Interlaboratory study of the primary antibody response to sheep red blood cells in outbred rodents following exposure to cyclophosphamide or dexamethasone.

EPA guidelines provide a choice in evaluating humoral immune system function in rats and mice immunized with sheep red blood cells (sRBC): an antibody-forming cell (AFC) assay or a sRBC-specific serum IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Four different laboratories used both methods to detect suppression of the antibody response by cyclophosphamide (CP) or dexamethasone (DEX). Attempts were made to minimize interlaboratory variability through the use of common reagents and vendors; each laboratory used the same source for rodents, immunosuppressive agents, and one sheep for sRBCs, and determined optimal sRBC concentration for immunization and peak day of antibody response in female CD rats and CD1 mice. The CP dose at which statistical significance was first observed in each species was quite similar within each lab using either assay. For DEX, the AFC assay detected significant and greater suppression at lower concentrations compared to the ELISA in both rats and mice. All labs detected DEX suppression using an AFC assay, whereas only one lab detected significant suppression in both species using an ELISA. For both compounds the magnitude of suppression was greater using the AFC assay, and resulted in ID(50) values which were lower in the AFC assay when compared to the ELISA. In addition, cross-species comparisons of ID(50) values suggested rats were more sensitive than mice. These initial experiments with two chemicals indicated that the AFC assay is consistently better at identifying suppression of a T-dependent antibody response across laboratories following xenobiotic exposures in outbred rats and mice. Additional compounds will need to be evaluated before concluding that one method is superior or more sensitive to the other in detecting suppression of the antibody response.

Immunotoxicogenomics: the potential of genomics technology in the immunotoxicity risk assessment process.

Evaluation of xenobiotic-induced changes in gene expression as a method to identify and classify potential toxicants is being pursued by industry and regulatory agencies worldwide. A workshop was held at the Research Triangle Park campus of the Environmental Protection Agency to discuss the current state-of-the-science of "immunotoxicogenomics" and to explore the potential role of genomics techniques for immunotoxicity testing. The genesis of the workshop was the current lack of widely accepted triggering criteria for Tier 1 immunotoxicity testing in the context of routine toxicity testing data, the realization that traditional screening methods would require an inordinate number of animals and are inadequate to handle the number of chemicals that may need to be screened (e.g., high production volume compounds) and the absence of an organized effort to address the state-of-the-science of toxicogenomics in the identification of immunotoxic compounds. The major focus of the meeting was on the theoretical and practical utility of genomics techniques to (1) replace or supplement current immunotoxicity screening procedures, (2) provide insight into potential modes or mechanisms of action, and (3) provide data suitable for immunotoxicity hazard identification or risk assessment. The latter goal is of considerable interest to a variety of stakeholders as a means to reduce animal use and to decrease the cost of conducting and interpreting standard toxicity tests. A number of data gaps were identified that included a lack of dose response and kinetic data for known immunotoxic compounds and a general lack of data correlating genomic alterations to functional changes observed in vivo. Participants concluded that a genomics approach to screen chemicals for immunotoxic potential or to generate data useful to risk assessors holds promise but that routine use of these methods is years in the future. However, recent progress in molecular immunology has made mode and mechanism of action studies much more practical. Furthermore, a variety of published immunotoxicity studies suggest that microarray analysis is already a practical means to explore pathway-level changes that lead to altered immune function. To help move the science of immunotoxicogenomics forward, a partnership of industry, academia, and government was suggested to address data gaps, validation, quality assurance, and protocol development.

Persistent suppression of contact hypersensitivity, and altered T-cell parameters in F344 rats exposed perinatally to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD).

The outcome of perinatal low-level TCDD exposure on the T-cell-mediated contact hypersensitivity (CHS) response in adult F344 rats was investigated. Suppression of the 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB)-specific contact hypersensitivity reponse occurred in mature offspring of dams dosed by gavage with 1microg or 3microg TCDD/kg on gestation day (GD) 14. To determine if this effect was correlated with altered distribution or activation of major T-cell subtypes, cells of the auricular lymph node draining the hapten-treated skin were evaluated by flow cytometry for expressed phenotype, including activation markers, 24h after challenge. Six-month-old female offspring with significantly decreased CHS and born to dams given 3microg TCDD/kg, had significantly greater proportion of CD4(+) T cells expressing a naive phenotype marker, CD45RC(hi), in their draining nodes. The greater relative frequency of this CD4(+) subset in peripheral lymphoid tissues associated with a reduced CHS in these rats may be attributed to a reduction in the proportion of CD4(+) T cells maintaining or recruited into an activated state. The CHS proved to be a valuable bioassay for investigating long-term immunotoxic effects of perinatal TCDD exposure in rats.