Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
2.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 16: E143, 2019 10 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31625868

ABSTRACT

Although most smokers visit a health care provider annually, only half report being provided evidence-based assistance with quitting, defined as brief counseling and an offer of medication. The New York State Department of Health designed a provider-targeted media campaign to increase provider-assisted quitting, which was implemented in 2016. Messaging focused on the addictive nature of tobacco products and evidence-based interventions. Online surveys of 400 New York State health care providers measured advertising awareness, associations between awareness and assistance with quit attempts, and perceptions that patients expect providers to assist with quitting. Forty-three percent of providers were aware of at least 1 advertisement, and providers who had seen an advertisement were more likely to provide evidence-based assistance (AOR = 2.55, P = .01), which includes recommending or prescribing cessation medications. Provider-targeted media is a promising approach to reach health care providers and encourage evidence-based smoking cessation treatment.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel/education , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking/therapy , Advertising/methods , Counseling/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , New York , Pilot Projects , Program Evaluation , Smoking/psychology , Smoking Cessation Agents/therapeutic use , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
PLoS One ; 13(4): e0194914, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29652890

ABSTRACT

This research is the first nationally representative study to examine the relationship between actual state-level tobacco control spending in each of the 5 CDC's Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Program categories and cigarette sales. We employed several alternative two-way fixed-effects regression techniques to estimate the determinants of cigarette sales in the United States for the years 2008-2012. State spending on tobacco control was found to have a negative and significant impact on cigarette sales in all models that were estimated. Spending in the areas of cessation interventions, health communication interventions, and state and community interventions were found to have a negative impact on cigarette sales in all models that were estimated, whereas spending in the areas of surveillance and evaluation, and administration and management were found to have negative effects on cigarette sales in only some models. Our models predict that states that spend up to seven times their current levels could still see significant reductions in cigarette sales. The findings from this research could help inform further investments in state tobacco control programs.


Subject(s)
Capital Expenditures , Commerce , Nicotiana , Taxes , Tobacco Products/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Middle Aged , Models, Economic , United States , Young Adult
4.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 64(42): 1194-9, 2015 Oct 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26513425

ABSTRACT

Medicaid enrollees have a cigarette smoking prevalence (30.4%) twice as high as that of privately insured Americans (14.7%), placing them at increased risk for smoking-related disease and death. Individual, group, and telephone counseling and seven Food and Drug Administration (FDA)­approved medications are evidence-based, effective treatments for helping tobacco users quit. A Healthy People 2020 objective (TU-8) calls for all state Medicaid programs to adopt comprehensive coverage of these treatments. However, a previous MMWR report indicated that, although state Medicaid coverage of cessation treatments had improved during 2008­2014, this coverage was still limited in most states. To monitor the most recent trends in state Medicaid cessation coverage, the American Lung Association collected data on coverage of, and barriers to, accessing all evidence-based cessation treatments except telephone counseling in state Medicaid programs (for a total of nine treatments) during January 31, 2014­June 30, 2015. As of June 30, 2015, all 50 states covered certain cessation treatments for at least some Medicaid enrollees. During 2014­2015, increases were observed in the number of states covering individual counseling, group counseling, and all seven FDA-approved cessation medications for all Medicaid enrollees; however, only nine states covered all nine treatments for all enrollees. Common barriers to accessing covered treatments included prior authorization requirements, limits on duration, annual limits on quit attempts, and required copayments. Previous research in both Medicaid and other populations indicates that state Medicaid programs could reduce smoking prevalence, smoking-related morbidity, and smoking-related health care costs among Medicaid enrollees by covering all evidence-based cessation treatments, removing all barriers to accessing these treatments, promoting coverage to Medicaid enrollees and health care providers, and monitoring use of covered treatments.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/economics , Smoking Prevention , Tobacco Use Cessation/economics , Humans , Tobacco Use Cessation/methods , United States
5.
Health Promot Pract ; 5(3 Suppl): 159S-166S, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15231110

ABSTRACT

The Master Settlement Agreement generated expectations that significant, long-term funding would be available to the 46 participating states in reparation for the health costs incurred by tobacco use. Facing intense pressure to use anticipated funds for effective programming, states and national organizations considered how to supply the technical assistance and training at the state and local levels. This article reviews assessments by the American Legacy Foundation, the Tobacco Technical Assistance Consortium, and selected states of the current needs for support, technical assistance, and training in tobacco prevention and control. Key findings indicated the need for information, information exchange, mentoring, and training targeted to new staff, with advanced skill sets for experienced staff. As future funding is uncertain, all these organizations are exploring innovative ways to maintain infrastructure and programming at the state and local levels. Training and technical assistance can be the solution to sustaining impetus in the movement.


Subject(s)
Inservice Training/organization & administration , Needs Assessment , Smoking Prevention , Social Control, Formal , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Tobacco Industry/economics , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...