ABSTRACT
The purpose of this article has been to review some concepts regarding the histophysiology and histopathology of the pulpodentinal complex and the "language of classification." Although there may not be agreement on the "language" presented here, there can be no disagreement that from a clinical perspective, knowledge and appreciation of the ideas presented can be helpful in determining pathologic presence. In reaching the ultimate clinical decision, the following questions must be answered: Are we dealing with a pulpal disease that is potentially reversible? If treatment is necessary do we treat the pulp or the pulp canal?
Subject(s)
Dental Pulp Diseases/classification , Atrophy/classification , Atrophy/diagnosis , Dental Pulp/physiopathology , Dental Pulp Diseases/diagnosis , Dental Pulp Diseases/physiopathology , Dental Pulp Necrosis/classification , Dental Pulp Necrosis/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Pressure , Pulpitis/classification , Pulpitis/diagnosis , Pulpitis/physiopathology , Toothache/physiopathologyABSTRACT
Root perforations were created in dog premolars; thirty-one were filled with Cavit, whereas seventeen were left unfilled. The animals were killed after 1, 15, 30, 60, 120, and 180 days, and hematoxylin and eosin sections were prepared. Perforations near the gingival sulcus usually led to severe destruction, whereas those surrounded by ample bone tended to gain a favorable response, even when left unfilled.
