ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Medical errors may be occasionally explained by inattentional blindness (IB), i.e., failing to notice an event/object that is in plain sight. We aimed to determine whether age/experience, restfulness/fatigue, and previous exposure to simulation education may affect IB in the anesthetic/surgical setting. METHODS: In this multicentre/multinational study, a convenience sample of 280 anesthesiologists watched an attention-demanding video of a simulated trauma patient undergoing laparotomy and (independently/anonymously) recorded the abnormalities they noticed. The video contained four expected/common abnormalities (hypotension, tachycardia, hypoxia, hypothermia) and two prominently displayed unexpected/rare events (patient's head movement, leaky central venous line). We analyzed the participants' ability to notice the expected/unexpected events (primary outcome) and the proportion of expected/unexpected events according to age group and prior exposure to simulation education (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: Anesthesiologists across all ages noticed fewer unexpected/rare events than expected/common ones. Overall, younger anesthesiologists missed fewer common events than older participants did (P = 0.02). There was no consistent association between age and perception of unexpected/rare events (P = 0.28), although the youngest cohort (< 30 yr) outperformed the other age groups. Prior simulation education did not affect the proportion of misses for the unexpected/rare events but was associated with fewer misses for the expected/common events. Self-perceived restfulness did not impact perception of events. CONCLUSION: Anesthesiologists noticed fewer unexpected/rare clinical events than expected/common ones in an attention-demanding video of a simulated trauma patient, in keeping with IB. Prior simulation training was associated with an improved ability to notice anticipated/expected events, but did not reduce IB. Our findings may have implications for understanding medical mishaps, and efforts to improve situational awareness, especially in acute perioperative and critical care settings.
RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les erreurs médicales peuvent parfois s'expliquer par la cécité d'inattention, soit le fait de ne pas remarquer un événement/objet qui est à la vue de tous et toutes. Notre objectif était de déterminer si l'âge/l'expérience, le repos/la fatigue et l'exposition antérieure à l'enseignement par simulation pouvaient affecter la cécité d'inattention dans le cadre de l'anesthésie/chirurgie. MéTHODE: Dans cette étude multicentrique/multinationale, un échantillon de convenance de 280 anesthésiologistes ont visionné une vidéo exigeant l'attention portant sur un patient de trauma simulé bénéficiant d'une laparotomie et ont enregistré (de manière indépendante/anonyme) les anomalies qu'ils et elles ont remarquées. La vidéo contenait quatre anomalies attendues/courantes (hypotension, tachycardie, hypoxie, hypothermie) et deux événements inattendus/rares bien en vue (mouvement de la tête du patient, fuite du cathéter veineux central). Nous avons analysé la capacité des participant·es à remarquer les événements attendus/inattendus (critère d'évaluation principal) et la proportion d'événements attendus/inattendus selon le groupe d'âge et l'exposition antérieure à l'enseignement par simulation (critères d'évaluation secondaires). RéSULTATS: Les anesthésiologistes de tous âges ont remarqué moins d'événements inattendus/rares que d'événements attendus/courants. Globalement, les anesthésiologistes plus jeunes ont manqué moins d'événements courants que leurs congénères plus âgé·es (P = 0,02). Il n'y avait pas d'association constante entre l'âge et la perception d'événements inattendus ou rares (P = 0,28), bien que la cohorte la plus jeune (< 30 ans) ait surpassé les autres groupes d'âge. La formation antérieure par simulation n'a pas eu d'incidence sur la proportion d'inobservation des événements inattendus ou rares, mais a été associée à moins de cécité d'inattention envers les événements attendus ou courants. Le repos perçu n'a pas eu d'impact sur la perception des événements. CONCLUSION: Les anesthésiologistes ont remarqué moins d'événements cliniques inattendus/rares que d'événements attendus/courants dans une vidéo exigeant l'attention portant sur la simulation d'un patient traumatisé, ce qui s'inscrit dans la cécité d'inattention. La formation préalable par simulation était associée à une meilleure capacité à remarquer les événements anticipés/attendus, mais ne réduisait pas la cécité d'inattention. Nos résultats peuvent avoir des implications pour la compréhension des accidents médicaux et les efforts visant à améliorer la conscience situationnelle, en particulier dans les contextes de soins périopératoires aigus et de soins intensifs.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction is an integral part of breast cancer care. There are 2 main types of breast reconstruction: alloplastic (using implants) and autologous (using the patient's own tissue). The latter creates a more natural breast mound and avoids the long-term need for surgical revision-more often associated with implant-based surgery. The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the gold standard approach in autologous breast reconstruction. However, complications do occur with DIEP flap surgery and can stem from poor flap tissue perfusion/oxygenation. Hence, the development of strategies to enhance flap perfusion (eg, goal-directed perioperative fluid therapy) is essential. Current perioperative fluid therapy is traditionally guided by subjective criteria, which leads to wide variations in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this trial is to determine whether the use of minimally invasive cardiac output (CO) monitoring for guiding intravenous fluid administration, combined with low-dose dobutamine infusion (via a treatment algorithm), will increase tissue oxygenation in patients undergoing DIEP flap surgery. METHODS: With appropriate institutional ethics board and Health Canada approval, patients undergoing DIEP flap surgery are randomly assigned to receive CO monitoring for the guidance of intraoperative fluid therapy in addition to a low-dose dobutamine infusion (which potentially improves flap oxygenation) versus the current standard of care. The primary outcome is tissue oxygenation measured via near-infrared spectroscopy at the perfusion zone furthest from the perforator vessels 45 minutes after vascular reanastomosis of the DIEP flap. Low dose (2.5 µg/kg/hr) dobutamine infusion continues for up to 4 hours postoperatively, provided there are no associated complications (ie, persistent tachycardia). Flap oxygenation, hemodynamic parameters, and any medication-associated side effects/complications are monitored for up to 48 hours postoperatively. Complications, rehospitalizations, and patient satisfaction are also collected until 30 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Funding and regulatory approvals were obtained in 2019, but the study recruitment was interrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. As of October 4, 2023, 34 participants have been recruited. Because of the significant delays associated with the pandemic, the expected completion date was extended. We expect the study to be completed and ready for potential news release (as appropriate) and publication by July 2024. No patients have suffered any adverse effects/complications from participating in this study, and none have been lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: CO-directed fluid therapy in combination with a low-dose dobutamine infusion via a treatment algorithm has the potential to improve DIEP flap tissue oxygenation and reduce complications following DIEP flap breast reconstruction surgery. However, given that the investigators remain blinded to group randomization, no comment can be made regarding the efficacy of this intervention for improving tissue oxygenation at this time. Nevertheless, no patients have been withdrawn for safety concerns thus far, and compliance remains high. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04020172; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04020172.
