Medical cannabis use in Canadians with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: The extent of medical cannabis use by people with multiple sclerosis (MS) in Canada has not been evaluated for more than a decade since recreational cannabis was legalized. Legalization provided an avenue for those to whom legal cannabis was previously inaccessible to access it as an alternative therapy. Our objective was to evaluate the prevalence of medical cannabis use by Canadians with MS, the reasons it is used, adverse effects, as well as the context surrounding how it is obtained and where users learned about it. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to prospective participants through various channels. The questionnaire included questions about participant characteristics and quality of life, their MS, and their medical cannabis use. It also employed two validated patient-reported outcome measures, the PDDS and the MSQOL-54. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were submitted by 344 individuals. Among respondents, 215/344 (64.5%) reported having used medical cannabis at least once, and 180 (52.3%) reported still currently using it. Based on disease and quality of life data, we found that respondents with more severe or progressive forms of MS were more likely to have tried medical cannabis. Medical cannabis was used most by current and former users to treat sleep problems (84.2%), pain (80.0%), and spasticity (68.4%), while the most reported adverse effects were drowsiness (57.2%), feeling quiet/subdued (48.8%), and difficulty concentrating (28.4%). Most current and former users obtained their cannabis from a legal, reliable source (76.1%) and many (74%) learned about medical cannabis from someone other than a healthcare provider. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that nearly two-thirds of survey respondents, comprised of Canadians living with MS, have tried medical cannabis at least once and that those with a greater disease burden were more likely to have tried it. Users reported that cannabis is moderately to highly effective in treating several symptoms and that adverse effects are not generally severe, nor are they the main factor driving medical cannabis cessation. Our results support the need for more research examining medical cannabis use in MS and for evidence-based resources to be publicly available for those exploring it as a potential therapy.

Impact of a "Pharmacist First" innovative workflow plan in patients with hypertension and/or diabetes.

Usual community pharmacy workflow, whereby patients might see a pharmacist at the end of the dispensing process, is not conducive to proactive patient-centred care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the "Pharmacist First" (P1st) workflow model on blood pressure and glycemic control in patients with hypertension and/or diabetes. This retrospective review was set in 2 community pharmacies that use the P1st model in the Greater Edmonton Region. The population entailed patients with hypertension and/or type 1 or 2 diabetes who received care via the P1st workflow model. The P1st workflow model places the patient in immediate contact with the pharmacist. The pharmacist first assesses prescription appropriateness, reviews relevant laboratory tests, discusses chronic disease control and addresses any questions or concerns the patient has before passing the prescription to be filled by a technician. This allows issues or concerns to be identified and addressed up front, rather than waiting until the prescription is filled and the patient is ready to leave the pharmacy. The primary outcome assessed in this study was change in blood pressure and/or A1C from baseline to the last follow-up visit. We reviewed 215 patient records. The mean age was 69.4 years (standard deviation 12.5), 51.2% of patients were male, 57.7% had hypertension, 5.6% had diabetes, and 36.7% had both. Median follow-up time was 4.2 months (interquartile range 2.5-9.3). In 203 patients with hypertension, systolic blood pressure was reduced from 139.83 mmHg to 131.26 mmHg (p < 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure from 80.26 mmHg to 76.86 mmHg (p < 0.001). In 87 patients with diabetes, A1C changed from 7.4% to 7.2% (p = ns). The P1st workflow model demonstrated significant improvements in blood pressure. Further investigation is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of this model with a control group, longer follow-up and evaluation of the patient experience.