Association of Internal Medicine Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) with Length of Stay, Hospitalization Costs, and Formal Imaging: a Prospective Cohort Study.

Background: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) use has rapidly expanded among internal medicine (IM) physicians in practice and residency training programs. Many benefits have been established; however, studies demonstrating the impact of POCUS on system metrics are few and mostly limited to the emergency department or intensive care setting. The study objective was to evaluate the impact of inpatient POCUS on patient outcomes and hospitalization metrics. Methods: Prospective cohort study of 12,399 consecutive adult admissions to 22 IM teaching attendings, at a quaternary care teaching hospital (7/1/2011-6/30/2015), with or without POCUS available during a given hospitalization. Multivariable regression and propensity score matching (PSM) analyses compared multiple hospital metric outcomes (costs, length of stay, radiology-based imaging, satisfaction, etc.) between the "POCUS available" vs. "POCUS unavailable" groups as well as the "POCUS available" subgroups of "POCUS used" vs. "POCUS not used". Results: Patients in the "POCUS available" vs. "POCUS unavailable" group had lower mean total and per-day hospital costs ($17,474 vs. $21,803, p<0.001; $2,805.88 vs. $3,557.53, p<0.001), lower total and per-day radiology cost ($705.41 vs. $829.12, p<0.001; $163.11 vs. $198.53, p<0.001), fewer total chest X-rays (1.31 vs. 1.55, p=0.01), but more chest CTs (0.22 vs 0.15; p=0.001). Mean length of stay (LOS) was 5.77 days (95% CI = 5.63, 5.91) in the "POCUS available" group vs. 6.08 95% CI (5.66, 6.51) in the "POCUS unavailable" group (p=0.14). Within the "POCUS available" group, cost analysis with a 4:1 PSM (including LOS as a covariate) compared patients receiving POCUS vs. those that could have but did not, and also showed total and per-day cost savings in the "POCUS used" subgroup ($15,082 vs. 15,746; p<0.001 and $2,685 vs. $2,753; p=0.04). Conclusions: Availability and selected use of POCUS was associated with a meaningful reduction in total hospitalization cost, radiology cost, and chest X-rays for hospitalized patients.

Post-thrombolytic coagulopathy and complications in patients with pulmonary embolism treated with fixed-dose systemic alteplase.

BACKGROUND: Alteplase treatment can cause a systemic coagulopathy although the incidence and contributory factors are unknown in pulmonary embolism (PE). Fixed-dosing of alteplase for PE may lead to interpatient variability in drug exposure and influence post-thrombolytic coagulopathy (PTC). While changes in fibrinogen and INR have been used to describe PTC, no universal PTC definition is available. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the incidence of PTC after alteplase treatment for PE, the effect of patient weight and blood/plasma volume and the association with bleeding complications. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients treated with alteplase for massive or high-risk submassive PE. Demographics, alteplase dosing, laboratory assessment of coagulopathy, and bleeding events were collected. The primary endpoint was incidence of PTC defined as an international normalized ratio (INR) > 1.5 or fibrinogen < 170 mg/dL. Secondary outcomes included correlation between coagulopathies and alteplase dose normalized to actual body weight (ABW), ideal body weight (IBW), plasma volume (PV), and estimated blood volume (EBV). Bleeding events in patients with and without PTC were compared. RESULTS: 125 patients met criteria for inclusion in the study. PTC occurred in 35.3% of patients, with INR >1.5 in 21.8% and fibrinogen <170 mg/dL in 26%. Alteplase dose >50 mg was associated with increased odds of PTC (OR 6.5, CI 2.1-19.9). Dose normalized to ABW and EBV correlated weakly with absolute increase in post-alteplase INR (r =0.20, p =0.06 and r =0.21, p =0.057 respectively) and to percent change in INR (r =0.20, p = 0.058 and r =0.21, p =0.048 respectively). Dose/ABW, dose/PV, and dose/EBV each correlated moderately with absolute decrease in fibrinogen (r =-0.53, -0.49, and -0.47 respectively, p <0.001 for each) and percent change in fibrinogen (r = -0.55, -0.49, and -0.49 respectively, p < 0.001 for each). Dose/IBW correlated weakly with absolute and percent decrease in fibrinogen (r = -0.32, p =0.013 and r =-0.33, p =0.011). Patients with bleeding were more likely to have PTC (58.3% vs. 28.6%, p= 0.05) and a bleeding event was predictive of PTC (OR 5.33, 1.32-23.99). CONCLUSIONS: PTC is prevalent in patients with PE. PTC is influenced by alteplase dose and exposure parameters (ABW, IBW, PV, EBV) and may contribute to the bleeding risk.

Outcomes in hospitalised patients with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock and reported penicillin allergy: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine outcomes in hospitalised patients with sepsis and reported penicillin allergy (PcnA). DESIGN: Observational retrospective cohort study using data from electronic health records. SETTING: A large single health system with 11 hospitals of small, medium and large sizes including a 630-bed tertiary care teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n=5238) ≥18 years of age, hospitalised with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2018, received antibacterial agents, and had documented PcnA status. Patients <18 years of age at admission were excluded. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes evaluated were inpatient mortality and 30-day mortality posthospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay, 30-day readmissions, duration of antibiotic use, rate of Clostridium difficile infection and total cost of care. RESULTS: There was no difference in outcomes including inpatient or 30-day mortality, hospital length of stay, in-hospital antibiotic duration, C. difficile infection, total cost of care and 30-day readmission rate between patients labelled with a PcnA vs patients who did not report PcnA (non-PcnA). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective single health system study, there was no difference in key outcomes including inpatient or 30-day mortality in patients admitted with sepsis and reported PcnA compared with patients who reported no PcnA.

Transorbital Debulking of Sphenoid Wing Meningioma.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical features and outcomes of patients who underwent transorbital debulking of sphenoid wing meningioma. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of sphenoid wing meningioma who underwent transorbital debulking were included in this series. Preoperative and postoperative symptoms and examination findings, including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and proptosis were extracted from patient charts. All imaging studies, records of additional surgical and medical management, and complications of surgery were collated. RESULTS: Eight patients were included. The most common symptoms at presentation were blurred vision (6/8) and proptosis (6/8). The most common clinical findings at presentation were decreased visual acuity and proptosis. Mean BCVA preoperatively was 0.93 in logMARunits andmeanrelative proptosis preoperatively was 4.88 mm. All patients underwent orbitotomy with or without bone flap with decompression of hyperostotic bone and subtotal resection of soft tissue mass. Mean follow-up time was 14months. Five of eight patients experienced postoperative improvement in BCVA, for mean change of 0.32. All patients demonstrated reduction in proptosis postoperatively with a mean reduction of 3.63 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Sphenoid wing meningioma can present with decreased visual acuity and/or proptosis. It is possible to address both of these problems in selected patients with transorbital debulking, an approach that avoids the aesthetic and functional consequences of craniotomy. The aim of this technique is not surgical cure, but rather improvement in vision and disfigurement.

Outcomes of Minnesota Detoxification Scale (MINDS) Assessment With High-Dose Front Loading Diazepam Treatment for Alcohol Withdrawal in Hospitalized Patients.

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepines are the gold standard for alcohol withdrawal treatment but choice and dosing vary widely. In 2015, our institution implemented a Minnesota detoxification scale (MINDS) and single standardized high-dose diazepam based protocol for treatment of alcohol withdrawal to replace multiple Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol (CIWA) based protocols using lower dose benzodiazepines. We compared use of MINDS versus CIWA assessment protocols with high front loading diazepam treatment in care of patient experiencing alcohol withdrawal during hospitalization. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients experiencing alcohol withdrawal to statistically analyze difference in outcomes between CIWA based lower benzodiazepine dose protocols used in 2013-2015 versus the MINDS based high-dose front-loading diazepam protocol used in 2015-2017. RESULTS: Patients treated with MINDS based high dose diazepam protocol were less likely to have physical restraints used (AOR = 0.8, CI: 0.70-0.92), had a shorter hospital length of stay, and fewer days on benzodiazepines (p < 0.001). Patients were more likely to be readmitted to the hospital within 30 days (AOR = 1.13, CI: 1.03-1.26) in MINDS based diazepam treatment group. Total diazepam equivalent dosing was similar in both groups. Mortality rates and ICU use rates were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Higher dose front loading long acting benzodiazepine can be safely used with beneficial outcomes in hospitalized alcohol withdrawal patients.

Effects of a Consensus-Based Pulmonary Embolism Treatment Algorithm and Response Team on Treatment Modality Choices, Outcomes, and Complications.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) treatment depends on disease severity and risk of complications. Physician and institutional expertise may influence the use of reperfusion therapy (RT) such as systemic thrombolysis (SL) and catheter-directed interventions (CDI). We aimed to investigate the effects of a consensus-based treatment algorithm (TA) and subsequent implementation of PE response team (PERT) on RT modality choices and patient outcomes. A cohort of PE patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital between 2012 and 2017 was retrospectively evaluated. Demographics, clinical variables, RT selections, and patient outcomes during 3 consecutive 2-year periods (baseline, with TA, and with TA+PERT) were compared. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. A total of 1105 PE patients were admitted, and 112 received RT. Use of RT increased from 4.7% at baseline to 8.2% and 16.1% during the TA and TA+PERT periods. The primary RT modality transitioned from CDI to SL, and reduced-dose SL became most common. Treatment selection patterns remained unchanged after PERT introduction. Hospital length of stay decreased from 4.78 to 2.96 and 2.81 days (P < .001). Most of the hemorrhagic complications were minor, and their rates were similar across all 3 periods and between SL and CDI. No major hemorrhages occurred in patients treated with reduced-dose SL. In conclusion, TA and PERT represent components of a decision support system facilitating treatment modality selection, contributing to improved outcomes, and limiting complications. Treatment algorithm emerged as a factor providing consistency to PERT recommendations.

Tablet vs. station-based laptop ultrasound devices increases internal medicine resident point-of-care ultrasound performance: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is becoming an important part of internal medicine (IM) residency training. Achieving competency requires performing a large volume of clinical exams which can be difficult within the constraints of residency. Often-cited barriers include insufficient resident time and the interruption of daily workflow. Despite availability of hospital station-based laptop ultrasound machines, we hypothesized that the addition of ward team-based tablet ultrasound devices would lower barriers and increase clinical POCUS volume within an IM residency POCUS curriculum at a 670-bed, quaternary care, teaching hospital. IM resident POCUS volumes and characteristics during an 18-mo. baseline (station-based laptop devices only) period were compared to matched months during the intervention (station-based + tablet). RESULTS: Total patients examined with POCUS by 6 inpatient resident teams during the 18-mo. baseline and intervention periods were 1386 and 1853, respectively. Patients examined per month increased during the intervention by 34% (77 vs. 103, p = 0.002). The number of areas (e.g., abdominal, cardiac) and items (e.g., bladder, pericardial effusion) examined per month increased by 27% (p = 0.021) and 23% (p = 0.073), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A combined program infrastructure of station-based laptop and "in-the-pocket" tablet ultrasound devices lowered common POCUS barriers of inadequate time and workflow disruption for IM residents and resulted in a meaningful increase of exams within a longitudinal residency-based training program where station-based laptop devices already existed.

Comparative Performance of Pulmonary Ultrasound, Chest Radiograph, and CT Among Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure.

OBJECTIVES: The study goal was to concurrently evaluate agreement of a 9-point pulmonary ultrasound protocol and portable chest radiograph with chest CT for localization of pathology to the correct lung and also to specific anatomic lobes among a diverse group of intubated patients with acute respiratory failure. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Medical, surgical, and neurologic ICUs at a 670-bed urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Intubated adults with acute respiratory failure having chest CT and portable chest radiograph performed within 24 hours of intubation. INTERVENTIONS: A 9-point pulmonary ultrasound examination performed at the time of intubation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients had pulmonary ultrasound, portable chest radiograph, and chest CT performed within 24 hours of intubation. Overall agreement of pulmonary ultrasound and portable chest radiograph findings with correlating lobe ("lobe-specific" agreement) on CT was 87% versus 62% (p < 0.001), respectively. Relaxing the agreement definition to a matching CT finding being present anywhere within the correct lung ("lung-specific" agreement), not necessarily the specific mapped lobe, showed improved agreement for both pulmonary ultrasound and portable chest radiograph respectively (right lung: 92.5% vs 65.7%; p < 0.001 and left lung: 83.6% vs 71.6%; p = 0.097). The highest lobe-specific agreement was for the finding of atelectasis/consolidation for both pulmonary ultrasound and portable chest radiograph (96% and 73%, respectively). The lowest lobe-specific agreement for pulmonary ultrasound was normal lung (79%) and interstitial process for portable chest radiograph (29%). Lobe-specific agreement differed most between pulmonary ultrasound and portable chest radiograph for interstitial findings (86% vs 29%, respectively). Pulmonary ultrasound had the lowest agreement with CT for findings in the left lower lobe (82.1%). Pleural effusion agreement also differed between pulmonary ultrasound and portable chest radiograph (right: 99% vs 87%; p = 0.009 and left: 99% vs 85%; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: A clinical, 9-point pulmonary ultrasound protocol strongly agreed with specific CT findings when analyzed by both lung- and lobe-specific location among a diverse population of mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory failure; in this regard, pulmonary ultrasound significantly outperformed portable chest radiograph.

Resident Perspectives on Teaching During Awake Surgical Procedures.

INTRODUCTION: Residents learn technical and communication skills during training and practice both concurrently during awake surgical procedures. Patients have expressed mixed views on resident involvement in their surgical care, making this context challenging for residents to navigate. We sought to qualitatively explore resident perspectives on teaching during awake surgical procedures. METHODS: Residents in Urology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and General Surgery who had been exposed to 10 or more awake surgical procedures were recruited for recorded focus groups at the University of Chicago. Recordings were transcribed, coded, and reviewed by 3 researchers using the constant comparative method until thematic saturation was reached. RESULTS: Twenty-five residents participated in 5 focus groups. Residents identified positive educational techniques during awake surgery including preprocedural communication, explaining teaching and the resident role, whispering/nonverbal communication, involving the patient in education, and confident educator. Residents described challenges and failures in education, including hesitating to ask questions, hesitating to correct a learner, whispering/nonverbal communication, and taking over. In discussing informed consent during awake procedures, some residents described that the consent process should or did change during awake procedures, for example, to include more information about the resident role. CONCLUSIONS: Residents participating in awake surgical procedures offer new insights on successful techniques for teaching during awake surgery, emphasizing that good communication in the procedure room starts beforehand. They also identify challenges with teaching in this context, often related to a lack of open and clear communication.

Surgeon-patient communication during awake procedures.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons are increasingly performing procedures on awake patients. Communication during such procedures is complex and underexplored in the literature. METHODS: Surgeons were recruited from the faculty of 2 hospitals to participate in an interview regarding their approaches to communication during awake procedures. Three researchers used the constant comparative method to transcribe, code, and review interviews until saturation was reached. RESULTS: Twenty-three surgeons described the advantages and disadvantages of awake procedures, their communication with the awake patient, their interactions with staff and with trainees, the environment of awake procedures, and how communication in this context is taught and learned. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons recognized communication during awake procedures as important and reported varied strategies for ensuring patient comfort in this context. However, they also acknowledged challenges with multiparty communication during awake procedures, especially in balancing commitments to teaching with their duty to comfort the patient.