Endoscopic ultrasound-guided antegrade treatment versus balloon enteroscopy endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The safety and technical success of endoscopic ultrasound-guided antegrade treatment (EUS-AG) compared to balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (BE-ERCP) for choledocholithiasis in Roux-en-Y gastrectomy has not been well documented. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of the 2 procedures. Methods: A systematic search of multiple databases was undertaken through January 25, 2024, to identify relevant studies comparing the 2 procedures. Standard meta-analysis methods were employed using a random-effects model. For each outcome, risk-ratio (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and P-values were generated. P<0.05 was considered significant. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic. Results: Three studies with 795 patients (95 in the EUS-AG group and 700 in the BE-ERCP group) were included. The technical success rate was similar between EUS-AG and BE-ERCP (RR 1.08, 95%CI 0.84-1.38; P=0.57; I 2=56%). The overall rate of adverse effects was higher in the BE-ERCP group than in the EUS-AG group (RR 1.95, 95%CI 1.21-3.15; P=0.006; I 2=0 %). Rates of clinical success, pancreatitis, perforation, and bile peritonitis were similar between the 2 procedure techniques. Conclusions: Our analysis showed no distinct advantage in using one technique over the other for patients with Roux-en-Y anatomy in achieving technical and clinical success. However, the incidence of adverse effects was greater in the BE-ERCP group than in the EUS-AG group.

Comparative Efficacy of Treatment Options for the Prevention of Post-TIPS Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is often used in patients with cirrhosis to manage portal hypertension-related complications. Unfortunately, 35-50% of patients develop overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) after TIPS. However, data on lactulose and rifaximin to prevent post-TIPS HE is limited. Therefore, we aimed to perform a network meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of multiple pharmacological regimens in the prevention of post-TIPS HE. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy to identify reports of studies of rifaximin use on post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy was constructed using truncated keywords, phrases, and subject headings developed in Embase. This strategy was translated to MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Web of Science Core Collection, with all searches performed on 10 February 2022. No publication date or language limits were used. RESULTS: The initial search identified 72 studies, and 56 studies were screened after removing duplicates. Five studies, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three retrospective studies, met our inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. A total of 840 patients were included, with 65% male. Our meta- analysis did not find a statistically significant difference between lactulose vs placebo/no prophylaxis, nor rifaximin vs placebo/no prophylaxis, nor rifaximin plus lactulose vs placebo/no prophylaxis in the reduction of post-TIPS HE. CONCLUSIONS: Rifaximin alone, lactulose alone, and rifaximin plus lactulose did not significantly reduce the development of post-TIPS HE. Based on the P-scores of the three treatment groups, the combination of rifaximin plus lactulose showed the most promising trend towards preventing post-TIPS HE. More studies, especially large RCTs, are warranted.

Predictors of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients following left ventricular assist device implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim: Our study aims to provide a more holistic understanding of the available data and predictive risk factors for gastrointestinal bleed (GIB). Materials & methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science Core Collection and calculated relative risk and meta-regression was utilized to evaluate for risk factors in order to assess the effect of covariates. Results: Our meta-analysis reported a pooled prevalence rate of GIB of 24.4%. Meta-regression analysis did not yield a statistically significant association between GIB and risk factors, including age, gender, hypertension, chronic kidney disease and diabetes. Conclusion: Studies investigating larger sample sizes are required for conclusive findings.

Safety of biologics in inflammatory bowel disease patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remain highly concerned that either their disease or medications-namely, biologics-may increase the risk of severe coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to assess the safety of biologics in Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We systematically reviewed multiple databases to find relevant articles reporting the effect of biologics on "severe" COVID-19 in IBD patients. Those in the form of case series (> 10 patients), case-control, and cohort studies were included. Severe COVID-19 was defined as intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and/or mortality. Pooled analysis with multivariate regression was performed. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies with 2681 patients were included. The proportion of females was (48.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 47.0-49.5%). The proportion of UC patients was (44.8%, 95% CI 41.0-48.5%). Overall, in IBD patients, the need for mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mortality was 5.1%, 6.1%, and 4.5%, respectively. Use of biologics did not show a moderating effect on mechanical ventilation (p = 0.68), ICU admission (p = 0.27), or mortality (p = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings advocate for the continued biologic therapy in IBD patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, the incidence, severity, and outcomes related to COVID-19 in IBD patients' needs to be reassessed as data continues to emerge.