A lipoglycopeptide antibiotic for Gram-positive biofilm-related infections.

Drug-resistant Gram-positive bacterial infections are still a substantial burden on the public health system, with two bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae) accounting for over 1.5 million drug-resistant infections in the United States alone in 2017. In 2019, 250,000 deaths were attributed to these pathogens globally. We have developed a preclinical glycopeptide antibiotic, MCC5145, that has excellent potency (MIC90 ≤ 0.06 µg/ml) against hundreds of isolates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and other Gram-positive bacteria, with a greater than 1000-fold margin over mammalian cell cytotoxicity values. The antibiotic has therapeutic in vivo efficacy when dosed subcutaneously in multiple murine models of established bacterial infections, including thigh infection with MRSA and blood septicemia with S. pneumoniae, as well as when dosed orally in an antibiotic-induced Clostridioides difficile infection model. MCC5145 exhibited reduced nephrotoxicity at microbiologically active doses in mice compared to vancomycin. MCC5145 also showed improved activity against biofilms compared to vancomycin, both in vitro and in vivo, and a low propensity to select for drug resistance. Characterization of drug action using a transposon library bioinformatic platform showed a mechanistic distinction from other glycopeptide antibiotics.

Biofilm Time-Kill Curves to Assess the Bactericidal Activity of Daptomycin Combinations against Biofilm-Producing Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium and faecalis.

INTRODUCTION: E. faecium and E. faecalis are responsible for 13.9% of hospital-acquired infections with frequent resistance to vancomycin (82.6% of E. faecium, 9.5% of E. faecalis). Medical device infections secondary to enterococci often require combination therapy due to impaired activity against biofilm embedded cells. In vitro data demonstrate synergistic activity of daptomycin combinations. Using a novel, biofilm time-kill approach, we evaluated whether daptomycin combinations maintained synergy against biofilm-producing E. faecium and E. faecalis. METHODS: Broth microdilution (BMD) and biofilm MIC (bMIC) values for daptomycin, ampicillin, ceftriaxone, fosfomycin, and rifampin were determined against biofilm-producing E. faecium and E. faecalis. Daptomycin combination bMIC values were determined in the presence of biologic concentrations of other antimicrobials. Synergy was evaluated against two E. faecalis (R6981, R7808) and two E. faecium (5938 and 8019) using a previously described biofilm time-kill method. Synergy was defined as ≥2 log10 CFU/cm2 reduction over the most active agent alone. Bactericidal activity was defined as ≥3 log10 CFU/cm2 reduction. RESULTS: Daptomycin bMICs were 2-8-fold higher than BMD. In the presence of other antimicrobials, daptomycin bMICs were reduced ≥ two-fold in dilutions. Ceftriaxone and ampicillin demonstrated the most potent combinations with daptomycin, yielding synergy against three of four strains. Daptomycin plus rifampin was synergistic against E. faecium 5938 and E. faecalis 6981 and produced bactericidal kill. The combination of daptomycin plus fosfomycin displayed synergy solely against E. faecalis 6981. CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin combinations with beta-lactams demonstrated promising synergistic activity against both E. faecium and E. faecalis. While daptomycin plus rifampin yielded bactericidal results, the effect was not seen across all organisms. These combinations warrant further evaluation to determine the optimal dose and response.

Impact of Daptomycin Dose Exposure Alone or in Combination with ß-Lactams or Rifampin against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in an In Vitro Biofilm Model.

Enterococcus faecium strains are commonly resistant to vancomycin and ß-lactams. In addition, E. faecium often causes biofilm-associated infections and these infections are difficult to treat. In this context, we investigated the activity of dosing regimens using daptomycin (DAP) (8, 10, 12, and 14 mg/kg of body weight/day) alone and in combination with ceftaroline (CPT), ampicillin (AMP), ertapenem (ERT), and rifampin (RIF) against 2 clinical strains of biofilm-producing vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm), namely, strains S447 and HOU503, in an in vitro biofilm model. HOU503 harbors common LiaS and LiaR substitutions, whereas S447 lacks mutations associated with the LiaFSR pathway. MIC results demonstrated that both strains were susceptible to DAP and resistant to CPT, AMP, ERT, and RIF. The 168-h pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) CDC biofilm reactor models (simulating human antibiotic exposures) were used with titanium and polyurethane coupons to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic combinations. DAP 12 and 14 achieved bactericidal activity against S447 but lacked such effect against HOU503. Addition of ERT and RIF enhanced DAP activity, allowing DAP 8 and 10 plus ERT or RIF to produce bactericidal activity against both strains at 168 h. While DAP 8 and 10 plus CPT improved killing, they did not reach bactericidal reduction against S447. Combination of AMP, CPT, ERT, or RIF resulted in enhanced and bactericidal activity for DAP against HOU503 at 168 h. Our data provide further support for the use of combinations of DAP with AMP, ERT, CPT, and RIF in infections caused by biofilm producing VREfm. Further research involving DAP combinations against biofilm-producing enterococci is warranted.

Imipenem-Cilastatin-Relebactam: A Novel ß-Lactam-ß-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections.

Imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam (IMI-REL) is a novel ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combination recently approved for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) and complicated intraabdominal infections (cIAIs). Relebactam is a ß-lactamase inhibitor with the ability to inhibit a broad spectrum of ß-lactamases such as class A and class C ß-lactamases, including carbapenemases. The addition of relebactam to imipenem restores imipenem activity against several imipenem-resistant bacteria, including Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clinical data demonstrate that IMI-REL is well tolerated and effective in the treatment of cUTIs and cIAIs due to imipenem-resistant bacteria. In a phase III trial comparing IMI-REL with imipenem plus colistin, favorable clinical response was achieved in 71% and 70% of patients, respectively. Available clinical and pharmacokinetic data support the approved dosage of a 30-minute infusion of imipenem 500 mg-cilastatin 500 mg-relebactam 250 mg every 6 hours, along with dosage adjustments based on renal function. In this review, we describe the chemistry, mechanism of action, spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and clinical efficacy, and safety and tolerability of this new agent. The approval of IMI-REL represents another important step in the ongoing fight against multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens.

A Multicenter Evaluation of Vancomycin-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the real-world incidence of and risk factors for vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury (V-AKI) in hospitalized adults with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). METHODS: Retrospective, observational, cohort study at ten U.S. medical centers between 2015 and 2019. Hospitalized patients treated with vancomycin (≥ 72 h) for ABSSSI and ≥ one baseline AKI risk factor were eligible. Patients with end-stage kidney disease, on renal replacement therapy or AKI at baseline, were excluded. The primary outcome was V-AKI by the vancomycin guidelines criteria. RESULTS: In total, 415 patients were included. V-AKI occurred in 39 (9.4%) patients. Independent risk factors for V-AKI were: chronic alcohol abuse (aOR 4.710, 95% CI 1.929-11.499), no medical insurance (aOR 3.451, 95% CI 1.310-9.090), ICU residence (aOR 4.398, 95% CI 1.676-11.541), Gram-negative coverage (aOR 2.926, 95% CI 1.158-7.392) and vancomycin duration (aOR 1.143, 95% CI 1.037-1.260). Based on infection severity and comorbidities, 34.7% of patients were candidates for oral antibiotics at baseline and 39.3% had non-purulent cellulitis which could have been more appropriately treated with a beta-lactam. Patients with V-AKI had significantly longer hospital lengths of stay (9 vs. 6 days, p = 0.001), higher 30-day readmission rates (30.8 vs. 9.0%, p < 0.001) and increased all-cause 30-day mortality (5.1 vs. 0.3%, p = 0.024) CONCLUSIONS: V-AKI occurred in approximately one in ten ABSSSI patients and may be largely prevented by preferential use of oral antibiotics whenever possible, using beta-lactams for non-purulent cellulitis and limiting durations of vancomycin therapy.

Parenteral Fosfomycin for the Treatment of Multidrug Resistant Bacterial Infections: The Rise of the Epoxide.

Fosfomycin was initially discovered in 1969 but has recently gained renewed interest for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections, particularly in the United States. Its unique mechanism of action, bactericidal activity, broad spectrum of activity, and relatively safe and tolerable adverse effect profile make it a great addition to the dwindling antibiotic armamentarium. Fosfomycin contains a three-membered epoxide ring with a direct carbon to phosphorous bond that bypasses the intermediate oxygen bond commonly present in other organophosphorous compounds; this structure makes the agent unique from other antibiotics. Despite nearly 50 years of parenteral fosfomycin use in Europe, fosfomycin has retained stable activity against most pathogens. Furthermore, fosfomycin demonstrated in vitro synergy in combination with other cell wall-active antibiotics (e.g., ß-lactams, daptomycin). These combinations may offer respite for severe infections due to MDR gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. The intravenous (IV) formulation is currently under review in the United States, and apropos, this review collates more contemporary evidence (i.e., studies published between 2000 and early 2019) in anticipation of this development. The approval of IV fosfomycin provides another option for consideration in the management of MDR infections. Its unique structure will give rise to a promising epoxide epoch in the battle against MDR bacteria.

Evaluation of dalbavancin alone and in combination with ß-lactam antibiotics against resistant phenotypes of Staphylococcus aureus.

Background: Emergence of reduced susceptibility to vancomycin warrants the development of new antimicrobial agents for the treatment of MRSA. We evaluated the activity of dalbavancin, a novel lipoglycopeptide antibiotic, both alone and combined with ß-lactams, in combination MIC testing and time-kill assays against resistant phenotypes of Staphylococcus aureus. Methods: S. aureus isolates included 50 organisms with varying susceptibility patterns. Dalbavancin was tested alone and in combination with five ß-lactams: cefazolin, cefepime, ceftaroline, ertapenem and oxacillin. MIC values of the antibiotics were determined for all isolates. After initial MIC testing, dalbavancin MICs were determined in the presence of 0.5 × MIC of each ß-lactam to determine the effect of each ß-lactam on dalbavancin MIC. Time-kill assays were performed with dalbavancin and ß-lactams tested at 0.5 × MIC for randomly selected organisms representing each MRSA phenotype. Time-kill curves were generated by plotting mean colony counts (log10 cfu/mL) versus time. Results: Dalbavancin MIC50 was 0.0313 mg/L and MIC90 was 0.0625 mg/L. Dalbavancin MICs decreased by zero to greater than five 2-fold dilutions in combination with each ß-lactam. In time-kill assays, dalbavancin was synergistic with cefazolin, cefepime and ertapenem against all strains and the combination of dalbavancin and ceftaroline was synergistic against all but one. The combination of dalbavancin and oxacillin was synergistic against 5/8 strains. Conclusions: Dalbavancin was active against all MRSA strains tested, including heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus, daptomycin-non-susceptible and linezolid-resistant isolates. The synergy demonstrated against these organisms supports the use of dalbavancin in combination with ß-lactams against resistant phenotypes of S. aureus. Further evaluation is warranted.

Combination of Tedizolid and Daptomycin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro Model of Simulated Endocardial Vegetations.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major pathogen responsible for health care-associated infections, and treatment options are limited. Tedizolid (TZD) is a novel oxazolidinone antibiotic with activity against MRSA. Previously, daptomycin (DAP) has demonstrated synergy with other antibiotics against MRSA. We sought to determine the efficacy of the combination of TZD and DAP against MRSA in an in vitro model of simulated endocardial vegetations (SEVs). TZD simulations of 200 mg once daily and DAP simulations of 6 mg/kg of body weight and 10 mg/kg once daily were tested alone and in the combinations TZD plus DAP at 6 mg/kg or DAP at 10 mg/kg against two clinical strains of MRSA, 494 and 67. These regimens were tested in SEV models over 8 days to determine the antibacterial activity of the regimens and whether synergy or antagonism might be present between the agents. Against both strains 494 and 67 and at both DAP dose regimens, the combination of TZD and DAP was antagonistic at 192 h. In all cases, DAP alone was statistically superior to DAP plus TZD. When the combination was stopped after 96 h, transitioning to DAP at 6 mg/kg or DAP at 10 mg/kg alone resulted in better antibacterial activity than either of the TZD-plus-DAP combinations, further demonstrating antagonistic effects. Against MRSA, we demonstrated that TZD and DAP have antagonistic activity that hinders their overall antimicrobial efficacy. The exact nature of this antagonistic relationship is still undetermined, but its presence warrants further study of the potentially harmful grouping of the two antibiotics in clinical use.

Impact of a pharmacist-driven care package on Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia management in a large community healthcare network: A propensity score-matched, quasi-experimental study.

OBJECTIVES: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Suboptimal treatment has been associated with poor patient outcomes. Our antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) evaluated SAB management based on predefined performance measures both prior to and after instituting a "care package" intervention led by clinical pharmacists and infectious diseases physicians. The primary outcome included a 4-point "optimal care score" (OCS) consisting of targeted antibiotic therapy within 24hours, repeating blood cultures, antibiotic duration assessment, and appropriate duration of therapy. The presence of an ID consult, SAB readmission and mortality were also assessed. METHODS: This was a quasi-experimental, propensity score matched study of SAB management. Adult patients were retrospectively evaluated from October 2011 - October 2012, and intervention took place from November 2013 - December 2015. Intervention consisted of a clinical pharmacist contacting the primary team after identification of SAB to recommend (1) appropriate antibiotics within 24hours, (2) repeat blood cultures to document clearance, (3) assessment for metastatic infection, (4) and appropriate duration of therapy. These constituted the 4-point OCS. ID consult was also recommended. Patients were propensity score matched 1:2 based on age, diabetes, presence of hardware, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolate, and stratified infectious source. Patients ≥18 with SAB were included. RESULTS: Intervention was associated with improved adherence to each metric within the OCS, and more patients in the intervention cohort achieved a perfect OCS of 4. Intervention was associated with a lower rate of readmission and mortality. CONCLUSION: A pharmacist-driven, ASP intervention on SAB therapy was associated with increased adherence to core SAB care metrics and reduced relapse and mortality.

Evaluation of daptomycin combinations with cephalosporins or gentamicin against Streptococcus mitis group strains in an in vitro model of simulated endocardial vegetations (SEVs).

Objectives: Among viridans group streptococcal infective endocarditis (IE), the Streptococcus mitis group is the most common aetiological organism. Treatment of IE caused by the S. mitis group is challenging due to the high frequency of ß-lactam resistance, drug allergy and intolerability of mainstay antimicrobial agents such as vancomycin or gentamicin. Daptomycin has been suggested as an alternative therapeutic option in these scenarios based on its excellent susceptibility profile against S. mitis group strains . However, the propensity of many S. mitis group strains to rapidly evolve stable, high-level daptomycin resistance potentially limits this approach. Methods: We evaluated the activity of 6 mg/kg/day daptomycin alone or in combination with gentamicin, ceftriaxone or ceftaroline against two daptomycin-susceptible S. mitis group strains over 96 h in a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of simulated endocardial vegetations. Results: Daptomycin alone was not bactericidal and high-level daptomycin resistance evolved at 96 h in both organisms. Combinations of daptomycin + ceftriaxone and daptomycin + ceftaroline demonstrated enhanced killing activity compared with each antibiotic alone and prevented emergence of daptomycin resistance at 96 h. Use of gentamicin as an adjunctive agent neither improved the efficacy of daptomycin nor prevented the development of daptomycin resistance. Conclusions: Addition of ceftriaxone or ceftaroline to daptomycin improves the bactericidal activity against S. mitis group strains and prevents daptomycin resistance emergence. Further investigation with combinations of daptomycin and ß-lactams in a large number of strains is warranted to fully elucidate the clinical implications of such combinations for treatment of S. mitis group IE.

Real-World Experience with Oritavancin Therapy in Invasive Gram-Positive Infections.

INTRODUCTION: Oritavancin is a novel lipoglycopeptide approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. The pharmacokinetic profile and convenient one-time dosing make oritavancin an enticing option for other serious Gram-positive infections requiring prolonged treatment courses. Unfortunately, data for using oritavancin in these populations are limited. METHODS: We report ten cases of oritavancin use for invasive Gram-positive infections in our health system, and provide a review of the currently available literature regarding oritavancin therapy for invasive infections. RESULTS: Among the ten patients who received oritavancin, the most common infection was methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia (n = 5, 50%). Other indications for oritavancin use included methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) bursitis (n = 1, 10%), group B streptococcal bacteremia with native tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (n = 1, 10%), coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia (n = 1, 10%), MSSA deep tissue infection (n = 1, 10%), and enterococcal bacteremia (n = 1, 10%). Oritavancin was well tolerated, and 7/10 (70%) patients were successfully treated. CONCLUSION: Oritavancin is a potential option for patients with invasive Gram-positive infections. Further study is warranted.

Role of Combination Antimicrobial Therapy for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Infections: Review of the Current Evidence.

Enterococcus species are the second most common cause of nosocomial infections in the United States and are particularly concerning in critically ill patients with preexisting comorbid conditions. Rising resistance to antimicrobials that were historically used as front-line agents for treatment of enterococcal infections, such as ampicillin, vancomycin, and aminoglycosides, further complicates the treatment of these infections. Of particular concern are Enterococcus faecium strains that are associated with the highest rate of vancomycin resistance. The introduction of antimicrobial agents with specific activity against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) faecium including daptomycin, linezolid, quinupristin-dalfopristin, and tigecycline did not completely resolve this clinical dilemma. In this review, the mechanisms of action and resistance to currently available anti-VRE antimicrobial agents including newer agents such as oritavancin and dalbavancin will be presented. In addition, novel combination therapies including ß-lactams and fosfomycin, and the promising results from in vitro, animal studies, and clinical experience in the treatment of VRE faecium will be discussed.

Time-kill determination of the bactericidal activity of telavancin and vancomycin against clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from cancer patients.

The bactericidal activity of vancomycin and telavancin was compared against 4 clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates recently recovered from cancer patients, using minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC):MIC ratios and time-kill studies. All 4 isolates were susceptible to both agents based on individual MIC values. The 2 methodologies for assessing bactericidal activity produced variable results. Telavancin appeared to have somewhat better bactericidal activity than vancomycin based on narrower MBC:MIC ratios. However, based on the results of the time-kill studies, neither agent demonstrated reliable bactericidal activity (defined as a ≥3 log10 reduction of the starting inoculum at the end of 24hours) against these organisms. These findings might be of some therapeutic importance in certain clinical settings and/or specific patient populations (such as febrile neutropenic patients) in whom potent bactericidal activity is either desired or preferred.

ß-Lactamase Inhibitors Enhance the Synergy between ß-Lactam Antibiotics and Daptomycin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

The evidence for using combination therapy for the treatment of serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections is growing. In this study, we investigated the synergistic effect of daptomycin (DAP) combined with piperacillin-tazobactam and ampicillin-sulbactam against MRSA in time-kill experiments. Six of eight strains demonstrated synergy between DAP and the ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combination. In 5/8 strains, the synergy occurred only in the presence of the BLI, highlighting a role for BLIs in peptide-ß-lactam synergy.

Evaluation of Pharmacodynamic Interactions Between Telavancin and Aztreonam or Piperacillin/Tazobactam Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

INTRODUCTION: In clinical trials comparing telavancin (TLV) with vancomycin for treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia, TLV demonstrated lower clinical cure rates than vancomycin in patients who had mixed gram-positive and -negative infections and were concomitantly treated with either aztreonam (ATM) or piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ). Here, we investigated therapeutic interactions between TLV and ATM or PTZ in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model under simulated reduced renal function conditions. METHODS: In vitro one-compartment PK/PD models were run over 96 h simulating TLV 10 mg/kg every 48 h, ATM 500 mg every 8 h and PTZ continuous infusion 13.5 g over 24 h alone and in combination against P. aeruginosa, E. coli and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). The efficacy of antimicrobials was evaluated by plotting time-kill curves and calculating the reduction in log10 cfu/ml over 96 h. RESULTS: Against both MRSA strains, TLV was rapidly bactericidal at 4 h and maintained its activity over 96 h with no observed antagonism by either ATM or PTZ. PTZ maintained bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities against E. coli ATCC 25922 and clinical strain R1022 at 96 h, whereas both strains regrew as soon as 24 h in ATM models. Against P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, regrowth was noted at 24 h in models simulating ATM and PTZ. The addition of TLV to ATM or PTZ had no appreciable impact on activity against the two E. coli strains and P. aeruginosa strain. CONCLUSIONS: The combinations of TLV and either ATM or PTZ did not demonstrate any antagonistic activity. Clinical variables and patient characteristics should be further explored to determine possible reasons for discrepancies in outcomes. FUNDING: Theravance Biopharma Antibiotics, Inc.

Daptomycin in Combination with Ceftolozane-Tazobactam or Cefazolin against Daptomycin-Susceptible and -Nonsusceptible Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro, Hollow-Fiber Model.

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (TOL-TAZ) is a novel cephalosporin/beta-lactamase inhibitor with activity against several Gram-negative pathogens. Daptomycin (DAP) has demonstrated synergistic activity with beta-lactams against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates with reduced lipopeptide and glycopeptide susceptibilities. Our objective was to determine if DAP and TOL-TAZ possess synergy in hollow-fiber pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models. One isogenic pair of daptomycin-susceptible and daptomycin-nonsusceptible MRSA strains was evaluated. DAP, TOL-TAZ, and cefazolin (CFZ) MIC determinations were performed. DAP MIC determinations were also performed in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of TOL-TAZ and CFZ. Ninety-six-hour in vitro models were run, simulating DAP at 10 mg/kg of body weight/day; TOL-TAZ at 1,500 mg every 8 h; TOL at 1,000 mg every 8 h; and DAP combined with TOL-TAZ (DAP+TOL-TAZ), DAP+TOL, DAP+TAZ, and DAP+CFZ at 2,000 mg every 8 h. DAP MICs were 0.5 and 4 µg/ml for strains R8845 and R8846, respectively. In the presence of CFZ, R8845 and R8846 DAP MICs were reduced 8-fold and 16-fold, respectively. TOL and TAZ had no effect on DAP MICs. PK/PD models demonstrated bactericidal activity with DAP+CFZ against both strains. The combination of DAP+TOL-TAZ was bactericidal against R8845 but was not bactericidal against daptomycin-nonsusceptible strain R8846. DAP+TOL and DAP+TAZ were not bactericidal. No other regimens were bactericidal. DAP+TOL-TAZ did not demonstrate synergistic activity against daptomycin-nonsusceptible S. aureus but prevented daptomycin-nonsusceptible MRSA emergence. Because DAP+TOL or TAZ alone did not prevent daptomycin-nonsusceptible MRSA emergence, the combination TOL-TAZ may be necessary for synergy with DAP. DAP+CFZ demonstrated enhancement against both strains. The combination of DAP+CFZ warrants further clinical study.

Oritavancin Combinations with ß-Lactams against Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci.

Oritavancin possesses activity against vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA).In vitrodata suggest synergy between beta-lactams (BLs) and vancomycin or daptomycin, agents similar to oritavancin. We evaluated the activities of BLs combined with oritavancin against MRSA and VRE. Oritavancin MICs were determined for 30 strains, 5 each of MRSA, daptomycin-nonsusceptible (DNS) MRSA, vancomycin-intermediate MRSA (VISA), heteroresistant VISA (hVISA), vancomycin-resistantEnterococcus faecalis, and vancomycin-resistantEnterococcus faecium Oritavancin MICs were determined in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of BLs. Oritavancin combined with ceftaroline, cefazolin, or nafcillin was evaluated for lethal synergy against MRSA, and oritavancin combined with ceftaroline, ampicillin, or ertapenem was evaluated for lethal synergy against VRE in 24-h time-kill assays. Oritavancin at 0.5× the MIC was combined with BLs at 0.5× the MIC or the biological free peak concentration, whichever one was lower. Synergy was defined as a ≥2-log10-CFU/ml difference between the killing achieved with the combination and that achieved with the most active single agent at 24 h. Oritavancin MICs were ≤0.125 µg/ml for all MRSA isolates except three VISA isolates with MICs of 0.25 µg/ml. Oritavancin MICs for VRE ranged from 0.03 to 0.125 µg/ml. Oritavancin in combination with ceftaroline was synergistic against all MRSA phenotypes and statistically superior to all other combinations against DNS MRSA, hVISA, and MRSA isolates (P< 0.02). Oritavancin in combination with cefazolin and oritavancin in combination with nafcillin were also synergistic against all MRSA strains. Synergy between oritavancin and all BLs was revealed against VRE strain 8019, while synergy between oritavancin and ampicillin or ertapenem but not ceftaroline was demonstrated against VRE strain R7164. The data support the potential use of oritavancin in combination with BLs, especially oritavancin in combination with ceftaroline, for the treatment of infections caused by MRSA. The data from the present study are not as strong for oritavancin in combination with BLs for VRE. Further study of both MRSA and VRE in more complex models is warranted.

Evaluation of tedizolid against Staphylococcus aureus and enterococci with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, daptomycin or linezolid.

OBJECTIVES: Tedizolid displays potent activity against Gram-positive pathogens. In vitro studies against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and enterococci demonstrated improved tedizolid activity over linezolid. However, this is not well-characterized against a large collection of resistant isolates, including vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA), heterogeneous VISA (hVISA), daptomycin-non-susceptible (DNS) S. aureus, linezolid-resistant (LR) S. aureus and VRE. Therefore, our objective was to determine tedizolid activity versus other agents, against MRSA and VRE with various resistance phenotypes. METHODS: In total, 302 MRSA (75 DNS, 100 VISA, 120 hVISA and 7 LR) and 220 VRE [100 Enterococcus faecalis (all susceptible to daptomycin and linezolid) and 120 E. faecium (25 DNS and 10 LR)] were evaluated. LR isolates were analysed for the cfr gene. MICs of tedizolid, linezolid, ampicillin, clindamycin, daptomycin, gentamicin, levofloxacin, oxacillin, tigecycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and vancomycin were determined in accordance with CLSI guidelines. RESULTS: Tedizolid MIC90 values for hVISA, VISA and DNS were 0.5 mg/L (versus 4, 4 and 2 mg/L, respectively, for linezolid). The tedizolid MIC range for LR MRSA was 0.063-1 mg/L. Two LR MRSA possessed the cfr gene with tedizolid MICs of 0.125 and 0.25 mg/L (linezolid MICs of 16 and 8 mg/L). The tedizolid MIC90 for vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis and E. faecium was 0.25 and 1 mg/L, respectively; three dilutions lower for E. faecalis and two dilutions lower for E. faecium compared with linezolid. CONCLUSIONS: Tedizolid MICs demonstrate activity against isolates with decreased susceptibility to alternative agents, including linezolid. Tedizolid may be a viable treatment option in clinical situations with MDR Gram-positive pathogens.

Dalbavancin: A Novel Lipoglycopeptide Antibiotic with Extended Activity Against Gram-Positive Infections.

Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antibiotic recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). It is active against gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) are consistently <0.125 µg/ml, much lower than most other anti-MRSA agents. Dalbavancin possesses an extended half-life of over 1 week, allowing an initial dose of 1000 mg followed by 500 mg 1 week later to complete a course of therapy for ABSSSI. It is approximately 95% protein bound and is widely distributed throughout the body, achieving concentrations similar to plasma levels in numerous tissues. Against MRSA, dalbavancin is 4-8 times more potent than vancomycin in vitro, and limited data suggest it possesses activity against MRSA with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin such as hVISA and VISA. Dalbavancin also possesses in vitro activity against streptococci and enterococci, although activity against vancomycin-resistant enterococci is lacking. In phase 3 ABSSSI studies, dalbavancin demonstrated similar activity to vancomycin and provides a more convenient dosing regimen. Limited phase 2 data suggest dalbavancin also possesses activity in catheter-related bloodstream infections. Potential further therapeutic uses include conditions that require long-term treatment such as osteomyelitis and infective endocarditis, although data are currently lacking. The extended half-life of dalbavancin, along with its in vitro activity against gram-positive organisms with reduced susceptibility to other anti-MRSA antibiotics, suggest it could have an exciting clinical role going forward.