Evaluation of postural stability and vestibulo-ocular reflex in adults with chronic suppurative otitis media.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the vestibulospinal reflex and vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) in patients with chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) using posturography and the video head impulse test (vHIT). METHODS: Sixty-five patients with CSOM and 65 healthy participants as controls were included. Patients with CSOM were instructed to complete the dizziness handicap inventory (DHI). All participants underwent otoscopy, pure-tone audiometry, posturography sensory organization test (SOT), and vHIT. RESULTS: Patients with CSOM exhibited a high prevalence of dizziness. The CSOM group had poor SOT vestibular scores compared to the control group. Patients with CSOM had worse sways in the antero-posterior and mediolateral planes. The CSOM group was divided into two subgroups according to the type of hearing loss. SOT vestibular scores were significantly poorer in the mixed hearing loss group than those in the conductive hearing loss group. We found a positive correlation between disease duration and poor SOT vestibular scores. Moreover, poor SOT vestibular scores correlated with high DHI scores. We found abnormalities in the vHIT results in the CSOM group in the form of low VOR gain and corrective saccades. CONCLUSION: Our study provides clinical evidence of dizziness, poor postural control, and VOR abnormalities in patients with CSOM. The presence of sensory elements of hearing loss in patients with CSOM appears to be positively associated with vestibular dysfunction.

Management of Vestibular Schwannoma with Normal Hearing.

INTRODUCTION: This work aimed to study the management of vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients with normal hearing (NH). METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken in a Quaternary referral center for skull base pathologies. Among 4,000 VS patients 162 met our strict audiological criteria for NH. These patients were divided into 2 management groups, wait and scan (W&S) (45/162, 25%) and operated patients (123/162, 75%), and 6 patients were included in both groups. RESULTS: Our management strategy achieved the goals for treatment of VS. First goal, all tumors were completely removed except for 2 intentional residuals. Second goal, facial nerve (FN) function preservation (House Brackmann I, II, and III) was 95.9%. Third goal, possible hearing preservation (HP) attempts occurred in (50/122) (40.9%) with an HP rate in 44% of the patients. Additionally, there were only 2 cases of postoperative complications with no CSF leakage. The prospect of HP in NH patients did not differ with respect to tumor size. However, patients with normal preoperative ABR seemed to have better chances of HP and good FN function and vice versa. HP rate was superior for the MCFA as opposed to the RS + RLA. W&S group demonstrated hearing stability in 88.9% of the patients and FN function stability of HB I in 100% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection is a reasonable and definitive management option for VS with NH. Nevertheless, choosing to manage cases with observation remains an appropriate management option for NH patients. ABR might be considered as an adjuvant tool indicating better prognosis for HP.

Comparing Hearing Outcomes in Irradiated and Conservatively Managed Vestibular Schwannoma.

OBJECTIVE: Compare hearing outcome for vestibular schwannoma patients following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or conservative management. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: University Hospital. PATIENTS: Patients with small- or medium-sized sporadic vestibular schwannoma (intracanalicular or with CPA component <2 cm) who were managed conservatively or underwent SRS with available clinical, radiological, and audiometric data from the time of presentation (or just before radiotherapy for the SRS group) and most recent follow-up; with the two sets of data to be compared being at least 3 years apart (minimum follow-up period). INTERVENTIONS: SRS or observation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Pure-tone averages, speech discrimination scores, and corresponding hearing classifications. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-seven patients met our inclusion criteria; 140 were managed conservatively with a mean follow-up period of 5.9 ±â€Š1.6 years and 107 underwent SRS with a mean follow-up period of 7.1 ±â€Š1.9 years. There was significant deterioration of hearing measures for both groups; with the SRS group displaying consistently worse measures. SRS patients showed worse mean pure-tone averages and speech discrimination scores decline rates by 2.72 dB/yr and 2.98 %/yr, respectively, when compared with conservatively managed patients. Stratifying patients according to Tokyo's hearing classification revealed that 68.75% of conservatively managed patients who had baseline serviceable hearing preserved their hearing throughout the studied period compared with only 15.38% of the SRS patients. CONCLUSION: Based on our data we conclude that patients with small- and medium-sized tumors will have a better hearing outcome if managed via an initial conservative approach with radiotherapy reserved for those demonstrating disease progression.

Effects of Prosody Rehabilitation on Acoustic Analysis of Prosodic Features in Hearing-Impaired Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The role of prosody in language acquisition and effective communication is documented in research. Nevertheless, rehabilitation of prosodic skills in children with hearing impairment using hearing aids or cochlear implants is relatively neglected compared to other speech and language areas. OBJECTIVE: To detect the effect of prosodic rehabilitation using the adapted translated version of the "Prosody Treatment Program" on expression of prosodic features in Egyptian Arabic-speaking hearing-impaired school-age children fitted with hearing aids or cochlear implant devices in comparison to conventional auditory and language rehabilitation. METHODS: This study was conducted on 34 children with sensorineural hearing loss in a randomized controlled trial design. Children were randomly divided into 2 groups, group A (cases) and group B (control), by block randomization. Both groups were initially evaluated for their prosodic skills using objective measures. Group A received rehabilitation for prosody using the Prosody Treatment Program for 1 h, once per week for 3 months, while group B received conventional auditory and language training and served as their control. Both groups were re-evaluated using the same protocol after 3 months of therapy. RESULTS: A statistically significant improvement of most of the assessed prosodic parameters in group A was shown when comparing the pretherapy and posttherapy scores, as well as comparing between both studied groups after therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Prosody is amenable to motor learning. The Prosody Treatment Program seems to be an effective rehabilitation tool in improving some prosodic skills of hearing-impaired children. Prosodic rehabilitation showed superiority to conventional auditory and language training in improving the expression of some prosodic features and pragmatic language skills.

Binaural interaction component of the auditory brainstem response in children with autism spectrum disorder.

INTRODUCTION: There is ample evidence that auditory dysfunction is a common feature of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Binaural interaction component (BIC) manifests binaural interaction and is valid and proven response which reflects ongoing binaural processing. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the differences in binaural interaction component of auditory brainstem response (ABR-BIC) between children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and normal peers and to correlate between ABR-BIC amplitudes and the acquired communication skills in ASD children. METHODS: ASD was diagnosed according to the criteria of 5th edition of diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-V) and all children with ASD underwent test of acquired communication skills (TACS). Click evoked ABRs were elicited by left monaural, right monaural and binaural stimulation at intensity of 65 dBnHL in all participants. ABR-BIC was then calculated as the difference between the binaurally evoked ABR waveform and a predicted binaural waveform created by algebraically summing the left and right monaurally evoked ABRs. The difference in amplitudes that gives rise to ABR-BIC is at IV-VI waves. RESULTS: ABR-BIC amplitudes were demonstrated to be significantly reduced in the ASD group compared to the control group. There was significant positive correlation between ABR-BIC amplitude and the language and social scores in TACS. CONCLUSION: This study provided an objective evidence of binaural processing disorder in children with ASD.

Audiological Evaluation of Vestibular Schwannoma Patients with Normal Hearing.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the audiological aspects of vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients with normal hearing. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Quaternary referral center for skull base pathologies. PATIENTS: The records on 4,000 patients who had been diagnosed with VS between 1986 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients included in the study were the ones who complied with the strict audiological normality criteria, as follows: a pure tone hearing threshold (at the 6-octave-spaced frequencies from 250 to 8,000 Hz) ≤25 dBHL; a word recognition score >90%; and interaural differences ≤10 dB at each frequency. INTERVENTIONS: Auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing and radiological imaging. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of normal objective hearing among VS patients, and the diagnostic utility of the ABR and the effect of tumor size and site on the response. RESULTS: The incidence of normal hearing among VS patients was 4.2%. Tinnitus and vertigo were the most common symptoms across tumor grades; 5.6% of the tumors were large and giant tumors. The ABR yielded a sensitivity of 73.6%, with a false negative rate of 26.3% using a cutoff point of 0.2 ms for interaural latency differences. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of VS should not be based on audiometric thresholds alone. Alarming signs of VS should be clear to the physician in order not to miss or delay the diagnosis of the disease. The ABR is useful in the diagnosis of VS, but normal results do not exclude the occurrence of the disease in patients with normal hearing.