Ultrasound-Guided Great Saphenous Vein Access: Revisiting an Old Friend in a New Location.

BACKGROUND: Early recognition of difficult intravenous (i.v.) access and use of ultrasound-guided techniques prior to multiple attempts are important steps in improving patient care in the emergency department (ED). Success rates for ultrasound-guided peripheral i.v. (PIV) cannulation are affected by depth, size of target vessel, and predictability of anatomy. The great saphenous vein (GSV) in the medial distal thigh may provide an alternative site for ultrasound-guided cannulation in cases of difficult peripheral venous access. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to determine the feasibility of ultrasound-guided GSV PIV placement as an alternative site for patients with difficult i.v. access. METHODS: Participants were prospectively enrolled from a convenience sample of patients presenting to the ED in June and July 2019. Inclusion criteria were age 18 years and older, and a history of difficult i.v. access or two unsuccessful nursing staff attempts. Ultrasound-guided access was conducted with an in-plane or out-of-plane approach on the basis of proceduralist preference. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled; 1 patient withdrew consent prior to cannulation. GSV cannulation was successful in 14 (73.7%) of the 19 patients. Phlebotomy, blood transfusion, i.v. medications including norepinephrine, and i.v. computed tomography contrast medium were successfully performed via GSV access. No reported infection, thrombosis, or extravasation was identified throughout the cannulation dwell time, hospitalization, or for 72 h after discharge. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided GSV PIV placement is a feasible alternative in situations of difficult i.v. access. No unforeseen complication or safety issue was identified. Blood products, medications, and contrast medium were successfully administered safely.

Increased body mass index does not impact the imaging quality of focused assessment with sonography in trauma.

BACKGROUND: Many clinicians believe that a patient's body mass index (BMI) affects the likelihood of obtaining high quality ultrasound images. OBJECTIVES: To assess the hypothesis that increased BMI is associated with worsening focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) image quality. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center study of FAST examinations performed in a large academic emergency department (ED) with fellowship-trained emergency ultrasonography faculty performing quality assurance review. RESULTS: Mean (SD) BMI was 28.0 (6.6) among the 302 included studies. The overall quality rating tended to decrease as BMI increased but did not achieve statistical significance in a univariable setting (P = .06) or after adjustment for age and sex (P = .06). Operators perception of image adequacy was largely unaffected by BMI, with the exception of the pericardial view. CONCLUSION: This study did not identify a statistically significant difference in FAST quality with increased BMI. This result may help assuage clinician concerns about ultrasonography for patients in the ED.