Temporal Trends in Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation and Its Core Components: A Nationwide Cohort Study From the Netherlands.

PURPOSE: Patient- and disease-specific data on cardiac rehabilitation (CR) participation and changes over time are limited. The objective of this study was to describe time trends in CR participation between 2013 and 2019 and provides insights into the utilization of CR components. METHODS: Patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) with an indication for CR were enrolled between 2013 and 2019. Dutch health insurance claims data were used to identify CR participation and its components. RESULTS: In total, 106 212 patients with CVD were included of which 37% participated in CR. Participation significantly increased from 28% in 2013 to 41% in 2016 but remained unchanged thereafter. Participation was highest in the youngest age groups (<50 yrs 52%; 50-65 yrs 50%), men (48%), patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (73%), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (59%), and coronary artery bypass grafting (82%). In contrast, it was the lowest in the oldest age group (≥85 yrs 8%), women (30%), and in patients with heart failure (11%). Most participants in CR received referral plus an admission session (97%) and exercise training (82%), whereas complementary services related to dietary (14%) and mental health counseling (10%) had a low utilization. CONCLUSIONS: CR participation rates increased to 41% in 2016 but remained unchanged thereafter. Participation modulators included age, sex, CVD diagnosis, and undergoing a cardiothoracic procedure. Education and exercise sessions were frequently adopted, but dietary and mental health counseling had a low utilization rate. These findings suggest the need for reinvigorated referral and novel enrollment strategies in specific CVD subgroups to further promote CR participation and its associated underutilized adjunctive services.

Cardiac telerehabilitation: current status and future perspectives.

Multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves the prognosis and quality of life of patients with cardiovascular disease and has therefore received strong recommendations in international guidelines for the treatment of patients with chronic coronary syndromes and chronic heart failure. Aiming to both resolve several barriers that impede participation in CR and to improve the effectiveness of CR, cardiac telerehabilitation (CTR) has emerged as a cost-effective alternative to traditional, centre-based CR. Although the body of evidence for the feasibility and effectiveness of CTR is large and still growing, real-life implementations are scarce, which may be due to insufficient knowledge about CTR interventions and due to the challenges its implementation comes with. Up to now, mainly exercise-related core components of CR and e­coaching have been investigated in the setting of CTR. Translation of research findings to clinical practice may be hampered by methodological limitations present in most CTR studies, being selection bias of participants, lack of long-term follow-up, heterogeneity of studied interventions and the lack of robust outcome measures. Besides conducting highly needed implementation studies for CTR interventions, their implementation could be facilitated by the development of guideline-based, multidisciplinary and personalised CTR programmes and widespread reimbursement for CTR.

Clinical Utility of the Cardiorespiratory Optimal Point in Patients with Heart Failure.

INTRODUCTION: We assessed the cardiorespiratory optimal point (COP)-the minimal V̇E /V̇O 2 in a given minute of an incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test-in patients with heart failure (HF) and aimed to determine 1) its association with patient and disease characteristics, 2) changes after an exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program (CR), and 3) the association with clinical outcomes. METHODS: We studied 277 HF patients (67 (58-74) yr, 30% female, 72% HF with restricted ejection fraction) between 2009 and 2018. Patients participated in a 12- to 24-wk CR program, and COP was assessed pre- and post-CR. Patient and disease characteristics and clinical outcomes (mortality and cardiovascular-related hospitalization) were extracted from patient files. The incidence of clinical outcomes was compared across COP tertiles (low, <26.0; moderate, 26.0-30.7; high, >30.7). RESULTS: Median COP was 28.2 (24.9-32.1) and was reached at 51% ± 15% of V̇O 2peak . Lower age, female sex, higher body mass index, the absence of a pacemaker or the absence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lower N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide concentrations were associated with a lower COP. Participation in CR reduced COP (-0.8; 95% confidence interval, -1.3 to -0.3). Low COP had a reduced risk (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.84) for adverse clinical outcomes as compared with high COP. CONCLUSIONS: Classic cardiovascular risk factors are associated with a higher, more unfavorable, COP. CR-based exercise training reduces COP, whereas a lower COP is associated with a better clinical prognosis. As COP can be established during a submaximal exercise test, this may offer novel risk stratification possibilities for HF care programs.

Identifying Reasons for Nonattendance and Noncompletion of Cardiac Rehabilitation: INSIGHTS FROM GERMANY AND THE NETHERLANDS.

PURPOSE: Despite strong recommendations and beneficial health effects of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), participation rates remain low. Little data are available on reasons beyond quantitative factors in the underutilization of CR. The aim of this study was to identify personal reasons for nonattenders and noncompletions of CR among Dutch and German patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) eligible for CR. METHODS: Between December 2017 and January 2019, a total of 4265 questionnaires were distributed among eligible patients for CR in the bordering area of the eastern Netherlands and western Germany. Patients were eligible if they had an indication for CR according to national guidelines. Questionnaires were used to assess reasons of nonattendance and noncompletion of CR, when applicable. RESULTS: A total of 1829 patients with CVD completed the questionnaire. Of these, 1278 indicated that they received referral to CR. Despite referral, 192 patients decided not to participate in CR and 88 patients with CVD withdrew from the CR program. The three most reported reasons for nonattendance were as follows: (1) did not need the supervision (56%, n = 108), (2) did not need the CR trajectory (55%, n = 105), and (3) already exercised regularly (39%, n = 74). The most reported reasons for noncompletion were as follows: (1) could no longer participate because of other physical problems (30%, n = 26), (2) did not need the CR trajectory (26%, n = 23), and (3) the CR program was not personal enough (23%, n = 20). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients had motivational or perceptive reasons for nonattendance or noncompletion to CR. These possible misconceptions as well as perceived shortcomings of traditional CR underline the need for adequate motivation, information, and more personalized solutions (eg, eHealth, home-based CR) to increase the uptake and completion of CR.

The sustained effects of extending cardiac rehabilitation with a six-month telemonitoring and telecoaching programme on fitness, quality of life, cardiovascular risk factors and care utilisation in CAD patients: The TeleCaRe study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the acute and sustained effects of a six-month heart-rate-based telerehabilitation programme, following the completion of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), on peak oxygen uptake (peakVO2), quality of life (QoL), cardiovascular risk factors and care utilisation in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: A total of 122 patients with CAD were randomised, after the completion of CR, to an intervention group with six months of telemonitoring and telecoaching (TELE) or a control group with a traditional six-month follow-up programme with monthly calls (CON). The primary outcome was peakVO2 at 12 months, to assess the sustained effects of TELE. The secondary outcomes included QoL, cardiovascular risk factors (lipid spectrum), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and habitual physical activity. RESULTS: PeakVO2 increased significantly from baseline to 12 months in TELE (+2.5 mL·kg-1min-1 (95% CI 1.5-3.2)) and CON (+1.9 mL·kg-1min-1 (95% CI 1.0-2.5)), and did not differ between groups (P = 0.28). Similarly, QoL (P = 0.31), total cholesterol (P = 0.45), MACE (P = 0.86) did not differ between groups and in time. DISCUSSION: Extending CR with a heart-rate-based telerehabilitation programme did not yield additional sustainable health benefits compared with regular care with monthly telephone calls. These observations highlight that both telerehabilitation and regular care with monthly telephone calls may prevent the typically observed reductions in peakVO2 following the completion of a CR programme.Trial registration: Dutch Trial Register NL4140 (registered 6 December 2014).

Sedentary behaviour in cardiovascular disease patients: Risk group identification and the impact of cardiac rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Sedentary behaviour (SB) is potentially an important target to improve cardiovascular health. This study 1) compared SB between cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients and age-matched controls, 2) identified characteristics associated with high SB levels, and 3) determined the impact of contemporary cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on SB. METHODS: For objective 1, we recruited 131 CVD patients and 117 controls. All participants were asked about their general characteristics and medical history. SB was assessed by an objective accelerometer (activPAL3 micro). For objective 2, 2584 CVD patients were asked to fill in a questionnaire about their general characteristics, lifestyle, medical history and their SB. For objective 3, 131 CVD patients were followed over time and measured, pre-, directly post- and 2 months post-CR. RESULTS: Objective 1. CVD patients spent 10.4 h/day (Q25 9.5; Q75 11.2) sedentary which was higher compared to healthy controls (9.4 h/day [Q25 8.4; Q75 10.29]). Objective 2. CVD patients being male, single or divorced, employed, physically inactive, reporting high alcohol consumption, living in an urban environment, having comorbidities and cardiac anxiety demonstrated a greater odds for large amounts of SB. Objective 3. The CR program significantly reduced sedentary time (-0.4 h/day [95%CI -0.7; -0.1]), which remained lower at 2-months post-CR (-0.3 h/day [95%CI -0.6; -0.03]). CONCLUSIONS: CVD patients had greater amounts of objectively measured sedentary time compared to healthy controls. Sedentarism was associated with personal- and lifestyle characteristics, and comorbidities. Participation in a contemporary CR program slightly reduced sedentary time, but tailored interventions are needed to target SB in CVD patients.

Effectiveness of Home-Based Mobile Guided Cardiac Rehabilitation as Alternative Strategy for Nonparticipation in Clinic-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Elderly Patients in Europe: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Although nonparticipation in cardiac rehabilitation is known to increase cardiovascular mortality and hospital readmissions, more than half of patients with coronary artery disease in Europe are not participating in cardiac rehabilitation. Objective: To assess whether a 6-month guided mobile cardiac rehabilitation (MCR) program is an effective therapy for elderly patients who decline participation in cardiac rehabilitation. Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients were enrolled in this parallel multicenter randomized clinical trial from November 11, 2015, to January 3, 2018, and follow-up was completed on January 17, 2019, in a secondary care system with 6 cardiac institutions across 5 European countries. Researchers assessing primary outcome were masked for group assignment. A total of 4236 patients were identified with a recent diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome, coronary revascularization, or surgical or percutaneous treatment for valvular disease, or documented coronary artery disease, of whom 996 declined to start cardiac rehabilitation. Subsequently, 179 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria consented to participate in the European Study on Effectiveness and Sustainability of Current Cardiac Rehabilitation Programmes in the Elderly trial. Data were analyzed from January 21 to October 11, 2019. Interventions: Six months of home-based cardiac rehabilitation with telemonitoring and coaching based on motivational interviewing was used to stimulate patients to reach exercise goals. Control patients did not receive any form of cardiac rehabilitation throughout the study period. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome parameter was peak oxygen uptake (Vo2peak) after 6 months. Results: Among 179 patients randomized (145 male [81%]; median age, 72 [range, 65-87] years), 159 (89%) were eligible for primary end point analysis. Follow-up at 1 year was completed for 151 patients (84%). Peak oxygen uptake improved in the MCR group (n = 89) at 6 and 12 months (1.6 [95% CI, 0.9-2.4] mL/kg-1/min-1 and 1.2 [95% CI, 0.4-2.0] mL/kg-1/min-1, respectively), whereas there was no improvement in the control group (n = 90) (+0.2 [95% CI, -0.4 to 0.8] mL/kg-1/min-1 and +0.1 [95% CI, -0.5 to 0.7] mL/kg-1/min-1, respectively). Changes in Vo2peak were greater in the MCR vs control groups at 6 months (+1.2 [95% CI, 0.2 to 2.1] mL/kg-1/min-1) and 12 months (+0.9 [95% CI, 0.05 to 1.8] mL/kg-1/min-1). The incidence of adverse events was low and did not differ between the MCR and control groups. Conclusions and Relevance: These results suggest that a 6-month home-based MCR program for patients 65 years or older with coronary artery disease or a valvular intervention was safe and beneficial in improving Vo2peak when compared with no cardiac rehabilitation. Trial Registration: trialregister.nl Identifier: NL5168.

Impact of a Graded Exercise Program on V˙O2peak and Survival in Heart Failure Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Although exercise therapy has the potential to improve health outcomes of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), less than 50% of patients adhere to prescribed physical activity guidelines 1 yr after cardiac rehabilitation. We aimed to assess the effects of an extended cardiac rehabilitation program with 12 months of graded exercise therapy (GET) and resistance exercise training (RT) on exercise capacity and long-term survival in patients with CHF. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 60 CHF patients between 2009 and 2010. The GET-RT program consisted of exercise sessions at 6 d·wk. Total training time of aerobic exercises increased incrementally every other week without changing exercise intensity. Resistance exercise training consisted of 8 exercises with a durable resistance band. Guidance consisted of a step-down approach from in-hospital to home-based training. Cardiopulmonary exercise tests were performed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Subsequently, patients were propensity score matched on a 1:2 ratio with controls (n = 117) from a CHF registry of patients from the same clinic receiving usual out-patient care and the incidence of all-cause mortality was compared between both groups. RESULTS: Baseline V˙O2 peak was 15.0 mL·min·kg and significantly elevated at 3 months (+1.1 mL·min·kg (95% CI, 0.4-1.8), 6 months (+2.9 mL·min·kg (95% CI, 1.1-2.9) and 12 months (+2.6 mL·min·kg (95% CI, 1.4-3.8). During 8 yr of follow-up 23 (38.3%) patients of the GET-RT program died versus 63 (53.8%) patients of the control group (P = 0.063). CONCLUSIONS: The 12-month GET-RT program was associated with an improved fitness during 1-yr follow-up, whereas a tendency toward better survival rates was observed during long-term follow-up.

Absence of Fitness Improvement Is Associated with Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine the clinical effect of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and improvements in CRF after cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in heart failure (HF) patients for their risk for all-cause mortality and unplanned hospitalization and to investigate possible factors associated with the absence of improvement in CRF after rehabilitation. METHODS: We included 155 HF patients receiving CR between October 2009 and January 2015. Patients performed an incremental bicycle test to assess CRF through peak oxygen uptake (V˙O2-peak) before and after CR-based supervised exercise training. Patients were classified as responders or nonresponders on the basis of pre-to-post CR changes in V˙O2-peak (≥6% and <6%, respectively). Cox proportional hazards models evaluated all-cause mortality and unplanned hospitalization during 5 yr of follow-up. Patient characteristics, HF features, and comorbidities were used to predict changes in V˙O2-peak using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Seventy HF patients (45%) were classified as responder. Nonresponders had a significantly higher risk for all-cause mortality or hospitalization (hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17-3.94) compared with responders. This was even higher in nonresponders with low CRF at baseline (hazard ratio, 4.88; 95% CI, 1.71-13.93). Factors associated with nonresponse to CR were age (odds ratio (OR), 1.07/yr; 95% CI, 1.03-1.11), baseline V˙O2-peak (OR, 1.16 mL·min·kg; 95% CI, 1.06-1.26), and adherence to CR (OR, 0.98/percentage; 95% CI, 0.96-0.998). CONCLUSIONS: Independent from baseline CRF, the inability to improve V˙O2-peak by CR doubled the risk for death or unplanned hospitalization. The combination of lower baseline CRF and nonresponse was associated with even poorer clinical outcomes. Especially older HF patients with higher baseline V˙O2-peak and lower adherence have a higher probability of becoming a nonresponder.

Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial for an extended cardiac rehabilitation programme using telemonitoring: the TeleCaRe study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the known positive effects of cardiac rehabilitation and an active lifestyle, evidence is emerging that it is difficult to attain and sustain the minimum recommendations of leisure time physical activity. The long-term benefits are often disappointing due to lack of adherence to the changes in life style. Qualitative research on patients' perspectives suggests that motivation for lifestyle change tends to diminish around 3 months after the index-event. The time most cardiac rehabilitation programmes end. The aim of the present study is to determine if prolongation of a traditional cardiac rehabilitation programme with additional heart rate based telemonitoring guidance for a period of 6 months results in better long term effects on physical and mental outcomes, care consumption and quality of life than traditional follow-up. METHODS: In this single centre randomised controlled trial 120 patients with an absolute indication for cardiac rehabilitation will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to an intervention group with 6 months of heart rate based telemonitoring guidance or a control group with traditional follow-up after cardiac rehabilitation. The primary endpoint will be VO2peak after 12 months. Secondary endpoints are VO2peak after 6 months, quality of life, physical-, emotional- and social functioning, cardiac structure, traditional risk profile, compliance to the use of the heart rate belt and smartphone, MACE and care-consumption. DISCUSSION: The TeleCaRe study will provide insight into the added value of the prolongation of traditional cardiac rehabilitation with 6 months of heart rate based telemonitoring guidance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register: NTR4644 (registered 06/12/14).

Performance of the Lausanne questionnaire and the 2010 European Society of Cardiology criteria for ECG interpretation in athletes.

BACKGROUND: In recent years various proposals and subsequent changes have been made to improve pre-participation screening (PPS) methods. This study examines the Lausanne questionnaire and the old and new ESC criteria for a positive electrocardiogram (ECG) in athletes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: All consecutive students undergoing a PPS between January and July 2011 were included. The screening consisted of the Lausanne questionnaire, a physical examination, and a 12-lead ECG. RESULTS: A total of 561 students were screened. A total of 310 students (55%) answered positively to one or more of the Lausanne questions and 49 (9%) of these abnormalities were assessed as medically relevant. Physical examination was abnormal in nine (1.6%) students. In total, 120 (21%) ECGs were found positive following the old criteria. According to the new criteria, 68 (12%) ECGs were found positive. Four (already known) congenital cardiac disorders and four new diagnoses were found. When using the new ECG criteria, two out of four new cardiovascular diagnoses would have been missed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Lausanne questionnaire provides many irrelevant findings causing unnecessary positive screening outcomes. With the new ESC criteria for a positive 12-lead ECG in athletes, the number of false-positive screenings greatly decrease: however, at the cost of an increase in the number of false-negatives. To reach a conclusive judgment on the cost:benefit ratio of PPS, it is necessary to have a validated discriminating questionnaire, specific medical knowledge of PPS and clear definitions of a normal and abnormal 12-lead ECG in athletes.

Effect of aerobic training on heart rate recovery in patients with established heart disease; a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Although a delayed decrease in heart rate during the first minute after graded exercise has been identified as a powerful predictor of overall mortality in cardiac patients, the potential to influence this risk factor by aerobic training remains to be proven. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to study the relationship between aerobic training and Heart Rate Recovery (HRR) in patients with established heart disease. METHODS: (Quasi) randomized clinical trials on aerobic exercise training in adults with established heart disease were identified through electronic database and reference screening. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias and therapeutic validity. Methodological validity was evaluated using an adapted version of the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias and the therapeutic validity of the interventions was assessed with a nine-itemed, expert-based rating scale (CONTENT). Scores range from 0 to 9 (score ≥ 6 reflecting therapeutic validity). RESULTS: Of the 384 articles retrieved, 8 studies (449 patients) were included. Three of the included studies demonstrated adequate therapeutic validity and five demonstrated low risk of bias. Two studies showed both adequate therapeutic validity and a low risk of bias. For cardiac patients aerobic exercise training was associated with more improvement in HRR compared to usual care. CONCLUSION: The present systematic review shows a level 1A evidence that aerobic training increases HRR in patients with established heart disease.