Experiences of Black Women With Pelvic Floor Disorders-A Qualitative Analysis Study.

IMPORTANCE: Disparities research in Black women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) has primarily focused on epidemiology or surgical outcomes, but little is known about the patient perspective on seeking PFD care. OBJECTIVE: To provide quality and equitable care to Black women with PFDs, we conducted a qualitative study to hear their perspectives and lived health care experiences. STUDY DESIGN: Black women seeking care for PFDs at a tertiary care institution were invited to participate in qualitative interviews. Open-ended questions explored participants' knowledge, attitudes, and health care experiences. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded line-by-line. Inductive content analysis was performed to identify key themes, and consensus was achieved among the research team. RESULTS: Eight Black women aged 21-83 years consented to participate. Patients noted a stigma surrounding PFDs, both among health care professionals and their community. They noted several barriers to care: financial, logistical, and racial bias. They cited difficulties in patient-health care professional communication, including not feeling heard or treated as an individual. They preferred gender and racial concordance with their physicians. These women expressed both a desire for more knowledge and to share this knowledge and advocate for other women. CONCLUSIONS: Black women expressed distinct obstacles in their PFD health care. They reported not feeling heard or treated as a unique individual. The themes derived from this study identify complex patient-centered needs that can serve as the basis for future quality improvement work and/or hypothesis-driven research. By grounding health disparities research in patient perspectives, we can improve the health care experiences of Black women.

Increasing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Urology Residency Recruitment: Recommendations From the Society of Women in Urology.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a framework for diversifying the urologic workforce through residency recruitment by integrating principles of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) into program mission and values, application review, and interview process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this narrative review, the Society of Women in Urology Advancing DEI in Urology Residency Recruitment Task Force identified 4 areas for incorporating DEI into residency recruitment: defining a residency program's mission and values, holistic application review, an objective interview process, and implementing DEI principles into a program. Using PubMed and Google Scholar, we performed a non-systematic literature search of articles from January 2014 to January 2024. Search terms included combinations of "diversity", "equity", "inclusion", "residency", "holistic review", "applications", "interviews", and "initiatives". Additional resources were identified through citations of selected articles. Based on findings from these articles, Task Force members made recommendations for best practices. RESULTS: The diversity of practicing urologists is disproportionate to that of the United States population. Emerging evidence demonstrates that DEI efforts in healthcare are associated with better outcomes and reduction in healthcare inequities. We offer strategies for residency programs to integrate DEI initiatives into their recruitment, application review, and interview process. Furthermore, we address extending DEI principles into a program's mission and culture to create an inclusive environment conducive to training and supporting individuals from unique backgrounds. CONCLUSION: It is critical to recruit and retain diverse talent in urology to improve patient care. We urge residency programs and their supporting institutions to adopt DEI principles into their recruitment efforts.

Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Removal of Mid-Urethral Mesh Slings Eroded into the Bladder.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Depending on the indication, there are multiple surgical approaches for the removal of mid-urethral mesh slings (MUS): transvaginal, endoscopic, open abdominal, and robotic. We demonstrate the robotic approach to treat MUS that have eroded into the bladder. The robotic approach offers excellent exposure, visualization, and accessibility. Compared to endoscopic approaches, the entire arm of the sling can be removed from the bladder wall, the bladder repaired, and the foreign body completely eliminated. Robotic MUS excision is ideal in patients who would be best served by maximal removal of the mesh from the bladder to prevent future complications. METHODS: In this video, we display 2 different cases showing 2 unique approaches to robotic MUS excision depending on the location of mesh erosion: 1. If a retropubic sling is eroded through the anterior bladder, we begin by dropping the bladder and entering the space of Retzius to locate the mesh arm. 2. If the sling is eroded into the posterior bladder, a cystotomy is made on the anterior dome to visualize the posterior bladder wall. RESULTS: Once the mesh is identified, we follow the mesh graft carefully and dissect it away from surrounding tissues. The dissection is immediately close to the mesh, without fragmenting it, to allow for complete excision and protection of adjacent critical structures. The surgical principles and instrument techniques of robotic mesh excision mirror those utilized for transvaginal mesh excision. Complications of this surgical approach include a urinary leak that may require prolonged catheterization or re-operation and recurrent stress urinary incontinence, in addition to typical operative risks. CONCLUSION: For treatment of mesh erosion into the bladder, a robotic approach offers excellent visualization, is feasible, and well-tolerated. Compared to fragmenting the mesh using an endoscopic approach, the robotic approach has the advantage of excising the mesh definitively and preventing future recurrences of mesh erosion. Properly selected patients should be offered the robotic approach to mesh excision.