Parent and staff focus groups to address NICU racial inequities: "There's radical optimism in that we're in a different time and we're not doing it alone".

OBJECTIVES: To understand local mechanisms of racial inequities and generate recommendations from community members regarding how to promote racial equity in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). METHODS: In an urban tertiary care NICU, 4 semi-structured in-person focus groups with follow-up audio diaries were conducted with NICU parents and staff from 2022-2023 with support from interpreters, a psychologist, and a family advocate. Researchers coded transcripts independently and thematic analysis was utilized to generate and refine themes. RESULTS: 16 racially diverse and multidisciplinary staff and parents participated, and six themes emerged from the data. Mechanisms of racial inequities included power dynamics, interpersonal and institutional dehumanization, and societal inequities. Recommendations included redistributing power, transforming space and staff to promote humanism, and mitigating harm through peer support and resource allocation. CONCLUSION: Focus groups are a promising strategy to identify interventions to address racial inequities. Future research should focus on intervention implementation and evaluation.

Parent and staff perceptions of racism in a single-center neonatal intensive care unit.

IMPACT: In alignment with previous literature, NICU parents reported experiencing racism and NICU staff reported witnessing racism in the NICU. Our study also uniquely describes personal experiences with racism by staff in the NICU. NICU staff reported witnessing and experiencing racism more often than parents reported. Black staff reported witnessing and experiencing more racism than white staff. Differences in reporting is likely influenced by variations in lived experience, social identities, psychological safety, and levels of awareness. Future studies are necessary to prevent and accurately measure racism in the NICU.

Structural Racism Operationalized via Adverse Social Events in a Single-Center Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate structural racism in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) by determining if differences in adverse social events occur by racialized groups. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of 3290 infants hospitalized in a single center NICU between 2017 and 2019 in the Racial and Ethnic Justice in Outcomes in Neonatal Intensive Care (REJOICE) study. Demographics and adverse social events including infant urine toxicology screening, child protective services (CPS) referrals, behavioral contracts, and security emergency response calls were collected from electronic medical records. Logistic regression models were fit to test the association of race/ethnicity and adverse social events, adjusting for length of stay. Racial/ethnic groups were compared with a White referent group. RESULTS: There were 205 families (6.2%) that experienced an adverse social event. Black families were more likely to have experienced a CPS referral and a urine toxicology screen (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.2-6.1 and OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4-3.5). American Indian and Alaskan Native families were also more likely to experience CPS referrals and urine toxicology screens (OR, 15.8; 95% CI, 6.9-36.0 an OR, 7.6; 95% CI, 3.4-17.2). Black families were more likely to experience behavioral contracts and security emergency response calls. Latinx families had a similar risk of adverse events, and Asian families were less likely to experience adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: We found racial inequities in adverse social events in a single-center NICU. Investigation of generalizability is necessary to develop widespread strategies to address institutional and societal structural racism and to prevent adverse social events.