Implementation and outcomes of beta-lactam allergy management protocol at a comprehensive cancer center.

PURPOSE: Beta-lactam allergy (BLA) is associated with increased broad-spectrum antibiotic (Br-ABX) use and worse clinical outcomes. We evaluated our hospital-wide BLA protocol (BLA-P) that used following categories: intolerance, low-risk, and high-risk. METHODS: Hospitalized adult patients with listed BLA during 10/2021-12/2022 were eligible. Exclusions were critically ill, surgical, hospice or comfort care, or non-verbal patients. Assessment was counted each time a pharmacist evaluated BLA. Interventions were no further action (high-risk allergy, patient refusal, unstable clinical status), updated allergy label, or delabeled. Delabeling was done either based on antibiotic history (direct-delabeling), or via test-dose challenge for low-risk patients. Br-ABX usage was compared in the unique delabeled patients: the empiric antibiotic use 90 days post-delabeling versus pre-delabeling using McNemar test (SPSS). RESULTS: A total of 700 assessments in 631 patients were identified. 441 assessments in 377 patients (median 63 years-old, 41% male, 50% hematological cancer) met inclusion criteria. The assessments revealed 9% intolerance, 55% low-risk, 23% high-risk and 13% unknown reaction. Interventions resulted in no further action 7%, updated label 72%, and delabeling 21%. 65% of the delabeling was via direct-delabeling and 35% test-dose challenge. Among patients who received a test-dose challenge, 36/36(97%) had no documented allergic reactions, and 1/26(3%) developed a mild rash. The use of aztreonam (pre-delabeling 28% vs. post-delabeling 1.2%, p < 0.001) and meropenem (13% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.022) significantly decreased while cefepime (24% vs. 50%, p = 0.001) and piperacillin-tazobactam (3.7% vs. 22%, p < 0.001) increased after delabeling. CONCLUSION: BLA-P led to 21% delabeling, which resulted in increased preferred Br-ABX and decrease in aztreonam/meropenem use among delabeled patients.

Diverse Role of blaCTX-M and Porins in Mediating Ertapenem Resistance among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales.

Among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are diverse mechanisms, including those that are resistant to meropenem but susceptible to ertapenem, adding further complexity to the clinical landscape. This study investigates the emergence of ertapenem-resistant, meropenem-susceptible (ErMs) Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae CRE across five hospitals in San Antonio, Texas, USA, from 2012 to 2018. The majority of the CRE isolates were non-carbapenemase producers (NCP; 54%; 41/76); 56% of all NCP isolates had an ErMs phenotype. Among ErMs strains, E. coli comprised the majority (72%). ErMs strains carrying blaCTX-M had, on average, 9-fold higher copies of blaCTX-M than CP-ErMs strains as well as approximately 4-fold more copies than blaCTX-M-positive but ertapenem- and meropenem-susceptible (EsMs) strains (3.7 vs. 0.9, p < 0.001). Notably, carbapenem hydrolysis was observed to be mediated by strains harboring blaCTX-M with and without a carbapenemase(s). ErMs also carried more mobile genetic elements, particularly IS26 composite transposons, than EsMs (37 vs. 0.2, p < 0.0001). MGE- ISVsa5 was uniquely more abundant in ErMs than either EsMs or ErMr strains, with over 30 more average ISVsa5 counts than both phenotype groups (p < 0.0001). Immunoblot analysis demonstrated the absence of OmpC expression in NCP-ErMs E. coli, with 92% of strains lacking full contig coverage of ompC. Overall, our findings characterize both collaborative and independent efforts between blaCTX-M and OmpC in ErMs strains, indicating the need to reappraise the term "non-carbapenemase (NCP)", particularly for strains highly expressing blaCTX-M. To improve outcomes for CRE-infected patients, future efforts should focus on mechanisms underlying the emerging ErMs subphenotype of CRE strains to develop technologies for its rapid detection and provide targeted therapeutic strategies.

Multidisciplinary approach in diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19-associated mucormycosis: a description of current reports.

Background: We reviewed the epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, and clinical presentations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated mucormycosis (CAM), then discussed the importance of rapid diagnosis and treatment facilitated by multidisciplinary approach. Main body: India has reported world's highest number of CAM cases where Rhizopus arrhizus was the most predominant etiology. CAM caused by Rhizopus microsporus was the most common from the rest of the world. Multiple risk factors for CAM were identified including diabetes mellitus, inappropriate corticosteroid use, COVID-19-related hypoxia, and lung damage.Rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis (ROCM) accounted for almost 90% of CAM in India while 64% of global cases were ROCM. Less than 10% of CAM from India were pulmonary while the rest of the world reported 21% of pulmonary CAM.CAM is diagnosed by confirmed SARS-CoV2 infection along with clinical, radiological, histopathological, and/or microbiological evidence of mucormycosis. In patients with risks of CAM and associated symptoms, CT or MRI are recommended. If ROCM is suspected, endoscopy and biopsy are recommended. If pulmonary CAM is suspected, tissue biopsies, nasal samples, or bronchoalveolar lavage is recommended with histopathological exams.Early diagnosis, surgical, and pharmaceutical interventions are key to treat mucormycosis. Upon diagnosis, antifungal therapy with liposomal amphotericin B (IV) is considered first-line of therapy. Alternatively, posaconazole (PO/IV) or isavuconazole (PO/IV) can be used. Conclusion: Treating CAM requires a multidisciplinary approach for early diagnosis and prompt initiation of interventions to maximize patient's chance of survival.

Characteristics of procalcitonin in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and clinical outcomes of antibiotic use stratified by procalcitonin levels.

We examined the characteristics of pro-calcitonin (PCT) in hospitalized COVID-19 patients (cohort 1) and clinical outcomes of antibiotic use stratified by PCT in non-critically ill patients without bacterial co-infection (cohort 2). Retrospective reviews were performed in adult, hospitalized COVID-19 patients during March-May 2020. For cohort 1, we excluded hospital transfers, renal disease and extra-pulmonary infection without isolated pathogen(s). For cohort 2, we further excluded microbiologically confirmed infection, 'do not resuscitate ± do not intubate' status, and intensive care unit (ICU). For cohort 1, PCT was compared between absent/low-suspicion and proven bacterial co-infections. Factors associated with elevated PCT and sensitivity/specificity/PPV/NPV of PCT cutoffs for identifying bacterial co-infections were explored. For cohort 2, clinical outcomes including mechanical ventilation within 5 days (MV5) were compared between the antibiotic and non-antibiotic groups stratified by PCT ≥ 0.25 µg/L. Nine hundred and twenty four non-ICU and 103 ICU patients were included (cohort 1). The median PCT was higher in proven vs. absent/low-suspicion of bacterial co-infection. Elevated PCT was significantly associated with proven bacterial co-infection, ICU status and oxygen requirement. For PCT ≥ 0.25 µg/L, sensitivity/specificity/PPV/NPV were 69/65/6.5/98% (non-ICU) and 75/33/8.6/94% (ICU). For cohort 2, 756/1305 (58%) patients were included. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the antibiotic and non-antibiotic groups except PCT ≥ 0.25 µg/L (antibiotic:non-antibiotic = 59%:24%) and tocilizumab use (antibiotic:non-antibiotic = 5%:2%). 23% (PCT < 0.25 µg/L) and 58% (PCT ≥ 0.25 µg/L) received antibiotics. Antibiotic group had significantly higher rates of MV5. COVID-19 severity inferred from ICU status and oxygen requirement as well as the presence of bacterial co-infections were associated with elevated PCT. PCT showed poor PPV and high NPV for proven bacterial co-infections. The use of antibiotics did not show improved clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients with PCT ≥ 0.25 µg/L outside of ICU when bacterial co-infections are of low suspicion.

Antimicrobial stewardship perspectives from a New York City hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and opportunities.

PURPOSE: To share challenges and opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship programs based on one center's experience during the early weeks of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. SUMMARY: In the spring of 2020, New York City quickly became a hotspot for the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, putting a strain on local healthcare systems. Antimicrobial stewardship programs faced diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainties as well as healthcare resource challenges. With the lack of effective antivirals, antibiotic use in critically ill patients was difficult to avoid. Uncertainty drove antimicrobial use and thus antimicrobial stewardship principles were paramount. The dramatic influx of patients, drug and equipment shortages, and the need for prescribers to practice in alternative roles only compounded the situation. Establishing enhanced communication, education, and inventory control while leveraging the capabilities of the electronic medical record were some of the tools used to optimize existing resources. CONCLUSION: New York City was a unique and challenging environment during the initial peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Antimicrobial stewardship programs can learn from each other by sharing lessons learned and practice opportunities to better prepare other programs facing COVID-19 case surges.

Predominance of Non-carbapenemase Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales in South Texas.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) pose a significant global public health threat. Resistance among CRE is particularly complex, owing to numerous possible resistance mechanisms and broad definitions. We aimed to characterize the clinical and molecular profiles of CRE in the South Texas region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the clinical, genotypic, and phenotypic profiles of carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales (CPE) with those of non-carbapenemase producers (NCPE) isolated from South Texas, United States between 2011 and 2019. Molecular characteristics and resistance mechanisms were analyzed using whole-genome sequences. RESULTS: The majority (59%) of the CRE isolates were NCPE while 41% of isolates harbored carbapenemases, predmonantly bla KPC-type. The most common CPE was Klebsiella pneumoniae while majority of Enterobacter cloacae and Escherichia coli were NCPE Among K. pneumoniae, the clonal group 307 has emerged as a predmoninant group and was associated with as many CRE infections as the previous common clonal group 258. Patients with NCPE compared to CPE infections were associated with higher antimicrobial exposure prior to culture collection (days of therapy, 795 vs. 242; p < 0.001) and emergency department visits within past 90 days (22% vs. 4%; p = 0.011). The all cause 30-day mortality was 21%. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the diversity of resistance mechanisms underlying CRE in South Texas, with 59% not harboring a carbapenemase. Individuals with NCPE infections were more likely to have had prior antimicrobial therapy and emergency department visits compared to those with CPE. Identification and distinction of these mechanisms by rapid identification of species and carbapenemase would allow for optimal treatment and infection control efforts.

Prospective CYP2C19-Guided Voriconazole Prophylaxis in Patients With Neutropenic Acute Myeloid Leukemia Reduces the Incidence of Subtherapeutic Antifungal Plasma Concentrations.

A risk mitigation strategy was implemented to determine if a higher prophylactic voriconazole dosage in patients with CYP2C19 rapid metabolizer neutropenic acute myeloid leukemia (AML) reduces the incidence of subtherapeutic trough concentrations. Patients with AML (n = 263) were preemptively genotyped for CYP2C19*2, *3, and *17 alleles as part of a single-center prospective, interventional, quality improvement study. CYP2C19 rapid metabolizers (CYP2C19*1/*17) were recommended to receive interventional voriconazole 300 mg twice daily, ultrarapid metabolizers (CYP2C19*17/*17) were recommended to avoid voriconazole, and all others received the standard prophylactic dosage of 200 mg twice daily. In this real-world setting, 202 patients (76.8%) were prescribed prophylactic voriconazole, and of these patients 176 (87.1%) received CYP2C19-guided prophylactic dosing. Voriconazole trough concentrations were obtained for 41 of the 58 (70.7%) CYP2C19 rapid metabolizers prescribed prophylactic voriconazole. Interventional voriconazole resulted in higher plasma trough concentrations (median 2.7 µg/mL) compared with the standard prophylactic dosage (median 0.6 µg/mL; P = 0.001). Subtherapeutic concentrations were avoided in 83.8% of CYP2C19 rapid metabolizers receiving interventional dosage compared to 46.2% receiving standard dosage (P = 0.02). CYP2C19 genotyping to preemptively guide prophylactic voriconazole dosing is feasible and may be a potential strategy for reducing the risk of subtherapeutic trough concentrations that potentiate breakthrough fungal infections.

Infectious Risks and Complications in Adult Leukemic Patients Receiving Blinatumomab.

BACKGROUND: Blinatumomab is an anti-CD19 immunotherapy approved for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with significantly increased survival rate. While blinatumomab showed lower rates of infection, neutropenia and mucosal barrier injury versus chemotherapy, its infection risks are not well described. METHODS: All patients who received blinatumomab for ≥ seven days at an academic cancer center from May 2015 to April 2017 were included. Patient characteristics pertinent to infectious risks and complications were examined. RESULTS: Twenty patients with refractory (25%), relapsed (70%), or remitted (5%) B-ALL who received a total of 35 cycles were included. Ten of the 35 cycles were interrupted, none of which were due to infections. Twenty-six infections (n) were observed with lower respiratory (9), gastrointestinal (6) and bacteremia (5) being most common. Compared to patients without nodular, possible mold pneumonia (n=16), patients with nodular pneumonia (n=4) had significantly lower baseline absolute neutrophil count (ANC) (2319 v. 208/µL, p=0.011). There were no differences in baseline characteristics including ANC between bacteremic and non-bacteremic patients. One patient was discharged with no antibacterial prophylaxis since ANC recovered to >500cells/µL, but developed Pseudomonal bacteremia within a week with ANC ~100cells/µL. CONCLUSION: Despite blinatumomab's relatively modest myelosuppression and the lack of mucotoxicity, host factors (e.g., duration and degree of neutropenia/lymphopenia) play a key role and should be considered when choosing anti-microbial prophylaxis. In relapsed/refractory disease, the ANC should be monitored closely post blinatumomab since neutropenia can unexpectedly develop after treatment which may be compounded by the underlying disease and recent chemotherapy effects.

Physical compatibility of isavuconazonium sulfate with select i.v. drugs during simulated Y-site administration.

PURPOSE: The physical compatibility of isavuconazonium sulfate with 95 i.v. drugs during simulated Y-site administration was studied. METHODS: Isavuconazonium sulfate for injection and all other drugs were reconstituted according to the manufacturer's recommendation and further diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride injection or 5% dextrose injection to a final concentration (1.5 mg/mL for isavuconazonium sulfate and standard concentrations used clinically for other drugs). A Y site was simulated in glass culture tubes by mixing 5 mL of the tested drug and isavuconazonium sulfate solutions in each diluent. Incompatibility was defined as changes in visual characteristics or increases in turbidity by greater than 0.5 nephelometric turbidity units over the 120-minute experiment. RESULTS: Of the 95 drugs tested, isavuconazonium sulfate was physically compatible with 66 drugs in 0.9% sodium chloride injection and 60 drugs in 5% dextrose injection. Incompatibility was observed with albumin, amphotericin B deoxycholate, amphotericin B lipid complex, amphotericin B liposome, ampicillin-sulbactam, cefazolin, cefepime, ceftaroline fosamil, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, colistimethate sodium, cyclosporine, ertapenem, esomeprazole, filgrastim, fosphenytoin, furosemide, heparin, meropenem, methylprednisolone, micafungin, phenytoin, potassium phosphate, propofol, sodium bicarbonate, sodium phosphate, and tedizolid. Azithromycin, bumetanide, penicillin G potassium, and piperacillin-tazobactam were incompatible with isavuconazonium sulfate in 5% dextrose injection only. CONCLUSION: Of the 95 drugs tested, isavuconazonium sulfate 1.5 mg/mL was physically compatible with 66 drugs in 0.9% sodium chloride injection and 60 drugs in 5% dextrose injection. Incompatibility was observed with 18 antimicrobials, including most cephalosporins tested, and 14 other i.v. drugs in at least 1 of the 2 tested diluents.

Antibacterial activity of achievable epithelial lining fluid exposures of Amikacin Inhale with or without meropenem.

OBJECTIVES: While Amikacin Inhale (BAY41-6551), an integrated drug-device combination under development, achieves an estimated amikacin epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentration of ∼ 5000 mg/L, its target site pharmacodynamics are unknown. We evaluated the pharmacodynamics of ELF exposure of inhaled amikacin ± meropenem. METHODS: ELF exposures of inhaled amikacin (400 mg every 12 h), intravenous meropenem (2 g every 8 h) and a combination of both were studied in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. Seven Klebsiella pneumoniae and 10 Pseudomonas aeruginosa with amikacin/meropenem MICs of 1 to 32,768/≤ 0.125 to >128 mg/L were included. Efficacy was assessed over 24-72 h. RESULTS: The mean ± SD 0 h bacterial density was 6.5 ± 0.1 log10 cfu/mL. Controls grew to 8.0 ± 0.5 log10 cfu/mL by the end of the experiments. Simulation of inhaled amikacin monotherapy rapidly achieved and sustained bactericidal activity near the limit of detection over 24 h for all 13 isolates with amikacin MIC ≤ 256 mg/L except only ∼ 2 log10 cfu/mL reduction was observed in K. pneumoniae 375 (amikacin/meropenem MIC 64/32 mg/L) and P. aeruginosa 1544 (amikacin/meropenem MIC 64/128 mg/L). No activity was seen against the three isolates with amikacin MIC ≥ 2048 mg/L. Among the six isolates tested with meropenem monotherapy, five (meropenem MIC ≥ 16 mg/L) grew similarly to the controls while one (meropenem MIC 2 mg/L) achieved ∼ 2.5 log10 cfu/mL decrease. Among seven isolates tested in combination, four (amikacin/meropenem MIC ≤ 64/32 mg/L), including K. pneumoniae 375, maintained limit of detection until 72 h, whereas P. aeruginosa 1544 sustained a 1 log reduction. Combination therapy had no activity against the two isolates with amikacin MIC ≥ 2048 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled amikacin monotherapy showed bactericidal activity against most isolates tested with amikacin MICs ≤ 256 mg/L. Adjunct inhaled amikacin plus meropenem sustained this activity for 72 h for the tested isolates with amikacin/meropenem MIC ≤ 64/32 mg/L.

Poor outcomes of empiric ceftriaxone ± azithromycin for community-acquired pneumonia caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

While ceftriaxone 1 g q24h is commonly used for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), the prescribing information recommends 2-4 g a day to treat methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). Similarly, recent pharmacodynamic analyses suggest shortcomings of 1 g q24h against the bulk of the MSSA. We evaluated the outcomes of empiric ceftriaxone 1 g q24h ± azithromycin in patients with MSSA pneumonia, as compared with Streptococcus pneumoniae. Adult patients admitted to Hartford Hospital from 1/2005 to 12/2014 with respiratory culture for MSSA or S. pneumoniae were considered for inclusion. Non-ICU, CAP patients were included. Early clinical failure (ECF) was defined as persistent signs/symptoms or change of antibiotic due to poor response at 72-96 h. A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate predictors of ECF. Over the study period, 403 MSSA and 227 S. pneumoniae positive respiratory cultures were identified. The majority of patients were excluded due to the following: no signs/symptoms of pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia, alternative antibiotics, and polymicrobial infection. Thirty-nine patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria. All but three patients in the S. pneumoniae group received ceftriaxone + azithromycin. ECF was greater in the MSSA group (53 vs. 4 %, P = 0.003), as was length of stay (7.5 ± 5.4 vs. 4.6 ± 3.3 days, P = 0.006). When controlling for disease severity and macrolide non-susceptibility in a multivariate analysis, MSSA was significantly correlated with ECF (OR 12.3, 95 % CI 0.8-188.8). Poor clinical outcomes were observed in patients empirically treated with ceftriaxone ± azithromycin for MSSA CAP. Despite the popularity of ceftriaxone 1 g q24h, these data suggest this dose or compound may be inadequate for CAP caused by MSSA.

Pharmacodynamic Profile of GSK2140944 against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Murine Lung Infection Model.

GSK2140944 is a novel bacterial type II topoisomerase inhibitor with in vitro activity against key causative respiratory pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We described the pharmacodynamics of GSK2140944 against MRSA in the neutropenic murine lung infection model. MICs of GSK2140944 were determined by broth microdilution. Plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) pharmacokinetics were evaluated to allow determination of pulmonary distribution. Six MRSA isolates were tested. GSK2140944 doses of 1.56 to 400 mg/kg of body weight every 6 h (q6h) were utilized. Efficacy as the change in log10 CFU at 24 h compared with 0 h controls and the area under the concentration-time curve for the free, unbound fraction of a drug (fAUC)/MIC required for various efficacy endpoints were determined. GSK2140944 MICs were 0.125 to 0.5 mg/liter against the six MRSA isolates. ELF penetration ratios ranged from 1.1 to 1.4. Observed maximal decreases were 1.1 to 3.1 log10 CFU in neutropenic mice. The mean fAUC/MIC ratios required for stasis and 1-log-unit decreases were 59.3 ± 34.6 and 148.4 ± 83.3, respectively. GSK2140944 displayed in vitro and in vivo activity against MRSA. The pharmacodynamic profile of GSK2140944, as determined, supports its further development as a potential treatment option for pulmonary infections, including those caused by MRSA.

Effects of Urine Matrix and pH on the Potency of Delafloxacin and Ciprofloxacin against Urogenic Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae.

PURPOSE: We assessed the effects of the urine matrix and its varying pH on the potency of the novel broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone delafloxacin and of ciprofloxacin against 16 urogenic Enterobacteriaceae in the urine of patients with suspected urinary tract infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We determined minimum inhibitory concentrations in broth and urine using microdilution in 9 Escherichia coli and 7 Klebsiella pneumoniae specimens. The change in potency between broth and urine was calculated. RESULTS: Against 16 highly ciprofloxacin resistant Enterobacteriaceae with a broth minimum inhibitory concentration of 32 mg/l or greater the minimum inhibitory concentration in delafloxacin in broth was 2 mg/l (1 and 0 isolates of E. coli and K. pneumoniae, respectively), 4 mg/l (3 and 0), 8 mg/l (3 and 1), 16 mg/l (2 and 4) and 32 mg/l (0 and 2). Across the 143 collected urines pH ranged from 4.7 to 9.0 with 71% at pH 6.5 or less. The delafloxacin minimum inhibitory concentration measured in 80% urine from 100 unique patient samples (pH 5.0 to 8.3) was 2 mg/l or less (18% and 0.8% for E. coli and K. pneumoniae, respectively), 4 mg/l (23% and 6%), 8 mg/l (21% and 18%), 16 mg/l (23% and 33%) and 32 mg/l or greater (15% and 42%). For E. coli and K. pneumoniae combined the median changes in the delafloxacin minimum inhibitory concentration were a 1 doubling dilution decrease at pH 6.0 or less, no change at pH 6.1 to 7.0 and a 1 doubling dilution increase at pH 7.1 or greater. Unlike delafloxacin, ciprofloxacin showed a 1 doubling dilution increase for E. coli and no change for K. pneumoniae at pH 7.0 or less with no change observed at pH 7.1 or greater. CONCLUSIONS: Most urines collected from patients with urinary tract infection had a pH of 6.5 or less. Delafloxacin broth minimum inhibitory concentrations were twofold to fivefold doubling dilutions lower than those of ciprofloxacin. In contrast to ciprofloxacin, the potency of delafloxacin was further enhanced in the acidic environment commonly observed in the setting of urinary tract infection.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Cefazolin in Serum and Tissue for Patients with Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections (cSSTI).

INTRODUCTION: Cefazolin is commonly used to treat complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTI) caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and Enterobacteriaceae. We aimed to determine the variability of cefazolin exposure in interstitial fluid (ISF) of tissue and evaluate its dosing recommendations. METHODS: Population pharmacokinetics were performed to co-model serum and ISF concentration data from six patients enrolled in a previous in vivo microdialysis study. A 5,000 patient Monte Carlo simulation was then conducted for 1 and 2 g every 8 h (q8h) regimens to calculate the penetration ratio and probability of target attainment (PTA) at 30% and 50% of the dosing interval that free drug concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT > MIC) in ISF of tissue. RESULTS: A three-compartment model, with one of the compartments representing ISF concentrations, fits the data best. The final model resulted in the mean ± SD parameter values: Clearance = 3.8 ± 2.1 L/h, volume of distribution in central compartment = 8.6 ± 6.4 L and volume of distribution in ISF = 36.6 ± 17.9 L. The mean ± SD and median penetration ratios were 1.36 ± 4.57 and 0.80, respectively. At the MIC90 for MSSA of 1 mg/L, PTAs for the 1 g q8h dose in ISF were 96% and 91% for 30% and 50% fT > MIC targets, respectively, which decreased to 87% and 71% at 2 mg/L. For the same respective targets, a 2 g q8h dosing regimen increased PTA to 96% and 91% at 2 mg/L. CONCLUSION: Cefazolin penetration into the ISF of a lower limb infection varied across this simulated patient population. Based on these data, a 1 g q8h regimen should be sufficient to obtain 30% fT > MIC exposure against most MSSA causing cSSTI. However, a 2 g q8h dose is required to obtain 50% fT > MIC pharmacodynamic targets at the current breakpoint for Enterobacteriaceae (2 mg/L).

In vitro activity of human-simulated epithelial lining fluid exposures of ceftaroline, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin against methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and -resistant (MRSA) strains, is an important pathogen of bacterial pneumonia. As antibiotic concentrations at the site of infection are responsible for killing, we investigated the activity of human-simulated epithelial lining fluid (ELF) exposures of three antibiotics (ceftaroline, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin) commonly used for treatment of S. aureus pneumonia. An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to simulate ELF exposures of vancomycin (1 g every 12 h [q12h]), ceftaroline (600 mg q12h and q8h), and ceftriaxone (2 g q24h and q12h). Four S. aureus isolates (2 MSSA and 2 MRSA) were evaluated over 72 h with a starting inoculum of ∼ 10(6) CFU/ml. Time-kill curves were constructed, and microbiological response (change in log10 CFU/ml from 0 h and the area under the bacterial killing and regrowth curve [AUBC]) was assessed in duplicate. The change in 72-h log10 CFU/ml was largest for ceftaroline q8h (reductions of >3 log10 CFU/ml against all strains). This regimen also achieved the lowest AUBC against all organisms (P < 0.05). Vancomycin produced reliable bacterial reductions of 0.9 to 3.3 log10 CFU/ml, while the activity of ceftaroline q12h was more variable (reductions of 0.2 to 2.3 log10 CFU/ml against 3 of 4 strains). Both regimens of ceftriaxone were poorly active against MSSA tested (0.1 reduction to a 1.8-log10 CFU/ml increase). Against these S. aureus isolates, ELF exposures of ceftaroline 600 mg q8h exhibited improved antibacterial activity compared with ceftaroline 600 mg q12h and vancomycin, and therefore, this q8h regimen deserves further evaluation for the treatment of bacterial pneumonia. These data also suggest that ceftriaxone should be avoided for S. aureus pneumonia.

Comparison of in vivo and in vitro pharmacodynamics of a humanized regimen of 600 milligrams of Ceftaroline Fosamil every 12 hours against Staphylococcus aureus at initial inocula of 106 and 108 CFU per milliliter.

In light of the in vivo/in vitro discordance among beta-lactams against Gram-negative pathogens, we compared the in vivo pharmacodynamics of humanized ceftaroline against 9 Staphylococcus aureus strains (MICs of 0.13 to 1 mg/liter) from published in vitro studies using standard and high inocula in the murine thigh infection model. Consistent with the in vitro findings, mean reductions of ≥1 log10 CFU were observed for ceftaroline against all strains using both standard and high inocula. These results suggest in vivo/in vitro concordance with no observed inoculum effect.