ABSTRACT
Mammalian primed pluripotent stem cells have been shown to be highly susceptible to cell death stimuli due to their low apoptotic threshold, but how this threshold is regulated remains largely unknown. Here we identify microRNA (miRNA)-mediated regulation as a key mechanism controlling apoptosis in the post-implantation epiblast. Moreover, we found that three miRNA families, miR-20, miR-92, and miR-302, control the mitochondrial apoptotic machinery by fine-tuning the levels of expression of the proapoptotic protein BIM. These families therefore represent an essential buffer needed to maintain cell survival in stem cells that are primed for not only differentiation but also cell death.
Subject(s)
Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins/genetics , Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins/metabolism , Apoptosis/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , MicroRNAs/metabolism , Pluripotent Stem Cells/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/metabolism , Animals , Bcl-2-Like Protein 11 , Cell Survival/genetics , Cells, Cultured , Gene Expression Profiling , Mice , Mitochondria/metabolism , Pluripotent Stem Cells/cytologyABSTRACT
The DNA damage response is crucial for bacterial survival. The transcriptional repressor LexA is a key component of the SOS response, the main mechanism for the regulation of DNA repair genes in many bacteria. In contrast, in mycobacteria gene induction by DNA damage is carried out by two mechanisms; a relatively small number of genes are thought to be regulated by LexA, and a larger number by an alternate, independent mechanism. In this study we have used ChIP-seq analysis to identify 25 in vivo LexA-binding sites, including nine regulating genes not previously known to be part of this regulon. Some of these binding sites were found to be internal to the predicted open reading frame of the gene they are thought to regulate; experimental analysis has confirmed that these LexA-binding sites regulate the expression of the expected genes, and transcriptional start site analysis has found that their apparent relative location is due to misannotation of these genes. We have also identified novel binding sites for LexA in the promoters of genes that show no apparent DNA damage induction, show positive regulation by LexA, and those encoding small RNAs.
