Development and characterization of anti-SARS-CoV-2 intravenous immunoglobulin from COVID-19 convalescent plasma.

Background: The authors describe the developmental process of intravenous anti-COVID-19 hyperimmune immunoglobulin from anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody-containing plasma. Furthermore, the authors investigated its safety and protective activity in animal models. Materials & methods: The manufacturing process included standard ethanol fractionation, chromatographic purification steps and virus removal or inactivation. Results: The authors produced pure and safe immunoglobulin for intravenous administration, with 98.1 ± 6.5 mg/ml protein content, of which 97.6 ± 0.7% was IgG. The concentration factor of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies was 9.4 ± 1.4-times. Safety studies in animals showed no signs of acute/chronic toxicity or allergenic or thrombogenic properties. Intravenous anti-COVID-19 hyperimmune immunoglobulin protected immunosuppressed hamsters against SARS-Cov-2. Conclusion: The obtained results can allow the start of clinical trials to study the safety and efficacy in healthy adults.

An intravenous immunoglobulin with a high concentration of SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibodies was prepared from COVID-19 convalescent plasma, which could be utilized as a passive immunization tool in regard to COVID-19 treatment. The manufacturing process employed conforms to commonly held business standards within the intravenous immunoglobulin industry and includes plasma ethanol fractionation following chromatographic purification and special virus removal or inactivation steps. The results of the preclinical in vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrate that the immunoglobulin produced in this study is pure and safe enough to be considered for intravenous applications. The SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody concentration was found to have increased 9.4 ± 1.4-times compared with human plasma. The anti-COVID-19 hyperimmune immunoglobulin showed no signs of toxicity and did not cause any blood clot formations when administered to rabbits. Furthermore, the anti-COVID-19 hyperimmune immunoglobulin was demonstrated to protect immunosuppressed hamsters against SARS-CoV-2.

Clinical differences between total PAPP-A and measurements specific for the products of free PAPP-A activity in patients with stable cardiovascular disease.

OBJECTIVES: We have previously reported that increases in total pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) which are thought to be indicative of vulnerable plaques and thus poor outcomes predict outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease. We hypothesized that the determination of CT- and NT-fragments of insulin-like growth factor binding protein 4 (CT- and NT-IGFBP4) which should be indicative of free PAPP-A would result in better performance. METHODS: In 229 stable cardiovascular patients with indication for heart catheterization after performance of a stress test and an echocardiogram, CT- and NT-IGFBP4 were measured. Their values were investigated in relation to clinical characteristics, findings of noninvasive investigations, laboratory data and coronary angiography as well as to outcomes after a follow-up of 1094±307days. RESULTS: CT-IGFBP4 values were independently predicted by patients with B-type (p=0.0069) or complex coronary lesions (p=0.0445). B-type and vulnerable coronary lesions were independently predicted by levels of CT-IGFBP4≥a cutoff of 31.55ng/mL derived from ROC analysis (p=0.0090 and 0.0480). NT-IGFBP4 was not predictive of coronary characteristics. Both IGFBP4 fragments were strongly dependent on age and renal function and were not predictive of outcomes. CONCLUSION: Despite the relation of CT-IGFBP4 to a more severe coronary artery disease, CT- and NT-IGFBP4, in contrast to our report based on total PAPP-A, failed to predict any long-term outcomes in patients with stable cardiovascular disease. Further knowledge about the interaction of the PAPP-A-insulin-like growth factor system is needed to explain values of IGFBP4 fragments in these patients.