to medical activity, and the tests involved are becoming increasingly complex. When this phenomenon is seen in parallel with declining teaching of laboratory medicine in the medical curriculum, a need emerges to manage demand to avoid unnecessary expenditure and improve the use of laboratory services: 'the right test in the right patient at the right time.' Various methods have been tried to manage demand, with success depending on the medical context, type of health service and preintervention situation. Because many factors contribute to demand, and the different settings in which these exist, it is not realistic to meta-analyse the studies and we are limited to trying to identify trends in results in particular situations. The studies suggest that education combined with facilitating interventions, such as feedback, prompts and changes to laboratory request forms are the most successful. From the perspective of a whole health service, it is important that results are not exaggerated by assessing benefits in terms of total rather than marginal cost. It would be desirable, although difficult, to include the impact on downstream clinical activity caused or avoided by the interventions. Advances in information and web technology may make the elusive goal of achieving substantial demand control more achievable.
Subject(s)
Clinical Chemistry Tests/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Needs and Demand , Hematologic Tests/statistics & numerical data , Guideline Adherence , HumansSubject(s)
Benchmarking , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Laboratories/standards , Albumins/metabolism , Alkaline Phosphatase/blood , Blood Chemical Analysis/standards , Calcium/blood , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/economics , Electrolytes/standards , Humans , Laboratories/economics , Liver Function Tests/standards , Thyroid Hormones/blood , Thyrotropin/blood , United Kingdom , Urea/standardsABSTRACT
This 13th best practice review examines tumour marker requesting primary care situations. The review is presented in question--answer format, referenced for each question. This review considers carcinoembryonic antigen carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (Ca15-3) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (Ca19-9). The recommendations represent a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by MEDLINE EMBASE searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Primary Health Care , CA-19-9 Antigen/analysis , Carcinoembryonic Antigen/analysis , Humans , Mucin-1/analysis , Prognosis , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
This 14th best practice review is the second of a pair that examines tumour marker requesting primary care situations. This review considers carbohydrate antigen 125, α-fetoprotein and human chorionic gonadotropin. It is presented in question-answer format, referenced for each question. The recommendations represent a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by MEDLINE EMBASE searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They will be updated periodically to take into account new information.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Primary Health Care , CA-125 Antigen/analysis , Chorionic Gonadotropin/analysis , Humans , Prognosis , Sensitivity and Specificity , alpha-Fetoproteins/analysisABSTRACT
This twelfth best practice review examines four series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (i) antiepileptic drug monitoring; (ii) infectious diarrhoea; (iii) methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus; and (iv) brain natriuretic peptide. The review is presented in question-answer format, referenced for each question series. The recommendations represent a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by MEDLINE EMBASE searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are not standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus rather than evidence-based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.
Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/blood , Diarrhea/microbiology , Drug Monitoring/methods , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/analysis , Humans , Mass Screening/methods , Primary Health Care/methods , Specimen Handling/methods , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiologyABSTRACT
Inappropriate fluid regimens are rarely documented as being responsible for patient harm, although there is considerable circumstantial evidence to suggest that fluid overload may be a considerably under-estimated source of patient morbidity and mortality. The GIFTASUP fluid management guidelines published in 2008 offer a valuable opportunity to consider a more standardised approach to fluid management, possibly in the context of developing routine hospital services to support good practice.
Subject(s)
Fluid Therapy/methods , Infusions, Intravenous/methods , Biochemistry/methods , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Safety , United KingdomABSTRACT
This article describes a website (www.bettertesting.org.uk) which provides guidance on use of laboratory tests in common situations. It was constructed using a standard search strategy to identify the best quality guidance from the literature and will shortly include clinical self-assessment questions.
Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Computer-Assisted Instruction/methods , Education, Medical, Continuing/methods , Internet , HumansABSTRACT
The uncertainty of a numerical laboratory result can be masked by the fact that the laboratory reports an absolute number, whereas users have limited knowledge of the confidence interval of the result. Interpretation of laboratory tests is in reality therefore an inexact science, a balance between clinical context and the likely relevance of a laboratory result. This review considers the factors which contribute to result variability and examines the implications for interpreting differences between sequential laboratory results. It offers suggestions to deal with a problem which has not yet been much addressed in routine practice. The examples used are restricted to the discipline of clinical biochemistry, although the issues and principles apply to numerical (and indeed qualitative) results in other disciplines. Laboratories could provide more guidance on the likelihood of a result being significant to assist users. There is a need for discussion about how this is best done, and compatible with electronic result delivery. Options for providing this information are considered.
Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Humans , Models, Statistical , Reference Values , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
This eleventh best practice review examines two series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (i) thyroid testing, and (ii) hypercalcaemia and hypocalcaemia. The review is presented in the same question-answer format as in the previous reviews. These questions and answers deal with common situations in men and non-pregnant women. The recommendations represent a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by Medline Embase searches to identify relevant primary research documents. In the case of the thyroid series, the recommendations are drawn from the 2006 guidelines published by the Association for Clinical Biochemistry, the British Thyroid Association and the British Thyroid Foundation. They are not standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus rather than evidence based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.
Subject(s)
Hypercalcemia/diagnosis , Hypocalcemia/diagnosis , Primary Health Care/methods , Thyroid Diseases/diagnosis , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Humans , Hypercalcemia/etiology , Hypocalcemia/etiology , Patient Selection , Thyroid Function Tests/methodsABSTRACT
Addison's disease is a relatively common disorder to endocrinologists, but is rare and potentially fatal when presenting acutely. Treatment now involves replacement of glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids with synthetic compounds, although historically patients took common salt and plant-based preparations. We describe the case of a 42-year-old woman who self-treated undiagnosed Addison's disease for several years with soy sauce and liquorice sticks. She presented with a four-week history of decreased energy, malaise and postural dizziness. Our patient described an unusual diet of liquorice sticks and soy sauce, consuming around 46 g of salt per week. There was a family history of Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Physical examination was unremarkable, although subsequent investigation confirmed Addison's disease. Liquorice provided glycyrrhizic acid and glycyrrhetinic acid, which act on 11-beta hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase enzymes. In this case, the net effect was potentiation of glucocorticoid action on renal mineralocorticoid receptors in the context of failing adrenocortical steroid production. The case highlights the importance of taking a dietary history to aid diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Addison Disease/drug therapy , Glycyrrhetinic Acid/administration & dosage , Glycyrrhiza/chemistry , Glycyrrhizic Acid/administration & dosage , Soy Foods , 11-beta-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenases/antagonists & inhibitors , Addison Disease/metabolism , Adult , Female , Humans , Sodium Chloride/administration & dosageABSTRACT
This tenth best practice review examines four series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (i) antenatal testing in pregnant women; (ii) estimated glomerular filtration rate calculation; (iii) safety testing for methotrexate; and (iv) blood glucose measurement in diabetes. The review is presented in question-answer format, referenced for each question series. The recommendations represent a precis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by Medline Embase searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are not standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus rather than evidence-based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Drug Monitoring/methods , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Prenatal Care/methods , Primary Health Care/methods , Blood Glucose/analysis , Female , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Methotrexate/adverse effects , Patient Selection , PregnancyABSTRACT
This ninth best-practice review examines two series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (i) potassium abnormalities and (ii) venous leg ulcer microbiology. The review is presented in question-and-answer format, referenced for each question series. The recommendations represent a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by MEDLINE EMBASE searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are not standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus rather than evidence-based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.
Subject(s)
Hyperkalemia/diagnosis , Hypokalemia/diagnosis , Leg Ulcer/microbiology , Primary Health Care/methods , Bacteriological Techniques , HumansABSTRACT
This sixth best practice review examines four series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (1) laboratory monitoring in hypertension and heart failure abnormalities; (2) markers of inflammatory joint disease; (3) laboratory investigation of chronic diarrhoea; and (4) mumps and chickenpox. The review is presented in question-answer format, referenced for each question series. The recommendations represent a precis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by Medline Embase searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are not standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus based rather than evidence based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.
Subject(s)
Pathology, Clinical/methods , Primary Health Care/methods , Arthritis/diagnosis , Biomarkers/blood , Chickenpox/diagnosis , Diarrhea/etiology , Drug Monitoring/methods , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Mumps/diagnosisABSTRACT
This seventh best-practice review examines four series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (1) blood count abnormalities 2; (2) cardiac troponins; (3) high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; and (4) viral diseases 2. The review is presented in a question-answer format, with authorship attributed for each question series. The recommendations are a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by Medline Embase searches to identify relevant primary research documents. The recommendations are not standards, but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus based rather than evidence based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.
Subject(s)
Infectious Mononucleosis/diagnosis , Leukocyte Disorders/diagnosis , Pathology, Clinical/methods , Primary Health Care/methods , Biomarkers/blood , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Humans , Lipoproteins, HDL/blood , Troponin/bloodABSTRACT
This eighth best practice review examines four series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (i) sodium abnormalities; (ii) faecal occult blood testing; (iii) warfarin management; and (iv) sputum cytology in diagnosis of bronchopulmonary malignancy. The review is presented in question-answer format, referenced for each question series. The recommendations represent a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by Medline Embase searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are not standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most are consensus rather than evidence-based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Occult Blood , Pathology, Clinical/methods , Primary Health Care/methods , Sodium/blood , Drug Monitoring/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Hypernatremia/diagnosis , Hyponatremia/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Sputum/cytologyABSTRACT
This best practice review examines four series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine: (i) "minor" blood platelet count and haemoglobin abnormalities; (ii) diagnosis and monitoring of anaemia caused by iron deficiency; (iii) secondary hyperlipidaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia; and (iv) glycated haemoglobin and microalbumin use in diabetes. The review is presented in question-answer format, referenced for each question series. The recommendations represent a précis of guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by Medline Embase searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are not standards, but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most of the recommendations are based on consensus rather than evidence. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.
Subject(s)
Hematologic Diseases/diagnosis , Pathology, Clinical/methods , Primary Health Care/methods , Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/diagnosis , Blood Cell Count , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/diagnosis , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Hyperlipidemias/etiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Health Care/standardsABSTRACT
This fourth best practice review examines four series of common primary care questions in laboratory medicine are examined in this review: (1) safety monitoring for three common drugs; (2) use of prostate-specific antigen; (3) investigation of vaginal discharge; and (4) investigation of subfertility. The review is presented in question-answer format, referenced for each question series. The recommendations represent a precis of the guidance found using a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes, consensus statements, health policy documents and evidence-based medicine reviews, supplemented by Medline Embase searches to identify relevant primary research documents. They are not standards but form a guide to be set in the clinical context. Most of them are consensus based rather than evidence based. They will be updated periodically to take account of new information.