ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A shift has occurred in interventional cardiology from transfemoral to transradial access due to a 70%-80% decrease in complications. This shift has not yet taken place in other interventional specialties, perhaps owing to the lack of generalizability of findings in the cardiology data. PURPOSE: Our aim was to assess data from the recent mechanical thrombectomy prospective trials to better understand the access-site complication rate. DATA SOURCES: Articles were systematically sourced from the National Center for Biotechnology Information PubMed archive. STUDY SELECTION: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, prospective, randomized controlled trials published after 2008 with mention of major and/or minor femoral access-site complications in neuroendovascular mechanical thrombectomies were included. DATA ANALYSIS: Major and minor femoral access-site complications were extracted. A total complication rate was calculated with major access-site complications alone and combined with minor access-site complications. DATA SYNTHESIS: Seven prospective studies of 339 total screened met the inclusion criteria. Eleven major access-site complications were identified in of 660 total interventions, revealing a major access-site complication rate of 1.67% for patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy with transfemoral access. If minor access-site complications were included, 35 total incidents were detected in 763 interventions, resulting in a total complication rate of 4.59%. LIMITATIONS: Multiple unspecified vessel and procedure-related complications were mentioned in the studies. CONCLUSIONS: The overall rate of major access-site complications was 1.67% in this review, which is not low and poses a risk to patients. We suggest further investigation into the feasibility and complication rates of alternative access sites for neurointerventional procedures.
Subject(s)
Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Stroke/surgery , Thrombectomy/adverse effects , Brain Ischemia/complications , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Femoral Artery/surgery , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Radial Artery/surgery , Stroke/etiology , Thrombectomy/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Malignant gliomas have long been a therapeutic dilemma in neuro-oncology, with a poor overall prognosis. Standard treatment, consisting of primary resection, followed by radiation therapy and temozolomide, has improved prognosis. Recently, studies have looked at the addition of bevacizumab (Avastin), a humanized murine IgG1 monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor-A, to conventional regiments. Bevacizumab gained US FDA approval for single agent use in recurrent glioblastoma in 2009. Known side effects of bevacizumab include increased risk of arterial and venous thromboembolism, as well as hemorrhage. With emerging data for the use of bevacizumab in malignant gliomas, the extent of risks such as bleeding and thrombosis in patients with primary brain tumors treated with bevacizumab remains unknown. Here, we present only the second reported case of dural venous sinus thrombosis during treatment with bevacizumab and the first reported case for a primary glioma treated with temozolomide, radiation, and bevacizumab.