Got milk? Effects of early enteral feedings in patients with gastroschisis.

BACKGROUND: Initiating early enteral intake post-surgical gastroschisis repair may result in better patient outcomes. However, there is lack of evidence and consistency in clinical practice regarding the timing of initiation of feedings, and few studies have determined best practices for post-operative nutritional management. PURPOSE: To determine whether early nutritional management using a standardized advancement protocol improves outcomes for patients with gastroschisis. FINDINGS/RESULTS: A retrospective study was used, following the implementation of a new early enteral feeding protocol. Patients managed without the new protocol, from January 2007 through December 2009, formed the traditional feeding group, while those receiving post-protocol nutritional management, from January 2010 through December 2012, comprised the early enteral feeding group. The main outcome, measured by length of stay (LOS), and secondary outcomes, including incidence of sepsis, were evaluated; N = 32. There was a statistically significant difference in the scores for LOS (P = .022) and incidence of sepsis (P = .36). No correlation was found between the number of days to initial feeding and LOS (P = .732). However, there was a robust, positive correlation between the number of days to achieve full feedings and LOS (P < .001) IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: These findings support the benefit of early initiation of enteral feedings in reducing the incidence of sepsis. Furthermore, they suggest the time to achieve full enteral feedings, not necessarily the timing of initiation of feedings, significantly impacts LOS. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: Consideration for future studies include incorporating strategies that combine early enteral feeding initiatives with interventions that allow for quicker onset of full enteral intake.

Creating windows of opportunity for policy change: Incorporating evidence into decentralized planning in Kenya.

PROBLEM: Because researchers and policy-makers work in different spheres, policy decisions in the health arena are often not based on available scientific evidence. APPROACH: We describe a model that illustrates the policy process and how to work strategically to translate knowledge into policy actions. Several types of activity--agenda-setting, coalition building and policy learning--together can create a window of opportunity for policy change. LOCAL SETTING: Activities were undertaken as part of the Kenyan Ministry of Health's new decentralized planning-process. The objective was to ensure that the results of a national assessment of health services were used in the preparation of district-level health plans. RELEVANT CHANGES: Following the intervention, 70 district-level, evidence-based work plans were developed and approved by the Kenyan Ministry of Health. LESSONS LEARNED: Substantial investment and effort are needed to bring stakeholders together to work towards policy change. More in-depth evaluation of these efforts can aid understanding of how systematic approaches to policy change can be replicated elsewhere.