Contrasting DNA-binding behaviour by ISL1 and LHX3 underpins differential gene targeting in neuronal cell specification.

The roles of ISL1 and LHX3 in the development of spinal motor neurons have been well established. Whereas LHX3 triggers differentiation into interneurons, the additional expression of ISL1 in developing neuronal cells is sufficient to redirect their developmental trajectory towards spinal motor neurons. However, the underlying mechanism of this action by these transcription factors is less well understood. Here, we used electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to probe the different DNA-binding behaviours of these two proteins, both alone and in complexes mimicking those found in developing neurons, and found that ISL1 shows markedly different binding properties to LHX3. We used small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) to structurally characterise DNA-bound species containing ISL1 and LHX3. Taken together, these results have allowed us to develop a model of how these two DNA-binding modules coordinate to regulate gene expression and direct development of spinal motor neurons.

Binding and folding in transcriptional complexes.

Transcription factors are among the classes of proteins with the highest levels of disorder. Investigation of these regulatory proteins is uncovering not just the mechanisms that underlie gene regulation, but relationships that apply to all intrinsically disordered proteins. Recent studies confirm that binding does not necessarily induce folding but that when it does, it tends to follow induced fit mechanisms. Other work emphasises the importance of electrostatics to interactions involving intrinsically disordered proteins, and roles of intrinsic disorder in phase transitions. All these features help direct transcription factors to target sites in the genome to upregulate or downregulate transcription.

Disparate binding kinetics by an intrinsically disordered domain enables temporal regulation of transcriptional complex formation.

Intrinsically disordered regions are highly represented among mammalian transcription factors, where they often contribute to the formation of multiprotein complexes that regulate gene expression. An example of this occurs with LIM-homeodomain (LIM-HD) proteins in the developing spinal cord. The LIM-HD protein LHX3 and the LIM-HD cofactor LDB1 form a binary complex that gives rise to interneurons, whereas in adjacent cell populations, LHX3 and LDB1 form a rearranged ternary complex with the LIM-HD protein ISL1, resulting in motor neurons. The protein-protein interactions within these complexes are mediated by ordered LIM domains in the LIM-HD proteins and intrinsically disordered LIM interaction domains (LIDs) in LDB1 and ISL1; however, little is known about how the strength or rates of binding contribute to complex assemblies. We have measured the interactions of LIM:LID complexes using FRET-based protein-protein interaction studies and EMSAs and used these data to model population distributions of complexes. The protein-protein interactions within the ternary complexes are much weaker than those in the binary complex, yet surprisingly slow LDB1:ISL1 dissociation kinetics and a substantial increase in DNA binding affinity promote formation of the ternary complex over the binary complex in motor neurons. We have used mutational and protein engineering approaches to show that allostery and modular binding by tandem LIM domains contribute to the LDB1LID binding kinetics. The data indicate that a single intrinsically disordered region can achieve highly disparate binding kinetics, which may provide a mechanism to regulate the timing of transcriptional complex assembly.

Mechanisms of DNA-binding specificity and functional gene regulation by transcription factors.

Eukaryotic transcription factors up-regulate and down-regulate the expression of genes in a very controlled manner. The DNA-binding domains of these proteins have quite well established mechanisms for binding to DNA, but a surprisingly poor intrinsic ability to discriminate target and variant non-target DNA sequences. Here, we summarise established mechanisms of protein-DNA recognition, as specified by both macromolecules. We also review recent advances in the fields of genome binding, molecular dynamics and biomolecular interaction studies that bring us close to a full understanding of how eukaryotic transcription factors find and target DNA in vivo to form functional centres of gene regulation through networks of protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions.