Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 13(11): e0206223, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30388137

ABSTRACT

Mouse syngeneic tumor models are widely used tools to demonstrate activity of novel anti-cancer immunotherapies. Despite their widespread use, a comprehensive view of their tumor-immune compositions and their relevance to human tumors has only begun to emerge. We propose each model possesses a unique tumor-immune infiltrate profile that can be probed with immunotherapies to inform on anti-tumor mechanisms and treatment strategies in human tumors with similar profiles. In support of this endeavor, we characterized the tumor microenvironment of four commonly used models and demonstrate they encompass a range of immunogenicities, from highly immune infiltrated RENCA tumors to poorly infiltrated B16F10 tumors. Tumor cell lines for each model exhibit different intrinsic factors in vitro that likely influence immune infiltration upon subcutaneous implantation. Similarly, solid tumors in vivo for each model are unique, each enriched in distinct features ranging from pathogen response elements to antigen presentation machinery. As RENCA tumors progress in size, all major T cell populations diminish while myeloid-derived suppressor cells become more enriched, possibly driving immune suppression and tumor progression. In CT26 tumors, CD8 T cells paradoxically increase in density yet are restrained as tumor volume increases. Finally, immunotherapy treatment across these different tumor-immune landscapes segregate into responders and non-responders based on features partially dependent on pre-existing immune infiltrates. Overall, these studies provide an important resource to enhance our translation of syngeneic models to human tumors. Future mechanistic studies paired with this resource will help identify responsive patient populations and improve strategies where immunotherapies are predicted to be ineffective.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/immunology , Neoplasms/therapy , Tumor Microenvironment , Animals , CD3 Complex/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation , Chemokines/metabolism , Complement System Proteins/metabolism , Disease Models, Animal , Disease Progression , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Immunotherapy , Ki-67 Antigen/metabolism , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Myeloid Cells/pathology , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/pathology , RNA, Neoplasm/genetics , RNA, Neoplasm/metabolism , Treatment Outcome
2.
Genes Dev ; 17(22): 2825-38, 2003 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14630943

ABSTRACT

Heterochromatin proteins are thought to play key roles in chromatin structure and gene regulation, yet very few genes have been identified that are regulated by these proteins. We performed large-scale mapping and analysis of in vivo target loci of the proteins HP1, HP1c, and Su(var)3-9 in Drosophila Kc cells, which are of embryonic origin. For each protein, we identified approximately 100-200 target genes among >6000 probed loci. We found that HP1 and Su(var)3-9 bind together to transposable elements and genes that are predominantly pericentric. In addition, Su(var)3-9 binds without HP1 to a distinct set of nonpericentric genes. On chromosome 4, HP1 binds to many genes, mostly independent of Su(var)3-9. The binding pattern of HP1c is largely different from those of HP1 and Su(var)3-9. Target genes of HP1 and Su(var)3-9 show lower expression levels in Kc cells than do nontarget genes, but not if they are located in pericentric regions. Strikingly, in pericentric regions, target genes of Su(var)3-9 and HP1 are predominantly embryo-specific genes, whereas on the chromosome arms Su(var)3-9 is preferentially associated with a set of male-specific genes. These results demonstrate that, depending on chromosomal location, the HP1 and Su(var)3-9 proteins form different complexes that associate with specific sets of developmentally coexpressed genes.


Subject(s)
Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental/physiology , Heterochromatin , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Animals , Chromobox Protein Homolog 5 , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/genetics , Chromosome Mapping , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Gene Expression Profiling , Gene Silencing/physiology , Heterochromatin/genetics , Heterochromatin/metabolism , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , RNA Interference , Repressor Proteins/genetics
3.
Science ; 298(5593): 621-2, 2002 Oct 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12386335

ABSTRACT

Phage display is a simple yet powerful technology that is used to rapidly characterize protein-protein interactions from amongst billions of candidates. This widely practiced technique is used to map antibody epitopes, create vaccines and to engineer peptides, antibodies and other proteins as both diagnostic tools and as human therapeutics. We overview the history of phage display and several recent applications.


Subject(s)
Peptide Library , Animals , Antibodies/immunology , Antibodies/metabolism , Antibody Affinity , Bacteriophages/genetics , Databases, Protein , Epitope Mapping , Humans , Nanotechnology , Peptides/metabolism , Protein Binding , Proteins/metabolism , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/metabolism , Semiconductors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...