Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Hematol ; 118(5): 589-595, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37660316

ABSTRACT

The goal of therapy in essential thrombocythemia (ET) is reducing thrombotic risk. No algorithm to predict hemorrhage risk exists. The impact ofanti-platelet, cytoreductive and anticoagulation therapies on risk of major bleeding (MB) was evaluated. MB events were retrospectively analyzed in 1381 ET from 10 European centers. There were 0.286 MB events/person-year. Neither the International Thrombosis Prognostic Score for thrombosis in essential thrombocythemia (IPSET-t) nor the revised IPSET-t (r-IPSET-t) was predictive for hemorrhage-free survival at 10 years (p = 0.092 vs p = 0.1). Ageand leukocyte count were MB risk factors, while low hemoglobin was protective. For ET with extreme thrombocytosis (ExtT) and leukocytosis cytoreduction was not protective. MB were more frequent in ET with ExtT who received anticoagulation. Antiplatelet therapy was not, while anticoagulation was a risk factor for MB (HR 3.05, p = 0.016, CI 1.23-7.56), in particular vitamin K antagonists (22.6% of those treated had a MB event, HR 2.96, p = 0.004, CI 1.41-6.22). Survival at 10 years was associated with hemorrhage (OR 2.54, p < 0.001) but not thrombosis (HR 0.95, p = 0.829). Hemorrhage has a higher risk of mortality than thrombosis. Improved risk stratification for MB is necessary. The choice of anticoagulation, cytoreduction and antiplatelet therapies is an important area of research in ET.


Subject(s)
Thrombocythemia, Essential , Thrombocytosis , Thrombosis , Humans , Thrombocythemia, Essential/complications , Thrombocythemia, Essential/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Prognosis , Thrombosis/etiology , Hemorrhage/etiology , Risk Factors , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Thrombocytosis/etiology
4.
Br J Haematol ; 199(1): 86-94, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35906782

ABSTRACT

Thrombosis and haemorrhage are frequent in patients with essential thrombocythaemia (ET). The 2016 revised International Prognostic Score for Thrombosis in Essential Thrombocythaemia-thrombosis (r-IPSET-t) score stratifies patients into very-low- (VLR), low- (LR), intermediate- (IR) and high-risk (HR) groups. We validated the r-IPSET-t in the biggest population of patients with ET (n = 1381) to date and found it to be a better fit than the earlier IPSET-t score. With an average follow-up of 87.7 months, there were 0.578 thrombotic events/person-year and 0.286 bleeding events/person-year after diagnosis. The 10-year thrombosis-free survival was 88% and 99% for the r-IPSET-t LR and VLR groups (p < 0.001). Cytoreduction was a thrombotic risk factor in younger patients (aged <60 years, hazard ratio 9.49, p = 0.026; aged ≥60 years, hazard ratio 1.04, p = 0.93). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, anti-aggregation after diagnosis was protective for thrombosis (hazard ratio 0.31, p = 0.005) but a risk factor for major bleeding (hazard ratio 10.56, p = 0.021). Of the IPSET-t HR and LR groups, 132/780 and 249/301 were re-classified as LR and VLR respectively (p < 0.001). The European LeukemiaNET (ELN) does not recommend aspirin for VLR patients but in this real-life analysis 83.1% of VLR patients received it. Our results validate the r-IPSET-t score as more predictive for thrombosis than the ELN-recommended IPSET-t and raise concerns about unnecessary cytoreductive and anti-aggregative therapy.


Subject(s)
Thrombocythemia, Essential , Thrombosis , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Humans , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Thrombocythemia, Essential/diagnosis , Thrombosis/diagnosis , Thrombosis/epidemiology , Thrombosis/etiology
6.
Blood Cancer J ; 11(6): 115, 2021 06 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34135309
7.
Blood Cancer J ; 11(2): 21, 2021 02 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33563901

ABSTRACT

In a multicenter European retrospective study including 162 patients with COVID-19 occurring in essential thrombocythemia (ET, n = 48), polycythemia vera (PV, n = 42), myelofibrosis (MF, n = 56), and prefibrotic myelofibrosis (pre-PMF, n = 16), 15 major thromboses (3 arterial and 12 venous) were registered in 14 patients, of whom all, but one, were receiving LMW-heparin prophylaxis. After adjustment for the competing risk of death, the cumulative incidence of arterial and venous thromboembolic events (VTE) reached 8.5% after 60 days follow-up. Of note, 8 of 12 VTE were seen in ET. Interestingly, at COVID-19 diagnosis, MPN patients had significantly lower platelet count (p < 0.0001) than in the pre-COVID last follow-up.This decline was remarkably higher in ET (-23.3%, p < 0.0001) than in PV (-16.4%, p = 0.1730) and was associated with higher mortality rate (p = 0.0010) for pneumonia. The effects of possible predictors of thrombosis, selected from those clinically relevant and statistically significant in univariate analysis, were examined in a multivariate model. Independent risk factors were transfer to ICU (SHR = 3.73, p = 0.029), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (SHR = 1.1, p = 0.001) and ET phenotype (SHR = 4.37, p = 0.006). The enhanced susceptibility to ET-associated VTE and the associated higher mortality for pneumonia may recognize a common biological plausibility and deserve to be delved to tailor new antithrombotic regimens including antiplatelet drugs.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Neoplasms/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Myeloproliferative Disorders/epidemiology , Thrombocythemia, Essential/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Marrow Neoplasms/complications , COVID-19/complications , Cohort Studies , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myeloproliferative Disorders/complications , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Thrombocythemia, Essential/complications
8.
Leukemia ; 35(2): 485-493, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33414483

ABSTRACT

We report the clinical presentation and risk factors for survival in 175 patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and COVID-19, diagnosed between February and June 2020. After a median follow-up of 50 days, mortality was higher than in the general population and reached 48% in myelofibrosis (MF). Univariate analysis, showed a significant relationship between death and age, male gender, decreased lymphocyte counts, need for respiratory support, comorbidities and diagnosis of MF, while no association with essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and prefibrotic-PMF (pre-PMF) was found. Regarding MPN-directed therapy ongoing at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, Ruxolitinib (Ruxo) was significantly more frequent in patients who died in comparison with survivors (p = 0.006). Conversely, multivariable analysis found no effect of Ruxo alone on mortality, but highlighted an increased risk of death in the 11 out of 45 patients who discontinued treatment. These findings were also confirmed in a propensity score matching analysis. In conclusion, we found a high risk of mortality during COVID-19 infection among MPN patients, especially in MF patients and/or discontinuing Ruxo at COVID-19 diagnosis. These findings call for deeper investigation on the role of Ruxo treatment and its interruption, in affecting mortality in MPN patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Myeloproliferative Disorders/mortality , Pyrazoles/administration & dosage , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Withholding Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Aged , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/virology , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myeloproliferative Disorders/drug therapy , Myeloproliferative Disorders/epidemiology , Myeloproliferative Disorders/virology , Nitriles , Prognosis , Pyrimidines , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...