Multi-institutional Retrospective Study of Percutaneous Cholangioscopy-Assisted Lithotripsy for Inoperable Calculous Cholecystitis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of percutaneous lithotripsy for gallstone eradication in patients with calculous cholecystitis with stones >1 cm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multi-institutional institutional review board approved retrospective review of patients who presented with calculous cholecystitis and were not determined to be surgical candidates. All patients underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy tube placement for acute infection, which was later exchanged for a large sheath for ShockPulse (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) lithotripsy and stone destruction. Review parameters included procedural technical and clinical data, including clinical presentation, mean length of hospital stay, and postintervention symptom reduction. RESULTS: Twelve patients (mean age, 74.6 years; range, 52-94 years; 6 men and 6 women) underwent large-bore sheath (24-30 F) cholangioscopy-assisted gallstone destruction via rigid lithotripsy. The size of the gallstones ranged from 1.2 to 4.0 cm. All patients had prior cholecystostomy access for a mean of 25 weeks before gallstone extraction to ensure tract maturation via transhepatic or transperitoneal access. The technical success rate in single-session stone removal was 100%, with no major procedure-related adverse events. All patients were symptom- and pain-free after the procedure. The mean procedure time was 111.5 minutes, and the mean fluoroscopy time was 19.2 minutes. The median length of hospital stay was 1 day after the procedure. The mean time from percutaneous lithotripsy to biliary tube removal was 35 days (range, 17-45 days). CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous rigid lithotripsy is a safe and effective procedure for gallstone destruction and extraction in patients who are poor surgical candidates with large lumen-occupying cholelithiasis.

Temporal and geospatial variations among the interventional radiology physician workforce in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the temporal trends and state-wide geospatial variations in Vascular and Interventional Radiology (VIR) workforce in the United States. METHODS: The State Physician Workforce Data from the AAMC website was accessed for years 2015, 2017, and 2019. The variables collected for each state included total number of active physicians, total number of physicians per specialty and total number of female physicians in VIR. Comparative data was obtained for vascular surgery (VS), diagnostic radiology (DR), and radiation oncology (RO). The annual growth rate for total physicians and sub-analysis of female physicians in each state was computed for each specialty. RESULTS: From 2015 to 2019, the total number of active physicians in the United States grew by 1.8% per year. Growth of active physicians in VIR grew by 8.3%, DR 0.06%, VS 4.4%, and RO 1.9% per year. Colorado and Minnesota had the highest growth rate for VIR physicians (15%). VIR physicians per 100,000 people increased from 0.84 (2015) to 1.10 (2019) in the US. In comparison, VS physicians increased from 0.99 (2015) to 1.14 (2019), DR physicians decreased from 8.61 (2015) to 8.43 (2019), and RO physicians grew from 1.48 (2015) to 1.56 (2019). Women represented 6.8% of the VIR workforce in the US in 2019 and increased by a rate of 16% annually in the US from 2015 to 2019. In comparison, the number of women in VS has grown by 21%, DR by 2%, and RO by 2.4% during the same period. The state of Maryland has the highest proportion of women in VIR at 18%. CONCLUSION: The number of VIR physicians is increasing at a higher rate than the national overall physician growth, and while female VIR physicians makeup a small fraction of the VIR workforce, their numbers have increased at a faster rate than overall VIR physicians.

Interventional Oncology: Keeping Out of Trouble in Ablation Techniques.

Interventional radiologists provide an essential role in the therapy and management of cancer patients. Computed-tomography (CT) guided percutaneous procedures have enabled interventionalists to treat multiple solid organ malignancies with minimal risk, however, certain lesions may present challenges to physicians due to a difficult approach, or their close proximity to other vital structures. The following presents a brief summary of tips and tricks the interventionalist may use to provide their patients with safe and effective therapy.

Cost Analysis of Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) and Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: Prostatic arterial embolization (PAE) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to TURP; however, there are limited cost comparisons reported. The purpose of this study was to compare in-hospital direct costs of elective PAE and TURP in a hospital setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective review was performed on patients undergoing PAE and TURP from January to December 2014. Inclusion criteria included male patients greater than 40 years of age who presented for ambulatory TURP or PAE with no history of prior surgical intervention for BPH. Direct costs were categorized into the following categories: nursing and operating room or interventional room staffing, operating room or interventional supply costs, anesthesia supplies, anesthesia staffing, hospital room cost, radiology, and laboratory costs. Additionally, length of stay was evaluated for both groups. RESULTS: The mean patient age for the TURP (n = 86) and PAE (n = 70) cohorts was 71.3 and 64.4 years, respectively (p < 0.0001). Intra-procedural supplies for PAE were significantly more costly than TURP ($1472.77 vs $1080.84, p < 0.0001). When including anesthesia supplies and nursing/staffing, costs were significantly more expensive for TURP than PAE ($2153.64 vs $1667.10 p < 0.0001). The average length of stay for the TURP group was longer at 1.38 versus 0.125 days for the PAE group. Total in-hospital costs for the TURP group ($5338.31, SD $3521.17) were significantly higher than for PAE ($1678.14, SD $442.0, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: When compared to TURP, PAE was associated with significantly lower direct in-hospital costs and shorter hospital stay.

Unexplained gastrointestinal bleed due to arteriobiliary fistula after percutaneous liver biopsy.

We represent a case of a 54-year-old male who presented to the emergency department with right upper quadrant abdominal pain and melena three weeks after percutaneous liver biopsy. He was found to have anemia secondary to an upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, unresponsive to multiple blood transfusions. Angiography later revealed an arteriobiliary fistula with contrast extravasation entering the duodenum. The fistula was successfully embolized and the patient was discharged without complication. This report demonstrates the importance in considering a vascular intrahepatic fistula in patients with right upper quadrant abdominal pain after remote liver biopsy.

Robotic-Assisted Versus Manual Prostatic Arterial Embolization for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Comparative Analysis.

PURPOSE: Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) is a safe and efficacious procedure for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), though is technically challenging. We present our experience of technical and clinical outcomes of robotic and manual PAE in patients with BPH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IRB-approved retrospective study of 40 consecutive patients 49-81 years old with moderate or severe grade BPH from May 2014 to July 2015: 20 robotic-assisted PAE (group 1), 20 manual PAE (group 2). Robotic-assisted PAE was performed using the Magellan Robotic System. American Urological Association (AUA-SI) score, cost, technical and clinical success, radiation dose, fluoroscopy, and procedure time were reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed within and between each group using paired t test and one-way analysis of variance respectively, at 1 and 3 months. RESULTS: No significant baseline differences in age and AUA-SI between groups. Technical success was 100% (group 1) and 95% (group 2). One unsuccessful subject from group 2 returned for a successful embolization using robotic assistance. Fluoroscopy and procedural times were similar between groups, with a non-significant lower patient radiation dose in group 1 (30,632.8 mGy/cm2 vs 35,890.9, p = 0.269). Disposable cost was significantly different between groups with the robotic-assisted PAE incurring a higher cost (group 1 $4530.2; group 2 $1588.5, p < 0.0001). Clinical improvement was significant in both arms at 3 months: group 1 mean change in AUA-SI of 8.3 (p = 0.006), group 2: 9.6 (p < 0.0001). No minor or major complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted PAE offers technical success comparable to manual PAE, with similar clinical improvement with an increased cost.

Multicenter Prospective Clinical Series Evaluating Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Painful Spine Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of vertebral body metastases (VBM) has been reported as safe and effective in retrospective studies. This single-arm prospective multicenter clinical study evaluates RFA in the treatment of painful VBM. METHODS: Fifty patients with VBM were prospectively enrolled during a 13-month period at eight US centers under an IRB-approved study. Percutaneous RFA was performed under imaging guidance with cement augmentation at the discretion of the operator. Pain, disability and quality of life were evaluated at baseline, prior to discharge, days 3, 7, 30 and 90 using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General 7 (FACT-G7) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Quality-of-Life Measurement in Patients with Bone Pain (FACT-BP). Adverse events were monitored throughout this time interval. RESULTS: Twenty-six male and 24 female patients (mean age 61.0) underwent 69 treatments (30 thoracic and 39 lumbar). Cement augmentation was performed in 96 % of reported levels. Significant improvement in mean scores for pain, disability and cancer-specific health-related quality of life from baseline to all time intervals was seen. NRPS improved from 5.9 to 2.1 (p < 0.0001). ODI improved from 52.9 to 37.0 (p < 0.08). FACT-G7 improved form 10.9 to 16.2 (p = 0.0001). FACT-BP improved from 22.6 to 38.9 (p < 0.001). No complications related to the procedure were reported. CONCLUSION: RFA with cement augmentation safely and effectively reduces pain and disability rapidly, while increasing quality of life in patients suffering from vertebral body metastases.

Comparative Analysis of Prostate Volume as a Predictor of Outcome in Prostate Artery Embolization.

PURPOSE: To determine the role of prostate volume as a predictor of outcome after prostatic artery embolization (PAE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2012 to September 2014, 78 consecutive patients undergoing PAE were evaluated at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months. Analysis was performed comparing prostate volume groups (group 1, < 50 cm3; group 2, 50-80 cm(3); group 3, > 80 cm3) at baseline and follow-up to assess for differences in outcomes of American Urological Association (AUA) symptom index, quality of life (QOL)-related symptoms, and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). RESULTS: Mean baseline prostate volumes were 37.5 cm(3) in group 1 (n = 16), 65.7 cm3 in group 2 (n = 26), and 139.4 cm3 in group 3 (n = 36). There were no significant differences in baseline age, AUA symptom index, QOL, or IIEF between groups. Bilateral embolization was successful in 75 of 78 patients (96%). Two patients underwent unilateral embolization, and treatment failed in one patient as a result of bilateral atherosclerotic occlusion. A significant reduction in AUA symptom index was achieved within groups from baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months (n = 77): in group 1, from 27.2 to 14.0, 12.9, and 15.9, respectively (P = .002); in group 2, from 25.6 to 17.1, 16.3, and 13.5, respectively (P < .0001); and in group 3, from 26.5 to 15.2, 12.5, and 13.6, respectively (P < .0001). There was also a significant improvement in QOL. Comparative analysis demonstrated no statistically significant differences in AUA symptom index, QOL, or IIEF between groups. Two minor complications occurred: groin hematoma and a urinary tract infection. CONCLUSIONS: PAE offers similar clinical benefits to patients with differing gland sizes and may offer a reasonable alternative for poor candidates for urologic surgery.

Recurrent Hemarthrosis Following Knee Arthroplasty Treated with Arterial Embolization.

Recurrent hemarthrosis is an uncommon but troublesome complication following knee arthroplasty. This study reports the results for 13 patients with spontaneous recurrent hemarthrosis after knee arthroplasty treated with arterial embolization. The average interval between arthroplasty and embolization was 47 months (range, 2-103 months), and the average time from onset of hemarthrosis to embolization was 4.1 months (range, 1-11 months). Geniculate arterial embolization lead to resolution of hemarthrosis in 12 of 13 patients (92.3%). The one clinical failure likely represented a case of misdiagnosed periprosthetic joint infection. Two patients experienced transient cutaneous ischemia related to distal particulate embolization that resolved spontaneously. Selective geniculate arterial embolization is an effective and safe treatment modality for recurrent hemarthrosis after knee arthroplasty.

The Effect of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in an Urban Population With Liver Cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in patients with cirrhosis is aimed at early detection so that effective therapeutic options may be offered. We undertook this study to assess the patterns of surveillance that had been offered to HCC patients evaluated at our center, and the effect of these strategies on outcome. METHODS: Consecutive patients, age 18 years and older, diagnosed with HCC between December 2007 and December 2012 were identified. Surveillance was defined as α-fetoprotein measurement and/or imaging examination in the 12 months before HCC diagnosis. Logistic regression and survival analysis models were utilized to investigate the association of surveillance with patient characteristics and survival. RESULTS: A total of 305 patients with HCC and a background of cirrhosis were analyzed. HCC was detected by surveillance in 131 patients (43%). Of those who underwent surveillance, 92% were diagnosed with early-stage cancer (stages I and II) compared with 62% of those who did not undergo surveillance (P<0.001). The rate of surgical therapy (hepatic resection and liver transplantation) was almost doubled in the surveillance group (61% vs. 33%, P<0.05). At median follow-up of 27.3 months, overall survival was high at 55% and surveillance was significantly associated with longer survival (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: At our center, surveillance efficacy for HCC detection was notably higher than earlier reported. IMPACT: Patients who underwent surveillance were more likely to have their tumors detected at an early stage, to qualify for surgical therapy, and to have improved survival.

Ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute submassive pulmonary embolism.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis (USAT) in patients with submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 45 consecutive patients (15 prospective, 30 retrospective) who underwent USAT for submassive PE from June 2012-May 2014. Inclusion criteria were right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) as indicated by right ventricle-to-left ventricle (RV:LV) ratio > 0.9, symptoms of < 2 weeks' duration, and absence of absolute contraindication to thrombolysis. All patients underwent pulmonary artery catheterization with a standardized protocol (24 mg recombinant tissue plasminogen activator). Hemodynamic evaluation immediately after USAT, RV:LV ratio evaluation at 48-72 hours after USAT by computed tomography angiography and echocardiography, and adverse event reporting for a minimum of 30 days were performed. Outcomes and complications are reported as per the Society of Interventional Radiology Reporting Standards for Endovascular Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism. RESULTS: USAT was technically successful in 100% (n = 45) of patients. Main pulmonary artery pressure significantly decreased from 49.8 mm Hg to 31.1 mm Hg (P < .0001). RVD significantly improved with mean RV:LV ratios decreasing from 1.59 to 0.93 (P < .0001). There were 6 complications: 4 minor bleeding episodes at access sites and 2 major bleeding complications (flank and arm hematoma). All-cause mortality at 30 days was 0%. There were no readmissions for PE at 30 days after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis using a standardized low-dose protocol is a safe and efficacious method of treatment of submassive PE to reduce acute pulmonary hypertension and RVD.

Laparoscopic-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: early favorable physical quality-of-life measures.

BACKGROUND: We compared outcomes and postpancreatectomy quality of life (QOL) in paired cohorts of patients undergoing conventional open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) or laparoscopic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (LAPD). METHODS: Comparative analysis of QOL was performed in a matched cohort of 53 patients after OPD or LAPD between 2010 and 2013. The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Health Survey and the Karnofsky score were used. RESULTS: Physical component score, mental component score, and Karnofsky scores were calculated at multiple time points for OPD (n = 25) and LAPD (n = 28). Operative times, complications, and readmission rates were equivalent. Time to starting adjuvant therapy trended toward clinical importance in LAPD (61 vs 110 days, P = .0878). Duration of stay was less in LAPD (7.10 vs 9.44 days, P = .02). LAPD had a superior QOL centered on functional status compared with OPD (physical component score 49.09 vs 38.4, P = .04; Karnofsky 92.22 vs 66.92%, P = .003). These statistical differences were not observed beyond 6 months. CONCLUSION: LAPD provided a more favorable QOL within the first 6 months and shorter length of stay compared with conventional OPD. LAPD may serve as an alternative operative therapy to potentially minimize delays in receipt of and enhance tolerability of adjuvant therapies.

Early results from a United States trial of prostatic artery embolization in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: To report early findings from a prospective United States clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2012 to March 2013, 72 patients were screened and 20 patients underwent treatment. Patients were evaluated at baseline and selected intervals (1, 3, and 6 mo) for the following efficacy variables: American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score, quality of life (QOL)-related symptoms, International Index of Erectile Function score, peak urine flow rate, and prostate volume (on magnetic resonance imaging at 6 mo). Complications were monitored and reported per Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines. RESULTS: Embolization was technically successful in 18 of 20 patients (90%); bilateral PAE was successful in 18 of 19 (95%). Unsuccessful embolizations were secondary to atherosclerotic occlusion of prostatic arteries. Clinical success was seen in 95% of patients (19 of 20) at 1 month, with average AUA symptom score improvements of 10.8 points at 1 month (P < .0001), 12.1 points at 3 months (P = .0003), and 9.8 points at 6 months (P = .06). QOL improved at 1 month (1.9 points; P = .0002), 3 months (1.9 points; P = .003), and 6 months (2.6 points; P = .007). Sexual function improved by 34% at 1 month (P = .11), 5% at 3 months (P = .72), and 16% at 6 months (P = .19). Prostate volume at 6 months had decreased 18% (n = 5; P = .05). No minor or major complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Early results from this clinical trial indicate that PAE offers a safe and efficacious treatment option for men with BPH.

Transesophageal echocardiographic screening before atrial flutter ablation: is it necessary for patient safety?

BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is commonly used before atrial flutter (AFl) ablation to detect atrial thrombus (AT) and thereby identify a heightened risk for systemic embolism both in patients with their initial episodes of AFl and in those with prior episodes whose anticoagulation has been inadequate. This treatment strategy has been extrapolated from guidelines for atrial fibrillation. In fact, limited data exist regarding the prevalence or clinical associations of AT and spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (SEC) in patients with AFl. Both AT and SEC are believed to represent risk factors for systemic embolization. This study was designed to provide further insight into the prevalence of these and their associated clinical findings. METHODS: The results of transesophageal echocardiographic examinations in 347 consecutive patients with AFl in whom radiofrequency ablation procedures were planned were reviewed. In each case, specific care was taken to identify AT and SEC. The presence of either AT or more than mild SEC was considered to reflect a thrombogenic milieu (TM). Clinical and echocardiographic data were analyzed to determine the frequency and relevant clinical associations of these two markers of increased thromboembolic risk. In addition to determining the prevalence of AT and TM, the study sought to identify predictors of their presence short of TEE that might allow that procedure to be avoided. RESULTS: AT were found in 19 of the 347 patients (5.4%). TM was present in 39 patients (11.2%). SEC was associated with reduced left atrial appendage emptying velocity (P < .001). History of myocardial infarction (P = .02) was associated with AT. Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (P = .01), reduced left atrial appendage emptying velocity (P < .001), diabetes mellitus (P = .02), congestive heart failure (P = .04), and chronic renal insufficiency (P = .05) were associated with a TM. CONCLUSIONS: Allowing for multiple comparisons, the significant markers of the risk for systemic embolization could be obtained only from TEE. Although there are several interesting clinical and echocardiographic associations with AT and a TM, none were strong enough to obviate the need for TEE.