Formalizing the curbside: digitally enhancing access to specialty care.

Asynchronous medical care has increased in utilization, patient interest, and industry demand. While E-consults have been discussed extensively in the literature, there are rare examples of a multispecialty implementation within a large health system. Here, we describe our experience in implementing an internal E-consult program for asynchronous, nonurgent communication between ambulatory specialists and primary care providers in our large multispecialty regional health system. To ensure adoption of the program, patient, specialist, and primary care physician concerns were systematically addressed. The program commenced in February 2022 with three high referral rate specialties: cardiology, orthopedics, and dermatology. In the 12 months after implementation, 2243 total E-consults were ordered among 505 ordering providers. Dermatology received the most consultations, and we have expanded to 19 specialties and subspecialties available in the program in the first year. Our E-consult implementation experienced substantial growth in a short time period, demonstrating the viability of E-consult utilization for increasing asynchronous access to ambulatory specialists' expertise in a large healthcare system.

Do symptoms of pelvic floor disorders bias maternal recall of obstetrical events up to 10 years after delivery?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective study was to investigate whether symptoms of incontinence and prolapse bias maternal recall of obstetrical events up to 10 years after delivery. METHODS: In this secondary analysis of data gathered from the Mothers' Outcomes After Delivery study, we compared obstetrical medical records with maternal recall of delivery events. We calculated the agreement between maternal recall and the medical record across 1821 deliveries from 1011 participants for events including macrosomia, mode of delivery, prolonged second of labor, episiotomy, spontaneous laceration, anal sphincter laceration, and operative delivery. Women with symptomatic pelvic floor disorders were identified through administration of the Epidemiology of Prolapse and Incontinence Questionnaire or a clinical history of therapy for a pelvic floor disorder. We determined whether agreement between maternal recall and the medical record differed for those with or without symptoms using the medical record as a criterion standard. RESULTS: Agreement between maternal recall and the medical record was excellent for macrosomia and forceps deliveries (κ > 0.8), fair to good for episiotomy (κ = 0.61) and anal sphincter laceration (κ = 0.57), and poor for spontaneous perineal laceration (κ = 0.41). Symptomatic pelvic floor disorders did not impact maternal recall of macrosomia, prolonged second stage, episiotomy, spontaneous laceration, or operative delivery. However, recall of anal sphincter lacerations was biased by symptoms of pelvic floor disorders. Specifically, symptomatic women were significantly more likely to report a history of anal sphincter laceration, regardless of whether a sphincter laceration was documented (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Maternal recall of anal sphincter laceration may be biased by symptomatic pelvic floor disorders. In research based on maternal recall of obstetrical events, this could strengthen the apparent association between sphincter laceration and pelvic floor disorders.