Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Psychiatry Res ; 259: 579-586, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28918860

ABSTRACT

General practitioners (GP), on the frontline for individuals with mental health problems, often deal with work-related common psychiatric disorders. We aimed to determine the prevalence of work-related common psychiatric disorders in general practice and associated patients' and GPs' characteristics. HERACLES, a cross-sectional study among 2019 working patients of 121 GPs in the Nord - Pas-de-Calais region in France. Common psychiatric disorders were assessed using the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview, patient-perceived psychological distress and GP-diagnosed psychiatric disorders. The work-relatedness of common psychiatric disorders was ascertained by the GP and/or the patient. Prevalence rates adjusted on age were calculated by sex and associated characteristics were ascertained using multilevel Poisson regression models. The prevalence of work-related common psychiatric disorders ascertained using the MINI was estimated at 25.6% [23.7-27.5], 24.5% [22.6-26.4] for self-reported psychological distress and 25.8% [23.9-27.7] for GP-diagnosed psychiatric disorders. Age, history of psychiatric disorders, consultation for psychological purpose and GP's characteristics were associated with MINI-identified psychiatric disorders. The prevalence of work-related common psychiatric disorders among working adults seen in general practice is high but further studies are needed to support this results.


Subject(s)
General Practitioners/psychology , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Workplace/psychology , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Family Practice , Female , France , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Primary Health Care
3.
Endokrinologie ; 74(3): 304-8, 1979.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-121076

ABSTRACT

Two methods of rabbit immunization were applied: multisite intradermal injections of small doses and intramuscular injections of large hormone doses for obtaining antibodies against the porcine luteinizing hormone (LH). A high titre, specificity towards LH and affinity were obtained in rabbits immunized by both methods. In most animals the highest titre was noted 10 weeks after the first immunization.


Subject(s)
Antibody Formation , Luteinizing Hormone/immunology , Animals , Cross Reactions , Follicle Stimulating Hormone/immunology , Immunization/methods , Injections, Intradermal , Injections, Intramuscular , Rabbits/immunology , Radioimmunoassay , Swine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...